I read an article from CNN yesterday regarding a tax credit for buying hybrid vehicles starting next year. I would like to know if now is a good time to buy a prius or a Honda Civic hybrid. Like to get your opinion on it. I tried to compare the cost by adding up the cost of the vehicle, maintenance, and gas and my example is shown below.
Prius (for 5 years,driving 15000 miles per year,45 miles per gallon) Cost of vehicle: ~$25000 Cost of gas: ~ $3750 (15000*5*2.25/45 - assume $2.25/gallon) Cost of maintenance: ~ $2000 Tax Credit: -$3150 Total: $27600
Corolla (for 5 years, driving 15k miles/yr, 30 miles per gallon) Cost of vehicle: ~$15000 Cost of gas: ~$5625 (15000*5*2.25/30) Cost of maintenance: ~$2000 Total: $22625
It seems to me that if you only want a fuel efficient vehicle to get you around and you don't mind the horse power issue, it makes more economical sense to just buy a Corolla or Civic. Let me know if my numbers are off.
Users like you can add images, links and other relevant information about this topic.
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 1:40p
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 1:43p
most reports are that it would take 250,000 - 350,000 miles of driving to see any cost savings by buying a hybrid
ZiGSoft
Charter Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 1:53p
At 250,000 and 300,000 BTW, you'd likely have to replace the very expensive (+$3000) battery and if parts of the vehicle were to fail... you'd certainly lose out because the maintenance and repair of such vehicles are sky high.
Most places won't service them... only authorized dealerships.
I don't think the time will be right to buy them until most auto shops can repair these vehicles.
losinghand
New Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 1:53p
I'm not sure about other states - but California offers s substantial tax rebate for Hybrid owners. I believe it's in the $3k range - but I'm not positive.
Also - in many states (CA included) Hybrid's can legally drive in HOV (Carpool) lanes - so that might be a big plus for you as well. That does also save gas mileage (actually driving shorter times, rather than idling or starting/stopping with the rest of traffic), but also can save some major headaches....
And more than a few major studies look at an impending oil crisis (as if we aren't in early stages of that already) - so the long-term investment will likely become more beneficial as gas costs continue to rise....
-Matt
hokiehigh
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 2:32p
Tax credit for hybrid was already considered in OP's calculation (-$3150)
But I do believe comparing to $25,000 Prius, similar equiped Corolla will cost more than $15,000. More likely will cost around $17,000 to $18,000 and still with less options. Driving in HOV lane by yourself in a hybrid is another plus.
Don't forget AMT. You may not get the full tax credit, if at all, especially in a state with high state income tax and property tax.
scrock
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 3:25p
Don't forget some POS politicians tried/trying to add tax to hybrid. Reason: Hybrid does not pay as much tax (low gas consumption) compare to lincon navegator.
cabernet
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 3:33p
didYOUsearch said: most reports are that it would take 250,000 - 350,000 miles of driving to see any cost savings by buying a hybrid
I had heard that the batteries only last 3-4 years and the mileage they quote can be inflated by as much as 2x (this from some friends who own the Prius). If so, you might never realize any cost savings. I'm waiting until they come up with longer lasting batteries.
My vote is the Civic/Corolla route for now.
xpguy
Senior Member - 3K
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 3:33p
so do any FWers own a hybrid currently? Other than the fact you can drive in HOV lanes, if you're not really saving yourself any money by saving gas, what was the reason to get one?
xpguy said: if you're not really saving yourself any money by saving gas, what was the reason to get one?
Being an engineer, I like the technology. I was seriously thinking about getting one but decided not to. Not being able to get the tax credit was one of the reasons.
NRGguy
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 3:55p
cabernet said: didYOUsearch said: most reports are that it would take 250,000 - 350,000 miles of driving to see any cost savings by buying a hybrid
I had heard that the batteries only last 3-4 years and the mileage they quote can be inflated by as much as 2x (this from some friends who own the Prius). If so, you might never realize any cost savings. I'm waiting until they come up with longer lasting batteries.
My vote is the Civic/Corolla route for now.
There's a lot of misinformation about Hybrids out there and this thread is contributing to that.
I have a 2001 Prius I bought in Nov 2000 for $19k (dealer's test car, was a 2K discount). It is now more than 5 years old and my battery has not worn out. Of course, it would be OK if it did, since the battery and entire hybrid system is guaranteed for 10 yrs / 100K miles by Toyota. The Prius also comes with a 3 year bumper-to-bumper warranty that includes all service (oil changes, etc.). I could probably trade it in now for about $10k (the resale market is strong). Depending on how you do the math, I think I did pretty well thus far.
