• Go to page :
  • 1 2345
  • Text Only

Update 12/22/03 The accounts have all been reopened. See the 12/22 post below for more details.


First, the problem. I received a call this morning to call American Express.

I promptly returned that call to 800-230-1289 which is the "Financial Review Department." I was told that they need financial statements to support my recent spending. Additionally, I was in violation of the terms of use for new Business line of credit account, because I'd netted $68,000 in spending during the last billing cycle, while having a credit limit of $25,000. (At first, they suggested that my blue line was in violation of this term of use also, but then retracted that when I pointed out that the line had been moved.)

I was then told that within 15 days, they would require that they receive 2002 tax returns, all pages of personal and business bank account statements for 3 months, and W2s. If I didn't get these to them, they would close all my accounts.

Moreover, as of the phone call, all of my accounts would be frozen until this matter was resolved! any charges which had been approved would go through, while any charges posting after today would not.

This will be a BIG problem, as I have several different AMEX accounts which include automatic billing.

I have good reasons for the excess billing on the business LOC, which is used for closing real estate deals and facilitating those transactions. Moreover, I didn't even realize that there was any issue about limits on a LOC (as apposed to a credit card)--I'll have to check my terms of use when I get home, and will update the post then.

In the meantime, I want to call the department back and speak to someone about clearing this up, without jeopardizing my position. Any advice that forum members would have would be most appreciated!


Edit by Moderator: Thank you for your participation. Please note that there is also discussion about a similar topic Here.


Mod: thank you for reopening this thread!

All: this is a VERY DIFFERENT incident from the one in the lowering AMEX credit thread. There, we were worried about lines getting too large and AMEX cracking down. Here, ironically, the allegation is that a BUSINESS LINE (not CC) wasn't large enough (since when does a business line not get paid up and down all the time...?)

I will be calling AMEX ASAP, hopefully tomorrow, to get to the bottom of this. What I'd very much appreciate in the meantime is any experience, links, advice, useful contact people, etc. for resolving this as amicably and quickly as possible. TIA!

And in the meantime, I suggest we DON'T PRE-PAY and spend over your limit with Amex, EVEN IF IT'S AN LOC!!!


That's very strange behavior from AMEX!

6 weeks ago I called to get my spending limit on the CostCo Business Card (charge card) raised from 27k to 40k. At that time I explicitly asked, on different calls, if I can spend more than that amount by pre-paying midcycle. On each occasion I was told that prepaying would allow me to spend more than my spending limit and that it would be OK to do so. I then proceeded to spend 43k and 47k in my September and October billing cycles.

Sorry I can't be of help telling you what to do but wanted to share that AMEX does allow charging higher amounts than the credit line allows.

Did you obtain this LoC just recently? Looks to me as if AMEX is concerned that you launder money and thus want the statements due to your spending being almost 3x higher than your credit.


I read about a similar problem with AMEX... wish I could find the thread. The end result is that the issue was not resolved to the satisfaction of the customer.


The Patriot Act rears it's ugly head yet again!

This obviously isnt an issue of spending or credit line being too big and them getting worried. Considering you were able to pre-pay large amounts of cash, they cant be worried about large spending and then defaulting. I think they are worried you are using the money in an illegal enterprise.

Remember, any bank transaction over $3000 can trigger a SAR (suspicious activity report) and all transactions over 10k (or that 'appear to be close, but avoiding the 10k mark' as stated in the Patriot Act) get one AND several other reports. It's funny that we really dont think of credit card companies as banks, but of course we all know they are, and thus subject to the Patriot Act.


mephisto, thanks for the helpful data point. It suggests the initial claim is all the more implausible.

Crazytree, do you mean a thread other than the one the moderator linked?

Palador, your explanation certainly makes more sense than what I was told, and is consistant with mephisto's experience.

