Finances in Relationships

Archived From: Finance
  • Go to page :
  • 1 23
  • Text Only
rated:

Lately I've been having a lot of friction with my fiancee about finances. We didn't have problems before engagement because:
1. We both have high paying jobs.
2. We've kept separate finances.
3. We both live below our means, saving the max in retirement accounts and saving a significant amount of cash in taxable accounts on top of that.
4. I like to buy things that she wouldn't be willing to spend money on. She likes to buy things I wouldn't be willing to spend money on. This has been no big deal to either of us because of everything above.

Since we've been engaged though, we've had issues because:
1. We've started sharing big costs, mainly rent and wedding costs.
2. She wants to spend more on these things than I would want to.
3. We've settled on costs in between our expectations, but not without significant fights.
4. Her expectations on spending are higher than mine in part because she makes a lot more money than I do.
5. What she wants to spend is actually very reasonable given what she makes. For example, when we weren't sharing rent, she saved a higher % of her salary and a higher absolute $ amount per month than I did in spite of paying significantly more rent.

These arguments have led to arguments about finances that didn't really come up before. That's all the background. Now, a few questions here:
1. Am I just being unreasonable about the spending? It's not like we aren't spending below our means and wouldn't be in good financial shape even if we spent as much as she wanted to on the wedding and rent.
2. If I'm not being unreasonable, how should we reach a state where we're both happy with our finances?
3. More generally, how have you all managed finances in relationships, both in similar and different situations? What's worked out well and not so well?
4. How do you think finances should be managed in relationships?

Edit: made everything more readable


Member Summary
Most Recent Posts

marcvh said:   
Different people do different things, but I think it's fair to say there are broadly 3 different... (more)

EvilCapitalist (Jun. 07, 2011 @ 5:47p) |

"The Ex-Wife." 90% of your income goes to your ex-wife. She spends it on lavish vacations & designer clothes while you ... (more)

SpeedingLunatic (Jun. 07, 2011 @ 8:37p) |

Take your submissive, subservient crap and stick it.... somewhere.

DH and I met in high school. Throughout our dating,... (more)

terryann56 (Jun. 08, 2011 @ 12:11p) |

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.

  • Also categorized in:
Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

This topic comes up from time to time, and what I've learned is that although no one system seems to work for everyone, you better find a system that works for both of YOU. Otherwise, save yourselves a lot of time and break up now.

The only other advice would be for you to give up the fight on the wedding costs. It's her wedding, not yours. You are simply another invited guest.


Out of curiosity, care to throw down some salary numbers? You both have high-paying jobs, but she makes "a lot more" than you do? The real friction here could be in the difference in your pay. A lot of this, at least in terms of your immediate concerns, come down to her personally, not so much finance in general. Nobody can tell you how much to spend on a wedding. If she wants extravagance, that's a personal thing... You take a 100% loss on these events anyway, minus the value of any gifts you receive that a court wedding wouldn't have garnered.

Just going to forewarn you: There are a lot of different opinions on this, and none of them are wrong. It all depends on the two people involved, and how they feel most comfortable managing things. In the long term, I believe that you should stand your ground, negotiate big expenses, and keep things separate. In the short term, if you're interested in getting this thing off to a good start, I'd let her have the big wedding. Since you're not taking on debt, it'll be water under the bridge when it's over...


When you say "sharing costs" how do you mean? Splitting 50-50 isn't really fair in cases like this where incomes are unequal; the classic technique is that joint costs (rent, wedding, that sort of thing) are divided proportionate to your respective incomes.


pic?


ajh5408 said:   Out of curiosity, care to throw down some salary numbers? You both have high-paying jobs, but she makes "a lot more" than you do?

In terms of salary, I make low six digits, she makes about 175% what I make.

marcvh said:   When you say "sharing costs" how do you mean? Splitting 50-50 isn't really fair in cases like this where incomes are unequal; the classic technique is that joint costs (rent, wedding, that sort of thing) are divided proportionate to your respective incomes.