The $25k the OP cited for a Prius would have to include many options -- probably the GPS? I don't think it's fair to compare a stripped down Corolla to a loaded Prius. The Prius is a superior car to the Corolla -- bigger, nicer interior, better fit/finish. There isn't a directly comparable car (why not compare the price to a Camry?), but I'd estimate the price premium at about $3k for hybrid -- certainly not the $10k some imply. If you don't care about anything but getting economical transportation, then the Corolla is probably a better deal (or maybe a Kia?)...
When you figure in the quality of the car, the warranty, the Fed + State tax credits and/or how you value the right to use HOV lanes in some states it can make the Prius quite appealing. You may then be able to add in the personal value of polluting a lot less than other cars (more so than the mpg difference). For me the appeal was the technology (energy engineering is my field), the cool LCD screen, the fuel economy, and the pollution reduction.
cabernet
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 3:59p
No comment on gas mileage? Do you get 60-70 mpg?
xpguy
Senior Member - 3K
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 4:36p
I don't think you can normally achieve 60-70mpg without something like the pulse and glide method of driving which is not very practical for freeway driving
BTW if you just drive slower you can get an extra 10 to 12 mpg out of your gas engine on the freeway. I once gased up, drove 55mph (set by cruise) at 2am for about 300 miles, then gased up again and got around 42mpg with a car that normally gets 30mpg at 75mph
didYOUsearch
Cranky Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 4:42p
NRGguy said: There's a lot of misinformation about Hybrids out there and this thread is contributing to that.
When you figure in the quality of the car, the warranty, the Fed + State tax credits and/or how you value the right to use HOV lanes in some states it can make the Prius quite appealing. You may then be able to add in the personal value of polluting a lot less than other cars (more so than the mpg difference). For me the appeal was the technology (energy engineering is my field), the cool LCD screen, the fuel economy, and the pollution reduction.But This is a finance forum. We only care about cents per mile here.
The Prius may be a gee whiz technological marvel, but thats not relevant to a finance discussion.
A hybrid , any hybrid, is simply not the cheaper financial option unless driven over 250k miles....
Engineers should know it's all about price/performance - not the technology alone. Or else we'd all be driving $100K marvel machines.
Spendthrift gadget freaks ignore $$ and have to have the latest and greatest of everything. Nothing wrong with that but it's not really FWF material.
24yodoc
New Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 5:50p
i read somewhere that the tax break for 2006 will come as a credit and not a deduction. how is that different and is it better?
cabernet
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 5:54p
24yodoc said: i read somewhere that the tax break for 2006 will come as a credit and not a deduction. how is that different and is it better?
A $1000 credit means that your taxes are reduced by $1000. A $1000 deduction means that your taxable income is reduced by $1000 which if you are in the 28% tax bracket would mean a tax reduction of $280.
NRGguy said: The $25k the OP cited for a Prius would have to include many options -- probably the GPS? I don't think it's fair to compare a stripped down Corolla to a loaded Prius. The Prius is a superior car to the Corolla -- bigger, nicer interior, better fit/finish. There isn't a directly comparable car (why not compare the price to a Camry?), but I'd estimate the price premium at about $3k for hybrid -- certainly not the $10k some imply. If you don't care about anything but getting economical transportation, then the Corolla is probably a better deal (or maybe a Kia?)...
Prirus is a brother of Corolla not Camry. That's why Toyota will come out a Camry hybrid. Regradless whatever you want to say, I don't think many people will agree with you. It's not because prirus has a little better clothing and sexier, it makes it on the par of Camry. It's the same when people compare Accord, Altima and Camry, these cars is at the same class regardless some people feeling that the Camry is better or the Accord is better.
Also, many people love their HP, so hybrid is a no no choice. IMO, I don't think buying a hybrid is a way to save $$.
welphd
Tired Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 6:32p
no
manuel
Greedy Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 6:36p
Interesting data point - the passenger volume of the prius is right in the middle of the corolla and camry. My visceral impression of the prius is driven by the horrible rear visibility. Can't get excited by the technology of anything I can't see out of when I'm driving.
Do think the camry hybrid is a clear sign that toyota knows folks don't see the prius as a camry sized thing.
