I still use quicken 2002 deluxe. I used Money until 1997 and found it more intuitive, but switched because several providers at that time offered quicken but not money data.
The last quicken v. Money we had was over 18 months ago, here . With lots of folks thinking of upgrading soon, I'm hoping the time is ripe for a new go-around.
I'm tired of recurring downloading issues with quicken. I'm also hopeful that 2002 quicken data should be handled competently by a 2005 money program. Here are factors I've considered (no doubt I'm missing some):
Money Premium 2005 seems to get the better reviews over Quicken Premier 2005. Here is the most recent example I've seen. I especially like the greater customizability. Of course these more expensive versions of these packages may not be worth the cost...
Neither 2005 product should be adopted for at least a few more months. Newsgroups and reviews alike indicate that early adopters of these new versions of these at their peril.
Quicken ineptly handles CDs and simple interest loans. For a previous FW discussion of the CD issue, see here
How much will tax software issues complicate a switch. I've used turbotax for the last several years, and like being able to import data over...perhaps switching to Money would make that conversion problematic...?
Handling very complex finances easily is a big plus. I have many bank accounts, several rental properties, a couple of businesses, and various assets to track. I'm constantly getting the "too many tabs" error message in Quicken. I don't know if Money does this better or not...
Here are 2005 and 2004 comparisons of the MS Money products (thanks tivo1).
TIA for your insights!
giddemyer
Member
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 9:17a
Good post Dave, I am still using Quicken 2001 Deluxe because there has been no compelling reason for me to upgrade. When I recently looked at the latest versions, I decided it would have to be Money 2005 if I upgraded because of the lack of QIF support for most account types in Quicken 2005.
I know this isn't a issue for most users, but my main bank, Commerce Bank in St. Louis, does not offer OFX (or Web Connect) downloads yet.
TheGrayMan
Tired Member
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 11:13a
Interesting thread. I'm using Quicken Deluxe 2004 for Windows and there is definitely room for improvement.
Reviewers have absolutely trashed MS Money 2005 on Amazon. One relevent excerpt from a review (note: I have not verified this myself): First there is a new Internet Services Policy you must agree to. It starts out with "Microsoft® Money 2005 includes up to two (2) years of Internet-based Services. You will be able to use the Internet-based Services in Microsoft Money 2005 for a period of two (2) years from installation of the product or until September 1, 2007, whichever is earlier." **** In two years you can not perform online banking!!!
$7.xx for deluxe at target (maybe get 12.00 back with MIR) http://www.fatwallet.com/forums/messageview.php?catid=18&threadid=372433&start=0
I think im going to pick it up... Hopefully it will do what i need... any of the finance guys have coments about 2004 deluxe? - i just platinum were cheaper.. seems like it has some nice features!
zender
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 11:53a
TheGrayMan said: Reviewers have absolutely trashed MS Money 2005 on Amazon.This happens every year at Amazon and I don't put much credence in the reviews. It seems to be a matter of a large and prolific pro-Quicken, anti-Microsoft contingent at work.
The most recent PC Magazine review gave the nod to Money in a heads up comparison study.
I've never used Quicken, been using Money for awhile now. The only problems I have with Money are budgeting. Here are a couple examples, I upgraded to the '04 version from '01 hoping it would fix it. My memory might be a little rusty on these since I gave up on getting it working.
Budgets with paycheck feature. This is done with the recurring bills/deposits. Really only useful for salaried people, you can setup your check to keep track of how much you deduct for taxes, 401-k, health, etc. The problem is that your budgeting numbers get off when you start transferring money to non-budget accounts (like a 401-k), etc. Then you have to add in phantom money in your check to make up for Money's refusal to let you manually adjust the amounts. I don't know if that makes sense to anyone who hasn't tried it. Rather than basing your budget on the net income, Money bases the budget on the gross income, so you think you have a ton of money left-over -- when you don't.
Student loan accounts. I have three separate school loans all though the same institution. I write one check which covers the payment amount on all three loans. In Money I have set this up as 3 separate accounts, since they have different interest rates, payment amounts, etc. The problem is that I can't split up my transaction to go to three separate loans/accounts. I had to setup a dummy account that the money was "transferred" to, from which I could then apply the different amount to the different three loans.
Anyway, I am definitely not using the full power of this package since I can't get it to work how I want. Just my 2 cents.
I'm currently using Quicken Deluxe 2003. I've been a Quicken user for over 10 years, and have never used money.
