Here's a topic that has, to my knowledge, been brought up as an aside in several different related threads, but I do not believe it has ever been discussed in its own topic. While perhaps the information found here is basic to seasoned FWF'ers, many new members (if recent experience is any indication) may find a lot of basic answers here.
This was actually a good article. One of the few that actually have sound advice. Although most of regulars arounds here know this stuff, I quoted some of stuff that many of us repeat over and over (but no one listens!).
I am not sure about -20 for opening a store card though.
Steve Rhode, president of Myvesta, a nonprofit consumer-education organization, agrees, saying that each time you open a store credit card, 20 points are taken off of your credit score because, he says, "Historically, store credit cards are issued to anyone with a pulse. They issue credit cards to people who otherwise can't get credit."
Another rule of thumb to remember is to keep your debt ratio under 50%. If your credit card has a $5,000 limit, don't carry a balance of more than $2,500.
"Keep credit purchases under 50% of the credit limit. (If you have a) $5,000 limit -- and you want to buy a $4,000 furniture set -- split the purchase onto two cards," says Williams. She says that creditors don't like to see a card almost maxed out; they look at you as a risk, someone who is using too much credit and has trouble paying off debt. .
Make your payments on time. One late fee or even two can really bring down your credit score and increase the rates on your other credit cards. You are the only person responsible for payment.
Do not run up your credit. Ideally, you should keep your balance low -- less than 30% of your credit limit on each card. Some debt advisers also warn not to close too many cards at once. It will cause your debt-to-credit ratio to fall. For example, if you have $10,000 of potential credit and a $5,000 balance, you are using 50% of your potential. If you shut down a card with a $2,500 balance quickly thereafter, you will have $5,000 of debt and only $7,500 of potential, upping your ratio to 67%.
davef139
Senior Member - 3K
posted: Jul. 24, 2005 @ 8:30p
Good Read
mikkopel
Member
posted: Jul. 24, 2005 @ 8:44p
I keep hearing this all the time, that to start building your credit you should open up a store account. But when I was starting, I tried to open a Sears account, and would not get one, due to the lack of previous credit.
Maybe it's Sears, and I should've tried someone else, but isn't a secured credit card better in that you'll be more likely to get approved?
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Jul. 24, 2005 @ 8:48p
BigBucksNoWhammy said: Here's a topic that has, to my knowledge, been brought up as an aside in several different related threads, but I do not believe it has ever been discussed in its own topic. check the CC faq in the sticky, there have been prior threads on this topic
BigBucksNoWhammy said: Here's a topic that has, to my knowledge, been brought up as an aside in several different related threads, but I do not believe it has ever been discussed in its own topic. While perhaps the information found here is basic to seasoned FWF'ers, many new members (if recent experience is any indication) may find a lot of basic answers here.
Does the Dell Preferred Account count as a store card? I've had this account open for awhile now to get a discount and am no longer using it. Don't want it to be dropping my score by being open.
andrewry2k
New Member
posted: Jul. 24, 2005 @ 10:59p
try Dicsover Card for start. It has more liberal credit requirments. I opened it when was in the country for only 2 month. Then u gona get 10 new offers a week...
workingonit
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 4:20a
mikkopel said: I keep hearing this all the time, that to start building your credit you should open up a store account. But when I was starting, I tried to open a Sears account, and would not get one, due to the lack of previous credit.
Maybe it's Sears, and I should've tried someone else, but isn't a secured credit card better in that you'll be more likely to get approved?
I've heard that Sears is one of the harder store cards to get. Try JC Penney, or Macy's.
BigBucksNoWhammy
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 9:10a
didYOUsearch said: check the CC faq in the sticky, there have been prior threads on this topic
Of course, you could argue that there are not many general use topics left that haven't been brought up at some point in this forum. Finding them quickly and easily, however, is another thing altogether, especially for those new to the forum. On the flip side, I would argue that a perusal of the sticky does not readily show much on this particular subject other than What is the optimal number of credit cards to have open at a time? (in relation to credit rating) and that brief thread is more chit chat and show and tell than anything nearly as informative, comprehensive and authoritative as the article shared in the OP here.
The purpose of posting was that these types of questions seem to be asked with increased frequency of late by new members who haven't read the sticky. Count the number of times you yourself has had to police and chastise those who were unaware or unwilling to read the FAQs. No offense, but sometimes I get the sense (as I bet you do too) that you are a broken record no one is listening to. Rather than face the demand to repeat this info, as reckner77 has pointed out earlier, it seemed appropriate to just send those interested straight to this very useful and well written article where they can get the information they seek quickly and painlessly.
