• Page :
  • 1
  • Text Only
rated:

I have a family/financial issue that I am not sure how to deal with, and I thought it would be best to bring to you all, my most financially-saavy friends.

Short story: I feel that my father is gambling my parent's retirement savings on a few very risky stocks. He is quite stubborn and is not the type to take advice from anyone. He had a string of good luck with his stock-picking in the past, which is likely why he feels that he will be able to beat the averages. He is a good father, but this has been driving me nuts. He has a background in accounting, which makes it even harder to believe that he is taking these kind of risks.

Long story: In 2008 my father correctly timed the market bottom by a few months. He moved ALL of his/my mother's retirement savings from diversified mutual funds into individual stocks. The number of stocks that he is in at one time varies from 5 to 10, though usually it is heavily weighted towards two or three. His investment strategy was one of picking stocks that had been beaten down by the market.

For a while, this strategy worked REALLY well. From his initial starting point, the money had quadrupled by mid-2010. I believe he came to view himself as an expert capable of strategically selecting stocks at this time. Since then, it has been on a downhill slide and today stands at a number just greater than his initial starting point.

I have spoken to my dad about diversifying on a number of occasions, but my dad seems pretty convinced that he can do better than the market. If the money was only my father's I would have no problems letting him do his own thing with it. That is not the case, however, as my mother is nine years his junior. My mom is an amazing person, but her financial savvy is limited to things like getting deals on groceries, etc. I do not believe she fully understands the risks of her portfolio, and she does not want to get involved with what she views as my father's territory.

My father is now retired at age 63 while my mother is still working at age 54. My parents live a middle-class lifestyle and could be perfectly happy without a ton of money. It seems like there is very limited upside happiness-wise if the stocks do well, but there could be a lot of pain and suffering if they do not.

Has anyone here ever dealt with a similar situation? Is this any of my business to begin with? Thanks in advance for your help with this.

ConcernedSon


Member Summary
Most Recent Posts

And maybe OP enjoyed the level of support he received as a child because his grandfather didn't have a gambling addiction... (more)

Revike (May. 17, 2012 @ 10:10a) |

I wonder if he might be willing to diversify most of the money while leaving some amount - say, 10k - for use however he... (more)

JTausTX (May. 17, 2012 @ 10:55a) |

He can still have individual stocks if he wants, but he need to do it right and in the context of a diversified portfolio.... (more)

TravelerMSY (May. 17, 2012 @ 11:47a) |

 

  • Also categorized in:
Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

When looking for your next house, consider one with mother in law quarters or pool house.


ConcernedSon said:   ... however, as my mother is nine years his senior. <snip>
My father is now retired at age 63 while my mother is still working at age 54.

You probably meant "my mother is nine years his junior".


uutxs said:   
You probably meant "my mother is nine years his junior".

I did... fixed the OP.


How much money are we talking? What would happen to them financially if he lost all of the stock investments? Could they live off social security and whatever other retirement income they might have?
Do you have siblings? What do they think?
So starting from the bottom in '09 he quadrupled his money in a couple years and then a couple years later he was back to start? If so then he's drastically underperformed the market in the past couple years and underperformed the market as a whole. Does he realize that a simple index fund is beating him? Maybe you could point that out if not. If he does realize he's underperforming then he may just be like a delusional gambling addict and assume he's gonna hit the next big win any day now.


If your dad is stubborn and not going to take advice from anyone like you say then that pretty much answers what you can do about it.

Any sign of dementia? If so then you could maybe legally intervene and get the money taken out of his control. But it doesn't sound like thats the case here. (edit : plus I think it would likely have to be real solid medical grounds for that kinda thing, but I don't know the details)

Otherwise I'd just make sure he knows you won't bail him out after he pisses away all his money on stupid investments.


Before I reply, no, it's not any of your business if he's of sound mind and body. However...

Get him to talk about his results over the last three decades. If he's beaten 60/40 stocks/bonds on a buy and hold basis, then he can trade whatever he wants. One or two years doesn't matter.

Or I'll refer him to one of my relatives, who I recently found out got wiped out with a bunch of Enron stock he received as compensation from an acquisition. Great stock on paper, but ultimately worthless due to accounting fraud. He's still working at age 70.