We have been splitting 50-50 so far. She offered to pay a higher % for things she wants more, but I refused because it seemed unfair. I didn't know that dividing proportionate to income was the norm, especially before we're actually married?


StudentOfGab said:   ajh5408 said:   Out of curiosity, care to throw down some salary numbers? You both have high-paying jobs, but she makes "a lot more" than you do?In terms of salary, I make low six digits, she makes about 175% what I make.Unless you are in an exceedingly high-cost area, I think she can afford an income-split situation comfortably.
StudentOfGab said:   marcvh said:   When you say "sharing costs" how do you mean? Splitting 50-50 isn't really fair in cases like this where incomes are unequal; the classic technique is that joint costs (rent, wedding, that sort of thing) are divided proportionate to your respective incomes.We have been splitting 50-50 so far. She offered to pay a higher % for things she wants more, but I refused because it seemed unfair. I didn't know that dividing proportionate to income was the norm, especially before we're actually married?I think you are being unfair to yourself. People assume the norm is to combine finances. If you made 100K and she made 300K, your combined income is $400K. If you spend 100K/yr from a combined account with no regard to whose purchase it technically was, that is essentially a 25/75 split. So yes, if you assume combined finances to be the norm, and I think most people do, then splitting expenses based on income is also the norm.


dcwilbur said:   This topic comes up from time to time, and what I've learned is that although no one system seems to work for everyone, you better find a system that works for both of YOU. Otherwise, save yourselves a lot of time and break up now.

The only other advice would be for you to give up the fight on the wedding costs. It's her wedding, not yours. You are simply another invited guest.


ajh5408 said:   Just going to forewarn you: There are a lot of different opinions on this, and none of them are wrong. It all depends on the two people involved, and how they feel most comfortable managing things. In the long term, I believe that you should stand your ground, negotiate big expenses, and keep things separate. In the short term, if you're interested in getting this thing off to a good start, I'd let her have the big wedding. Since you're not taking on debt, it'll be water under the bridge when it's over...

I've more or less come around on the wedding costs and I'm glad FWF seems to agree. It's obviously very important to her even if I feel like we're just throwing money away.

I can see how one system might not work for everyone. I've taken the approach that ajh has suggested so far in terms of negotiating big expenses and keeping things separate. I am curious what systems have worked for you, even if they might not work for me.


marcvh said:   When you say "sharing costs" how do you mean? Splitting 50-50 isn't really fair in cases like this where incomes are unequal; the classic technique is that joint costs (rent, wedding, that sort of thing) are divided proportionate to your respective incomes.

Good point. Since my wife spends 75% of the time raising the kids I only get 25% of time with the kids. If I am doing something with them and I go over my alotted time they get taken away. She also cooks 90% of the time. It is a real bitch eating only 10% of the food. Since I make more of the income she only gets to cook 25% of the food available (cause I pay for 75% of it).

ETA: Hope people realize I am being sarcastic. Good luck in the business relationship with benefits.

Agree on a system or don't get married. You guys aren't agreeing on a system right now which is your problem. The system does not matter as long as both people truly want that system

BTW the classic technique is merge all income. It is both of your money. That is the classic technique. Not to say that a different technique won't work, but what you call the classic technique surely ain't.

Negotiate big expenses? I really hope my wife and I never get to the point where we have to negotiate anything. I hope that I continue to do things she wants and loves (and vice versa) because I love her.


Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.


mikef07 said:   marcvh said:   When you say "sharing costs" how do you mean? Splitting 50-50 isn't really fair in cases like this where incomes are unequal; the classic technique is that joint costs (rent, wedding, that sort of thing) are divided proportionate to your respective incomes.

Good point. Since my wife spends 75% of the time raising the kids I only get 25% of time with the kids. If I am doing something with them and I go over my alotted time they get taken away. She also cooks 90% of the time. It is a real bitch eating only 10% of the food. Since I make more of the income she only gets to cook 25% of the food available (cause I pay for 75% of it).

ETA: Hope people realize I am being sarcastic. Good luck in the business relationship with benefits.