Beyond this, I'm not certain that having monstrously long threads in some cases (many times 3/4th or more of which are useless and annoying clutter posts) is a good thing, and that forum-goers are rather better served if thread topics are renewed and refreshed every couple of years. Times do change as do many policies of banks, credit card issuers, and other financial institutions over the years. After all, who wants to wade through dozens or more pages of outdated, misinformed, irrelevant, or otherwise useless posts (for example, the several pages of posts about receiving a hat in the ED thread) in the hopes of gleaning scattered tidbits of actually useful information? Most readers, I'd wager, don't have that kind of time, even if they have the inclination.
It is no wonder to my mind why some rather risk suffering your wrath to get an answer by posting their question. I think it would be wise to consider overhauling the FAQs thread to condense those current FAQs threads into concise, comprehehsive single informative posts that would much better perform as "quick and ready references" to this forum's most frequently asked questions. There is a possible reason they are the most frequently asked: because the threads in the current FAQs are too cluttered and need to be edited for content, shortened, or otherwise revised to become the convenient and effective references they're supposed to be. Perhaps in addition to "didYOUsearch" police we should have a "you'reOFFtopic" police? After all, look how easy it is for threads to get off topic, present company not excluded?
Well would you look at that, this really turned into a somewhat of a rant there at the end. I blame the heartburn and indigestion that kept me tossing and turning most of last night.
edit: the last time the CC FAQ was updated was May 2, 2004.
Two members brought this up in that thread.
Date Posted: Apr/30/2005 10:56 PM
Get busy. This thread should be current.
Thanks
Walpoc
And
Date Posted: Apr/30/2005 2:17 PM
The best reward thread is a little out of date, I would open a new one with all the new credit cards with rewards that are out there but don't want the repost police to come a knocking.
chrsb
FWIW.
SoBeyondTheNorm
Greedy Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 9:45a
This article is a bit more on target than the usual anti credit card rants. Though the same old:
"Credit agencies warn that the more cards you have, the bigger risk you carry for racking up debt and damaging your credit"
still is the same frame of mind that most people needing saving from themselves. I bet that people with fewer cards-generally because they can't get more or because they don't trust themselves with more- are more likely to go into debt.
As far as scores go, it's always YMMV.
papkov
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 10:22a
This article is a bit more on target than the usual anti credit card rants. Though the same old:
"Credit agencies warn that the more cards you have, the bigger risk you carry for racking up debt and damaging your credit"
still is the same frame of mind that most people needing saving from themselves.
I bet that people with fewer cards-generally because they can't get more or because they don't trust themselves with more- are more likely to go into debt.
As far as scores go, it's always YMMV.
NOT TRUE.I do not see why i need more than 4 credit cards for personal use. I could get more, but i do not need them. And the credit score has nothing to do with it, just keep your balance below 25% (of your total credit on all cards) and you will be fine!
The problem is that there are to many irresponsible people in this country. from the average "Joe" with 10 maxed out credit cards to the "smart guy" in white house with the LARGEST DEBT in the world!
papkov
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 10:22a
nm
z0mb13
Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 10:25a
wow store credit cards are THAT bad for your credit score?
I opened a Macy's card like four or five years ago, then I never used it again. Is it still active? should I call them up and close it?
SoBeyondTheNorm
Greedy Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 10:26a
papkov said: NOT TRUE.I do not see why i need more than 4 credit cards for personal use. I could get more, but i do not need them. And the credit score has nothing to do with it, just keep your balance below 25% and you will be fine!
If you think you don't need any more cards, then that works for YOU. However other people may need more than 10. It is correct that some people cannot handle more than 1 card.
But to imply that keeping only a couple cards will keep them from going on a spending beyond their means frenzy is ridiculous.
The store credit cards give me the most headaches. My family members often go shopping and open new store credit card accounts (to get discounts) without my knowledge. Then I receive bills out of the blue and often forget to pay them (not in my billpay system).
papkov
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 10:32a
Who said one card? You do not need more than ~4 cards. The average 4x 5000-10000 line on each card should be more than enough! Unless you have a low credit line .. or love to have have a debt on your shoulders. If you have several credit cards from the same bank, leave only one card, close the rest of the accounts and combine the credit lines. This way you can "make your credit report look better".