The point being, he'd be retired now if he had been diversified.


jerosen said:   How much money are we talking? What would happen to them financially if he lost all of the stock investments? Could they live off social security and whatever other retirement income they might have?

I believe the amount is between $400-$500k. At one point, it was pushing $2MM.

If they lost the investments my parents would be able to scrape by but it would be a very meager existance. Besides Social Security they would not have any other income; that's my concern.

Two of my brothers are still at home, so they aren't really old enough to fully realize what's going on. My other brother is concerned just as I am but has been similarly unsuccessful at reasoning with my dad.


TravelerMSY said:   Before I reply, no, it's not any of your business if he's of sound mind and body. However...

Get him to talk about his results over the last three decades. If he's beaten 60/40 stocks/bonds on a buy and hold basis, then he can trade whatever he wants. One or two years doesn't matter.

He never traded individual stocks before December of 2008, so he doesn't have any track record. He was previously exclusively in mutual funds.

It's not my dad I am concerned about here, it is my mother. She will stand and not become involved with financial issues, so I feel some responsibility for her well-being. My mom does not have any significant savings of her own; they are all-in together.


Showing a slight gain from 2007 to 2010 aint bad. Does he actually have enough to reitre, or is he trying to make up for a lack of savings by seeking miraculous returns? If he has enough money to retire, I'd say he must have acted somewhat reasonably over the course of 40 years, there's no point in second guessing him now. If not, if he doesn't have enough money to retire, he needs to respond by having a job, saving aggressively, and postponing retirement. But... there's nothing you can do to make him do that. He has to decide to do it himself.


Here are my ideas (which are not neccessarily good ideas):


1. Give up and let him do what he wants. If you think you might end up supporting him, start saving a "dumb daddy retirement" fund.
2. Have him declared incompetent, snatch his money, stick it in tiered CDs. Get the stinkeye at family events.
3. Offer him access to the " super high performance dumb daddy money market fund" : He puts in money, you match a certain percentage then put it into tiered CDs, so that it come otu to, say, 7% guarranteed return. You get to lock his retirement funds into a safe vehicle, and it costs you a few percent of his retirement, instead of potentially costing you the entire cost of his retirement.


soundtechie said:   Does he actually have enough to reitre, or is he trying to make up for a lack of savings by seeking miraculous returns?

As of right now he could scrape by in retirement but it would really be no-frills. Any expensive medical bills could easily put them under given a bit of time.

I do think he is seeking very high returns. The stocks he is in typically trade at $1 - $3. He is not investing in profitable companies, he is really rolling the dice that the companies will turn around.


Yet another person making an alternate ID to hide their identity, then for some unknown reason feeling the need to tell everyone they're hiding their anonymous identity behind a new anonymous identity.... Why does everyone feel so compelled to say this? Is it because they really are new posters, and think claiming otherwise will somehow give them more validity?

To be brief, if your dad has other intentions than to preserve your inheritance, that's his business not yours.


Glitch99, I'm personally identifiable under my other name.

I don't expect any inheritance, nor do any of my brothers. I also don't want to pay for 15+ years of care for my mother because my dad made some risky investment choices.


How extensive have your conversations been with your mom? Have you been blunt about the potential outcomes? Even if she distances herself from the financial decision-making, surely she can understand how $500K -> $2Mil -> $500K represents a huge risk that one more negative miscalculation means $500K -> $0. How does she respond to Scenario #1 = scraping by on social security, and Scenario #2 = severe medical or other event creates big debt and reliance on children to support her for many years? Her silence enables these scenarios to become reality ...


ConcernedSon, Glitch's question wasn't just "why use an alt id?" it was "Why use an alt id then alert everyone that it is an alt id?" You've gone a step further and given us a new clue about your 'main' id.

I think it's weird too.


It sounds like a bit of a hobby to him. As a compromise, do you think you and your brothers, or your mother, could convince him to buy and hold and/or buy an annuity with most of the money, but let him use 10-20% of it to gamble with?


satchelsofgold- I think you are right in that he views it as a hobby. Your solution sounds like a reasonable one. I will bring it up with him to see what he says.

Revike- I don't know if my mom has really thought about what could happen. I'll try to bring it up without terrifying her.

Glitch and Tim- You guys are right, my ID is irrelevant. Can we let it go now please?


