|
-
-
Daniel2218
- New Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 12, 2001 @ 11:06a
Ganja & Whooze:
The trick is to find a popular resort in an area with lower real estate values. For example, I was looking at a rental condo at the Westin Innisbrook Resort in Tarpon Springs, FL. Wonderful facilities, great golf, great restaurants, golf managed by Troon Golf, etc. They had some management problems in the last few years but seem to be straigtening them out. Last time I checked, you could get a studio condo for less than $50K and (assuming you would not carry a mortgage) would actually have a modest return based on rental income history.
When buying a vacation investment property associated with a resort/ski area/etc., keep your expectations real. My prime motivation for doing this is not making money, but rather offsetting costs that I normally would be spending with my family on vacations. For some people, the opportunity cost of tying up those funds with one location may be less desireable than a timeshare at a variety of properties. It's definitely a case-by-case basis.
Daniel2218 |
-
-
MaxMojo
- Addicted Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 15, 2001 @ 10:46a
Besides placing any income properties in a LLC or Corp, you may also consider placing them in a trust. Although a trust does not offer any legal liability protection, it does do a good job of "hiding" the asset.
For example, if somebody decides to sue you personally, an ambulance chasing contingency lawyer will run a simple search which will reveal all your property holdings (equity). However if your assets are in trusts you will appear to own nothing, therefore the lawyer might tell the client that he will take the case only on a per hour basis. This alone will stop many lawsuits cold.
If they spend enough effort they can easily force your trustee to reveal the benificiary of the trust (you) but there's a good chance they may not get that far. Think of a trust as your first line of defense. It should not replace a proper business entity and a good amount of insurance.
Your trustee should be someone who does not share your last name, lives out of state, is trustworthy, and has some common sense. Your otherwise useless lawyer brother in law is a good candidate.
Trusts cost only a few bucks to establish, have no effect on your taxes, are legal, cost nothing to maintain, are simple to manage, and do not trigger the due on sale clause.
You can also have fun with their names. Try something like "The Thailand Christian Girls Orphans Trust", or the "Keep You Greedy Paws Off My Fat Wallet Trust". |
Message edited by: MaxMojo on 12/15/2001 13:06:28
-
-
cache
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 15, 2001 @ 11:48a
I think the only problem with rental idea to me is: I can not find a property that can generate positive income in two years. |
-
-
Daniel2218
- New Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 15, 2001 @ 1:10p
Max Mojo:
Great suggestions.
Cache:
That definitely is the most difficult part, finding the right property. They definitely are out there, though, or nobody would be purchasing real estate. If you spent 5 hours a week looking at various neighborhoods, evaluating existing properties, looking for opportunities (distressed property in good area, etc), I'd bet you'd find a property within 6 months.
One thing I haven't mentioned on this thread yet: There are many houses out there that either (a) have a legal MIL (mother-in-law) apartment in the basement or (b) have the potential for putting one in, completely separate from the rest of the house. This can be a great way to get additional revenue with minimal expense. The cost varies, of course, but shouldn't be more than $10-20K, depending on existing plumbing, etc.
Always check with your local regulations regarding MIL's, but many densely populated areas often encourage this as an easy way to increase supply.
Just a thought,
Daniel2218 |
-
-
SUCKISSTAPLES
- Charter Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 16, 2001 @ 9:50p
CACHE these properties ARE ALL OVER THE PLACE. If yo dont see them in your neighborhood, expand your horizons.....
I live in the SF Bay Area, one of the HARDEST places to get cashflow due to the exorbitant home prices...but just 100-200 miles away, in the Central Valley, are hundreds upon thousands of properties which can generate positive cash flow...
Dont keep your mind closed to focusing on just one area |
-
-
cache
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 16, 2001 @ 11:43p
Daniel2218 and suck,
I agree there are there. But I think this is harder than finding a stock that is undervalued. I lost a lot of money in the stock market, what makes me believe that I would be better with a house?
Suck, where is Central Valley? Are you refering the Livermore area or the Napa valley? I was thinking of buying some property in the Coyote Valley. It is good I did not buy any because cisco may never build the new campus there. |
-
-
Aurianne
- Happy Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 17, 2001 @ 8:59a
One thing I don't see anyone mentioning here is closing costs. Besides having to have enough spare cash for the down payment & cosmetic improvements to make your potential rental property marketable you may end up shelling out quite a chunk in closing costs per property.