That being said, I'd happily move to Money if I thought it was going to be a big improvement. Intuit's policies and lack of fixes is quite annoying. I tried Quicken 2004 but swiftly dropped it and stayed on 2003. I'm considering an upgrade to '05 but don't see the need just yet. Maybe at tax time, when they are bundling Quicken with Turbotax, I'll get a copy.
And I'll readily cede that Money gets better reviews than Quicken. It's just that, for me, it's not worth the headache to make the switch, and get used to a new interface, when there aren't any feature difference that are driving my changing.
Good point about QIF, giddemyer. Has anyone confirmed that MS Money 2005 still supports QIF?
TheGrayMan, the point about a 2-year window for online banking is disconcerting if true. Has anyone confirmed this? I take it money 2004 does NOT have this limitation?
tivo1, thanks for the alert on the target thread and the comparison. Sounds like a cheap way to give 2004 a spin.
PersonalLegend
Happy Member
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 1:08p
To add my two cents to the discussion... I used to have Money 2000, then 2002. I stopped using Money 2002 for a variety of reasons - mostly, just not being organized enough at the time. This year, when I wanted to do a new budget, I decided to start with a clean slate and purchased Quicken Premier 2005. I figured that this software is the market leader, so I hoped that it would not have some of the annoying issues that Money had. Guess what? It had all the same annoying issues, and it was a lot less sophisiticated than what I was used to with Money. Just as an example that first comes to mind, I could not specify on my credit card accounts that an introductory rate was in effect, and when it expires. That's important to me personally, and not having this feature was a turn-off. Having spent a number of hours with Quicken, I became disappointed. And the fact that it didn't easily accept the QIF format was the deal breaker. So I went back to Money, purchasing the Deluxe 2005 package.
My review so far? In a nutshell, I like it. It's MUCH improved from what I remember from 2002, and overall, a significantly more sophisticated software package than Quicken. It has better features, more intuitive interface. Does it solve all my problems? Of course not. Having read a lot of the Amazon and other reviews, I can see how people are annoyed when their financial software doesn't do EXACTLY what they want. But I have also come to realize that there is no single financial software package out there that will do it. Just like with any software, one also has to adapt to it at the very beginning because it will never be a perfect fit.
If you're not in a hurry to buy a software package now, I would also recommend you wait for a couple of months, until MSFT irons out all the kinks. One big disappointment for me is that it doesn't "talk" to Ameritrade, although they are supposedly "working" on it. I'm sure that they'll fix it eventually. Ultimately, I think that Microsoft will end up the winner in this race between Quicken and MS Money, and I'd rather bet on the winner right now than having to switch my entire financial history to a different program a few years down the road.
DaveHanson said: Has anyone confirmed that MS Money 2005 still supports QIF? ... a 2-year window for online banking is disconcerting if true. Has anyone confirmed this? I take it money 2004 does NOT have this limitation?
I have Money 2005. It still supports QIF. In fact, for many manual downloads that do not have Money-specific formats, QIF import is still the best option.
And yes, the EULA reminds you upon install that you only get two years online banking with the product. Software as leased service. Welcome to MS's new revenue maximisation strategy. God knows I was running Money 2001 for so many years it wasn't funny, especially if you were a bean counter in MS.
I discussed some of Money 2005's new UI limitations here:
One more thing that may be of interest. My machine just now felt a little sluggish so I checked the task manager. Money 2005 is doing a background online update. Its footprint has grown to Peak Memory: 310,000 KB, Memory Used: 120,000 KB. I think it needs a few more patches...
alwaysTempted
Senior Member
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 2:21p
meehawl said: I have Money 2005 .... And yes, the EULA reminds you upon install that you only get two years online banking with the product. Software as leased service. Welcome to MS's new revenue maximisation strategy. God knows I was running Money 2001 for so many years it wasn't funny, especially if you were a bean counter in MS.
Thanks for that insight meehawl. Do you know when this limitation was introduced? I'm wondering if a good compromise would be to use the very last version BEFORE Microsoft limited the ability to use online services. I am using Quicken 2002 Deluxe still, and would not want to have to upgrade 2 years if I made the switch to MS Money 2005.
Is this helpful for those of you looking at QIF stuff http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;141157
On a side note.. being able to get money 2004 deluxe so cheap right now, does anyone know if it has the 2 year online thing also? Or is it unrestricted? and how does it count that.. hopefully 2004 does not run out jan 2006, but if i install it oct 2004, it expires oct 2006???
Any input on this would be extremenyl helpful!
