• Page :
  • 1
  • Text Only

[RANT]

Here's an example, (and I *KNOW* I'm sticking my neck out here), but there are 'Forum-specific / FuseTalk TAGS' for:

  • Bullet Lists
  • Numbered Lists
  • LINKs
  • ...etc...

Why don't 'seemingly otherwise intelligent' folks bother to utilize these 'Forum-features'?

Is it:

  1. Ignorance (i.e. unaware of their existence)
  2. Laziness
  3. Time-constraints
  4. Other...

NOTE to zubba: This reply is NOT addressed at you - just your TYPE of post. AND, this isn't the WORST example - just the first that I found while reading some 'interesting' threads tonight.

ORIGINAL POST:

zubba said: • Over 31 percent of laptops will fail in the first three years of ownership.
• Of these failures, two-thirds came from hardware malfunctions (20.4 percent) and one-third (10.6 percent) was reported as accidental damage.
• Asus and Toshiba were the most reliable manufacturers, with fewer than 16 percent having a hardware malfunction over three years.
• Netbooks are projected to have a 20 percent higher failure rate from hardware malfunctions than more expensive laptop computers.
• Manufacturers proved to be a more reliable determinant of reliability than the type of laptop and should be a greater factor in making a purchase decision.

http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/deal-discussion/975796

RANK-EXPECTED 3 YEAR LAPTOP MALFUNCTION % RATE
1 ASUS 15.6 <<<<<<<<<<< BEST
2 Toshiba 15.7
3 Sony 16.8
4 APPLE 17.4
5 Dell 18.3
6 Lenovo 21.5
7 ACER 23.3
8 GATEWAY 23.5
9 HP 25.6 <<<<<<<<<< WORST

Since Acer bought Gateway and Gateway owned E-Machines, you can bet E-Machines has one of the worst failure rates as well. One should not be confused by the upfront cost alone. It's like buying a cheap printer, only to realize after the fact how expensive the ink cartridges are and that generic ink cartridges are not available.

FORMATTED POST:

zubba said:

  • Over 31 percent of laptops will fail in the first three years of ownership.
  • Of these failures, two-thirds came from hardware malfunctions (20.4 percent) and one-third (10.6 percent) was reported as accidental damage.
  • Asus and Toshiba were the most reliable manufacturers, with fewer than 16 percent having a hardware malfunction over three years.
  • Netbooks are projected to have a 20 percent higher failure rate from hardware malfunctions than more expensive laptop computers.
  • Manufacturers proved to be a more reliable determinant of reliability than the type of laptop and should be a greater factor in making a purchase decision.


Laptop Notebook reliability comparison data by SquareTrade.com

RANK-EXPECTED 3 YEAR LAPTOP MALFUNCTION % RATE:
  1. ASUS 15.6 <<<<<<<<<<< BEST
  2. Toshiba 15.7
  3. Sony 16.8
  4. APPLE 17.4
  5. Dell 18.3
  6. Lenovo 21.5
  7. ACER 23.3
  8. GATEWAY 23.5
  9. HP 25.6 <<<<<<<<<< WORST


Since Acer bought Gateway and Gateway owned E-Machines, you can bet E-Machines has one of the worst failure rates as well. One should not be confused by the upfront cost alone. It's like buying a cheap printer, only to realize after the fact how expensive the ink cartridges are and that generic ink cartridges are not available.
I also can't understand why folks continue to post 'RAW' URLs, sometimes SUPER-LONG (forcing those of us with 1024x768, OR LESS!, displays to HORIZONTALLY SCROLL, back-and-forth, for EACH line of EACH post on the ENTIRE SCREEN containing the SUPER-LONG URL), instead of utilizing the appropriate LINK Tags.

But, that's a topic for another thread (SUGGESTION for a New 'Pending Approval' System Keyword Filter)...

[/RANT]

THANKS for listening...



Okay, I am sure I am going to get my head knocked off for asking ...

But, why are you making such a big deal of formatting and such (this thread and the others on various formatting). I had to re-read your thread on the list issues a few times before I understood what exactly you were asking about there.

I mean, if something is obviously broken, then let the staff know. I've mentioned some trivial things too (like extra spacing inserted with quotes, etc.). But, you seem to be like completely upset (like, can't sleep at night) over these formatting issues.


OP, your version of the post is uglier to read, unnecessary line spacing, unneeded bolding, etc.


Here are some reasons:
*. The quick reply doesn't have bullet buttons.
@. The buttons on the full featured reply take more effort.
^. And who really wants to type in formatting commands?


you lost me at 3rd sentence.




Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2012