As I'm sure you've noticed, there have been some changes to the ratings system.
“Boost Rating” = 1 positive vote
There is no super-secret formula for determining voting weight. All votes are equal. You can remove your vote if you change your mind, but there is no longer any negative voting. We found that negative voting was often abused and rarely contributed.
As part of the change, everyone's ratings filter has been reset to “All Messages.” Please experiment with your filter and make adjustments to accommodate the new system.
It will probably no longer be feasible to use ratings as a personal filter to weed out posts you don't wish to see, and it is not intended as such. The ratings system is meant to be a community filter, not a personal tool.
Previous uses of negative voting, and what you should do now:
spam, repost, wrong forum --> send in a moderator alert
poor title, missing information --> reply with helpful suggestions to the poster
don't like the deal? --> walk on by, not much value in replying and bumping a crappy deal
scrabbler said:The vote button is missing?It says "boost rating" now.Also, what happened to the thread ratings? Threads that had double-digit ratings are now down to single digit ratings.Give it a few minutes while we work out the kinks. That's a lot of voting history that has to transfer over.
nunaliorte said: It will probably no longer be feasible to use ratings as a personal filter to weed out posts you don't wish to see, and it is not intended as such. The ratings system is meant to be a community filter, not a personal tool.
Previous uses of negative voting, and what you should do now:
spam, repost, wrong forum --> send in a moderator alert
poor title, missing information --> reply with helpful suggestions to the poster
don't like the deal? --> walk on by, not much value in replying and bumping a crappy deal
I totally disagree with this new feature. In fact, it is good for FW members (probably not for FW owner) to see if it is a hot deal or just someone newbie posting or self advertisement. When the red flag feature is reset like this, FW enforces all member to check out all new posting. After all, the FW members respond faster than the FW mods.
I hope this can be re-adjusted in the near future for members convenient and without reducing profit for FW. FW does not work like digg.com.
You should keep the negative rating. Just make the filter to all messages anyways. That way at least we can see the bad topics or reposts without having to sift through every thread. This change deserves a negative.
i like the neg votes bc like above poster, it filters out the spam and newbies reposts. now i have to read every post and scan myself. NOT a good improvement.
Obviously not everyone know what price is hot for certain item. And people in FW vote on item when they don't even closely keeping track of the price (or recent deal) of that item.
For example, a lot of people vote positive just for the effort (like those Amazon Friday deal post) instead of real Deal in the post.
If the price is not hot, even if 10 persons vote green because they think it is hot (or just thank for the effect), usually there will be enough people to counter those vote so the rating is closed to neutral (neither green nor red). This is how rating system supposed to work. But in this new system, you just need to have 10 friends sign up from school, and come in to vote green, then it will always look like positive (and hot deal). But in fact the price may be just ok.
Making this rating system useless to find out if the deal is good deal or ok deal. Let's say it again, not all member know what price is HOT DEAL and need other FW members that do know the hot deal price to balance out the vote.
This is, IMHO, a bad change. Especially in the finance forum which frequently cluttered with useless topics. Only by neg'ing threads below the threshold is the signal-to-noise ratio kept in any way acceptable. Bah.
nunaliorte said:don't like the deal? --> walk on by, not much value in replying and bumping a crappy deal So we can't neg it, and we also shouldn't reply? Great idea! And what about when someone posts a deal that involves a scam site or something? People who simply react to the price can give the thread a positive rating, but people who know that buying from that retailer is a bad idea can't counter. People can reply (and bump the thread), but that doesn't necessarily have the same effect. It's also more effort for members.
Removing negative voting is just another stupid, unneeded change. Oh well.
Yeah, this is lame. Any abuses of the negative ratings could have only resulted in a few hurt feelings (which is silly). If something really was a decent deal, then isolated negative "abuses" would have little effect on the overall rating.
Perhaps instead of getting rid of the negative ratings, you should get rid of the people who for whatever reason (thin skin, ratings obsession) couldn't handle a few negative votes.
I second adip, pop & premed. Worst FW change yet. The negative ratings helped me scan past the useless posts without having to waste time. I HATE wasting time!
upNdown said:Yeah, this is lame. Any abuses of the negative ratings could have only resulted in a few hurt feelings (which is silly). If something really was a decent deal, then isolated negative "abuses" would have little effect on the overall rating.
Perhaps instead of getting rid of the negative ratings, you should get rid of the people who for whatever reason (thin skin, ratings obsession) couldn't handle a few negative votes.
I think the Negs were alrite... Occasionaly people would use it to hide a really good deal but only rarely were they used inappropriately. Not often enough to warrant taking them away I feel.. I feel they were more beneficial than malicious. I hope the newbies don't get conned just because they don't see any negs..
scrabbler said:nunaliorte said:scrabbler said:The vote button is missing?It says "boost rating" now.I don't see "boost rating". Where is it located?It's only available to "super-secret" people!
i think this is a terrible move, we need the red flag back. some users that are unsure of a certain product's currency rely on the red or green flag to tell if its a good or bad deal. Also, this will waste us memebers a ton of time filtering the good deals from the bad deals by reading every thread. bring back the red flag
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Where is it located?