Meltz
Cranky Member
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 2:28p
SliverOfFear said: Student loan accounts. I have three separate school loans all though the same institution. I write one check which covers the payment amount on all three loans. In Money I have set this up as 3 separate accounts, since they have different interest rates, payment amounts, etc. The problem is that I can't split up my transaction to go to three separate loans/accounts. I had to setup a dummy account that the money was "transferred" to, from which I could then apply the different amount to the different three loans.
Anyway, I am definitely not using the full power of this package since I can't get it to work how I want. Just my 2 cents.
SoF: I think there is way to do what you want to do at least for the student loan accounts. Can't you use the "split" feature on the transaction and then split up the payment accordingly?
prozario
Senior Member
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 2:39p
i just got the latest issue of kiplinger ... and it says quicken is still better, so if you're still using quicken it suggests that you stay with quicken. On the other hand, it suggest if you're using microsoft, you might want to upgrade to the latest money, and not much incentive to switch to quicken as the latest version of money is very close to quicken. But kiplinger definitely seems to think quicken is still better then money (they say quicken is always a year ahead of money).
bk330ci said: Do you know when this limitation was introduced? I'm wondering if a good compromise would be to use the very last version BEFORE Microsoft limited the ability to use online services.
Money 2004 specifies no limited duration for online services. Of course, because MS reserves the right to amend the terms and conditions of Money's online services and partner offers unilaterally, your guess is as good as mine as to how long Money 2004 will be able to access online services.
torridpsu
Member
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 4:04p
I've been using Money Premiere 2005 for a few weeks now. It is similar to money 2004 for the most part. The newest features are cosmetic and navigation. The main page looks much less cluttered. There also is the whole thing with the web integration. I used it once, and it looks like a nice interface, but I would rather just remote desktop into my home pc, because I read there is alot you cannot do with the web interface. It does pull your financial info from yodlee for the web, or atleast the name Yodlee is somewhere on that screen. Also, the money program seemed to have difficulty with the syncronization with the web. I have to restart the program daily for that sync, so its good that i don't use the web sync.
It seems to have the same pet peeves as last year. Advanced budget isn't always right. Adds A-pays nearly a month in advance, with no option to change this. Have to do some bass ackwards thing with the debt planner and your credit card to get it to automatically pay the balance every month. Oh, appearently the free Credit Expert thru Experian link is not functioning right. To get it you have to create a new money file, and then it will work. Like an earlier poster said, these are just pet peeves, and hopefully a few like the credit expert will be ironed out with patches.
All in all, i would be lost without MS Money. I got the premiere, and with the free Money Mag subscription, free credit report, free year credit expert, free year gainskeeper, free tax prep, plus MS Money, for 85 - 35MIR = $55... really can't beat that IMHO
DaveHanson said: Good point about QIF, giddemyer. Has anyone confirmed that MS Money 2005 still supports QIF?The beta did. QIF->OFX converters are out there. Most institutions are switching over, anyway...TheGrayMan, the point about a 2-year window for online banking is disconcerting if true. Has anyone confirmed this? I take it money 2004 does NOT have this limitation?I am surprised by this. What a perverse limitation! I can't imagine why anyone would buy it, except through the "better than FAR" deals that may pop up. Glad I managed to ditch it for GNUCash! What do they mean by "online banking, though?" The services through MSN money (billpay, credit monitoring, online account consolidation)? I can see this. But if they mean auto-downloading of statements, that would be a stupid move!
EDIT: I guess it does also mean downloading statements and stock quotes (which should be cheap for MS to give away--you can, after all, get this info manually). Quicken's QIF importer expires after a similar timeframe too. Wow--encouraging upgrades by annoying your customers.
TheGrayMan said: Interesting thread. I'm using Quicken Deluxe 2004 for Windows and there is definitely room for improvement.
Reviewers have absolutely trashed MS Money 2005 on Amazon. One relevent excerpt from a review (note: I have not verified this myself): First there is a new Internet Services Policy you must agree to. It starts out with "Microsoft® Money 2005 includes up to two (2) years of Internet-based Services. You will be able to use the Internet-based Services in Microsoft Money 2005 for a period of two (2) years from installation of the product or until September 1, 2007, whichever is earlier." **** In two years you can not perform online banking!!!
I would agree with his statement. I used to have money 99 deluxe... after two years, i had trouble getting information through the internet (including bank info and stock quotes). No amount of their updates worked, so I bought 03 deluxe. Internet connectino problem solved. If you read their fine print... it states after two years, internet usage through money does not work. It's been that way for years now.
