|
-
-
TM1
- piņata
posted: May. 16, 2008 @ 5:43p
I totally agree with using store categories and not having product categories as the parent category. We want to browse the stores we shop at and it makes sense to have the stores as the parent category and then people can look for deals at their specific store of choice. |
-
-
Beboparoo
- **Dust Warrior**
posted: May. 16, 2008 @ 6:00p
TM1 said:Beboparoo said:PromoMagazine Link
sadly, that article is more than 2 years old. I don't care on a personal level, it is isn't my site, I am just showing reasons why FW might not want to go down the selling road. I understand, but unfortunely it's been more than two years since Bud Miller updated cents-off.
|
-
-
Beboparoo
- **Dust Warrior**
posted: May. 16, 2008 @ 6:07p
jayK said:MarsdenFubar said:I am totally fine dropping the product categories if you all don't see a need for them. We can work out something like bebop suggested. Store break down would be a must (CVS and the like included), along with manufacturers. I would definitely use product categories. I don't see why we can't keep both product and store categories...if you find store categories more useful, you can just ignore the product categories.
For example, I buy Tropicana OJ and soy milk every week. Before I go shopping, I'd like to be able to check the Beverages -> Juice -> Orange Juice and Beverages -> Milk -> Soy Milk categories. The deals in those categories could determine whether I shop at Safeway, Lucky, Costco, or Target that week. And most people that use grocery coupons are flexible when they buy products. Because coupons and sales change rule number one is not to be brand loyal, and rule number two is to stockpile on a deal to get you to the next deal. If I'm going to go walgreens for all the hot items that week, I want those things listed in one place. I don't want to look through each product to see if there is a sale on it and then to see if the sale item is at Walgreens. JayK is a rather simple method that is used on most if not all couponing forums. Why make it complicated and confusing to new users? |
-
-
Madmurphy
- Ancient Member
posted: May. 16, 2008 @ 6:17p
Most serious couponers don't have a specific need in mind when they use the GC forums. They're looking to minimize out of pocket costs so that means looking at bargains at stores as a whole. To break categories down into the minutiae is overkill. So looking for a categorized deal on orange juice isn't something that most of the people using the GC forum will be doing 99% of the time. The folks using the GC forum will be looking for deals in which they can stock up while they are in a particular store or find deals which produce overage situations which can be applied to other items in their grocery order. For instance, many people don't search CVS threads for specific items. They are, however, searching for the items that are free after ECB and can be used with the $ off $$ coupons which result in overage. Ask most of the folks who are serious about CVS shopping and they'll have 30 to 40 tubes of toothpaste stockpiled. It's not that they wanted toothpaste, it's that the toothpaste was free and resulted in overage that allowed them to buy other items for free or very little out of pocket. Having the store categories allows deals to be put together for the minimum out of pocket expenditure for the fewest trips to the store. If the categories were listed by products, it would be almost impossible to put together deals and it would frustrate most of the serious couponers. |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: May. 16, 2008 @ 6:36p
Beboparoo said:If I'm going to go walgreens for all the hot items that week, I want those things listed in one place.You would still be able to do that, since new topics would be listed under both the store and the product.
I don't want to look through each product to see if there is a sale on it and then to see if the sale item is at Walgreens.That's fine, since topics are posted under multiple categories, you would simply ignore the category tree you don't want to use.