I'm now home, and spent the first 10 minutes combing the complete terms of the card. It's available at http://www.dhanson.net/Amex-tou.pdf for anyone who's interested. The most germaine passage says,

<< You may send us more than the minimum payment, pay us before the payment is due, pay more than once a month, or pay off your balance entirely without any prepayment penalty. You may not however, pay us with a check drawn against your Account or any other account issued by us. >>

How I was supposed to interpret this agreement as prohibiting my conduct is beyond me--especially when it's issued to a real-estate business in the first place, which will often have high-dollar transactions by its very nature.

Also irritating but unsurprising: no one will ever communicate with you in writing on stuff like this. I asked if they would send their request in writing, and was told they would send something, but it would say "you need to call us" and that's it.


sorry


I had a similar situation with my AMEX Starwood card. We put an auto down-payment on the card (for the points) and did an online payment that night for the whole amount. A week later (still same billing cycle) my card gets declined for dinner (very embarrasing). I am pissed because at this point the card actually had no balance at all. I call AMEX and they say that I used up my limit for that billing cycle and it didn't matter what my balance was. I had to put the card away for a week until it could be used again.

You would think they would offer to raise the limit but didn't...thanks AMEX


Dave, I think you and I and everyone else knows that when CSRs allege TOS violations, fraud. "abuse", or whatever other scary word they feel will convey seriousness, you can basically flush their whole comment down the toilet.

Exceeding credit limits on CC midcycle (even when making prepayments) is always risky, especially with AMEX and their actions reported in the linked thread....however, with a line of credit, if payments are made before more funds are drawn, I cant see a problem.

If I understand what happened to you DH, This is just like if I had a $100k HELOC, I draw out $75k to buy a condo, payback the $75k, then draw out $90k to buy another one (all during the same month)....I may have drawn 165k that month on the HELOC, but at any one time I never exceeded the max limit.

This all being said, AMEX is going to do whatever it pleases. You triggered a flag, and If they dont like your usage patterns, they will cut you off. If you never exceeded the credit line at any particular time, I would only speak to the highest level manager and get them to explain exactly what has happened and why they are taking action on a line that was maintained below its limit at all times. Hopefully someone with a brain will look at the activity and see everything is fine. But they may still want to see financials (and Im guessing their terms allow such a request). If you did exceed the limit, count on cutting ties with AMEX unless you plan on providing financials.

Personally, I wouldnt have even returned the initial phone call. And I certainly wouldnt provide financials. But thats just me.

From this and the linked thread, all I can say is be VERY careful dealing with AMEX and dont get flagged as a risk, lest they start hassle and demanding docs....


nhokt said:

<< I had a similar situation with my AMEX Starwood card. We put an auto down-payment on the card (for the points) and did an online payment that night for the whole amount. A week later (still same billing cycle) my card gets declined for dinner (very embarrasing). I am pissed because at this point the card actually had no balance at all. I call AMEX and they say that I used up my limit for that billing cycle and it didn't matter what my balance was. I had to put the card away for a week until it could be used again.

You would think they would offer to raise the limit but didn't...thanks AMEX
>>


I hate their stupid spending limit policy...because amazon.com canceled an order for $500+ and that counts against my spending limit for the month even though Amazon credited the amount back to my card. In Amex's eyes it's already been used. UGH.

So even though my limit is $4000 and I only have $500 in actual charges, the stupid card only shows $2500 in remaining credit. I don't even know what other charges they're tabbing in their head but it's horrible that they're doing this...I think they counted a refund I got from COMPUSA towards my limit. How this makes sense to them is beyond me.


SIS,

<< I think you and I and everyone else knows that when CSRs allege TOS violations, fraud. "abuse", or whatever other scary word they feel will convey seriousness, you can basically flush their whole comment down the toilet. >>

LOL! Perhaps I am naive about this. I actually wondered whether I was in some kind of technical non-compliance, but after reviewing the TOS, I don't think can't for the life of me figure out what it would be...

<< however, with a line of credit, if payments are made before more funds are drawn, I cant see a problem. >>

Agreed. It never even occurred to me that this would be a problem with a LOC.