Agree on a system or don't get married. You guys aren't agreeing on a system right now which is your problem. The system does not matter as long as both people truly want that system

BTW the classic technique is merge all income. It is both of your money. That is the classic technique. Not to say that a different technique won't work, but what you call the classic technique surely ain't.

Negotiate big expenses? I really hope my wife and I never get to the point where we have to negotiate anything. I hope that I continue to do things she wants and loves (and vice versa) because I love her.

Thanks, your sarcasm really goes to show how stupid my current point of view and how broken our current "system" is. Great advice. (I mean that completely non-sarcastically) We do love each other a lot, and you're right that we need to figure out a real system that works for both of us. A related issue is that she doesn't enjoy talking with me about finances, but I think this thread so far goes to show that that's largely my fault because of my stupid views about finance. If I approach it more as a love relationship than a business relationship, that would probably go a long ways to making our finance talks a lot more amicable.


jkimcpa said:   Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.

I would give u 100000++++ if I could


Based on my experience with women:
They are nice to u when everything is perfect, but once shit hits the fan, they will come after even your airline miles. (even if they have a lot more $ than u)


Mike is a good guy; however, his system works when both people "started off" together. It does not work on people who get married AFTER they have been on their own for a while. (Sorry mike thats my opinion.)

A Rapper and Comedian provide mantras for your situation:

1. Snoopp Dogg says, "You pay the cost ... to be the Boss." Your wife makes substantially more than you -- In other words, she is the boss.

2. Chris Rocks says, " A woman cannot move DOWN in lifestyle." Don't expect her to come down to your lifestyle to live. It ain't happening... homey!

Sage wisdom


jkimcpa said:   Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.

Don't spend your life trying to make someone else happy. Its a losing game.


StudentOfGab said:   
5. What she wants to spend is actually very reasonable given what she makes. For example, when we weren't sharing rent, she saved a higher % of her salary and a higher absolute $ amount per month than I did in spite of paying significantly more rent.

If this is the case, and she makes significantly more money than you do, I'd give it a rest. The wedding is obviously very important to her (as it is for many girls), and if she is in essence footing most of the bill (since she makes more money than you), let her have her day of being a princess. You already mentioend that she lives significantly beneath her means. At most you'll save what...$10-$15k? Yes, that's a significant sum of money to most people, but if y'all really have that high of a combined salary, it's not going to be that big of a deal to you two.

Usually, most people agree that the person who brings more money to the table calls the shots. In this instance, it would be her.


In my house, there is no splitting expenses, no negotiating, etc. Household income, household expenses, period.

Many couples give themselves "allowances" so that they don't have to explain their purchases to each other. Many couples also establish a threshold for purchases that they need to discuss first.


patch96 said:   jkimcpa said:   Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.

Don't spend your life trying to make someone else happy. Its a losing game.

I chose to marry my wife because I knew I didn't have to spend my life trying to make her happy.


jkimcpa said:   patch96 said:   jkimcpa said:   Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.

Don't spend your life trying to make someone else happy. Its a losing game.


I chose to marry my wife because I knew I didn't have to spend my life trying to make her happy.

how long u been married for?


jigsaw1975 said:   jkimcpa said:   patch96 said:   jkimcpa said:   Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.

Don't spend your life trying to make someone else happy. Its a losing game.


I chose to marry my wife because I knew I didn't have to spend my life trying to make her happy.


how long u been married for?

Yea yea...only been 3 years.


Have you had any friendly, non-confrontational, big picture discussions about what to do with your money? For example:
* I think we should save x%/$x per month
* I think we should be saving our money for _____.
* I want to retire at age __.
* I think our house/apr/condo should cost $x.
* I've analyzed our monthly spending, and here's the breakdown.
* I think our monthly budget should look like this.

Rather than sorting everything out on an ad hoc fighting basis, try to establish some points of agreement, then give some thought to where you need to compromise and where she needs to compromise.


jkimcpa said:   jigsaw1975 said:   jkimcpa said:   patch96 said:   jkimcpa said:   Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.

Don't spend your life trying to make someone else happy. Its a losing game.


I chose to marry my wife because I knew I didn't have to spend my life trying to make her happy.


how long u been married for?