DrWu
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 6:10p
I'm a Quicken user. . .have been for years. I'm also an accountant I spend as much time in Excel as I do in my personal Quicken (like a true fw'er).
Every year a new version of Quicken comes out, I ALWAYS upgrade to the new version. I figure it's a small investment if it's going to help me better manage my finances. If it keeps me from missing only one late payment (or other costly mistakes), it's pretty much paid for itself.
In all of my upgrade years I have never had more problem's than with this year's version of Quicken. And I'm talking about going backwards here. . .things that worked before, now do not work and it's a PITA.
Simple stuff like my two biggest issues: -My scheduled paycheck with a mass of deductions now loses all of it's split categories. So if I had classified the paycheck to go to 12 different categories, upon upgrade, the program lost all of that information. And I have TONS of scheduled transactions! It's been a lot of work to recrate that stuff and this problem continues to re-create itself.
-The "out of reconciliation" tool that warns you that you deleted a reconciled transaction that now causes your account to be out of balance never comes on anymore. Hate that.
I discover more problems each day too.
I'm curious as to the comment about "Money is more sophisticated." Allowing you to enter an introductory rate on a credit card is way cool. I can't do this in Quicken and it's stressful if I were to forget to pay the balance when the introductory rate was up (and like a true FW'er, I have about 5 of these I'm floating on right now).
I think it would be helpful to list the things I CANNOT do in Quicken and see if others have solutions or if Money does these things:
-Like SliverofFear mentioned, Quicken cannot budget it NET income (after payroll deductions). In my budget, it shows me when my federal tax was $50.00 outside of budget (maybe due to a raise or something). I don't care. Net net, my paycheck was bigger. Just show me the net increase. I have "heard" in Quicken that you can group expenses. I've been thinking you could maybe create a group of expenses and income called Net Paycheck and then have that one group flow to your budget as one item. I haven't tried this.
-I struggle greatly with business expenses. I travel a lot for work and currently I have $12,000 in expense receivables. I dump everything into a seperate account to track seperately, but it's hard to reconcile what I've expensed, what I haven't, what I've been reimbrused for, and what I haven't.
-I took a loan out of my 401(k). Can you say QUICKEN NIGHTMARE??? I have no idea how to do this. Currently it looks like my 401(k) return % is in the tank because I "lost" all this money. I have no idea how to fix this. I even used their "wizard" to enter the transaction. . .I don't know what happened.
-For awhile I could never get my 401(k) balance to accurately reflect FMV. After a great deal of searching I finally figured out that in this very tiny menu there are historical prices and somehow a very low futuristic price got in there and was making the balance appear very low.
-Quicken has a Cash Flow Forecast that is one of my favorite tools. You put in monthly income and expenses and it shows you a timeline and how your cash is going to grow. When you feeling down, hating your job, fire this baby up and it shows you that in 10 years you'll have $1m in cash (or whatever). And it'll save mulitple versions of the forecast, so I estimated 5 years ago what I would have today, then I did another estimate 3 years ago, then I have today's actual and I can look at all three graphs stacked on top of each other to see how my estimates have changed over the years. Problems: this tool doesn't pool from your budget. You're basically entering your budget all over again and you're maintaining two sets of numbers in the same program. Also, I have a terrible time reconciling the numbers. The tool says I have $12,000, but in my account I only show $8,000??? Where is it getting the information.
-Flexible spending accounts: same thing as business expenses. I spend more than is in the account, so I submit a bunch of receipts. I want the program to remind me when I need to submit more receipts.
-(this one is so minor and easy it drives me nuts). . .I get paid on the 15th and the last day of the month. . .why can't the scheduled transaction adjust for weekends?? If the 15th falls on a Saturday, the deposit will happen on Friday (or maybe Monday, it should be a parameter). Same with expenses. I don't know how many times I've mixed up credit card payments because it falls on a Sunday and they wanted the payment YESTERDAY.
-For my budget, how do you show a transfer to an account as an "expense"?? I want to know how my cash situation looks from month-to-month, but I can't tell my budget that I have a student loan payment $xx.xx, a mortgage payment of $xx.xx, and a credit card payment of $xx.xx because those aren't really expenses. They're more of just a "transfer" to another account for Quicken.
-Investments are a huge gray area with Quicken. Until two years ago, I didn't even track my 401(k) in Quicken because it was nearly impossible. Today it's still really hard (and I have an accounting background). The program puts in these "placeholder" entries (I have no idea what these are); they drive me nuts. There is such a big slew of reports it's hard to tell what report will give you what information. My background is not strong in finance. . .I just want to know how my 401(k) is doing, but it's next to impossible.
