clearanceman said:sage224 said:Seems like a pretty decent HDTV for the price, choose instore pickup to cut out the shipping charges.

Some of the features:

Built-in HDTV tuner
Add HD-capable antenna to receive over-the-air high-definition broadcasts, where available. Optional set-top box required for high-definition cable or satellite programming.
32" screen
Measured diagonally from corner to corner brings your favorite movies to life.
1366 x 768 pixel resolution
16:9 widescreen aspect ratio
3:2 inverse pulldown
High brightness (400 cd/m²) and incredible contrast (2500:1)
6.5 ms response time
Wide 160° horizontal and 150° vertical viewing angles
3D Y/C digital comb filter
Two 6W stereo speakers
Ultraslim design (3-1/2" deep)
3 HDMI inputs
PC video input
Inputs
Include 2 composite (1 side, 1 rear), 1 S-video (rear), 2 component video (rear), 3 HDMI (1 side, 2 rear), 1 PC (rear) and 1 RF (rear).
Outputs
Include 1 headphone and 1 audio

link

Surely those viewing angles aren't correct? 150 and 160 makes it a lot worse than a 160/170 TN panel and way worse than the typical 178 HDTV.

This model isn't listed on the Dynex site, the one that is is the 09. It lists 176 degree viewing angles. Anyone confirm the 150 and 160 are typos?

Anyone confirm these angles, they are horrible but the reviews are good, I suspect a typo. I'd like to know, want to buy if the angles aren't 150 and 160.

LCD TV's viewing angle specs by all manufacturers are pretty much all bs according to latest tests. Those top of the line LCD TVs have viewing angle of 10 - 15 degree, which practically means only one person in the exact sweet spot of viewing angle can get the best color.
clearanceman said:clearanceman said:sage224 said:Seems like a pretty decent HDTV for the price, choose instore pickup to cut out the shipping charges.

Some of the features:

Built-in HDTV tuner
Add HD-capable antenna to receive over-the-air high-definition broadcasts, where available. Optional set-top box required for high-definition cable or satellite programming.
32" screen
Measured diagonally from corner to corner brings your favorite movies to life.
1366 x 768 pixel resolution
16:9 widescreen aspect ratio
3:2 inverse pulldown
High brightness (400 cd/m²) and incredible contrast (2500:1)
6.5 ms response time
Wide 160° horizontal and 150° vertical viewing angles
3D Y/C digital comb filter
Two 6W stereo speakers
Ultraslim design (3-1/2" deep)
3 HDMI inputs
PC video input
Inputs
Include 2 composite (1 side, 1 rear), 1 S-video (rear), 2 component video (rear), 3 HDMI (1 side, 2 rear), 1 PC (rear) and 1 RF (rear).
Outputs
Include 1 headphone and 1 audio

link

Surely those viewing angles aren't correct? 150 and 160 makes it a lot worse than a 160/170 TN panel and way worse than the typical 178 HDTV.

This model isn't listed on the Dynex site, the one that is is the 09. It lists 176 degree viewing angles. Anyone confirm the 150 and 160 are typos?

Anyone confirm these angles, they are horrible but the reviews are good, I suspect a typo. I'd like to know, want to buy if the angles aren't 150 and 160.

If you want great viewing angles, you need a plasma. Period.

Anyone know the difference between this model (10A) and the (09) model that they were selling a few weeks ago for the same price?

rbraden said:If you want great viewing angles, you need a plasma. Period.

Is that true. Question Mark.

i can't decide between this or the costco 32" proscan for $329 for my mom. any recommendations?

yesidonoitall said:Better off with the Costco 32" Proscan for $329.99 delivered.yesidonoitall said:Proscan v Dynex.....

Dynex wins...Having a schizophrenic moment?

Edit: Why the red???? It's obvious that yesidontnoitall can't make up his mind.

If anyone has this, does this really have a headphone jack?

so finally decided to pick this up today after not pulling the trigger when it was 300 near memorial day because some of the reviews. it simply came down to the fact that 285 when using discover card vs 330 for the costco proscan one meant spending $45 more (15% more). it's not like this is going to be used as a main tv so if it breaks down it breaks down, and i have a no name konka tv that's outlasted a panasonic. EXTENDED WARRANTY! HOW CAN I LOSE! the set looks good, sound quality wasn't an issue for a room that's 15' x 15'. i can't believe people are posting about 10 vs 20 degree viewing angle; seriously where are you trying to watch it from where this will make a difference? 720p is fine since it's not being connected to any b-ray or anything that will optimize 1080p. i didn't see a headphone jack but didn't look either. the one issue i do have at the moment is that the auto scan picked up some stations multiple times (ch 3 came up as 3 analog, 3.1 digital, 203 analog again) with some of the 2## equivalents having a better signal/picture than the lower channel counterparts. will work this out later but picture quality issue is not with the set so much as with the input source. overall, it's an inexpensive tv that works well for a small room. i suspect power users will continue to disagree.

edit: headphone jack confirmed

djspliff said:Picked up 8 for all of my bathrooms! Thanks!

a lot of s...t !