<< If I understand what happened to you DH, This is just like if I had a $100k HELOC, I draw out $75k to buy a condo, payback the $75k, then draw out $90k to buy another one (all during the same month)....I may have drawn 165k that month on the HELOC, but at any one time I never exceeded the max limit. >>

Precisely. The limit was never exceeded, which they conceded.

<< Hopefully someone with a brain will look at the activity and see everything is fine. But they may still want to see financials (and Im guessing their terms allow such a request). >>

They do, per the PDF file I posted.

<< Personally, I wouldnt have even returned the initial phone call. And I certainly wouldnt provide financials. But thats just me. >>

So then, do you see the threat as an empty one, that should have been ignored? Or would you just run the risk that they'd cut you off?

<< From this and the linked thread, all I can say is be VERY careful dealing with AMEX and dont get flagged as a risk, lest they start hassle and demanding docs.... >>

Amen.

Thanks for your thoughts, and I will keep the board posted on what develops today.


DaveHanson said:

<< So then, do you see the threat as an empty one, that should have been ignored? Or would you just run the risk that they'd cut you off? >>

Was there a balance outstanding when they called? Or was it paid down? I;m guessing there was a balance...and at any rate, I would pay it down to 0 before calling in!

I wouldnt necessarily describe their call as an empty threat, but a flag probably popped up and they started their procedure: "contact the client, request docs, freeze lines, etc"...I would have just paid the line down. I think that would have solved the problem and the further steps would have dropped off the "to do" list. I know how employees are soooo lazy and just hate to have to do things such as follow up, generate a letter, etc., and paying it down likely would have averted further action. I dont think theyd cut me off...but now youre on "step 3" of their program, instead of step 1...

Good luck and keep us posted..


Prepayment to AMEX does not increase your credit limit. The way AMEX has set up their processing, the prepayment is not credited to your account until the end of the cycle (although they do cash your cheque into their accounts immediately).

However, their credit limit systems are "real time" ... and unfortunately some people get nailed by that. Although most of the time, AMEX allows a certain tolerance before cracking down on people.


gr!


My experience with prepaying AMEX cards and exceeding the CL is that officially (i.e. if you speak to a CSR) they don't allow it, but the computer lets it through in certain cases. In DH's case the amount may have been large enough to attract somebody's attention.


Just curious... but are you a platinum or centurion card member?

(i know your probably not a centurion, the annual fee is $2500 and doesnt pay for itself like the platinum does, purely status symbol)

But if so, I would pull that card out and call plat customer service manager (they are different divisions I beleive). I cant see them treating a platinum cardmember that way.


Thanks for the replies all.

SIS, thanks for clarifying. There was an outstanding balance, around $19K. If I had had the capacity to pay it down online before calling in, I probably would have, except that it honestly didn't occur to me what they were calling about. I do have a BT in progress that will effectively pay it down shortly...

I can certainly see why my case attracted attention if this is a prohibition of theirs. And, while AMEX never said anything in writing about this, other threads here did warn us that such behavior wasn't tolerated on their credit cards. But it just didn't occur to me that a line of credit would act this way. I feel a little stupid about not guessing this might happen anyway--I was trying to pull off both a BT and a RE close, and wasn't thinking about it--too used to the way EVERY OTHER LOC I've ever used behaves!

The unfortunate thing here is that AMEX LOC would otherwise be PERFECT for quickly accessing BTs. Virtually every CC will BT to AMEX electronically, so it's painless. Then, checks allow you to redeploy the BT proceeds immediately. But clearly it should only be done in doses small enough to steer clear of their rule.


Palador, I'm neither a Platinum nor Centurion member--I have Costco Business, Blue, Cash Rebate, and Business LOC.

I confirmed that all the cards were frozen today. An AMEX supervisor from another division did indicate that I'm not tagged for fraud or anything, but that it's company wide policy to not allow charges that total more than the card's limit. She indicated that if I comply with the request, this would likely be over quickly, and I could call her back if I had problems...I will probably call a senior supervisor in that dept per SIS's suggestion tomorrow, and see what happens.