Why make it complicated and confusing to new users?Topics in HD are usually listed both by the store and by the product, and that seems to be working pretty well. Why change it in GC? I just don't see the downside to adding more flexibility to the forum. There would be no single "parent" category, there would be 2 roots in the category hierarchy, and a single topic would appear in the appropriate category(s) under both roots. This doesn't have to be an either-or proposition. There's no need to drop product categories - just because serious couponers do things a certain way doesn't mean that everyone will want to do things the same way.  So, to reiterate, I'm suggesting that topics be categorized by BOTH stores AND products. |
-
-
shopliftinginva
- Tired Member
posted: May. 16, 2008 @ 7:03p
I'm thinking that JayK and Bebop are thinking of two different things. It seems that JayK is talking about multiple ways of searching the forum, like you can in the HotDeal forum in modern view. That everythign will be there, but you can search by store, by item, by category, etc. You are able to search whatever way you want. It seems that Bebop is thinking about the actual listings, not taking into account how the modern view works in Hot Deals and applying that to Grocery Forum? I could be wrong, so correct me if I am. |
-
-
Beboparoo
- **Dust Warrior**
posted: May. 16, 2008 @ 7:23p
shopliftinginva said:I'm thinking that JayK and Bebop are thinking of two different things.
It seems that JayK is talking about multiple ways of searching the forum, like you can in the HotDeal forum in modern view. That everythign will be there, but you can search by store, by item, by category, etc. You are able to search whatever way you want.
It seems that Bebop is thinking about the actual listings, not taking into account how the modern view works in Hot Deals and applying that to Grocery Forum?
I could be wrong, so correct me if I am. Yep, I do believe you are correct  |
-
-
mudley (Staff)
- @troyredington
posted: May. 16, 2008 @ 10:54p
Madmurphy said:Most serious couponers don't have a specific need in mind when they use the GC forums. They're looking to minimize out of pocket costs so that means looking at bargains at stores as a whole. To break categories down into the minutiae is overkill. So looking for a categorized deal on orange juice isn't something that most of the people using the GC forum will be doing 99% of the time.
The folks using the GC forum will be looking for deals in which they can stock up while they are in a particular store or find deals which produce overage situations which can be applied to other items in their grocery order.
For instance, many people don't search CVS threads for specific items. They are, however, searching for the items that are free after ECB and can be used with the $ off $$ coupons which result in overage. Ask most of the folks who are serious about CVS shopping and they'll have 30 to 40 tubes of toothpaste stockpiled. It's not that they wanted toothpaste, it's that the toothpaste was free and resulted in overage that allowed them to buy other items for free or very little out of pocket.
Having the store categories allows deals to be put together for the minimum out of pocket expenditure for the fewest trips to the store. If the categories were listed by products, it would be almost impossible to put together deals and it would frustrate most of the serious couponers. You're probably right. Serious couponers will use the stores rather than the products. But the product categories could be beneficial to people who are new to coupons - like me. JayK had a prime example. If he buys orange juice and soymilk (yuck dude, seriously? ) every week, its a perfect opportunity to start using coupons. It's a lot easier than forming a shopping list around a list of coupons. Are there any features any of the "coupon fiasco spin-off sites" are doing that are worthy? |
-
-
TM1
- piņata
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 5:58a
mudley said: Are there any features any of the "coupon fiasco spin-off sites" are doing that are worthy? ** giggling ** Do you shop with a list and then drive around trying to decide what store you you are going to shop at? I still think someone new to coupons will find it easier to see the specific store they shop at listed - Food Lion - and then look at categories withing Food Lion. That's just me. The one problem I see with this is how do you decide what gets listed? Do you pick the most mainstream stores??? There will also be tons of product categories, which is the lesser of the two?? |
-
-
Madmurphy
- Ancient Member
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 7:24a
And the other problem that I see with listing categories is getting people to list products by categories. I know that I sure am not going to list the prices for orange juice at Publix, Target, Kroger, WalMart, etc. each week and I doubt that many others (any besides jayK, that is ) will either. That's where the search feature comes in handy. If you want to see if anyone has listed that there's a sale on orange juice for a particular week, you do a search. |
-
-
DevilMonkey (Staff)
- Moderator
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 7:43a
TM1 said:Do you shop with a list and then drive around trying to decide what store you you are going to shop at? I still think someone new to coupons will find it easier to see the specific store they shop at listed - Food Lion - and then look at categories withing Food Lion. I think it'd be a lot more efficient to search by store. However, if a gallon of milk runs 30 dollars in six months, you might take a special trip to Harris Teeter or Rite-Aid for a good deal. Assuming the gas prices at $35/gal don't make it prohibitive.  Searching by product lets noobs (like me) get started. It'd be your job to teach them how to be more efficient with their research/planning! Maybe instead of an overwhelming list of every conceivable grocery product, there were instead simpler categories which covered staple foods? Meat, for instance, is worth a special trip to me if there's a good enough deal somewhere. Milk, eggs, baby food/formula, etc? Just thinking out loud...again. |
-
-
shopliftinginva
- Tired Member
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 7:51a
DevilMonkey said:TM1 said:Do you shop with a list and then drive around trying to decide what store you you are going to shop at? I still think someone new to coupons will find it easier to see the specific store they shop at listed - Food Lion - and then look at categories withing Food Lion.