Yea yea...only been 3 years.

Lets connect back in 10 years and after a few kids.


A few clarifications:

1. We're not married yet, we're still engaged. I wasn't planning on sharing finances until after we're officially married, but it does appear we need a system now.
2. While she makes more and saves more, I do have a significantly higher current net worth. This is because she went to graduate school and I did not, so she had significant loans to pay off first and I had an earlier start on my career. If we maintained separate finances, she would however catch up in a few years.

I don't think I would feel comfortable in a system where I just let her call all the shots even if #2 above wasn't true. It's not like 30% of the net income is an insignificant amount. I guess that's especially true for now since we are splitting costs 50-50.


jigsaw1975 said:   jkimcpa said:   jigsaw1975 said:   jkimcpa said:   patch96 said:   jkimcpa said:   Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.

Don't spend your life trying to make someone else happy. Its a losing game.


I chose to marry my wife because I knew I didn't have to spend my life trying to make her happy.


how long u been married for?


Yea yea...only been 3 years.


Lets connect back in 10 years and after a few kids.

Already have 2 kids.


jkimcpa said:   jigsaw1975 said:   jkimcpa said:   jigsaw1975 said:   jkimcpa said:   patch96 said:   jkimcpa said:   Unfortunately for us men, happy wife, happy life.

Don't spend your life trying to make someone else happy. Its a losing game.


I chose to marry my wife because I knew I didn't have to spend my life trying to make her happy.


how long u been married for?


Yea yea...only been 3 years.


Lets connect back in 10 years and after a few kids.


Already have 2 kids.

with the married one?


Ok two differnt issues
1. Wedding costs- hopefully a once in lifetime expense. If you disagree on everything wedding cost wise but on what fiscal things will be life post marriage then things are good.
2. Make vastly different amounts of money. That is fine. Now think about how you two want to go forward with money. Is all money combined or is it seperate and you treat the total household income as being household income or are you going to do teh proportions thing? Will that change with every raise or demotion in pay? What if you have kids?

There are certain economies of scale of being married and living together. I tend to think of household income because if you do not trust someone with your money i think you should not get married. ombine the goals you each want ionto what you together want.


jigsaw1975 said:   
with the married one?

Yup.


BarryAndLevon said:   Have you had any friendly, non-confrontational, big picture discussions about what to do with your money? For example:
* I think we should save x%/$x per month
* I think we should be saving our money for _____.
* I want to retire at age __.
* I think our house/apr/condo should cost $x.
* I've analyzed our monthly spending, and here's the breakdown.
* I think our monthly budget should look like this.

Rather than sorting everything out on an ad hoc fighting basis, try to establish some points of agreement, then give some thought to where you need to compromise and where she needs to compromise.

We've had amiable discussions about some of these points and established some points of agreement, mainly about what we should be saving our money for (house/retirement) and how much our house should cost. We've had discussions about our current saving, spending and budget, but because we've kept separate finances, it's basically all individual and we haven't worked something out jointly.

I did find out two possibly major issues in these discussions that are so far unresolved.
1. I want to retire earlier than typical retirement age, she is very career driven and wants to work until she can't.
2. Buying a house earlier is a higher priority for me than her.

Based on everything so far, looks like we should really sit down and figure out how everything should work jointly.


jkimcpa said:   jigsaw1975 said:   
with the married one?


Yup.

Good on ya,cobber!


marcvh said:   When you say "sharing costs" how do you mean? Splitting 50-50 isn't really fair in cases like this where incomes are unequal; the classic technique is that joint costs (rent, wedding, that sort of thing) are divided proportionate to your respective incomes.how's your marriage going?
lol


StudentOfGab said:   BarryAndLevon said:   Have you had any friendly, non-confrontational, big picture discussions about what to do with your money? For example:
* I think we should save x%/$x per month
* I think we should be saving our money for _____.
* I want to retire at age __.
* I think our house/apr/condo should cost $x.
* I've analyzed our monthly spending, and here's the breakdown.
* I think our monthly budget should look like this.