-Quicken help on things like refinancing, closing costs, and ESPP SUCKS. I've had to post messages on FW to understand how to do track these things.
-Is there a way to accrue expenses?? My property tax is $3,000 a year. I want to be able to recognize a portion of that as an expense each month, but not have it affect my cash. I can't find a way to do this.
-The tax planner is hard to use. I have certain accounts that hold income and expenses that I want Quicken to reference, but it just doesn't seem to work that way.
-Also, why can't they build in FICA, state, Medicare, and federal withholding rates to help us better estimate withholding for my paycheck?
-The retirement planner is kindof cool, but I just want to understand how the program calculates that I'm going to have $4m by retirement age because I just don't believe it. The tool is just black box you're supposed to rely on??
-How do I estimate real estate appreciation (or other types)??
-If I do have credit cards and I do miss the payment by a day or two (or if I have money in and out of my HELOC while it's not floating on 0% credit cards) why can't Quicken help me calculate the interest on those? There is a Loan wizard. I used it to set up my mortgage, but I don't find it easy to use.
I'll stop there. I'm sure people are getting bored with my issues.
DrWu
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Oct. 7, 2004 @ 6:28p
Also, one thing I love about Quicken that I just want to mention is it seems there is a new focus on "Net Worth." I never really used to look at this before. . .just kindof always managing my cash and credit cards, but now (thanks to Fat Wallet) my financial portfolio is increbily complex. I have rental property, eBay inventory, 0% credit cards and a host of other things. And all my husband kept saying was "man, we have a lot of debt" everytime he say the 0% credit card statements. It was hard for him to recognize how we were doing until last year (I think it was then?) when they came out with this "Net Worth." A very simple report (and it's also the number at the bottom on the left side of the program - I think only in newer versions). I see this number change (hopefully going up) with every transaction I enter and that's really how I gauge my performance. It's also the one number I can show my husband and he understands. There is also a simple Net Worth report that you can run at the click of the button to show you Net Worth over time. This feature does make things simpler.
Net Worth is simply all your assets - all your liabilities. It really put things in perspective for me.
Another reason for the 2 year limit on online banking support is that it allows them to make additional improvements to the online system without having to remain backwards compatible with 10 year old software. Upgrading is pretty cheap with the FAR or near FAR deals. If you can't handle that, then just upgrade one year late when you can buy the previous year's model at a signifcant discount.
TheGrayMan
Tired Member
posted: Oct. 8, 2004 @ 8:02a
DrWu said: -I took a loan out of my 401(k). Can you say QUICKEN NIGHTMARE??? I have no idea how to do this. Currently it looks like my 401(k) return % is in the tank because I "lost" all this money. I have no idea how to fix this. I even used their "wizard" to enter the transaction. . .I don't know what happened.
-For awhile I could never get my 401(k) balance to accurately reflect FMV. After a great deal of searching I finally figured out that in this very tiny menu there are historical prices and somehow a very low futuristic price got in there and was making the balance appear very low.Quicken Deluxe 2004's handling of my 401K is also a major problem for me. That's the main reason I've been considering switching to MS Money.
The problems all started when I took a loan from my 401K which I paid back in full a few months later. For some reason, Quicken now adds the full loan balance into my account every download - causing my account balance totals to be grossly incorrect.
I tried re-creating those accounts from scratch and it still exhibits the same behaviour. I wrote this off as a problem with the web services of my 401K provider but, since others have similar problems, maybe it's a Quicken issue.
taylor said: Another reason for the 2 year limit on online banking support is that it allows them to make additional improvements to the online system without having to remain backwards compatible with 10 year old software.The whole point of OFX and QIF is to create a standard method for online banking. I certainly can't imagine upgrades to the way that stock ticker history is downloaded. I can appreciate that MSFT might need to break compatibility, but two years is a very short period. Imagine the flack they'd get if they timed out features of Office after that time. At the very least, they could say that they only guarantee those features for x years, rather than forcibly removing them when nothing changed.Upgrading is pretty cheap with the FAR or near FAR deals. If you can't handle that, then just upgrade one year late when you can buy the previous year's model at a signifcant discount.I do agree with this and, if I was still a Money user, I'd be waiting to get a FAR copy. But given how many people had difficulties with rebates compared to the year before, I'm afraid that Money might become more and more expensive.
humangenomics
Thrifty Member
posted: Oct. 8, 2004 @ 8:51a
Just remember two or three months ago, MS money site was down for a couple of days, and people had trouble with their accounts. Something to think about money vs quicken.
