However, that thread is so old it is archived and cannot be added to either in reply or as an update to the Quick Summary, which doesn't even exist for that thread.
Therefore, in an effort to keep the FAQs up to date, I am reopening this topic for an updated and fresh discussion.
I found the article useful as it served as insight to some wonderings I have had in the past regarding my own credit history. For example, I wondered just why some cards continually increased my CL periodically without my request--at times very generously--while others haven't changed since the day they were first opened years ago. I also wondered why it was that one bank would issue me a card with a 20k CL while another only 2k. Is it "me"? Is it "them"? etc.
Incidentally, the article also discusses the impact these CC company practices have had on consumers. Namely, giving more credit to an individual than an individual can responsibly handle. While most FWF members do not fit this bill, we have had numerous questions from members who do (and these are the same members who could benefit most from up-to-date FAQs). Consider the data from the article:
Between 1993 and 2000, the credit card industry tripled the amount of credit it offered to customers, from $777 billion to almost $3 trillion.
The average card-holding household now has six credit cards with an average credit line of $3,500 on each, for a total of $21,000 in available credit.
This massive marketing and extension of credit lines has led to a big jump in consumer credit card debt. Whether out of temptation or financial necessity, many Americans have run up big balances on their supersized credit lines.
At any rate, I get the sense that there is still some confusion out there among FWF members over what is the "happy balance" with number of cards (as seen in this recent related discussionand amount of CLs and I think that many of us might benefit from an updated discussion of this topic.
Many of us, for example, especially those of us who participate in app-o-rama's to play the 0% BT game, probably find the advice provided in the article anathema to our aims. But I would also readily concede that we are in the minority of consumers. There is a lot of information that your "typical" consumer using credit cards could benefit from.
What I am most interested in discussing, however, is points in the article that knowledgeable FWF members agree or disagree with, and why, and in either case, how does your own personal experiences tend to support or contradict the information provided in the article.
Users like you can add images, links and other relevant information about this topic.
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 11:06a
CrazyRus
Ancient Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 12:21p
NO.
I gave you green, but I think this article is only good for people who know close to nothing about their credit and use of it. For most people around here CL increase is not an invitation to spend more money and carry a larger balance but rathe an opportunity to do a larger BT and make more money on it, a chance to get mor lucrative 0% offers etc. Personally, I don't see any good reason not to accept a CL increase unless you got a BIG spending problem, but then you probably not reading this right now anyways, you're spending your time and money at the mall
TheGrayMan
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 12:29p
BigBucksNoWhammy said: What I am most interested in discussing, however, is points in the article that knowledgeable FWF members agree or disagree with, and why, and in either case, how does your own personal experiences tend to support or contradict the information provided in the article.
From the article: Anyone carrying a lot of credit card debt should probably rebuff offers for credit line increases.
Why agree to a bigger credit line when your current card debt is already draining your bank account? Answering the article's rhetorical question: Because higher limits => lower % utilization => higher FICO score => lower interest costs
But, of course, the MSN article isn't written for the average FW Finance reader. It's written for the average dumb American who can't manage their finances effectively.
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Jul. 25, 2005 @ 11:48p
DONT decrease credit limits unless you are irresponsible with your CCs
BigBucksNoWhammy said: What I am most interested in discussing, however, is points in the article that knowledgeable FWF members agree or disagree with, and why, and in either case, how does your own personal experiences tend to support or contradict the information provided in the article.Hmm...not sure what would you like to discuss specifically, other than the title of the OP?
CrazyRus has the simple, correct answer to that question. Never, ever, ever, ever cut your own limits, unless they compromise your discipline.
Storme
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 1:02a
how many times is this going to be asked?
doesn't matter how old the FAQ is, its still right.
decreasing limits does nothing. if you want to go educate your friends who've never heard of money mgmt feel free to show them that article.
for this forum however, that article or this topic serve no purpose.
Chunhuatang
Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 1:41a
I worked in CC company. Most offers we send out have a critia "No credit limit decrease in 12 month"
....
BigBucksNoWhammy
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 8:34a
Storme said: for this forum however, that article or this topic serve no purpose.