Rather than sorting everything out on an ad hoc fighting basis, try to establish some points of agreement, then give some thought to where you need to compromise and where she needs to compromise.


We've had amiable discussions about some of these points and established some points of agreement, mainly about what we should be saving our money for (house/retirement) and how much our house should cost. We've had discussions about our current saving, spending and budget, but because we've kept separate finances, it's basically all individual and we haven't worked something out jointly.

I did find out two possibly major issues in these discussions that are so far unresolved.
1. I want to retire earlier than typical retirement age, she is very career driven and wants to work until she can't.
2. Buying a house earlier is a higher priority for me than her.

Based on everything so far, looks like we should really sit down and figure out how everything should work jointly.
have you talked about kids yet? If you guys are complete opposite in regards to retirement and buying a house, what about kids?

sounds like nothing has ever really been discussed until you now got engaged.


rmhop said:   have you talked about kids yet? If you guys are complete opposite in regards to retirement and buying a house, what about kids?

sounds like nothing has ever really been discussed until you now got engaged.

We talked about kids. We are in agreement about that fortunately - want 2, want 1st one in a few years. We've had discussions about what we want for their education, what we want to emphasize to them, how much we want them to play videogames, etc. Kids have actually been a pretty easy discussion because we agree on them.

We discussed the other things before engagement, but ignored actually resolving our differences. In hindsight, that's more or less as good as just not discussing them at all.


StudentOfGab said:   rmhop said:   have you talked about kids yet? If you guys are complete opposite in regards to retirement and buying a house, what about kids?

sounds like nothing has ever really been discussed until you now got engaged.


We talked about kids. We are in agreement about that fortunately - want 2, want 1st one in a few years. We discussed the other things before engagement, but ignored actually resolving our differences, which I guess is more or less as good as just not discussing them at all.
it sounds like you both want to be in control of the finances and that's why you are butting heads about it. my wife and i always talked about finances before we were married. We actually ended up buying our house and she lived in it before we got married so she didn't have to pay rent somewhere etc. It's funny bc we bought the house just in my name and she paid for utilities and i paid for mortgage/taxes etc. Everything was out in the open long before we got engaged. Part of my few duties is taking care of the finances and bills. That doesn't mean i make all the decisions. Any big purchase we talk about before we buy it, but a few hundred dollars is not a big issue. There are some couples that have to approve every transaction basically but that's not how we work. Really sitting down and coming up with a game plan is what you guys need to do.

There are also other couples who don't want finances together and don't want their spouse knowing about what they do with their money. My MIL and her husband have been married about 15 years now and they don't have a single dollar together, they split every bill down the middle. Sad thing, they don't have a clue about each others finances. They are near retirement age so should be interesting to see if that is going to cause major issue when one of them comes out with a bunch of debt etc..


She makes more cash then you, bite your tongue and say I do, don't complain. Simple solution. Make a monthly slush fund that you and her had no accountability for to spend in any way and continue building net worth. Welcome to married life, you will bicker and fight but that means you care.


Kids are a big deal. In my experience kids bring out a lot of differences in parenting styles, some of which spill over into the financial realm. A lot depends on how you and her were raised. What are your expectations -- private schools for the kids? Do you live or can you buy in an area with a great school district? Growing up, did she or you have a family environment where every desire was met? Or did you or her do chores and help with the family income? What do you and her expect to do upon having kids -- mom stays at home? You stay at home? Given that her income is higher and she likes to work she might expect to continue working while you stay at home. Have you discussed this with her?


Thanks for all the input everyone. I've always thought I was pretty smart about my finances, but it turns out I'm only smart about individual finances and am a complete idiot about joint finances. Big takeaways for me:

1. We need to reconcile our individual financial goals and come up with joint financial goals.
2. We need to figure out joint financial spending, savings and budget to work towards our goals.
3. We have to come up with a joint spending system where we both give up some financial control.
4. The wedding is important to her and we can afford it, so let her have what she wants there.

None of this is rocket science, but I've always been very focused on my individual financial goals and how to work towards those. Also, the nuclear option is to break off the engagement before it's too late if we can't reconcile points 1-3 above.