Dave, another concern I just thought of is that if you are playing the BT game with other AMEX products they are likely very concerned that you are paying one AMEX bill with funds from another AMEX account....it is VERY risky to be BTing the AMEX CCs and LOCs simultaneously....I dont know if you were doing that, but remember not try not take actions that could resemble paying one line off by chsrging another line in the future (if you maitain your relationship with them)...


AMEX must be scrutinizing their cardholders accounts more than they used to do.

I got a call from an AMEX rep about a month ago wanting financial statements, etc. I declined to provide them. The concern was that the balance owed for the past three months had ranged from $60K to $90K - this was the total between the prior month balance (before the due date) and the current month's charges. It had been ranging between $40K and $70K over the past year. This is on the regular AX card that does not have a pre-set credit limit.

I told them that I was perfectly willing to switch my charges to MBNA - who keep upping my credit limit though I hardly charge anything to the card. They then gave me a spiel about how much they valued my business, etc.

They acknowledged that I had paid the balance in time every month and there were no delinquencies. They said it was more to do with it being a business decision as to the level of exposure that they were willing to absorb without some documentation to show that I could support this level of debt.

The arrangement that I reached with them was that I would not exceed a balance of $50K outstanding at any point without first clearing it with them and that I could make interim payments during the month to keep the balance below this limit. I have been doing this without any arousing any questions. The AMEX rep told me that there are other card holders who do this with their accounts.

They also told me that the Blue Card which has a $25K limit was not part of the $50K limit mentioned above. So I could, in effect, go as high as $75K between the two cards. The information regarding charges for a particular month not exceeding the limit for the Blue card is certainly useful because I did not know that AMEX frowns on charges n excess of the limit even if the balance stays within the limit through interim payments on account.

If I was willing to provide financial statements, they would remove the limit. I felt that their position was reasonable. If I went to my bank and asked for a LOC of $100K I would have to provide a financial statement. I think what bothered me is that given the fact that I had the card with AMEX for the best part of 20 years without a single late payment, it seemed a bit needless to suddenly want a financial statement.


ranajo said:

<< AMEX must be scrutinizing their cardholders accounts more than they used to do.

I got a call from an AMEX rep about a month ago...

...it seemed a bit needless to suddenly want a financial statement.
>>

Ahh... it was October 1st of 2003 (a deadline I believe) that the Patriot Act restrictions went into effect at American Express and many other major banks.

I could definitely see cardmembers being overly questioned in the late September/October period because of the new laws.

You used to be able to refuse your SSN and DOB when you applied for a card if you threw a fuss. (both are accessable through your credit report with just a name and address, and if they cant positively identity you, they'll call and get them) Now you can't, they just wont take it if you refuse either.


DWJoe said:

<< My experience with prepaying AMEX cards and exceeding the CL is that officially (i.e. if you speak to a CSR) they don't allow it, but the computer lets it through in certain cases. >>

Yeah, I spend 600% of my Starwood CL in each of two consecutive months and never ran into any problems, but I dont use for everyday usage so might have inadvertently avoided times when it was frozen for a few days.


SIS, that's a good point. I used a couple of blue BT promo checks recently too, so perhaps that's another source of their worry. I do want to keep my relationship with them, it's much more important than BofI was, for instance (and relations haven't deteriorated nearly that much either.)

One thing frustrating about all this is that you're just never told anything about what their worry even is. I would be happy to try to address the concern were it ever articulated--long term readers here know I'd probably do it ad nausea, LOL --but you can't answer when you don't know what's really at issue.


ranajo, great post! Who did you deal with to reach this accommodation? I'm impressed you were able to come to a meeting of minds with them on something like this!


If you do intend to provide financials, you should also demand they raise the LOC limit so as not ro run into similar problems in the future...I wouldnt provide docs just to maintain the same line they extended without docs....


I got a call from MBNA yesterday. Even after my extensive questioning, she did not admit she calls because I spent and paid off double amount of credit line this month but this was obvious. She did not say I did something illegal either. At some point, her questions went like this:
Q: What is your annual income?
A: XXX
Q:So in the last, 3 months you spent x% of your annual income, is this correct?
A: Sounds about right
Q: Hmmm (pregnant pause here). Now, how much of it were business expenses?
A: Just about all
Q: (sight of relief)
Questioning abruptly stopped here and she ended up giving me 25% cl increase.
She was looking for a credible explanation of excessive spending in comparison to my last year's income. She went away when she found plausible explanation.


