Yesterday I just drove 90 miles each way to use my MicroCenter GC to buy the 830 model; they wouldn't ship. Paid about $130. Anyone know if the 840 is that much better than the 830? Overall,I only burned $20 in gas and won $85 in poker (Hawaiian Gardens) during the trip.
brentpresley
Ancient Member
posted: Dec. 12, 2012 @ 10:07a
The 840 is SLOWER than the 830. The 840 PRO is FASTER than the 830.
Basically: 840 PRO >> 830 >>>>>>> 840
We deploy a lot of SSDs for servers and cloud hosting, and the 830 is a fantastic drive, and the 840 pro is even better. The 840, however, uses TLC NAND, and because of that is far far slower. We will be completely skipping the 840 for our customers and only going 830 and 840 PRO.
brentpresley said: The 840 is SLOWER than the 830. The 840 PRO is FASTER than the 830.
Basically: 840 PRO >> 830 >>>>>>> 840
We deploy a lot of SSDs for servers and cloud hosting, and the 830 is a fantastic drive, and the 840 pro is even better. The 840, however, uses TLC NAND, and because of that is far far slower. We will be completely skipping the 840 for our customers and only going 830 and 840 PRO.
Your summary is a bit disingenuous. The 840 is slower sustained read/write (e.g. when you boot/shutdown) but random read/write of 4k blocks it is superior (your typical work with a computer is much more like this.)
Let's be honest, most people aren't working with gigs of data at once.
awhosit
Member
posted: Dec. 12, 2012 @ 10:39a
chripuck said: brentpresley said: The 840 is SLOWER than the 830. The 840 PRO is FASTER than the 830.
Basically: 840 PRO >> 830 >>>>>>> 840
We deploy a lot of SSDs for servers and cloud hosting, and the 830 is a fantastic drive, and the 840 pro is even better. The 840, however, uses TLC NAND, and because of that is far far slower. We will be completely skipping the 840 for our customers and only going 830 and 840 PRO.
Your summary is a bit disingenuous. The 840 is slower sustained read/write (e.g. when you boot/shutdown) but random read/write of 4k blocks it is superior (your typical work with a computer is much more like this.)
Let's be honest, most people aren't working with gigs of data at once.
Aren't most people actually boot/shutdown every time? I guess servers boot/shutdown much less.
ihaslittledolla
Member
posted: Dec. 12, 2012 @ 10:44a
awhosit said: chripuck said: brentpresley said: The 840 is SLOWER than the 830.
Aren't most people actually boot/shutdown every time? I guess servers boot/shutdown much less.
Sheez. Hibernate FTW. Unless you lump that together with boot/shutdown.
ir0nw0lf
Hysterical member
posted: Dec. 12, 2012 @ 10:53a
The overall consensus from the hardware sites is that this 840 non-pro overall is *slower* than the 830. If you can find the 830 for the same or less, go with it. 840 Pro obviously would be better choice but is currently too expensive to some.
awhosit
Member
posted: Dec. 12, 2012 @ 10:55a
ihaslittledolla said: awhosit said: chripuck said: brentpresley said: The 840 is SLOWER than the 830.
Aren't most people actually boot/shutdown every time? I guess servers boot/shutdown much less.
Sheez. Hibernate FTW. Unless you lump that together with boot/shutdown.
My win 7 with SSD takes much longer to hibernate/wake up than shutdown/boot.
Don't worry~ This offer will be back soon. Price seems to be dropping every few months. Who knows...we may see it for $69.99 without a rebate next time.
chripuck said: brentpresley said: The 840 is SLOWER than the 830. The 840 PRO is FASTER than the 830.
Basically: 840 PRO >> 830 >>>>>>> 840
We deploy a lot of SSDs for servers and cloud hosting, and the 830 is a fantastic drive, and the 840 pro is even better. The 840, however, uses TLC NAND, and because of that is far far slower. We will be completely skipping the 840 for our customers and only going 830 and 840 PRO.
Your summary is a bit disingenuous. The 840 is slower sustained read/write (e.g. when you boot/shutdown) but random read/write of 4k blocks it is superior (your typical work with a computer is much more like this.)
Let's be honest, most people aren't working with gigs of data at once.
My understanding was that TLC was slower for random read/writes than MLC. Also because it has 3 bits per cell it degrades quicker than MLC, leading to shorter life spans.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.
One-time set up
Avoid the hassle of entering your information every time you buy.
•
Instant Cash Back tracking
Since we complete the purchase, we can credit your Cash Back immediately.
•
Buy with just two clicks
One click begins checkout and another confirms your purchase.
Once set up, making a purchase with FW checkout is a breeze. FatWallet Checkout confirms the after-tax
price plus shipping and, after you confirm, completes your purchase for you.
Shopping
Earn Cash Back while you shop - just 3 simple steps.
1. Sign Up so we know who to pay! (It's FREE.)
2. Shop through FatWallet for deals from your favorite stores. Your online purchases earn Cash Back that builds in your FatWallet account.
3. Get Paid by requesting a payment via check or PayPal.
FatWallet coupons help you save more when shopping online. Use our Coupons Search to browse coupons and offers from thousands of stores, gathered into one convenient location.
Forums
As part of our FatWallet Community, you can share deals with almost a million shoppers in our forums. Forum content is generated by consumers for consumers. Share deals, money-saving tips, and more. It's FREE, fun, and addicting.
Support
Our customer experience team is here around the clock - real people ready to assist.
Click to copy code and go to .