Kanosh said:   Kids are a big deal. In my experience kids bring out a lot of differences in parenting styles, some of which spill over into the financial realm. A lot depends on how you and her were raised. What are your expectations -- private schools for the kids? Do you live or can you buy in an area with a great school district? Growing up, did she or you have a family environment where every desire was met? Or did you or her do chores and help with the family income? What do you and her expect to do upon having kids -- mom stays at home? You stay at home? Given that her income is higher and she likes to work she might expect to continue working while you stay at home. Have you discussed this with her?

We both went to public school and were expected to do very well in school by our parents. We were expected to do chores at home. We have similar morals, politics and religion. We didn't help with family income and had our undergrad paid for by our parents. We agreed that we want similar things for our kids.

When we have kids, we discussed both of us working part-time, me being a full-time stay at home dad, and hiring a nanny. All three are options on the table that I think we would both be happy with, but we haven't decided on an actual action yet.

Edit: We were also encouraged to participate in extra-curricular activities but not required to. Our parents didn't buy us whatever we wanted - we drove beater cars until we could buy our own (we both bought used) and had very few toys as children.


StudentOfGab said:   Kanosh said:   Kids are a big deal. In my experience kids bring out a lot of differences in parenting styles, some of which spill over into the financial realm. A lot depends on how you and her were raised. What are your expectations -- private schools for the kids? Do you live or can you buy in an area with a great school district? Growing up, did she or you have a family environment where every desire was met? Or did you or her do chores and help with the family income? What do you and her expect to do upon having kids -- mom stays at home? You stay at home? Given that her income is higher and she likes to work she might expect to continue working while you stay at home. Have you discussed this with her?

We both went to public school and were expected to do very well in school by our parents. We were expected to do chores at home. We have similar morals, politics and religion. We didn't help with family income and had our undergrad paid for by our parents. We agreed that we want similar things for our kids.

When we have kids, we discussed both of us working part-time, me being a full-time stay at home dad, and hiring a nanny. All three are options on the table that I think we would both be happy with, but we haven't decided on an actual action yet.

Full time stay at home dad AND a nanny?

Wow.


mikef07 said:   StudentOfGab said:   Kanosh said:   Kids are a big deal. In my experience kids bring out a lot of differences in parenting styles, some of which spill over into the financial realm. A lot depends on how you and her were raised. What are your expectations -- private schools for the kids? Do you live or can you buy in an area with a great school district? Growing up, did she or you have a family environment where every desire was met? Or did you or her do chores and help with the family income? What do you and her expect to do upon having kids -- mom stays at home? You stay at home? Given that her income is higher and she likes to work she might expect to continue working while you stay at home. Have you discussed this with her?

We both went to public school and were expected to do very well in school by our parents. We were expected to do chores at home. We have similar morals, politics and religion. We didn't help with family income and had our undergrad paid for by our parents. We agreed that we want similar things for our kids.

When we have kids, we discussed both of us working part-time, me being a full-time stay at home dad, and hiring a nanny. All three are options on the table that I think we would both be happy with, but we haven't decided on an actual action yet.


Full time stay at home dad AND a nanny?

Wow.

Sorry, that wasn't very clear. There were 3 distinct options there:

1. Both part-time
2. Nanny
3. Stay at home dad

I didn't mean both options 2 and 3 at the same time. The list above is roughly ordered in what our joint preference seems to be right now.


Skipping 62 Messages...

whodini said:   A man is the head of the household regardless of his income. If the woman does not accept this,
he should take his hockey stick somewhere else and play. Plenty of fish in the sea.

Take your submissive, subservient crap and stick it.... somewhere.

DH and I met in high school. Throughout our dating, we shared expenses but had separate bank accounts. Neither of us had any money anyway. From day one of our marriage almost 33 years ago, whatever came into the house was ours. I was a SAHM and I could never understand other SAHMs who said that they felt bad spending "his" money on a gift for him for birthdays, Christmas, whatever. Never made sense to me.

And, for the record, neither of us said obey at the ceremony.




Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.

Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2013