Everbank has a 5 Year CD that will pay the greater of 0.98% interest or 100% of the increase in theS&P 500. Has anyone heard of this? Is it a good investment?
Users like you can add images, links and other relevant information about this topic.
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 7:30a
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 7:56a
Wow, am I reading this right? You get the upside of the S&P500 without any downside.
Rationally you would think that you could construct this investment by holding the S&P500 portfolio, and a 5 year put at 105% of the current price at 7/22. The construction of this investment is not without cost. How can everbank offer this without any fees?
Sounds too good to be true. At first reading, I didn't get "the catch".
DFWDAL
Senior Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 8:15a
One potential catch is that early withdrawals are at the discretion of EverBank.
HappyGuy
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 8:21a
The easier way to look at this is to compare it to the currently available 6% 5 year CD. The 5% difference between the guaranteed return and the 6% CD yield should be used to purchase S&P 500 CALL options.
Just ran the numbers: A 10,000 investment in this cd will return a minimum of $10,500 To reach $10,500 with the 6% CD you would need to invest $7,846 This leaves you with $2,154 you could use to purchase S&P 500 options to construct a similar security.
Their fee is 4% of the interest you forfeit, as Penfed offers 5yr CD for 5% right now, while theirs is 1%.
What's the penalty for early redemption?
Can you do the same in the financial market for less?
DFWDAL
Senior Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 8:28a
HappyGuy said: The easier way to look at this is to compare it to the currently available 6% 5 year CD. Not anymore (assuming you are talking about Golden1 CD).
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 8:29a
Everbank would need to buy the put at 105% of the price on 7/22 so that they could realize that amount at maturity and pay back the investor. Probably a european-style put would be sufficient and cheaper.
Also what about the trading, custody, record-keeping, accounting, auditing, for the S&P500 investments? Would $2.1K be enough to buy the put and pay for all expenses?
HappyGuy
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 8:48a
After reading their disclosures, I would not hold this in a taxable account. You will have phantom income that will be impossibe estimate and some potential accounting issues.
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 8:54a
Sorry, I misread your post. You are saying buy a 5% or 6% CD for five years to return $10,500 in five years and buy the S&P500 call at 105 and grab the upside. Got your approach.
I ran the numbers with 5% return on the 5yr CD and the cash available is $1,773 to buy the call. I still doubtful that you could buy the call at that price. Insurance is never free.
HappyGuy said: The easier way to look at this is to compare it to the currently available 6% 5 year CD. The 5% difference between the guaranteed return and the 6% CD yield should be used to purchase S&P 500 CALL options.
Just ran the numbers: A 10,000 investment in this cd will return a minimum of $10,500 To reach $10,500 with the 6% CD you would need to invest $7,846 This leaves you with $2,154 you could use to purchase S&P 500 options to construct a similar security.
Suppose my retirement strategy calls for placing $10k in an S&P 500 Index fund. If I place my money in this Everbank CD, wouldn't this give me similar upside return (not the same return because of arithmatic average of index value) for less risk?
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 10:26a
Absolutely, that's why we are trying to see what the catch is. It's like the golden goose, and we are looking for pimples.
Bankrate gives Everbank of Florida 4 out of 5 stars - Catergory: Sound. Safe & Sound CAEL Rating is 2 out of 5 with 1 being the highest - Catergory - Sound.
Legit? Bankrate rates Everbank of Florida, but the bank has mailing addresses in NY and St. Louis, MO.
Anyone familiar with the bank and knows whether it has its charter in FL?
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 10:41a
The question is why would I ever invest in the Vanguard 500 fund if:
1) I could invest in the Marketsafe CD, 2) get all of the appreciation, with no losses, 3) zero fees, 4) a guaranteed 5% return for the 5 yrs (0.98% annually) and 5) FDIC insurance on the principal to boot?
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 10:50a
Just called their Market Safe information line. I was told that there are no fees for the product, specifically stated that there are no management fees as per the product summary. Also stated that they use options to make this offer. The guy didn't appear to know very much else and didn't inspire a lot of confidence.
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 11:06a
Found the Bank in the FDIC website. Same logo, but this is the Florida Bank.
http://www2.fdic.gov/idasp/main.asp
Type "Ever" in the Institution Name box and hit search.
Couldn't find the marketsafe product from there.
HappyGuy
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 11:08a
ETFnerd said: The question is why would I ever invest in the Vanguard 500 fund if:
1) I could invest in the Marketsafe CD, 2) get all of the appreciation, with no losses, 3) zero fees, 4) a guaranteed 5% return for the 5 yrs (0.98% annually) and 5) FDIC insurance on the principal to boot?