SoBeyondTheNorm said: papkov said: NOT TRUE.I do not see why i need more than 4 credit cards for personal use. I could get more, but i do not need them. And the credit score has nothing to do with it, just keep your balance below 25% and you will be fine!
If you think you don't need any more cards, then that works for YOU. However other people may need more than 10. It is correct that some people cannot handle more than 1 card.
But to imply that keeping only a couple cards will keep them from going on a spending beyond their means frenzy is ridiculous.
this is a pure irresponsibility.
76hhma said: The store credit cards give me the most headaches. My family members often go shopping and open new store credit card accounts (to get discounts) without my knowledge. Then I receive bills out of the blue and often forget to pay them (not in my billpay system).
truspark
Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 11:32a
Is there anywhere I can find out just how many open and active credit cards I have? My credit report doesn't seem to list them all. Can they reappear?
BigBucksNoWhammy
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 11:36a
truspark said: Is there anywhere I can find out just how many open and active credit cards I have? My credit report doesn't seem to list them all. Can they reappear?
If they don't exist on any of the big three reporting bureaus, then they don't exist (at least as far as anyone inquiring into your credit history is concerned).
What makes you think you have credit cards that aren't reported?
Keep in mind that closed accounts drop off the radar so to speak after several years.
CheapDB
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 11:46a
I had no idea that store credit cards are rated differently than major ones. I find it hard to believe that they "give to anyone with a pulse". I have a friend with great credit (700+) that got denied the Home Depot card twice within a few months after closing on a new mortgage.
Good thing I've never found a use for a store credit card though.
We've now got two main issues here: the merit of the article, and the appropriateness of the new thread.
1. I agree that this piece is better than the typical piece. It's particularly helpful that the piece notes how much disagreement (and, I would add, outright ignorance) among experts there is on many of these questions: In fact, four credit experts were interviewed for this story and they offered contradicting advice. At the same time, the author rightly implies, there are some elements of credit score protection that are beyond controversy:However, they all agreed on two major things:
* Make your payments on time. One late fee or even two can really bring down your credit score and increase the rates on your other credit cards. You are the only person responsible for payment.
* Do not run up your credit. Ideally, you should keep your balance low -- less than 30% of your credit limit on each card.This was responsible reporting on the part of the writer, and it is certainly consistant with my experience RE "experts" and their conflicting information.
The major weakness is the piece is that ASININE attribution to Steve Rhode: that each time you open a store credit card, 20 points are taken off of your credit scoreThis is WRONG, period. Now, since it's not a quotation, it's unclear whether the fault lies mostly with the reporter, or Mr. Rhode, but it's a serious enough error that one or both of them really should issue a correction. Many thousands of readers will recall that very specific tidbit, and it will cause many needlessly heated arguments between spouses about that latest dept store card used to get the $10 off discount on, e.g., the new living room set. The truth is that while store cards do not offer all the same benefits as bankcards to a credit profile, esp a new one, they will not hurt a credit profile significantly--unless, of course, they're used poorly (high utilization, late payments, etc.)
2. As for the OP's creating a new thread. For me, the key is that the OP wasn't asking the question, but rather providing a link to a new and useful piece (with one glaring flaw). Had he simply been asking a question asked before, he could be plausibly chided for not referencing the FAQs, placing it there, et cetera.
As it stands, this is new info, clearly worthy of its own thread, and a helpful post, IMO. OP gets green from me. (I might title the thread a bit differently, so it's clear that OP ISN'T asking, but providing new info--but that's a very minor point.)
Now, as for DYS's post. Note that he did NOT neg the thread, nor in any way suggest that the OP shouldn't have posted it. He only disagreed with the specific statement that "it had not been discussed in its own topic." This is a reasonable claim on DYS's part, and perfectly consistent with a view that the larger thread is entirely appropriate.
OP raises some other questions about our practices here concerning FAQs vs. new threads. As of 9am, OP's reply that raises these questions already has several positive votes. I agree that these are good questions, worthy of discussion. I do think we'd probably be better off doing so in a thread devoted to that, rather than taking OP's thread OT.
FWIW...
(Edited for typos only)
BigBucksNoWhammy
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 12:54p
Good points Dave, on both subjects.
Back on topic, found this in article on CNN Money, but will only qoute here:
There is no magic number for how many credit cards are too many, said Fair Isaac's Cheri St. John. But, if ratio of credit used to credit available is high, that indicates higher risk. "Clearly consumers want to keep balances below the available credit line," she added.
