|
-
-
mescad
- Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:27a
Ok, I'll try to put a positive spin on this, because everyone (including me) seems to think this is a bad idea.
Who thinks this is a good idea? |
-
-
krazykris
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:27a
I think this is a horrible idea. Sometimes I honestly don't know whether a deal is good or not, and I rely on some feedback from the FW crowd. Without the ability to rate neg, if a deal has no ratings, how can you tell if its a BAD deal vs. a deal that is ok, but nothing special? |
-
-
fentonpcrackshell
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:27a
boo. red for you. err, nevermind. |
-
-
nunaliorte (Staff)
- Moderator
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:28a
To weed out useless posts --> raise your ratings filter. |
-
-
scrabbler
- Ahoy Matey
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:28a
-
-
udonoogen
- Thrifty Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:28a
poor change! red!! makes the readability of fatwallet go down tremendously. this was the only thing that fatwallet really had over Anandtech. the people aren't as helpful or funny here, but i kept coming because shopping for deals was more efficient. back to AT. cheers. |
-
-
yanks0114
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:29a
adiganifatwallet said:nunaliorte said: It will probably no longer be feasible to use ratings as a personal filter to weed out posts you don't wish to see, and it is not intended as such. The ratings system is meant to be a community filter, not a personal tool.
Previous uses of negative voting, and what you should do now: spam, repost, wrong forum --> send in a moderator alert poor title, missing information --> reply with helpful suggestions to the poster don't like the deal? --> walk on by, not much value in replying and bumping a crappy deal
I totally disagree with this new feature. In fact, it is good for FW members (probably not for FW owner) to see if it is a hot deal or just someone newbie posting or self advertisement. When the red flag feature is reset like this, FW enforces all member to check out all new posting. After all, the FW members respond faster than the FW mods.
I hope this can be re-adjusted in the near future for members convenient and without reducing profit for FW. FW does not work like digg.com.
I would "boost" your post except I can't find the freaken button.
Stupid system |
-
-
katzmandoo
- Cranky Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:29a
is it just me? i can't see the 'boost rating' button or link anywhere! |
-
-
PML
- Serene Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:30a
Another vote for bad idea.
And katzmandoo, I don't see the 'boost rating' button either. |
-
-
shopliftinginva
- Tired Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:30a
nunaliorte said:To weed out useless posts --> raise your ratings filter. but wouldn't that keep you from seeing new hot deals posted, possibly not showing up until after the deal ends up dead? |
-
-
nunaliorte (Staff)
- Moderator
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:30a
-
-
fentonpcrackshell
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:30a
nunaliorte said:To weed out useless posts --> raise your ratings filter.Thats silly. Then no one would see the HOT DEAL that could've been... This is the best idea since the new gey look. |
-
-
comprx
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:32a
nunaliorte said:To weed out useless posts --> raise your ratings filter.Taking your suggestion to extremes and assuming everyone did this, new posts would not be seen by anyone, so good deals would not be "boosted", and then FW fades into obscurity. |
-
-
MechanicalMan
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:32a
nunaliorte said:To weed out useless posts --> raise your ratings filter. You mean so we can't see anything that hasn't been "boosted?" Yeah, that's brilliant... very helpful. |
-
-
enterkey
- Broke Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:33a
I don't like it either. It makes making critisism harder. If we critisize a post, it gets bumped to front, and there's no visual indication that the post isn't good. We just have to hope it gets buried deep under without people replying to it.
But wait...we can't neg this topic! |
-
-
NoMoneyInMyWallet
- Cranky Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:33a
shopliftinginva said:nunaliorte said:To weed out useless posts --> raise your ratings filter. but wouldn't that keep you from seeing new hot deals posted, possibly not showing up until after the deal ends up dead?I was thinking the same thing. Green for you! |
-
-
umcsom
- Ancient Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:33a
i guess it is to sliccckkkkdeals for me |
-
-
TheBusDriver
- Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:34a
-
-
weekendwarrior
- Senior Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:35a
There's going to be much frustration around here when trying to filter for "real" deals... |
-
-
shrimplover
- Senior Member
posted: Sep. 13, 2006 @ 11:35a
haha, bet most of the staff didn't see this negative response coming
how long before they change it back? when everyone jumps over to other sites? |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|