I think it'd be a lot more efficient to search by store.
However, if a gallon of milk runs 30 dollars in six months, you might take a special trip to Harris Teeter or Rite-Aid for a good deal. Assuming the gas prices at $35/gal don't make it prohibitive. 
Searching by product lets noobs (like me) get started. It'd be your job to teach them how to be more efficient with their research/planning!
Maybe instead of an overwhelming list of every conceivable grocery product, there were instead simpler categories which covered staple foods? Meat, for instance, is worth a special trip to me if there's a good enough deal somewhere. Milk, eggs, baby food/formula, etc?
Just thinking out loud...again. I wouldn't think the categories had to be in depth. Meat Produce Dairy household goods (like cleansers, papertowels, toilet paper) beverages general groceries with categories added as needed? For instance, that would have helped me when I was shopping for making tacos for cinco de mayo. I wanted the cheapest place to get hamburger, lettuce, tomatoes, cheese, and taco sauce for 40 kids. But for everyday kinds of grocery shopping, I'd probably search by stores. Just when I'm buying a huge amount for something specific like that, every penny counts. |
-
-
linrick
- Wacky Member
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 11:02a
my 2cents/suggestion: subcat in gc: cvs (actually deserve it's own forum) walgreens kroger & affil. tom thumb & affil albertsons & affil etc. under those sub cat, post deals, coupons, rebates (those can be printed off online). as far as trading/buying/selling coupons, let's not. what people want to do behind fw is their business. . just don't come back to fw and complaint about a deal gone sour. |
-
-
shopliftinginva
- Tired Member
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 11:48a
linrick said: as far as trading/buying/selling coupons, let's not. what people want to do behind fw is their business. . just don't come back to fw and complaint about a deal gone sour. Personally, I agree with this. As someone else mentioned (TM maybe?), if you allow selling/trading, you are going to be getting all kinds of scam artists setting up shop here. Plus the headaches of having to deal with trades/sales gone bad would be detrimental to community building. And if you allowed that in grocery coupons, now you are going to have people wanting it in every forum which would open the community up to even MORE spam/scammers. When I first joined here, I did a behind the scenes sale of a deal I got in on but another member didn't. I'm sure I'm not the only one who's done that. But at no time did I think that FW encouraged that or would have thought to hold FW liable should something go wrong. BTW, I don't remember who I sold that truck set to, but I still have that $2 bill he sent me. |
-
-
linrick
- Wacky Member
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 12:37p
shopliftinginva said:BTW, I don't remember who I sold that truck set to, but I still have that $2 bill he sent me. you know what you can do w/that $2 bill right ? btw, i think that gc deals should be limited to "really great deals" such as far, almost far (like hd forum), or a significant savings of $2+ to make it worthwhile. if people start posting stuff like 10 for $10, etc. (which all grocery stores have practically every week anyway), it will get too cluttered. |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 1:11p
Regarding categorization: I agree that for product categorization, subcategories are probably not necessary and might not add a whole lot of value. Sticking to just the product category list in the OP should be fine, with the addition of a household goods category. For categories that could go either way (i.e. Health & Beauty, or Pets), why not list topics assigned to those categories in both HD and GC? For store categorization, if there aren't a huge number of grocery retailers then a flat list should be fine. If that list gets too long, perhaps it could be divided into regions, i.e. Online, National, Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, West, etc. Many grocery stores operate in a limited number of states, so there shouldn't