I was a long time Quicken user until this spring when they stopped supporting older software versions and appeared to be actively keeping them from working properly. Let's just say I was more than mildly annoyed with them, when my beloved version of Quicken y2k ceased updating stocks and accounts easily. I wasn't going to keep these current manually and paying for an updated version seemed like EXTORTION.
Sooo, I did the unthinkable and converted to a msMoney 2001 version which came with my laptop and had been sitting their unused taking up space. The automatic conversion was not without a few challenges, but was amazingly smooth. The only thing I really miss is the nice Quicken networth graph with true stacked bar chart(assets/liabilities) and line showing value. Money's stacked bar charts suck and do not even show liabilities as negative. But, I can simply look at the numeric reports for networth and income/spending, and not use Money's graphics at all. I guess, I also miss Quicken's nice retirement planner, which automatically updated with stock changes, etc. to show you how well you were meeting or not meeting your goals. However, I don't miss either of these enough to pay Quicken (intuit) another dime and they can eat my shorts, if they think I'll pay them extortion $$$ to update software which was working just fine until they stopped supporting it.
As far as the newer software 'requiring' updates in two years, they can bite my shorts too. That's ridiculous and more extortion. I realize they are trying to follow the profit example of virus protection SW, and make users pay to update subscriptions etc., but there are far too many of us old-timers accustomed to getting it for free to be easily prostituted by this new paradigm. In summary, I'll use whatever I can get for free and won't pay extra for bells & whistles or dogs & ponies. Why pay for something you can get for free??
I used quicken for many years. Being in the banking business, I was asked to start using it to learn the product and to provide more knowledge to our online banking customers.
as always MS comes to take the business and I supported quicken because MS shouldnt have it all. I can tell you that Money is easier for me because its tied to MS (grits teeth) and all MS products interface somewhat. quicken over the years in banking have been more and more of a pain to deal with on their demands in the software world.
HOWEVER, quicken stepped over the line when they (without telling anyone loaded a macrovision on the PC the software was loaded on. it did a low level right to the hard drive as well and several pc were toast. the quicken uninstall did not uninstall the macrovision. This was BS in the tech community and several of my friends sweared off using quicken again. News spread and quicken hammered with a 20% drop in the stock price was forced to create an uninstall program for the macrovision and stores were told to credit customer back the software. this group continues to think of ways that the product cannot be shared and avoid the use of older software.
I weighed the leadership of the management at Quicken and big blue and went with big blue reluctantly. MS will win the battle as it always does and quicken will cut their own throat trying to protect the software.
PhillyChower
Senior Member
posted: Oct. 9, 2004 @ 7:22p
Quicken 2004 all of a sudden stopped downloading properly from my PNC account (major PIA) -- I have to deactivate and reactive the online access every time to get transactions. I'm wondering if going to Money would solve this, but I also really love the networth graphs, etc that are easily accessible in Quicken. Maybe upgrading Quicken would fix the PNC problems as well, but I'm afraid my 3 year old file is just corrupted in some way
Who knows. If anyone has any experience with upgrading a possible corrupted file (whether to Money or Quicken), let me know.
You cannot download transactions to Money from PNC bank. PNC is not supported in MOney to my knowledge.
amandaw33 said: Quicken 2004 all of a sudden stopped downloading properly from my PNC account (major PIA) -- I have to deactivate and reactive the online access every time to get transactions. I'm wondering if going to Money would solve this, but I also really love the networth graphs, etc that are easily accessible in Quicken. Maybe upgrading Quicken would fix the PNC problems as well, but I'm afraid my 3 year old file is just corrupted in some way
Who knows. If anyone has any experience with upgrading a possible corrupted file (whether to Money or Quicken), let me know.
DrWu said: -I struggle greatly with business expenses. I travel a lot for work and currently I have $12,000 in expense receivables. I dump everything into a seperate account to track seperately, but it's hard to reconcile what I've expensed, what I haven't, what I've been reimbrused for, and what I haven't.
just a suggestion: i used to travel several times a month on business plus customer lunches in between trips so i understand. what i ended up doing is to just keep the hardcopy of the latest expense reports (even after we went to web based entry, we could print a single page hardcopy summary) in the front of a folder. when i got a reimbursement, i went to those expense reports and wrote paid on it, the amount and when, then moved it/them to the back of the folder. we also had to turn in receipts so if i didn't have a receipt, then i knew i had submitted it.
and, it helps to fill out the expense report asap after incurring the expenses....after all, why lend your money to the company any longer than necessary.