What if my friends read this forum and need educating?
I respect your right to an opinion, but disagree you have the authority to speak on behalf of "this forum".
Why is it such a difficult thing for people to be selective in what threads they read and ignore those that do not interest them?
Is it going too far to ask, are we a bunch of Nazis?
Many of you are misinterpreting my purpose here. I'm not asking the question, I already know the answer. I'm simply attempting to stir debate over some issues mentioned in the article referred to. No one is forcing you to participate. If it doesn't interest you, move on, right?
I'm sure there are plenty of folks who DON'T KNOW this stuff and who haven't seen the FAQs. We can mention how many members have fled this forum for all the so-called reposts, but I'd wager the number is small compared to the number who flee due to the oppressive atmosphere of what can or cannot be brought up as a topic for discussion.
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 8:44a
BigBucksNoWhammy said: Many of you are misinterpreting my purpose here. I'm not asking the question, I already know the answer. I'm simply attempting to stir debate over some issues mentioned in the article referred to. No one is forcing you to participate. If it doesn't interest you, move on, right?
I'm sure there are plenty of folks who DON'T KNOW this stuff and who haven't seen the FAQs. We can mention how many members have fled this forum for all the so-called reposts, but I'd wager the number is small compared to the number who flee due to the oppressive atmosphere of what can or cannot be brought up as a topic for discussion.
"stirring up new debate" on questions already addressed (and where the answers havent changed) doesnt really make sense. Probably better to renew a discussion of a financial DEAL, in hopes someone will have a new better source to post, instead of reviving a financial QUESTION thats been asked and answered before.
OR ask FW to drop the "archiving" after 90 days in this forum so we can continue existing threads!
BigBucksNoWhammy
Tired Member
posted: Jul. 26, 2005 @ 9:06a
didYOUsearch said: OR ask FW to drop the "archiving" after 90 days in this forum so we can continue existing threads!
Chunhuatang said: I worked in CC company. Most offers we send out have a critia "No credit limit decrease in 12 month"
Interesting--so if I reallocate my CL between two cards (thus decreasing the line on one of them) to take full advantage of a 0% BT I am missing out on the offers from your bank?
OP, again, what would you like discuss specifically from this piece, other than the question of cutting CC limits (which has a clear and simple answer for anyone with discipline)?
didYOUsearch said: OR ask FW to drop the "archiving" after 90 days in this forum so we can continue existing threads!Hear hear! I have already requested this a couple of times. There's a current thread touching on the matter in the FW forum. I linked this thread over there. Those who agree with DYS, me, and BBNW on this please offer your reasons why. It's VERY inefficient having to start new threads every time a useful one dies.
summitsix
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 27, 2005 @ 12:45a
Only a fool would decrease ones credit limit. The only case in which it would be appropriate is if you are refinancing and in order to get the lowest rock bottom rate, you need to reduce CL exposure. Even then, there are other lenders who would work within your total revolving credit limits. Generally speaking, reducing ones CL's is considered negative and may have unintended consequences from other lenders when such action is taken. If you must, proceed with caution and watch for adverse action from current creditors when they notice your credit limits have dropped, voluntary or involuntary.
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Jul. 27, 2005 @ 8:11a
exactly, dont do this proactively...
if a lender is concerned, they can make reduction/closure of credit lines a condition of obtaining a new loan.
MillionaireNextDoor
Ancient Member
posted: Jul. 31, 2005 @ 4:57a
If you're disciplined enough to know your own limits, then no.
i've actually been thinking about this for the past couple months. my available credit on revolving accounts is approaching 150% of my yearly income. now surely that can't/won't look good when i apply for a mortgage at some point, right? but I think that the lender would ask me to close some accounts, and that i shouldn't take any preemptive action.
johto said: my available credit on revolving accounts is approaching 150% of my yearly income. now surely that can't/won't look good when i apply for a mortgage at some point, right?
Don't worry about it.
My available credit is a good 5x my annual income, and no one has ever asked me to do this. (I have several investment properties, so I'm obtaining mortgages all the time.) Several other FW members have experience similar to mine.