be too many stores listed in more than one regional category. There is also a third "type" dimension to a topic that could be useful: whether the topic is a deal, a discussion, or an informational post. The magnitude of the deal could potentially be captured in this dimension - as linrick mentioned, perhaps deals with significant savings could be categorized with a different type than a run-of-the-mill deal. Another "type" could be coupon exchange - all offers/discussion/complaining re coupon trades could be confined to this category, which could easily be excluded. Having these three dimensions would give users a huge amount of flexibility as to which topics they want to see (or not see). For example, you could set your view to show only deals (ignoring discussions) on all products, at national and northeast stores. Or you could see all deals and discussions on household goods at national and online stores. The key to making this work (as discussed in the finance categorization thread) would be allowing exclusions, and letting both the community and the OP categorize topics. |
-
-
FrugalFreak
- Teh d00d
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 1:18p
my few suggestions; A sticky that list stores that offer double or triple coupons always. Separate sticky for brick/malware printable coupons and one pdf or jpeg image based printable coupons. many REFUSE to download the software due to misrepresented installation facts. Manufacturers "end date to buy" reporting sticky thread. (great bargains can be had when items are nearing expiring date, 2 to 6 months before many stores drastically mark these items down. learning when the products expire and the mark down pattern can prove to be quite useful for savings. I vote for region categorizing too. it should be listed by region. and maybe regional coupon reporting by members since insert coupons do vary by regions mostly. jayK said:I'm assuming PPHF means PayPal Handling Fee, in that you send someone money via PayPal in exchange for a coupon? Perhaps a FCHF system could be implemented instead using FatCash. EXCELLENT IDEA! I DETEST PayPul |
-
-
shopliftinginva
- Tired Member
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 3:11p
-
-
TM1
- piņata
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 5:13p
DevilMonkey said:TM1 said:Do you shop with a list and then drive around trying to decide what store you you are going to shop at? I still think someone new to coupons will find it easier to see the specific store they shop at listed - Food Lion - and then look at categories withing Food Lion.
I think it'd be a lot more efficient to search by store.
However, if a gallon of milk runs 30 dollars in six months, you might take a special trip to Harris Teeter or Rite-Aid for a good deal. Assuming the gas prices at $35/gal don't make it prohibitive. 
Searching by product lets noobs (like me) get started. It'd be your job to teach them how to be more efficient with their research/planning!
Maybe instead of an overwhelming list of every conceivable grocery product, there were instead simpler categories which covered staple foods? Meat, for instance, is worth a special trip to me if there's a good enough deal somewhere. Milk, eggs, baby food/formula, etc?
Just thinking out loud...again. I see both sides as being effective, one for experienced, one for new users. I guess the answer is what is the most efficient for both sides. |
-
-
qcumber98
- Wacky Member
posted: May. 17, 2008 @ 8:02p
I currently have a bunch of 3x5 cards inside of a checkbook cover to separate my coupons. My ghetto coupon system goes like this: air fresheners, bakery/baking products, canned foods, cereal & pasta, cleaning supplies (including dishwashing liquid), condiments (including spaghetti sauce and butter), frozen foods, health & medicine, juice & soda, laundry detergent & fabric softeners, meat, oral & body hygiene, paper tissue, snacks, storage & waste bags (including aluminum foil, saran wrap), and miscellaneous. If you could make the GC Forum like that, then it will be easy for me to find and file coupons like 40-cents off 5 cans of Del Monte corn. |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|