One reason, vanguard 500 is liquid and value is transparent.
UncleSam
Addicted Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 11:17a
I can see 2 potential catches here:
1. I dont understand what they mean by "based on the average of semi-annual pricing dates". I don't this will equal the true gain in S&P 500 index.
2. What about all the dividends that S&P 500 stocks give. I don't think that distribution will be applicable here.
What is hard to figure out is how much of a difference this makes and whether it makes it a less attractive investment choice.
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 11:18a
Hi Happy Guy,
Usually I have a long horizon for investments, so liquidity wouldn't be an issue, especially if we determine together that this type of investment is best left inside a tax-sheltered retirement account.
Also in terms of transparency, we do not have a view of the underlying securities, but we can calculate exactly what we stand to make based on the semi-annual pricing dates beginning 1/26/06. The S&P value on these dates is perfectly transparent, when it happens. I would view that the Bank is obligated to pay out based on S&P500 returns, not the returns of the underlying investments as would be the case in a mutual fund. If their investments fall short, they still would need to pay as promised under the CD terms. Therefore, the only concern should be the financial viability of the bank in 5 years. Am I thinking about this incorrectly?
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 11:23a
UncleSam said: I can see 2 potential catches here:
1. I dont understand what they mean by "based on the average of semi-annual pricing dates". I don't this will equal the true gain in S&P 500 index.I think that the semiannual appreciation of the S&P 500 on 10 dates will be averaged. This should yield a slightly different result than the daily pricing done by mutual funds.
2. What about all the dividends that S&P 500 stocks give. I don't think that distribution will be applicable here.
What is hard to figure out is how much of a difference this makes and whether it makes it a less attractive investment choice.The current dividend yield of the S&P500 is ~1.67%. If this is not included, then this amount would have to be subtracted from the total return of the index.
Everbank of Florida was a retail bank based in Jacksonville, FL, and it was bought out by Alliance Capital Partners - the same company that owns Priceline mortgage.
Based on my reading of their terms, it looks like they only include the price appreciation of the index. So we will miss out on the dividend yield, which averaged 1.53% over the past 5 yrs.
Is losing 1.53%/yr worth it to protect the principal?
RagingBull
Ancient Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 12:02p
This company is legit, I bank with them for 5 years already.. nothing wrong with them.. This CD seems to be good.. I remember State Farm having something similar
mobilebuddha
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 12:36p
ETFnerd said: The question is why would I ever invest in the Vanguard 500 fund if:
1) I could invest in the Marketsafe CD, 2) get all of the appreciation, with no losses, 3) zero fees, 4) a guaranteed 5% return for the 5 yrs (0.98% annually) and 5) FDIC insurance on the principal to boot?
regarding your (4), that's 5% return each year for 5 years. correct? or am i reading their text wrong?
DFWDAL
Senior Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 1:10p
mobilebuddha said: regarding your (4), that's 5% return each year for 5 years. correct? or am i reading their text wrong? You get a 5% return after 5 years (which is the same as a 0.98% annual return with compounding).
ETFnerd
Happy Member
posted: Jun. 23, 2005 @ 1:50p
Did some calculations.
Assumption one: S&P500 increases by 10% each year in a straight line for the next 5 years. (I know, please don't argue about the validity of this assumption, it is just an assumption for illustration)
If I invest in the S&P500, then the compounded return should be 61.11% as per the calculation below:
If I invest in the marketsafe CD, then the index value would increase by 5% every 6 months. If we average those Pricing Date Values, then the return is only 32%, much less than the 61% we expect from regular compounding.
From the Product Summary: "Final Index Value: Arithmetic average of semi-annual Pricing Date Values over life of account Initial Index Value: The beginning value of the Index on the Issue Date."
That is the key: nothing is compounded. Also, the yearly returns for the S&P listed on the Everbank website are irrelevant: what you are looking for are the 5 year returns from the recent past. If the market goes down 20% this year and up 20% the following year, one would like to think that you lose nothing this year and gain 20% the following year. HOWEVER, you actually end up with a net negative gain for the index and overall, just preserving your principle (close to 0% return.)
Based on the S&P closing data from Everbanks website, this is a chart of historical 5 year returns:
Note that a compounding 5% CD will return 27.6% after 5 years.
Using historical performance as a reference, if your initial investment in this product had been made at any time since 12/31/1997, you would have been better off putting the money away in any 5 year CD earning over 0.98% interest.
this has been discussed before, I know it, I just can't find the thread. somebody with a better memory please help me? all i can recall is that the formula that they use to calculate the S&P 500 makes the deal not very hot.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.