• filter:
  • Text Only
  • Search this Topic »
rated:
Squeezer99 said:   Got a $2 check today from Stephenson et al v Neutrogena Corporation
  Received $4 here

rated:
TRU class action settlements are in the mail.  Of note on the T&C of your whopping $5 merchandise certificate... if you return an item purchased with this certificate, you FORFEIT the certificate value.  In other words, as part of your settlement, your ability to use the usual and customary store policy has been REVOKED.  Sounds pretty one-sided to me.

/2 cents

 

rated:
relevant post on Deal Disc forum re Toyota settlement

http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1350666/

rated:
$1082 from Toyota today
$3 from Neutrogena (last week)

rated:
cristinaaaron said:   $1082 from Toyota today
$3 from Neutrogena (last week)

  did Toyota require proof of claim?

rated:
AugustFour said:   
cristinaaaron said:   $1082 from Toyota today
$3 from Neutrogena (last week)

  did Toyota require proof of claim?

  You needed your VIN number, but otherwise, no.

rated:

rated:
Received a $70.59 check today from http://www.brazilianblowoutsettlement.com/

rated:
double post, sorry

rated:
cristinaaaron said:   
AugustFour said:   
cristinaaaron said:   $1082 from Toyota today
$3 from Neutrogena (last week)

  did Toyota require proof of claim?

  You needed your VIN number, but otherwise, no.

  What was the reason/case you received that big amount from Toyota?
I received $125 from unintended acceleration suit.

rated:
I filed a claim for my 2008 Lexus IS250 but I haven't received anything yet.

rated:
stuffedwallet said:   
What was the reason/case you received that big amount from Toyota?
I received $125 from unintended acceleration suit.

  
Different litigation.  See http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1170656/m1838363...

Similarly, I filed a brief in Nissan case claiming economic loss because Nissan's proposed settlement would have not provided me any relief since I was forced to unload the defective vehicle at liquidation price because Nissan was unwilling to resolve outside of litigation.  See http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1170656/m1749272...  Perhaps the court will look to this Toyota settlement as precedent for some future decision in the Nissan case, which might make me whole.



 

rated:
labboypro said:   
stuffedwallet said:   
What was the reason/case you received that big amount from Toyota?
I received $125 from unintended acceleration suit.

  
Different litigation.  See http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1170656/m1838363... 

Similarly, I filed a brief in Nissan case claiming economic loss because Nissan's proposed settlement would have not provided me any relief since I was forced to unload the defective vehicle at liquidation price because Nissan was unwilling to resolve outside of litigation.  See http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1170656/m1749272...  Perhaps the court will look to this Toyota settlement as precedent for some future decision in the Nissan case, which might make me whole.



 

  Thanks for your reply.

Looking back at one of your posts: http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1170656/m1713429... 
I believe my 2008 Sienna is impacted - not sure how to go about it. Bought it used about 1 1/2 years ago.


 

rated:
stuffedwallet said:   
Looking back at one of your posts: http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1170656/m1713429... 
I believe my 2008 Sienna is impacted - not sure how to go about it. Bought it used about 1 1/2 years ago.


 

  
Deadline for filing a claim for reimbursement: Postmarked by December 31, 2014

Since you bought used, it may exclude you.  Check the details.
 

rated:
Squeezer99 said:   Received a $70.59 check today from http://www.brazilianblowoutsettlement.com/
  did this class action require any proof of claim?

rated:

rated:
AugustFour said:   
veckle said:   Comprehensive list of jerky treat class action lawsuits including Waggin’ Train, Milo’s, Sergeant’s & Kingdom Pets
  any direct link to filing a claim?

  The post was mostly a preliminary for calling attention to the problems with Chinese jerky treats for pets. As the lawsuits progress, anyone interested should add information as they find it. I just recently found out about this, so to answer your question: No. (not yet anyway)

rated:
labboypro said:   
stuffedwallet said:   
Looking back at one of your posts: http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1170656/m1713429... 
I believe my 2008 Sienna is impacted - not sure how to go about it. Bought it used about 1 1/2 years ago.


 

  

Deadline for filing a claim for reimbursement: Postmarked by December 31, 2014

Since you bought used, it may exclude you.  Check the details.

  
I'm probably too late to get in on this, but does anyone know if there is any remaining open class action for an owner/past owner of a Corolla?

rated:
RedSombrero said:   
labboypro said:   
Deadline for filing a claim for reimbursement: Postmarked by December 31, 2014

Since you bought used, it may exclude you.  Check the details.

  
I'm probably too late to get in on this, but does anyone know if there is any remaining open class action for an owner/past owner of a Corolla?

  
It's March 2014.  You have _9_ months to file a claim. 

rated:
LCD Screen Class Action Settlement update:
As of April 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had granted Final Approval of settlements with all of the Defendants in this case. Soon thereafter, appeals were filed by individuals/entities who had objected to the settlements, which appeals are currently pending in the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. Based on experience with that court, it is expected that those appeals will not be scheduled for oral argument until the winter or spring of 2015, at the earliest. After oral argument, it could take one to three years for the entire appeal process to be finally concluded.
Unfortunately, distribution of Settlement Funds cannot occur until after the appeals are all resolved. Hence, at this point, the date of the distribution is unknown but could be delayed for years.
We are continuing to review claims and we will contact you if your claim is deficient or additional information is needed. If you would like to know if anything further is needed for your claim, or if you have questions regarding the Court proceedings, please feel free to email the Notice Administrator at info@lcdclass.com or call the toll-free hotline at 1-855-225-1886. Additionally, if you change addresses, please let us know.
Please visit the website, www.lcdclass.com for future updates and the status of the court proceedings.

rated:
Got $4 Visa gift card for Rossi et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company.

rated:
Noticed this Maidenform class action announcement in Deal Discussions today:

http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1356224/

rated:
Squeezer99 said:   Got $4 Visa gift card for Rossi et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company.That's messed up.

rated:
NantucketSunrise said:   Noticed this Maidenform class action announcement in Deal Discussions today:

http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/1356224/

  what is the direct link to submit a claim online?

rated:
Squeezer99 said:   Got $4 Visa gift card for Rossi et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company.
  has this class action expired? if not what is the link to claim?

rated:
scripta said:   
Squeezer99 said:   Got $4 Visa gift card for Rossi et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company.
That's messed up.

  Well, we all have to wait in line, for the lawyers to steal their fair share first.

rated:
GeoCacher said:   
scripta said:   
Squeezer99 said:   Got $4 Visa gift card for Rossi et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company.
That's messed up.

  Well, we all have to wait in line, for the lawyers to steal their fair share first.

  why is this messed up?

rated:
AugustFour said:   
GeoCacher said:   
scripta said:   
Squeezer99 said:   Got $4 Visa gift card for Rossi et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company.
That's messed up.

  Well, we all have to wait in line, for the lawyers to steal their fair share first.

  why is this messed up?

  I didn't say anything was messed up. That's the other guy.

rated:
I was referring to the fact that it was a $4 Visa gift card, not that the settlement amount was $4.

  • Quick Reply:  Have something quick to contribute? Just reply below and you're done! hide Quick Reply
     
    Click here for full-featured reply.


Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.

Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

TRUSTe online privacy certification

While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2014