Lenovo is offering brand new 2.64 lbs IdeaPad S10 (Black) 10.2" Notebook from $429 - 15% off Ideapad eCoupon code "USPIDEAPAD15" = $365 with free shipping. Click on "Features" to see more specifications. [Comments]
* 2.64 lbs, Intel ATOM N270 Single Core (1.60GHz 533MHz 512KB) * 10.2" LED backlit XGA, 512MB, 80GB, 802.11b/g Wireless * Webcam + Microphone, 3 Cell battery, XP Home, 1 year warranty
*edit I copied directly from dealsea, and they say WSVGA but I also only see XGA so I changed the specs. As for the CPP price I am assuming that the eCoupon will not work and I'm pretty sure that CashBack is invalid with CPP. Thanks for all the comments and corrections.
anyone else getting a payment processing error on the Order page ?
allantsu
Member
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 8:42a
me too
robrob
Happy Member
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 8:48a
Yeah and based on comments from the engadget post others are too...
"An error has happened in processing your order. Please try again later."
Update: On the phone with Lenovo and a rep tried to place the order with the same result. He "checked" and was made aware that Lenovo was working the issue as we speak. I let him take my order and he stated he would enter it as soon as it was fixed...we will see.
lancerjin
Member
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 8:51a
Same here:
(An error has happened in processing your order. Please try again later.)
Lenovo's reputation is solid and I am sure the build quality is there.
But I am witholding an order until I get my hands on one, or at least talk to somebody that I trust and get their opinion.
Of all the netbooks on the market right now, if I had to buy one today, I would stick with the MSI Wind or EEE 1000H. Everything else is too much of a compromise.
I bought a Lenovo T61 about 4 months ago, and it is definitely a much poorer quality product versus my Thinkpad T42 - no comparison. Lenovo for the failage.
wc2007
Member
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 9:46a
cartfan said: Lenovo's reputation is solid and I am sure the build quality is there.
But I am witholding an order until I get my hands on one, or at least talk to somebody that I trust and get their opinion.
Of all the netbooks on the market right now, if I had to buy one today, I would stick with the MSI Wind or EEE 1000H. Everything else is too much of a compromise.
cartfan - i am really tempted to get this, but your post kind of had me thinking...if you dont mind, could you post a couple of points on why you prefer msi wind and the 1000h...i am really keen to get one, especially at this price point...
I guess I should have put a caveat in there...IF you are going to use that netbook as your primary laptop and run XP on it, then the MSI Wind and EEE 1000H are probably the best right now. Personally, I haven't used either one of them.
I have used an EEE 900, and it's not good enough for me to consider over my "pedestrian" Acer 15" notebook as my main computer. It's OK for what it is. Something small that I can carry when I HAVE to have net access. In fact, the Linux version is fine. Don't even need XP for that.
As far as the Wind and the 1000H, here's a good comparison of the two:
The consensus is that the Wind and EEE1000H are the best out there right now. Each has it's quirks. The Acer Atom (only the model with the HD) is a close third and most people will buy it on price. I like Acer myself, and am looking forward to trying one eventually.
The Lenovo is really too new for anybody to really have an opinion yet. In fact, Lenovo seems to be "rushing it out the door".
JesseLivermore said: I bought a Lenovo T61 about 4 months ago, and it is definitely a much poorer quality product versus my Thinkpad T42 - no comparison. Lenovo for the failage.
I've had Thinkpads since my old 600e. I'm using a X60 right now. The Lenovo Thinkpads are built as well as any Thinkpad I've ever had. There better built if anything. I've busted a few older Thinkpads. My X60 has been around the world twice in my backpack. The black paint is rubbed off and it's still cranking along like a champ. There's a blemish on the screen where a pebble got stuck between the keyboard and the screen while I was in a sandstorm, but that's user error.
JesseLivermore said: I bought a Lenovo T61 about 4 months ago, and it is definitely a much poorer quality product versus my Thinkpad T42 - no comparison. Lenovo for the failage.
First, there's no such a word as "failage."
Second, IBMs and Lenovos are the #1 brand if you ask any tech guru or check out any online computer review site. Their models, even the aging ones, always come out in the top 5 of all notebook models reviewed.
If my company asked me to recommend a laptop, I would ONLY say Lenovo.
Lenovos are like Hondas and Toyotas. They may never ever look as sexy as an Asus Lamborghini, Acer Ferrari, or Sony Vaio, but they are built EXCEPTIONALLY durable and sturdy! Well maybe not as durable as Panasonic Toughbooks, but the Lenovo model OP posted costs a fraction of the Toughbook's. I have yet to successfully (intentionally) damage a Lenovo, besides drops and spills. Their screen has no flex and their keyboard is amazing! Some very smart, innovative engineers are responsible for Lenovos.