ConcernedSon said:   satchelsofgold- I think you are right in that he views it as a hobby. Your solution sounds like a reasonable one. I will bring it up with him to see what he says.

Revike- I don't know if my mom has really thought about what could happen. I'll try to bring it up without terrifying her.

Glitch and Tim- You guys are right, my ID is irrelevant. Can we let it go now please?


PM me son ... we can talk privately about this

you shouldn't be airing our family business in public


Call me a cynical skeptic, but I say TripleB is on a rampage of invented crisis scenarios. Within just two days, his 91-year old mom was run over, his wife is cheating on him with some guy in MI and his dad is risking (his other mom's) retirement savings.


ScrawneyWallet said:   Call me a cynical skeptic, but I say TripleB is on a rampage of invented crisis scenarios. Within just two days, his 91-year old mom was run over, his wife is cheating on him with some guy in MI and his dad is risking (his other mom's) retirement savings.
On the other side, Codename47 posted today after 2 years. What has been going on??


ScrawneyWallet said:   Call me a cynical skeptic, but I say TripleB is on a rampage of invented crisis scenarios. Within just two days, his 91-year old mom was run over, his wife is cheating on him with some guy in MI and his dad is risking (his other mom's) retirement savings.His billion-dollar IPO should be dropping any day now, too.


chaddi said:   ScrawneyWallet said:   Call me a cynical skeptic, but I say TripleB is on a rampage of invented crisis scenarios. Within just two days, his 91-year old mom was run over, his wife is cheating on him with some guy in MI and his dad is risking (his other mom's) retirement savings.
On the other side, Codename47 posted today after 2 years. What has been going on??
Full moon.


He earned it, he can do as he pleases with it. Sounds like this is more of a "there won't be anything left for me to inherit" issue.

Many years after retirement, my dad, always a prudent investor started chasing yield. I asked him what changed is investment philosophy and he said that he needed a certain return on his money to maintain his lifestyle and at his age, preservation of capital was not his primary objective. Hard to argue with that.


Your dad has told you all he doesn't want to listen to or take your advice.

Your mom has said this is your dad's territory and she is allowing him to take control of their finances.

They are adults, of sound mind, entitled to make their own decisions, and yes, that includes their own mistakes.

You've shared your concerns, you've been rebuffed. Personally, after airing my concerns out of love, I'd shut my trap and move on out of respect for them.


Thatsnotme said:   Your dad has told you all he doesn't want to listen to or take your advice.

Your mom has said this is your dad's territory and she is allowing him to take control of their finances.

They are adults, of sound mind, entitled to make their own decisions, and yes, that includes their own mistakes.

You've shared your concerns, you've been rebuffed. Personally, after airing my concerns out of love, I'd shut my trap and move on out of respect for them.

This.

Really, what can you do here? My folks are of the same age and my story is eerily similar to yours. Mix in maybe a bit more of a sense of entitlement and an irrational anger towards the federal government, and my folks are right there with yours.

I expressed my concern, but they retired early to the beach and are counting on a guaranteed return from the market in the short term to maintain their lifestyle.

I have no room for them in my house, so we'll cross that bridge when we get to it if it gets to that point.

Maybe we should form a support group?


parmenides said:   Thatsnotme said:   
I have no room for them in my house, so we'll cross that bridge when we get to it if it gets to that point.

You or the OP may not have any way to stop your parents' risky investments, but this is the reason why it is your business. If you know that in the case of investment failure you will be responsible for the financial support of your parents, it is certainly your business how your parents are investing their money.

My response is directed towards the people advising OP to butt out than towards the poster I quoted.


dukerau said:   parmenides said:   Thatsnotme said:   
I have no room for them in my house, so we'll cross that bridge when we get to it if it gets to that point.


You or the OP may not have any way to stop your parents' risky investments, but this is the reason why it is your business. If you know that in the case of investment failure you will be responsible for the financial support of your parents, it is certainly your business how your parents are investing their money.

Yes, agreed, in a perfect world. However, the situation the OP has expressed (and my comments too) reflect an imperfect scenario. There is no pre-planning which can take place because both parties are not at the table. It takes a good-faith effort on both sides to come to terms here.

However, as OP and I are discovering (I think) what we mean by "good Son" is not necessarily what out parents think the term means. So, we go into contingency mode. Unless we're going to completely walk away, contingency mode means to "be there" as any good family member would do for another, given an uncertain and unknown future.