It's possible that a particular mortgager might object at some point--but the odds of this being the best offer you get are small, and you can always close the lines if they say (I'd then re-open them right after the mortgage closed if it were me.)
manuel
Greedy Member
posted: Jul. 31, 2005 @ 5:47p
Purely anecdotal experience but in 5+ years of owing lots of 0% debt, often maxing out more CLs than I should, and having about 4x times my annual income I've never had trouble with a mortgage lender. I have always had -80% loan to value but I've gotten turned down for CCs but never for a mortage loan/refi.
Have had trouble with one HELOC lender - schwab offer - that had strict credit score guidelines.
LaJollaInvestor
Senior Member
posted: Aug. 3, 2005 @ 10:07a
I was looking for some other info and ran across this quote from an executive at Fair Isaac:
"And, Ulzheimer chimes in, those unused cards lying in your jewelry box aren't wreaking havoc with your score.
"The myth is that they look ominous to potential lenders," he explains. "Reality is that paying your bills on time and not being overextended is more important than having $5,000 worth of available credit on a card you're not using. We continue to evaluate this 'open to buy' statistic, and we simply don't find it falling into one of those highly predictive areas."
Although the exact calculation is a mystery, FICO is based upon predictive accuracy. The algorithm rewards behavior associated with low risk. Up to now (at least) high "open to buy" is not associated with increased risk. As a matter of fact, my observation has been that higher limits (as long as ratios remain low and bills are paid promptly) will increase one's FICO.
EugeneV
Ancient Member
posted: Aug. 8, 2005 @ 8:34p
Chunhuatang said: I worked in CC company. Most offers we send out have a critia "No credit limit decrease in 12 month"
....
Offers to existing customers? I don't think you could use credit report for marketing purposes/risk assessment. How could you tell the difference between credit limit decrease and credit reallocation?
warmandfuzzy
Member
posted: Sep. 24, 2005 @ 11:57p
LaJollaInvestor said: As a matter of fact, my observation has been that higher limits (as long as ratios remain low and bills are paid promptly) will increase one's FICO.
What exactly does he mean by "as long as ratios remain low"? What kind of ratios is he talking about?
workingonit
Senior Member
posted: Sep. 25, 2005 @ 1:18a
ratio of balance to limit.
grrarrgh
Member
posted: Sep. 25, 2005 @ 2:35a
Chunhuatang said:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I worked in CC company. Most offers we send out have a critia "No credit limit decrease in 12 month"
EugeneV said: Offers to existing customers? I don't think you could use credit report for marketing purposes/risk assessment. How could you tell the difference between credit limit decrease and credit reallocation?
Well, one easy (and bad) solution would be to not distinguish -- many non FW's have never even considered credit reallocation, let alone multiple cards from one issuer or other such esoterica Though, on the other hand, people who play the 0 BT game/reallocate may also be non profitable to banks...safe, but unprofitable Also, it could be done for new customers -- experian records historic CL's, for instance...
EugeneV said: Chunhuatang said: I worked in CC company. Most offers we send out have a critia "No credit limit decrease in 12 month"
....
I don't think you could use credit report for marketing purposes/risk assessment.
What do you think it's used for?
Answer: marketing prescreen and risk assessment.
Edit to add: with a custom marketing prescreen model, an issuer can take a look at most if not all the attributes on your credit report. NOTE: marketing prescreen is an "anonymous" process: they can't ask to look at EugeneV's credit report for the purpose of determining whether you are qualified for the offer; they can ask to see all consumers who meet the criteria for the offer.
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Sep. 25, 2005 @ 7:07a
why do i get the feeling marketing mike has experience with this?
EugeneV
Ancient Member
posted: Sep. 26, 2005 @ 12:41p
grrarrgh said: Well, one easy (and bad) solution would be to not distinguish -- many non FW's have never even considered credit reallocation, let alone multiple cards from one issuer or other such esoterica Though, on the other hand, people who play the 0 BT game/reallocate may also be non profitable to banks...safe, but unprofitable Also, it could be done for new customers -- experian records historic CL's, for instance...
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.