Robat
Ancient Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 6:47p
Your numbers look about right. But I am still considering a hybrid... call me an environmental nut but I think more about what it will do for the environment rather than my wallet. And being a usually frugal fatwalleter that is saying a lot. I'm hoping this hybrid thing catches on, prices will eventually come down, and we'll become less of a gas-guzzling country.
Robat said: ... call me an environmental nut but I think more about what it will do for the environment rather than my wallet. You can do that by driving less also.
By the way, I just cannot imagine with this 76HP, how hard is that to merge into the HOV lane?
manuel
Greedy Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 7:01p
Robat said: Your numbers look about right. But I am still considering a hybrid... call me an environmental nut but I think more about what it will do for the environment rather than my wallet. And being a usually frugal fatwalleter that is saying a lot. I'm hoping this hybrid thing catches on, prices will eventually come down, and we'll become less of a gas-guzzling country.
In and of itself I have no idea what good you'll do for the environment with a hybrid. Imagine more emissions have come from geewhiz-lookat-mycoolcar drives than have been saved. Feel good, do well who knows.
Note too that while you're enjoying tax credits, etc. that money came from somewhere. There's no free ride and the 3K might pay for 1 less hotel room for the next administration's luxury hotel in kyoto while they're joining up.
rbjrk
Happy Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 7:12p
Any one here knows which places in USA has "NO SALES TAX" for a brand new toyota cars which rolls out of a Toyota dealers?
Robat
Ancient Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 7:30p
manuel said: Robat said: Your numbers look about right. But I am still considering a hybrid... call me an environmental nut but I think more about what it will do for the environment rather than my wallet. And being a usually frugal fatwalleter that is saying a lot. I'm hoping this hybrid thing catches on, prices will eventually come down, and we'll become less of a gas-guzzling country.
In and of itself I have no idea what good you'll do for the environment with a hybrid. Imagine more emissions have come from geewhiz-lookat-mycoolcar drives than have been saved. Feel good, do well who knows.
Note too that while you're enjoying tax credits, etc. that money came from somewhere. There's no free ride and the 3K might pay for 1 less hotel room for the next administration's luxury hotel in kyoto while they're joining up.
I'm talking about consuming less fuel. What can I say, one of my pet peeves are the people who feel a need to drive an F150 to and from their office jobs. And yes, I'm aware that people can just drive less, car pool, walk... all that stuff everybody knows. However, it is isn't doing the trick. A huge overhaul in this country's driving habits needs to be made to avoid an oil crisis in the future, and you don't need me to tell you that. Hybrids may be that change but who knows. My point was that IF I do buy a hybrid the financial issues won't be the only things worth considering.
manuel
Greedy Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 7:34p
You may well use much of the fuel difference in driving betwixt toyota dealerships and waiting on a wait list for the prius than you'll save versus a corolla. And depending on your driving patterns you may well do very close to prius mileage in a corolla.
Certainly you'll do a lot more good if you can convince one F150 driver to buy a corolla than you would getting 10 corolla drivers to drive priuses. Best thing to get less fuel burnt is HIGHER prices, not gimmicky dodads for the rich and bored(read prius).
BTW, see no oil crisis in the future - but then I'm kinda dim that way.
unknownshopper
Senior Member<br>6K
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 8:03p
didYOUsearch said: But This is a finance forum. We only care about cents per mile here. The Prius may be a gee whiz technological marvel, but thats not relevant to a finance discussion. A hybrid , any hybrid, is simply not the cheaper financial option unless driven over 250k miles....
Gotta luv a financial forum where presentation of financial facts gets negged.
The tranformation from informational center to affirmational center is complete.
unknownshopper said: didYOUsearch said: But This is a finance forum. We only care about cents per mile here. The Prius may be a gee whiz technological marvel, but thats not relevant to a finance discussion. A hybrid , any hybrid, is simply not the cheaper financial option unless driven over 250k miles....
Gotta luv a financial forum where presentation of financial facts gets negged.
The tranformation from informational center to affirmational center is complete.
What financial facts? I see a statement that COULD be supported by facts, but not facts themselves.
Besides, part of the idea of the thread is comparing the timeliness of buying a hybrid (as indicated by the title) not merely hybrid vs non-hybrid discussion. Of course, it could just be mistitled.
cabernet
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 9:07p
Robat said: Your numbers look about right. But I am still considering a hybrid... call me an environmental nut but I think more about what it will do for the environment rather than my wallet. And being a usually frugal fatwalleter that is saying a lot. I'm hoping this hybrid thing catches on, prices will eventually come down, and we'll become less of a gas-guzzling country.
