|
-
-
vonNezzy
- Greedy Member
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 5:25p
IMO a checking is too risky (fraud, etc) to keep a high balance in, I would rather have a high % MM and a non-int checking, but just my preference  |
-
-
Alcibiades
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 5:30p
lindseyeliza said:Isn't that the same rate as Emigrant? Is there something better about the offer from this bank ??You can write unlimited checks and schedule Bill Payment transactions. Emigrant has a limit of 6 ACH debits per month; unlimited ACH debits with a Presidential Bank checking account. |
-
-
Alcibiades
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 5:36p
CyByte said:I have never used online bill payers before. It looks like for a Presidential Online Plus checking account they will let you use there bill paying software 10x a month for free."Presidential Bank offers FREE online bill payer for those customers who have our Internet Checking PLUS account. Otherwise the service is $5.95 per month covering the first 20 transactions, which is less than the cost of the postage stamps for each month!
Each additional 10 transactions will incur a $2.50 fee."
The wording is somewhat ambiguous, so perhaps after 20 bill pays in a month, they charge $2.50 for an additional batch of 10, EVEN if you have an Internet Plus account. |
-
-
Minjin
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 5:55p
vonNezzy said:IMO a checking is too risky (fraud, etc) to keep a high balance in, I would rather have a high % MM and a non-int checking, but just my preference 
I'd like to see the reasoning behind this...
Mark |
-
-
Alcibiades
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 5:58p
It wont be pretty. Poster implies that fraud is less likely on a non-interest bearing checking account than on a high-interest bearing checking account. Checking is checking.
Sure, if you lose your checks, someone could use them. Well, burn them all. I did not chose to get the debit card; so no increased risk of fraud there. |
-
-
Cheap
- Senior Member
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 6:10p
Alcibiades said:It wont be pretty. Poster implies that fraud is less likely on a non-interest bearing checking account than on a high interest bearing checking account. Or perhaps that it is higher on checking accounts making non-checking safer? |
-
-
bluegenie
- Senior Member
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 7:31p
vonNezzy said:IMO a checking is too risky (fraud, etc) to keep a high balance in, I would rather have a high % MM and a non-int checking, but just my preference 
Never post again, thanks. |
-
-
CyByte
- Member
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 7:38p
Haha You Just made me laugh out loud at work. i needed that  |
-
-
ananthar
- Senior Member
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 8:39p
lindseyeliza said:TAKE NOTE! Presidential checking is fee-free IF you keep the balance over $1000.00.
Also requires a monthly direct deposit : this must be a real payroll or pension deposit from a buisness account, so unless you make this your primary checking account, this is not a good option. |
-
-
Minjin
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 8:47p
ananthar said:lindseyeliza said:TAKE NOTE! Presidential checking is fee-free IF you keep the balance over $1000.00.
Also requires a monthly direct deposit : this must be a real payroll or pension deposit from a buisness account, so unless you make this your primary checking account, this is not a good option.
Sure it is. Many employers allow you to split your direct deposits. Presidential requires $200 DD a month. Put the net somewhere else if you want.
Mark |
-
-
Nagorak
- Member
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 9:59p
ananthar said:lindseyeliza said:TAKE NOTE! Presidential checking is fee-free IF you keep the balance over $1000.00.
Also requires a monthly direct deposit : this must be a real payroll or pension deposit from a buisness account, so unless you make this your primary checking account, this is not a good option.
Why wouldn't you make it your primary checking, though? With Presidential you have your money earning good interest up until the moment the check is paid. With any other checking account your money sits there in limbo getting like 0.25% interest for about a week before the check goes through (if you cut it closer than that, you're asking for a bounced check and a nice fat returned check fee). If I had to only choose one online account it would be Presidential, because you get both good rates and convience of use. |
-
-
Nagorak
- Member
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 10:00p
ohhenry1 said:
3. I also keep a local checking account with a very small balance simply for free ATM access (Presidential is based in a different state than where I live).
Are you aware that Washington Mutual ATMs don't have a surcharge for other banks' customers? Go to any WaMu ATM and you can withdraw money from your Presidential account with no fee. |
-
-
Alcibiades
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 10:08p
I only keep a local account (savings or checking) so that I can deposit cash easily, and then ACH it into the checking account. |
-
-
ccrzhh
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 10:12p
Nagorak said:Why wouldn't you make it your primary checking, though? With Presidential you have your money earning good interest up until the moment the check is paid. With any other checking account your money sits there in limbo getting like 0.25% interest for about a week before the check goes through (if you cut it closer than that, you're asking for a bounced check and a nice fat returned check fee). If I had to only choose one online account it would be Presidential, because you get both good rates and convience of use. Even more important is that you don't have to track, which funds are on checking and which are in savings, schedule transfers before big payments and after big deposits and have more time to read FW  |
-
-
ohhenry1
- Senior Member
posted: May. 5, 2005 @ 10:32p
Nagorak, I was not aware of this.
Many thanks!
Henry
Are you aware that Washington Mutual ATMs don't have a surcharge for other banks' customers? Go to any WaMu ATM and you can withdraw money from your Presidential account with no fee. |
-
-
vonNezzy
- Greedy Member
posted: May. 6, 2005 @ 12:37a
Alcibiades said:It wont be pretty. Poster implies that fraud is less likely on a non-interest bearing checking account than on a high-interest bearing checking account. Checking is checking.
Indeed - my post wasn't clear  I meant that I'd rather keep the majority of money in a money market, because it's harder for crooks to access. Not in a checking where it can be wiped out, which if it's happened to you can have an effect for weeks even if the reversal is timely.
2, this account looks good. Personally my checking balances run low-ish and my main account has rewards points that, when redeemed, are worth more than what I would earn in an interest account.
So my point was that leaving money in Emigrant is more secure than in a checking account, & I won't be cancelling my transfers  |
-
-
Alcibiades
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: May. 6, 2005 @ 2:46a
vonNezzy said:I meant that I'd rather keep the majority of money in a money market, because it's harder for crooks to access. Not in a checking where it can be wiped out ... So my point was that leaving money in Emigrant is more secure than in a checking accountMoney Market accounts usually allow checkwriting, so they are not really safer than a checking account. Emigrant, a savings not a money market, would be safer than any checking account including your non-interest bearing checking account. |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|