I think this just means that for OP and I there will be a rocky ride ahead, not of our doing, and not as we would have planned things. Such is life at times, correct?


I think the best suggestion here is to suggest investing a large chunk of the money in safer investments, and having some percentage - ideally 1/5, but even up to half would probably work it sounds like - of "play money".

Tell him up front that you know it's his money and he can do what he wants with it, but that you want to be a good son and support him if something happens, and because of that he's putting an unnecessarily high risk on your shoulders. Play to his ego some, saying he most likely can pick good stocks, but that the market is really uncertain right now and it's not worth risking their whole future. If it really does go well then even with a smaller percentage in stocks he should be able to grow some nice money, whereas if the stock market crashes again they'll still be fine. Something like that.


Thatsnotme said:   Your dad has told you all he doesn't want to listen to or take your advice.

Your mom has said this is your dad's territory and she is allowing him to take control of their finances.

They are adults, of sound mind, entitled to make their own decisions, and yes, that includes their own mistakes.

You've shared your concerns, you've been rebuffed. Personally, after airing my concerns out of love, I'd shut my trap and move on out of respect for them.

The father's actions do not reflect a sound mind - he is gambling with his and his wife's future. The mother does not need to be harangued, but it does not sound like the seriousness of possible worst-case scenarios has been presented to her or considered by her. The obvious outcome of a miscalculation by the father is that the son ends up supporting his parents for an extended time, an outcome that is entirely preventable if the father's gambling can be curtailed.

The son has specifically stated he is not interested in an inheritance, he may be lying but there's nothing to support that assumption. Odds are his mom will outlive his dad and hopefully be around for several more decades. Arranging for her support during that time is the father's responsibility. He is running a significant risk of dumping that responsibility onto the son, so it is the son's business and it is preventable at this point.

If the father's car was in a dangerous condition because he neglected to take proper safety/maintenance precautions despite his son's warnings, and the mother said "well, he's in charge of the car stuff, not my business", should the son shut his trap when they plan to set off on a cross-country trip?


ConcernedSon said:   Is this any of my business to begin with?

ConcernedSon

I vote no, you expressed your feelings now let it go.

If you have to support your mother for 15 years so be it - you didn't support yourself until you were 15.


chaddi said:   ScrawneyWallet said:   Call me a cynical skeptic, but I say TripleB is on a rampage of invented crisis scenarios. Within just two days, his 91-year old mom was run over, his wife is cheating on him with some guy in MI and his dad is risking (his other mom's) retirement savings.
On the other side, Codename47 posted today after 2 years. What has been going on??

Easy: TripleB was finally able to hack into CN47's stagnant account.


Also, unless I missed it, you don't mention whether your mother is contributing to a retirement account. Can she set money aside in a 401(k) while she's still working? How long does she plan to keep working?


BrlDsguise said:   ConcernedSon said:   Is this any of my business to begin with?

ConcernedSon

I vote no, you expressed your feelings now let it go.

If you have to support your mother for 15 years so be it - you didn't support yourself until you were 15.

And maybe OP enjoyed the level of support he received as a child because his grandfather didn't have a gambling addiction and didn't saddle OP's parents with an unnecessary financial burden.

Curious whether OP has a family. The father's irresponsibility is likely to impact them significantly if OP ends up supporting his parents for an extended time.

The fact that the worst-case scenario is entirely preventable is the maddening aspect. Millions of responsible retired people would kill to have $500K to finance their retirement, and here is a guy who, given enough time, is more than likely to flush that amount down the toilet ...


I wonder if he might be willing to diversify most of the money while leaving some amount - say, 10k - for use however he wishes. That way he still gets to play the stock pick game and preserve his wealth against a bad choice.


He can still have individual stocks if he wants, but he need to do it right and in the context of a diversified portfolio. I hope he doesn't learn that the hard way. Living off social security is the consolation prize if he busts out.

Get him some portfolio management books at the next present-giving occasion. And a stock picking one too, so it won't seem like you're manipulating him. I recommend "Pioneering Portfolio Management" by Swensen and for individual stocks, "Yes you too can be a stock market genius" by Greenblatt. Sorry for the title, but it is one of the best stock books around.




Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.

Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2013