I will also eventually buy a hybrid or hydrogen fuel cell vehicle. But not in 2006. Maybe in 5 years. I'm glad to hear though that there are alpha testers out there to find the bugs for the rest of us.
arkleseizure said: unknownshopper said: didYOUsearch said: But This is a finance forum. We only care about cents per mile here. The Prius may be a gee whiz technological marvel, but thats not relevant to a finance discussion. A hybrid , any hybrid, is simply not the cheaper financial option unless driven over 250k miles....
Gotta luv a financial forum where presentation of financial facts gets negged.
The tranformation from informational center to affirmational center is complete.
What financial facts? I see a statement that COULD be supported by facts, but not facts themselves.
Besides, part of the idea of the thread is comparing the timeliness of buying a hybrid (as indicated by the title) not merely hybrid vs non-hybrid discussion. Of course, it could just be mistitled.
Reminds me of a guy I frequently debate over various issues who likes to state: "It's a well-know fact that..." but has no sources to back his arguement.
whats the TCO on ownership of these cars say over 10 years. most toyota owners or honda owners tend to own their cars for the long haul. What battery/electronic motor maintenance can one expect?
i like to use maximum acceleration to reach my final cruising speed of about 80-90mph on the freeway, will i see that large of a gas mpg increase?
the car looks aerodynamic but how does it really feel at 100-130mph (my audi and bmw are rock solid).
Just curious this would be a neat toy but i am accustomed to the high end stability,handling,that is necessary 'round here to not get killed, and would not sacrifice an ounce of safety to save a few hundred out of pocket a year. TCO over 10 years.
kidhero
Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 9:41p
can someone explain to me the benefit of a hybrid car?
does the cost of ownership, the cost of the electricity bill, and the cost of gas for a hybrid really offset a regular car?
when people keep saying you can now rely less on gas for your cars it just seems stupid to me because for all they know their electricty came from a coal plant and it's working overtime to meet the demand for electricity.
can someone that own a hybrid explain how much their electric bill is?
Is 2006 a year to buy a hybrid? Yes, every year is a year to buy a hybrid.
Will buying a hybrid 1/2/2006 optimize your finances? No.
cabernet
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 9:56p
Another Edmunds webpage that everyone thinking about a Prius should read. I'm not saying that it has more problems than any other car but potential buyers should be aware of these frequently reported problems before buying one.
FWIW, I nearly bought a Prius 2-3 years ago. Then quickly got turned off by what I found.
I *wish* a Prius was a good financial move. But it's not there yet.
angelsou
Thrifty Member
posted: Dec. 23, 2005 @ 10:08p
well, i was going to buy a prius anyway, so I'm biased, but I rented one while mine was in the shop, and I loved it. The amount of space it has is great - I won't be giving up any room over my 1996 Camry, I'll actually be getting a more usable rear - yay for the hatchback. I admit I am a conservative driver - I go the speed limit (most of the time) and I try reasonably hard to anticipate my upcoming stops. In two days with the Prius, I went 170 miles and averaged 54.5 mpg. Not quite the EPA combined estimate of 55mpg, but pretty darned close.
I guess it's really down to this: If the car you would otherwise be getting is the Corolla, it's not worth the difference, unless you *really* like technology. If you were planning on any midsize car, the Prius may well meet your needs just as well, and it comes with oodles of nifty features and great gas milage,and it won't cost you a premium at all. For that one niche, this gar is a great value with these tax credits. It's an even better deal for techie geeks who would have bought a much more expensive vehicle, and be willing to 'downgrade' to a Prius just to get the cutting edge status. I don't happen to care that much about it, but there are a whole class of engineer geek Prii owners, and there are lots of them.
One last thing - OPs math assumes that after 5 years, the price of a $25,000 Prius will be the same as the price of a $15,000 Corolla - and thats not going to be the case
manuel said: Engineers should know it's all about price/performance - not the technology alone. Or else we'd all be driving $100K marvel machines.
Not everything in life is about money. I agree that for most people, it's not cost effective to buy a hybrid car at this time. After being on the waiting list for over 3 months, it was a financial decision not to buy the Prius.
Robat said: Your numbers look about right. But I am still considering a hybrid... call me an environmental nut but I think more about what it will do for the environment rather than my wallet. And being a usually frugal fatwalleter that is saying a lot. I'm hoping this hybrid thing catches on, prices will eventually come down, and we'll become less of a gas-guzzling country.
I don't think that a huge battery is that great for the environment.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.