Would have been nice if Cheri gave a figure for "how low" below the available CL is idea. I've seen figures now from 30% to 50% to 90% and would still like to have some definitive answer on which is "ideal." I suspect that this is one of those "too many variables" to generalize accurately things. Would also be nice to know what the "penalty" in points are for different levels of utilizations.
GeorgyMcFly
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 1:50p
Ok, I think the vets can agree (as with those in the article), that having less than 50% util per card is a huge factor. I personally feel below the 50% threshold (per card again) is the "best balance point". Dropping from 50% to below something like 25% might not make as big an impact. I'm making up numbers here but would think that the FICO score has this type of point "curve" with utilization on a per card basis:
Again, I'm making these numbers up but would guess they aren't far off. On 0% util on a card, I put a 0 point change because I'm not factoring in the total # of cards open... because, we all know that having more cards with low util on each will help your "overall" utilization across all cards and increasing your score.
So, in my personal CC management, I keep cards below 50% for "FICO score" purposes. Of course, I do the occasional high util 0% BT when it makes sense to me (not needing to apply for some credit in the near term).
BigBucksNoWhammy
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 2:42p
So more enigmatic clues to the ever elusive answer:
FICO stands for Fair Isaac & Company, and credit scores are reported by each of the three major credit bureaus: Experian, Equifax, and Trans-Union. The score does not come up exactly the same on each bureau because each bureau places a slightly different emphasis on different items. Scores range from 365 to 840.
Some of the things that affect your FICO scores:
Delinquencies Too many accounts opened within the last twelve months Short credit history Balances on revolving credit are near the maximum limits Public records, such as tax liens, judgments, or bankruptcies No recent credit card balances Too many recent credit inquiries Too few revolving accounts Too many revolving accounts
Again, what I find interesting is the last two items on the list: Too few or too many accounts. What are the guidelines for what is or is not considered "too many" accounts? Surely it is not the same for everyone otherwise they would just come out and say a number. It must have a connection to the myriad of other variables unique to each individual's history and current credit position. If there was only a way to figure out what constitutes "too many" in the case of accounts opened, credit inquiries, etc.
EDIT: Found some additional info that confirms my suspicion:
For some people, a given factor may be more important than for someone else with a different credit history. In addition, as the information in your credit report changes, so does the importance of any factor in determining your score. What's important is the mix of information, which varies from person to person, and for any one person over time.
For many people, one additional credit inquiry (voluntary and initiated by an application for credit) may not affect their FICO score at all. For others, one additional inquiry would take less than 5 points off their FICO score.
Inquiries can have a greater impact, however, if you have few accounts or a short credit history. Large numbers of inquiries also mean greater risk: People with six inquiries or more on their credit reports are eight times more likely to declare bankruptcy than people with no inquiries on their reports.
So at least we have a closer figure for what constitutes "too many" recent inquiries, if we settle for "more than 6". Something to consider when contemplating an app-o-rama!
One thing I don't really understand is the 50% ratio - is it per card, or overall? As an example:
I have one card with $1000 CL and a $1000 balance - utilization is 100% (assume no interest), and another card with $10k CL and $0 balance. Overall, the utilization is $1000/$11k ~ 9%. Would the score be affected negatively by this?
BigBucksNoWhammy
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 10:12p
SUB said: One thing I don't really understand is the 50% ratio - is it per card, or overall? As an example:
I have one card with $1000 CL and a $1000 balance - utilization is 100% (assume no interest), and another card with $10k CL and $0 balance. Overall, the utilization is $1000/$11k ~ 9%. Would the score be affected negatively by this?
See What's In Your Score under the subheading, "Amounts Owed." I interpret that list to include both per card and the aggregate.
ttllkktt
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 10:47p
If store credit cards were opened for a long time, would it be good to close them?
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 10:49p
ttllkktt said: If store credit cards were opened for a long time, would it be good to close them?no. read the CC Faq. You dont close accounts.
yupkisama
Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 6:53a
mikkopel said: I keep hearing this all the time, that to start building your credit you should open up a store account. But when I was starting, I tried to open a Sears account, and would not get one, due to the lack of previous credit.
Maybe it's Sears, and I should've tried someone else, but isn't a secured credit card better in that you'll be more likely to get approved?
Sears Card are handled by Citibank, so I assume it's not a Storecard?
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 7:08a
Citi took over all Sears cards, the store-only Sears credit card and the Citi Sears Mastercard are both operated by Citi
Googler
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 7:44a
didYOUsearch said: ttllkktt said: If store credit cards were opened for a long time, would it be good to close them?no. read the CC Faq. You dont close accounts.