Yukon
Member
posted: Oct. 10, 2004 @ 12:43a
I'm continually frustrated by Quicken 2004 so I installed the free Money Deluxe 2005 trial available from microsoft.com. It automatically imported my Quicken data during the install and everything seemed to go smoothly, but the account summary at the end showed several complaints about invalid transactions in the Quicken data (even though Quicken verifies the file as okay), and most accounts ended up with wrong balances (severely wrong - thousand$ off). Apparently the Quicken converter doesn't really understand what's in a .QDF file after all. That's all I needed to see - I uninstalled Money and counted myself lucky for not having wasted more than 10 minutes on it.
DrWu said: -Investments are a huge gray area with Quicken. Until two years ago, I didn't even track my 401(k) in Quicken because it was nearly impossible. Today it's still really hard (and I have an accounting background). The program puts in these "placeholder" entries (I have no idea what these are); they drive me nuts.
I just want to know how my 401(k) is doing, but it's next to impossible.
I started an IRA in 1998, and now have 401K, IRA, brokerage acct, etc. to track.
I've been upgrading every year to the new Quicken, and everything has been going smoothly, until...
DUN DUN DUNNNNN!! (scary music intro) QUICKEN 2004
For people who don't track investments like IRA's, heres the basics. You actually have TWO balances to be concerned with. A cash balance which is just like a checking acct, and your holdings (the stocks & funds that you have invested in). Up until 2004, Quicken always kept TWO seperate but linked accounts to keep track of these things. In Q2004, they decided to try to merge the accounts. I don't think even Warren Buffet would be able to comprehend the jumbled mess this creates. Like DrWu said, it started adding these 'placeholders' for some reason. I could never figure out the purpose, since they were not needed before. I managed to get my data back to Quicken 2003, and will be staying there as long as I can.
I'd also like to know why the Quicken designers do not consider U.S. Savings Bonds a common investment. I've been entering my bond values & serial numbers into a generic asset account. Once a year, I manually update the values. Seems like there should be a better way to do this. (Yes, I also use the Savings Bond Wizard program, but wanted this functionality built into Quicken.)
nhokt
Senior Member
posted: Oct. 10, 2004 @ 9:59a
I'll put in my $.02...
I have been using Quicken Deluxe 2003 for anout 1.5 years and have been fairly happy with it. Main problem I had was with a year end close out that really caused problems.
Yesterday I installed MS Money 2005 Deluxe and Quicken 2005 Premire.
I was looking forward to trying Money and had pretty high expectations. The install took much longer than expected, I think because it was converting the Quicken data file. When I opened Money all of my accounts were listed, things seemed accurate except for my IRA w/ Scottrade and 401k w/ Fidelity which were both significantly off. I went to set up the online access for the accounts and found you have to do this strange thing where you create a new account with online access and then merge it with the old one creating duplicate entries that you have to delete one by one, not impressed. The online sync seems to have siginificant trouble with some accounts that were never a problem in Quicken including ING USA who apparently isn't supported, only ING Canada.
The install of Quicken Premire 2005 was seamless and all accounts are functioning just as they were in Q 2003.
Not ready to give up on Money I decided to start from nothing with a new file and build up from there. The banking and credit cards were fine again, the use of Yodlee is kinda cool. Yodlee allows me to get transactions from Sovereign Bank and tries to get info from MBNA but that seems to be very inaccurate. For some reason Money takes my Fidelity 401k rollover contribution and keeps subtracting it from my account balence, not sure why.
I have not played with either apps more than basic setup but from my experience so far and as someone else mentioned it seems that trying toi switch from one to the other may not be worth it. Quicken did a great job of taking my old file and converting it; I had full accurate functionality right away. I will continue to play with Money to see how the rest ofit works.