Dave re ranajo, great post! Who did you deal with to reach this accommodation? I'm impressed you were able to come to a meeting of minds with them on something like this!

I do not recall the name of the person who I spoke to - she was not the usual customer service rep but was likely from some other department that has responsibility for risk management as it relates to accounts that are showing spending patterns that could lead to exposure - whether finanacial or legal ie the Patriot Act.

Keep in mind that the call pertained to the card that does not have a pre-set credit limit. I really did not negotiate with them per se. I declined to provide financial statements and informed them that if it was a precondition to the continued use of the credit card, I'd just take my business elsewhere. They were the ones who suggested payments on account to keep the balance at the agreed limit of $50K. The only negotiating that I did do was they first wanted to limit the balance to $40K and asked if that would be acceptable to me. I asked if $50K would be feasible and they said that would be fine. As I mentioned in my earlier post, they also indicated that if I needed to go above that level, I should could call for approval.

You should be aware that this lady said that other customers do the same thing ie make payments on account to reduce the balance owed. I assume - based on what you said - that this is not on cards that have pre-authorized spending limits, such as the Blue Card.

Also, I seem to recall that someone posted on another thread that when his balance reached over $100K, he was asked to make a payment on account.

As a business decision, I cannot quarrel with AMEX or any other lender requiring financial information if one is going to have a substantial balance outstanding.


SIS, how do you go about suggesting I "demand" an LOC increase? Or do you simply mean stipulate before sending the stuff in that I'm doing for purposes of supporting an LOC that lets me do what I need to do? I am planning on complying with their request, and I do agree that coupling a limit increase request with this seems reasonable and prudent... My hesitation is that some staffer there might use the financials to go fishing for a reason to justify a crackdown of some sort. But then I guess I can't really control that, it just means I'll need to get the Executive Assistant, etc. looking into it for me and hope for the best.


DWooley, thanks for your experience. It seems to me that that is the way things like this should probably work. I can understand why they won't admit much over the phone due to fear of being sued, but when they get a reasonable explanation, there's no evidence of anything illicit, and things like credit reports and payment history all look good, then they should stay their freezes and restrictive procedures.


ranajo, thanks. Any info at all that you could tell me about how you reached this person would be most appreciated.

While the account that bothered them did have a pre-set limit (the BLOC), I have a 10-month history of paying off medium-to-large monthly charges on the Coscto charge card as well.


The bottom line is, I do want this relationship to continue, and would be willing to accommodate some inconvenience and even grilling if it would produce results.


Sorry, double post


DaveHanson said:

<< SIS, how do you go about suggesting I "demand" an LOC increase? Or do you simply mean stipulate before sending the stuff in that I'm doing for purposes of supporting an LOC that lets me do what I need to do? . >>

Explain that you dont wish to encounter these types of problems when you kept the LOC below its limit at all times, and did not do anything improper. Mention that other creditors would be more than happy to have this business, and that once you provide financials you expect to have the credit line increased so that there will be no future risk of similar problems...Similar to what ranajo posted...


OK SIS, that's roughly what I was thinking also Thanks. Will probably reach them today.


Dave re Any info at all that you could tell me about how you reached this person would be most appreciated

I am sorry but I cannot be of help to you regarding this given that some one from AMEX called me. She did not seem to be the regular customer service rep just based on her questions and level of knowledge.


That makes sense ranajo. It's unfortunate that someone didn't see fit to call me, like they did you.


any updates DH?


Sure, here's where things are at...

On Wednesday, BTs from other banks were put through. Then on Thursday, AMEX bounced the one check that was outstanding prior to the phone call to me for $6,000. As a result, I not only owe nothing on the line, but they owe me $6,000--more than I'm carrying on all my other AMEX lines combined.

