|
|
|
|
-
1
-
-
myAmex
- Senior Member - 7K
posted: Sep. 14, 2006 @ 2:01a
jely said:Toddler said:...So I'm not seeing the community rating, just my personal rating? That would be pointless.
But if YOU have found that YOU feel the need to rate a deal, whether that be 1-star or 5-stars, why do you care that the community thinks differently or not? a deal to one person is not a deal to another, and voting means you've decided the value of that deal to you.
So you voted the president without checking the result? It makes no sense to me. |
-
-
Toddler
- Ancient Member
posted: Sep. 14, 2006 @ 2:02a
jely said:Toddler said:...So I'm not seeing the community rating, just my personal rating? That would be pointless.
But if YOU have found that YOU feel the need to rate a deal, whether that be 1-star or 5-stars, why do you care that the community thinks differently or not? a deal to one person is not a deal to another, and voting means you've decided the value of that deal to you.Deals often change after the initial post. As I said above, maybe I am not initially interested in a thread, but the deal gets sweeter or I missed something initially that the community picks up on. I am never going to see that everyone else considers it a 5-star thread because I already rated it early on? That is a total disincentive for me to ever rate a thread. |
-
-
adiganifatwallet
- Senior Member
posted: Sep. 14, 2006 @ 2:02a
jely said:Toddler said:...So I'm not seeing the community rating, just my personal rating? That would be pointless.
But if YOU have found that YOU feel the need to rate a deal, whether that be 1-star or 5-stars, why do you care that the community thinks differently or not? a deal to one person is not a deal to another, and voting means you've decided the value of that deal to you.
It does. That's why the old system still works better. |
-
-
HPFanatic
- Senior Member
posted: Sep. 14, 2006 @ 2:03a
jely said:Toddler said:...So I'm not seeing the community rating, just my personal rating? That would be pointless.
But if YOU have found that YOU feel the need to rate a deal, whether that be 1-star or 5-stars, why do you care that the community thinks differently or not? a deal to one person is not a deal to another, and voting means you've decided the value of that deal to you.
So the whole point is to discourage people from rating deals? |
-
-
wffsoccer
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Sep. 14, 2006 @ 2:03a
jely said:Toddler said:...So I'm not seeing the community rating, just my personal rating? That would be pointless.
But if YOU have found that YOU feel the need to rate a deal, whether that be 1-star or 5-stars, why do you care that the community thinks differently or not? a deal to one person is not a deal to another, and voting means you've decided the value of that deal to you.
Stupidest comment I've ever heard. |
-
-
Need
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Sep. 14, 2006 @ 2:03a
FatWallet.Com said:Once you have rated something, the display shows your rating rather than the community rating.
1 star is the minimum.... you can think of 1 star as "maximum red"
1 star = hate it 2 star - don't like it 3 star = ok 4 star = like it 5 star = love it
The new system is a little confusing. It is like the green/red system except now there are 5 levels + don't care. Isn't it easier to just have the old way, hate it or love it or don't care? I guess I can get used to it.. I still like the old system better.. I am so missing the little green bars. |
-
-
asdf916
- Senior Member
posted: Sep. 14, 2006 @ 2:03a
Well if we're gonna stick with the star ratings, can we at least rate individual posts? I found it VERY useful to look for the postitively-rated(?) posts in threads especially when a thread is 10+ pages long. |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|
|
|
|