Apparently the Quicken converter doesn't really understand what's in a .QDF file after all. That's all I needed to see - I uninstalled Money and counted myself lucky for not having wasted more than 10 minutes on it.Lucky that you're locked into using Quicken, which you don't like? The Money->Quicken converter was MUCH worse. If you only need to convert once, I think that it is worth it if the product you're moving to is better.I went to set up the online access for the accounts and found you have to do this strange thing where you create a new account with online access and then merge it with the old one creating duplicate entries that you have to delete one by one, not impressed.In 2004, you could setup online access with a preexisting account. I'd be surprised if they actually took this functionality away. The 2004 version also let you say choose the time period to import records from online. If you set this to a very short period, you'd at least have FEWER redundant entries if they did change it for the worse. The online sync seems to have siginificant trouble with some accounts that were never a problem in Quicken including ING USA who apparently isn't supported, only ING Canada.According to a previous thread, you can no longer auto-download in ING in Quicken either. EDIT: This has been confirmed by multiple posters in this thread.
zender
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Oct. 10, 2004 @ 12:19p
dup post
zender
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Oct. 10, 2004 @ 12:22p
harlock001 said: I'd also like to know why the Quicken designers do not consider U.S. Savings Bonds a common invertment. I've been entering my bond values & serial numbers into a generic asset account. Once a year, I manually update the values. Seems like there should be a better way to do this. (Yes, I also use the Savings Bond Wizard program, but wanted this functionality built into Quicken.)Same thing with MS-Money at least though the 2004 release. I'm hoping it's addressed in 2005, but am not holding my breath as I haven't seen anything written about such an enhancement. In years past though many undocumented enhancements have been made, so who knows?
zender
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Oct. 10, 2004 @ 12:24p
zender said: noksagt said: According to a previous thread, you can no longer auto-download in ING in Quicken either. Can anyone else confirm?Confirmed. It has nothing to do with Money or Quicken though and everything to do with ING tightening up security.
edit to fix tags...
steve48197
Member
posted: Oct. 10, 2004 @ 3:43p
I am using Quicken 2003 Deluxe, and don't see a reason to upgrade. On Amazon, the reviews for both Quicken 2005 Deluxe and Microsoft Money 2005 Deluxe don't inspire any confidence.
Still, I took a (quick) look at the Microsoft Money 2005 Deluxe trial version. I didn't see anything to make me want to switch, but the link is provided so you can judge for yourself.
mvjames
Member
posted: Oct. 10, 2004 @ 6:56p
noksagt said: According to a previous thread, you can no longer auto-download in ING in Quicken either. Can anyone else confirm?
If it is ING Direct you are refering to, they killed their Quicken Direct Connect feature for the One-Step Update in June 2002 beacuse it supposedly did not offer enough security. You now have to log in to their website and manualy download via QFX (Quicken) or OFX (Money).
mvjames
Member
posted: Oct. 10, 2004 @ 7:33p
DrWu said: -I took a loan out of my 401(k). Can you say QUICKEN NIGHTMARE??? I have no idea how to do this. Currently it looks like my 401(k) return % is in the tank because I "lost" all this money. I have no idea how to fix this. I even used their "wizard" to enter the transaction. . .I don't know what happened.
I'm still using Quicken 2002 Deluxe, but I think the same process should still apply. There isn't an easy way to to this but just think of it in terms of Assets and Liabilities. You will have to use two accounts to reflect correct values. One 401k/403b (or asset) account containing your inventsments and one Loan (or liability) account for the details of your loan against your 401k assets. When ever you do make a payment to the Loan you will have to register it to the Loan account as opposed to the 401K type account.
Unfortunately, Quicken (2002 at least) won't let you link the Loan account against Investment type (like 401k) accounts only Asset or Property type ones. You just don't get the combined Equity graphs, but your 401K value and investments and net worth are reflected correctly.
DrWu said: -For awhile I could never get my 401(k) balance to accurately reflect FMV. After a great deal of searching I finally figured out that in this very tiny menu there are historical prices and somehow a very low futuristic price got in there and was making the balance appear very low.
**It happens. I usually get skewed stock graphs when Quicken fails to download a closing price, but does download the high and low for the day. Imaging seeing a stock price suddenly go to zero. I haven't figured out if this is a Quicken software problem, transmission problem, or a failure on the company providing the quotes.
DrWu said: -Is there a way to accrue expenses?? My property tax is $3,000 a year. I want to be able to recognize a portion of that as an expense each month, but not have it affect my cash. I can't find a way to do this.
I've made most of my bills or expected payments (including the property tax) Liability accounts. I think of them as short term credit line. This way I can display the transactions without resorting to split transations. Then payments are done as credits (transfers) to that liability account. For reoccuring expeses you can setup a Scheduled transation to automatically enter the montly amount into the proper account (you can leave the category blank if you wish). This way Networth is correctly display thought the year. For the Property tax account, I usually will delete those scheduled transactions when the final tax assesment arrives and adjust the scheduled transaction for the up comming year.
has anyone successfuly configured a PNC bank account with Quicken basic? The only way I can do is download after logging in my account, but that way it does not automatically update my account.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.