I spoke with a woman from the Executive Assistant's office on Tuesday. She indicated that my account wasn't marked fraudulent--just a hold--and given that I'd been a good customer and had nothing to hide, I should be able to get this over with quickly by simply giving them what they wanted. She gave me her personal extension and said she'd be willing to help me follow up later.

I asked if they'd pulled a credit report, and said I wanted to know because I'm in the RE business, and want to guard my score jealously to keep A+ rates, and that many inquiries were the reason my score had dropped from the 750-760s to 718. At that moment she spontaneously revealed that "I must be very on top of my credit score, because it's a 716 here in our notes." She didn't know if it was a hard or a soft, but I'm 99% sure that they couldn't have obtained the actual score unless it was a hard inq.

I add this detail because of the next call I made to the Financial Review dept on Friday morning (I was busy with work between then and Thursday). This time I reached a woman who was more helpful than the first woman in FR. When I asked her if they had pulled a hard or a soft with equifax, she said that they couldn't reveal this information because they were not a credit bureau (lol.) She also said that not only accounts with me primary, but ALL AMEX accounts where I was even an AU were now "on hold"--without so much as notification from the bank. (Nice, though not unexpected.) She went on to say that once the docs are in, they say it takes 5-10 days to review, but it is often much quicker. She also said I'd been "an outstanding customer with us for a long time," and that I shouldn't be overly concerned. When I explained that it didn't seem appropriate to lock down my accounts given all this, she readily and politely answered that we'd be glad to see AMEX being so vigilant about monitoring the accounts if we ever had our account compromised (yeah, that's analogous.). She really was a nice person--she listened, took time, answered precisely what she could, and admitted when she DID know answers, but still couldn't tell me them. She gave me some advice as to what to include and what omit in the documents I faxed, and she thought my explanation was reasonable, and strongly encouraged me to include that. She was also obviously very well coached in precisely how to handle these matters.

Also Friday, I got letters to from AMEX for each of my accounts, all dated 11/17. They read,

<< We have an important business matter to discuss with you concerning your American Express account(s). We have been unable to reach you by telephone and need to speak with you to update our records. As a result, new charges will be declined on the account(s) listed above. It is important that you contact us immediately. Please call us today.... >>

Friday afternoon, I faxed 67 pages to them: a 5 page cover letter, complete financials, a statement of assets, and several other related documents.
I will keep you all posted as new developments arise. I honestly am not sure how they'll react, but I have a couple of options available if the reaction isn't favorable.


your detailed posts here and willingness to share your efforts to resolve this will no doubt help others who find themselves in this situation...at least in this forum, theres no such thing as providing too much detail abotu a situation (with the exception of providing your confidential/idenitification info)

However, in communications with AMex, my position would be the "less said, the better", but thats just how I choose to handle things. Companies, courts, etc. all HATE to receive long letters/statements. I know your financials are fairly complex, thus your explanation of the flow of funds, but if I were to provide financials, I would simply provide them with only my request for the line increase so as to avoid any future problems.

Its frankly none of AMex's business what kind of RE profit you are making, what other lines of credit you are using, etc. If they cant figure that out themself by looking at your credit, I wouldnt hand it to them. Thanks for keeping us updated, I'm interested to see whether AMEX actually pays attention to what you submitted, or if they just decide you are too "complex" of a customer and that its a better business decision to cut you off and focus on simple consumers who pay more interest at higher APRs....


Thanks for your thoughts SIS.

Your point about providing more info rather than less is well taken. And perhaps I should have omitted the details of the recent RE transaction. My thinking there was basically (1) I want to prove this is viable business activity, not laundering, and more important (2) it's worth giving a line increase on, since it's not overly risky yet demonstrably profitable.

The reason I erred on the side of providing more has to do with what the other AMEX folks told me to do. My thinking is that if they have more rather than less, I can credibly say that I've gone out of my way to do everything they've asked all at once, and that I've absolutely nothing to hide.

