|
|
|
|
-
-
HawkMultimedia
- New Member
posted: May. 18, 2005 @ 3:20p
ComputerWiz said:Ctrl+f (I don't think that there's a way to search within the whole thread, just one page.)
Then that's my suggestion. It would eliminate a LOT of redundant questions if we could search for a specific term within a thread containing a few hundred or thousands of posts. As it stands now, it's like finding a needle in a haystack. |
-
-
Maniac (Staff)
- Bottle Washer
posted: May. 18, 2005 @ 3:31p
You can view the "text only" version of a thread and then do the ctrl-f for searching a thread. |
-
-
srenna
- Senior Member
posted: May. 18, 2005 @ 3:33p
You can search an entire thread. First click on "Text Only". After the thread had loaded, use Ctrl + F to search the thread. |
-
-
HawkMultimedia
- New Member
posted: May. 18, 2005 @ 3:51p
Obscure, but it works. Thanks! |
-
-
TM1
- piņata
posted: May. 24, 2005 @ 3:16p
Bring back the "Members Logged On / Lurkers" stats. |
-
-
Beboparoo
- **Dust Warrior**
posted: May. 24, 2005 @ 3:33p
technomamma said:Bring back the "Members Logged On / Lurkers" stats.
agreed |
-
-
PartialwrtX
- Cranky Member
posted: May. 25, 2005 @ 12:35a
technomamma said:Bring back the "Members Logged On / Lurkers" stats.
EDIT: Make Chicago less windy!!! 
 |
-
-
TM1
- piņata
posted: May. 25, 2005 @ 9:52a
PartialwrtX said:technomamma said:Bring back the "Members Logged On / Lurkers" stats.
Or a means to find out whether or not a person is logged on...
that is already up in the OP as a suggestion - first one |
-
-
Maniac (Staff)
- Bottle Washer
posted: May. 25, 2005 @ 9:03p
Can someone explain this fascination with "how many" and "who" is logged on? Is there a valid reason for wanting to know this? |
-
-
Beboparoo
- **Dust Warrior**
posted: May. 25, 2005 @ 9:33p
Maniac said:Can someone explain this fascination with "how many" and "who" is logged on? Is there a valid reason for wanting to know this? Well I guess that users just liked having it would never be a valid reason. |
-
-
PartialwrtX
- Cranky Member
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 12:36a
technomamma said:PartialwrtX said:technomamma said:Bring back the "Members Logged On / Lurkers" stats.
Or a means to find out whether or not a person is logged on...
that is already up in the OP as a suggestion - first one
Shiiii... My bad! |
-
-
PartialwrtX
- Cranky Member
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 12:40a
Maniac said:Can someone explain this fascination with "how many" and "who" is logged on? Is there a valid reason for wanting to know this?
I don't particularly care for "how many" but knowing who is logged in allows for more direct communication. For example, if you're in Hot Deals and you want to ask a poster a personal question about a deal, it helps to know if the person is logged in and will respond to you (more) promptly since this has a direct implication on whether or not you'll be able to get in on the deal or not. This occurs quite frequently, but if you don't know whether or not a person is online then one is less likely to send them an urgent PM and this can either make or break getting a deal... |
-
-
Maniac (Staff)
- Bottle Washer
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 12:50p
Don't say we never give you anything....
On the private message to user screen, now you can see if that user is logged in or not. Enjoy. |
-
-
TM1
- piņata
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 3:29p
Maniac said:Don't say we never give you anything....
On the private message to user screen, now you can see if that user is logged in or not. Enjoy.
thanks hot geek guy.  |
-
-
Beboparoo
- **Dust Warrior**
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 6:41p
-
-
PeanutButterAndJelly
- Nuts
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 7:02p
Maniac said:Can someone explain this fascination with "how many" and "who" is logged on? Is there a valid reason for wanting to know this?
Bebop is a stalker. She knows everything about celebs. But they are too easy so she is branching out.  |
-
-
dumpsterDiva
- Member
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 7:09p
Looking for or requesting an expansion on the Subscribe feature. I would like to be able to do 2 things:
2. Be able to "subscribe" and/or create a watch list without necessarily having to post in order to do it. Currently, "subscribe to this topic" seems to be available only if I post and it seems cluttering and wasteful of resources to post an empty message just so I can subscribe to the topic. (Answered by srenna below, thanks srenna!)
1. Create a list of links to threads like "Subscribe" does but be able to choose per individual topic whether or not to receive emails. I know I could just bookmark the threads and that works OK but I like the format of the Subscription List and it would be great to be able to separate out the email feature.
Apologies if these features are already available, in which case my suggestion is to make them easier to find  |
-
-
dumpsterDiva
- Member
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 7:13p
srenna said:You can search an entire thread. First click on "Text Only". After the thread had loaded, use Ctrl + F to search the thread.
Agree that even though this workaroud exists, it would be beneficial to the quality of the discussions to have an obvious "Search within this topic" feature. Would eliminate a lot of redundant questions on the boards. Thanks! |
-
-
srenna
- Senior Member
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 9:51p
dumpsterDiva said: I would like to be...able to "subscribe" and/or create a watch list without necessarily having to post in order to do it. Currently, "subscribe to this topic" seems to be available only if I post and it seems cluttering and wasteful of resources to post an empty message just so I can subscribe to the topic. You can subscribe to a topic without posting in it. Click on "Subscribe to Topic" which is located at the top and bottom of each page of a thread, to the left of "Print Topic" and "Text Only". |
-
-
PartialwrtX
- Cranky Member
posted: May. 26, 2005 @ 9:57p
Maniac said:Don't say we never give you anything....
On the private message to user screen, now you can see if that user is logged in or not. Enjoy.
Oh bless you my chil... errrr, I mean good work, soldier!
Here's another one for yaaaa while you're en fuego...  |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|
|
|
|