Lol. I now realize I sound like a Lenovo salesperson though that wasnt my intention.
mces
Senior Member
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 10:12a
Go through Live Search Text For another 10% maybe.
I'd have to chime in as well. I have a variety of Txx's at work that I administer and I'd have to say the T6x build qualities are on par if not better than the T4x's. They may not look the best but they are well built and their support is fantastic.
anyone know if the ram in these can be upgraded at home without voiding the warranty? Asus said no on the Eee at first, but now they're letting everyone do it.
Does anybody know how long the battery lasts on this notebook. That is primary concern for me, as I have Acer which is the best machine for the price but HORRRRRRRRRRIBLE battery life of 1.5 hrs and then the battery died in 2 years, while laptop is still cranking.
Would appreciate your thoughts and experience and then pull the trigger.
On all these Atom-based netbooks, a 3-cell LION battery gives an average of about 2-3 hours running time. A 6-cell battery gives about 4-6 hours. That's assuming your doing constant web-surfing with Wifi on. Turn the Wifi off and you'll get a little more run time (probably 1/2 hour longer).
I expect the Lenovo will be about the same as the MSI, EEE, Acer netbooks.
Read the review links I put in an earlier post.
mmq75
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 10:30a
cartfan said: I guess I should have put a caveat in there...IF you are going to use that netbook as your primary laptop and run XP on it, then the MSI Wind and EEE 1000H are probably the best right now. Personally, I haven't used either one of them.
I have used an EEE 900, and it's not good enough for me to consider over my "pedestrian" Acer 15" notebook as my main computer. It's OK for what it is. Something small that I can carry when I HAVE to have net access. In fact, the Linux version is fine. Don't even need XP for that.
As far as the Wind and the 1000H, here's a good comparison of the two:
The consensus is that the Wind and EEE1000H are the best out there right now. Each has it's quirks. The Acer Atom (only the model with the HD) is a close third and most people will buy it on price. I like Acer myself, and am looking forward to trying one eventually.
The Lenovo is really too new for anybody to really have an opinion yet. In fact, Lenovo seems to be "rushing it out the door".
Comparing IBM Thinkpads with Lenovo Thinkpads is just plain irrelevant.
IBM failed at making PCs. Period. They sold the division. Judge them for what they are now. Good quality, current, even cutting-edge technology, and affordable.
If you don't like Lenovos 'cause they're not like your old IBM, it's because they're not your old IBM.
chungalee
Tired Member
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 10:36a
aztec5109 said: Does anybody know how long the battery lasts on this notebook. That is primary concern for me, as I have Acer which is the best machine for the price but HORRRRRRRRRRIBLE battery life of 1.5 hrs and then the battery died in 2 years, while laptop is still cranking.
Would appreciate your thoughts and experience and then pull the trigger.
Thanks
one article i read says the 3 cell is up to 3 hours while the 6 cell will be up to 6 hours...so in real life numbers i'd imagine the 3 cell is just over 2 hours and the 6 might last up to 5? just my guess...
pyee01 said: JesseLivermore said: I bought a Lenovo T61 about 4 months ago, and it is definitely a much poorer quality product versus my Thinkpad T42 - no comparison. Lenovo for the failage.
...there's no such a word as "failage."
The truthiness of your claim is circumspect.
numatrix
Member
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 10:50a
order page is working again. just completed my order. WOOT!
tonysavealot
Senior Member
posted: Aug. 19, 2008 @ 10:51a
I would say 10" is the sweet spot, small enough to carry around, regular keyboard and with a screen that can show a web normally.
What are the current options in the 10" notebook market:
For me, getting a netbook with anything less than a 6-cell battery would be a disappointment. I tried the EEE 900, and that was one of the things that bugged me about it.
Finally got it to work. Lets see if Live discount works. Also ordered the Acer a couple of days ago. Will keep the better one. Thanks, OP. Already have a 12.1" Lenovo laptop and love it.
EDIT: Just received an email from Live that $36.46 is my eligible CashBack. Lets see if it is indeed processed.
mail4calvin said: "..now a total of 2.5GB installed with 2GB recognized after reboot (just as expected)." Does it mean it's utilizing all 2.5GB RAM? (despite of only displayed / recognized 2GB) Nope. If it doesn't recognize it, it doesn't know it's there. 2GB is all it can cope with.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.