<< I'm interested to see whether AMEX actually pays attention to what you submitted, or if they just decide you are too "complex" of a customer and that its a better business decision to cut you off and focus on simple consumers who pay more interest at higher APRs. >>

Ah, there's the rub alright. Let's just say that if they did that, without giving me a chance to play by their undisclosed rules, after everything they've represented and done to me, they will hear more about it than a long, boring letter.


SUCKISSTAPLES said:

<< Thanks for keeping us updated, I'm interested to see whether AMEX actually pays attention to what you submitted, or if they just decide you are too "complex" of a customer and that its a better business decision to cut you off and focus on simple consumers who pay more interest at higher APRs.... >>

I dont think that will happen.

AMEX makes more on DH (discount rates anyone?) that it makes on a dozen Blue cardholders who pay 15% habitually. I mean, that amount of cash is impressive. Even for AMEX platinum holders, if you had a plat DH, you would be invited for the Centurion guaranteed. 6 figures a month is nothing to shy at.

If I were you DH, I'd put down $300 on an AMEX Biz Plat. It can easily pay for itself... not to mention I think you'd be getting better treatment.


Palador said:

<< If I were you DH, I'd put down $300 on an AMEX Biz Plat. It can easily pay for itself... not to mention I think you'd be getting better treatment. >>

I got an offer for $175/year for platinum somewhere...need to see what that was all about...


Thanks Palador, but I might have mislead you--I do 6 figures of business with them in a year, but not in a month...

Having said that, I do make a respectable profit for them. I've yet to need a BVG, I pay electronically, I do pay lots of promotional interest (eg at 3.9-5%). I've also never had any incident with them before, so I'd hope they wouldn't be too eager to sever ties.


Dave Hanson, I posted this on another thread but since you raised the issue in the first place I thought that I would post it on this thread as well.

I just called AMEX to ascertain their policy regarding this matter: I gave them a specific example which entailed purchases of $25K during the first 10 days of the billing cycle (my credit limit is $25K). I then pay down the balance by $20K and make purchases of $18K. My balance has stayed within the $25K credit limit the whole time but I have actually made purchases of $43K during a billing cycle. After initially stating that this ought not to be a problem, the rep said that she was going to check with her supervisor. I was then told that it would not be permissible to do so because it would be a potential violation of the Patriot Act and could conceal money laundering.

Pelador was correct when he posted that this added scrutiny seems to be related to the Patriot Act.


Hey ranajo-- Thanks for the research. I find this whole trend disturbing. I totally understand companies assessing risk, but I do not understand how this relates to money laundering. Can anyone explain it to me? Other credit cards have always released credit upon receipt of payment. There's no currency (cash) involved. (I assume DH is not sending AMEX envelopes stuffed with twenties)

Part of the problem is that (even well-meaning) phone reps often dispense misinformation. Call 3 times and get 3 different
answers. I have to believe that AMEX is concerned with exposure and that this does not relate to money laundering fears.
Or am I missing something?


ranajo said:

<< Dave Hanson, I posted this on another thread but since you raised the issue in the first place I thought that I would post it on this thread as well.

I just called AMEX to ascertain their policy regarding this matter: I gave them a specific example which entailed purchases of $25K during the first 10 days of the billing cycle (my credit limit is $25K). I then pay down the balance by $20K and make purchases of $18K. My balance has stayed within the $25K credit limit the whole time but I have actually made purchases of $43K during a billing cycle. After initially stating that this ought not to be a problem, the rep said that she was going to check with her supervisor. I was then told that it would not be permissible to do so because it would be a potential violation of the Patriot Act and could conceal money laundering.

Pelador was correct when he posted that this added scrutiny seems to be related to the Patriot Act.
>>

I called MBNA and asked them the very same question. No problem at all to use the credit line over and over again after paying it off within the same billing cycle.


Skipping 145 Messages...

steveme said: So they cancelled my accounts due to documents not received. Which is a lie because I faxed in two sets of documents which they have no record of. Questions..

Will my membership rewards points go away? Should I transfer them now.
I would transfer them away. I don't believe that you'll get to keep them with your accounts closed.




Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2012