A lot of experts say the opposite as well, and say not to keep unused lines open.
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 7:46a
Googler said: didYOUsearch said: ttllkktt said: If store credit cards were opened for a long time, would it be good to close them?no. read the CC Faq. You dont close accounts.
A lot of experts say the opposite as well, and say not to keep unused lines open. sorry they dont know what they are talking about. Choose to believe who you want.
Its safe to say me , DaveHanson, and some other FWers have far more actual, real world experience than any "expert" . This is financial myth #2
But dont believe us and our real world experience, Heres an article that addresses the "closing accounts" myth http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Banking/Yourcreditrating/P41876.asp
BigBucksNoWhammy
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 8:18a
The big guys are right. The important part to understand is:
It’s true that having too many open accounts can hurt your score. But once you’ve opened the accounts, you’ve done the damage. You can’t repair it by shutting the account, and you may actually make things worse.
I can only assume that ignorant people assume that by closing accounts it rectifies the "too many open accounts," while it reality it doesn't quite work that way. That you might have "Too many open accounts" is a proactive warning to not open them in the first place, not reactive advice to close down those you already have.
The trick remains, how many is too many? The answer to which depends on many variables specific to each individual. It's like asking how many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie roll tootsie pop? The world may never know.
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 8:22a
BigBucksNoWhammy said: I can only assume that ignorant people assume that by closing accounts it rectifies the "too many open accounts," while it reality it doesn't quite work that way. That you might have "Too many open accounts" is a proactive warning to not open them in the first place, not reactive advice to close down those you already have. excellent comment
BigBucksNoWhammy said: I can only assume that ignorant people assume that by closing accounts it rectifies the "too many open accounts," while it reality it doesn't quite work that way.
Yes.
Keep in mind that virtually all financial advisors and financial journalists buy into what they see as a benign paternalism here. Indeed, many readily admit this when asked. The reasoning goes like this:
1. Many (if not most) cannot handle large/multiple credit lines without doing themselves financial harm. 2. Thus, we should convince people that they should not obtain many/large credit lines. 3. As a result, we will always play up reasons to keep credit modest--both obtained and used.
The first point is demonstrably true. The issue is whether the second and third point follow. Reasonable people can disagree on that. I for one don't think misleading people for their own benefit is effective in the long run, and I have other philosophical problems with it as well.
LaJollaInvestor
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 7:19p
None of us know the "magic algorithm" However, if one sees many credit reports some things become obvious.
For instance: I have observed that on reports with very high mortgages (700K or higher) there seems to be an *allowance* for more cards (in other words, little or no ding as long as utilization is less than 50%)
There is also a benefit to having 1-2 dept store cards, especially ones with high limits and long histories.
The algorithm is based upon data collected over time. FI, "customers who run their cards up to their limits more frequently default" or "customers who pay off a student loan rarely default". It is so complex, however, that a single activity perceived as "risky" can trigger a rapid decrease (any collection, new delinquency, etc).
It is not only the credit "experts" who give confusing advice. Read the reason codes from my recent tri-merge: • There are too many bankcard accounts on your credit report. [TransUnion] Having too much available credit can sometimes harm your credit score. Lenders may feel that you have the ability to spend more than you could potentially pay back. You might want to consider closing a few accounts or asking to have your credit limits reduced. Avoid closing too many accounts - especially the oldest accounts on your credit report - because it could harm your credit score. Closing the oldest accounts can damage your score by making the length of your credit use appear shorter.
and • Not enough revolving debt experience. [Experian,Equifax] A healthy balance of credit and loan accounts is key to achieving a high credit score. It is important to build a record of responsible credit use over time with different types of accounts. Consider opening a new account to strengthen your credit report and improve your score.
At least that advice was given by different bureaus!
SoBeyondTheNorm
Greedy Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 7:53p
LaJollaInvestor said: There is also a benefit to having 1-2 dept store cards, especially ones with high limits and long histories.
Though it's fact that long histories and high credit limits on cc's are beneficial, I have yet to be convinced that having store cards in your portfolio helps the scores.
Skipping 45 Messages...
AllieP
Happy Member
posted: Feb. 10, 2006 @ 12:57p
You all made me curious so I went and just ran my credit report w/fico. I have 40+ accounts (about 10 satisfied and closed) listed on my credit report and my fico is 805. I think maybe it has more to do with how you treat the credit than how many open/close you have?
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.