You can possibly avoid that by scouting for assumable properties. When I was stationed at Ft Polk (Louisiana) I got to know the owners of a large apartment complex that also managed a condo community & every time they caught a hint that one of the condo owners wanted to sell I was able to contact that owner & acquire the condo by assuming the current mortgage & paying a nominal $150 closing fee to a local attorney.
While I didn't find that owning rental properties actually turned a profit themselves they did allow us to save thousands every year on taxes and to charge off a LOT of things that actually went into our primary residence to the rentals.
When my husband's construction company started making in excess of a million dollars per year the only way to keep most of our net was to keep expanding our rental property ownership. Having been there & done that I would advise that being landlords is NOT the way to bring in wealth but it's the best way to preserve your wealth as your income grows.
And there are a thousand ways to make sure that each unit "needs" some maintenance every year. Just be sure to keep track by receipts of which unit supposedly got a "new" stove, carpet, or fridge etc.. and how often.
If you own the property long term though you will need to sell it at a break even or else take a blood bath on capital gains if you sell it for anything above it's residual value. The government allows depreciation but recoups it via capital gains at the end in other words unless you're careful. |
-
-
WhoozeYerDaddy
- giddy
rated:
posted: Dec. 17, 2001 @ 9:11a
Cache-Your predicament is exactly why real estate investment is lucrative. If it was easy to find the 'right' property, then more people would be doing it and it would be even more difficult to make money in this business. Like finding undervalued stocks, you'll probably have to look at 75-100 pieces of potential real estate to find just ONE good one. |
-
-
cache
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 17, 2001 @ 5:31p
I am thinking about the "foreclosure" property. It will take some time and effort to go through the bidding in the court, but I think it may be worth.
Has anyone tried it? Which is easier, A or B? A: going through one foreclosure property B: going through thirty regular property |
-
-
MaxMojo
- Addicted Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 17, 2001 @ 7:57p
Cache:
Foreclosure shopping in most states is broken down into 3 markets:
1. Pre-foreclosure, where you bargain with the owner after they receive their notice of default, but before the property goes up for auction.
2. At the auction.
3. After the auction, where you deal with the bank, or lender, who got the property back at auction when nobody else bid high enough.
All three have their pluses and minuses. #1 involves dealing with people, usually when they're in a difficult time of their life. This requires lots of people skills and can be very time consuming, however under the right conditions can require very little of your money.
#2 is easy, just bring a wad of cash and bid. This also has the added convienience of the senior foreclosing loan needs to be bid upon and purchased, but most all junior lien are wiped off by the foreclosing auction! In other words if a first loan of $100k forecloses, a junior second of $25k is simply wiped out, the winning bidder is no longer responsible for it. The downside is that others, including a junior lien holder protecting his position, may bid against you. And there aren't that many deals that make it all the way to auction, but they do happen.
#3 is fairly easy, but does take some detective work. Also most banks are pretty savy and they have local brokers market repos (know as REO's) in the retail arena.
This forum isn't big enough, nor am I knowledgable enough, to fully explore this market but there are several good books about foreclosures available. No one needs to take an expensive "guru" course to learn the basics. Get a book and if you're still interested consider a course. |
-
-
DaveHanson
- Senior Member - 6K
rated:
posted: Dec. 17, 2001 @ 9:52p
Great post, MaxMojo. I would welcome any book references or other links you have on this...you just laid out more than I knew on the subject. |
-
-
MaxMojo
- Addicted Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 18, 2001 @ 12:52a
Two books worth checking out are: “How To Pick Up Foreclosures”, by Wade Cook and “How To Buy Foreclosed Real Estate”, by Theodore Dallow.
Presently Wade Cook is pimping Wall Street get-rich scheme seminars, but that doesn’t detract from this earlier book, which is a pretty good primer.
I have had a long interest in real estate investing and have done pretty well by it. Recently I’ve decided to try it full time, so I’ve been reading quite a few books and taking many meetings with some serious players in the Creative Real Estate (CRE) arena. Let me point out that there really aren’t any “secrets to success”. If any "guru" is promising you the short-cut secrets to success, do not walk, but run for the doors!
Most of the info you will need is available for free at your local library. If those books whet your appetite then there are seminars and courses that may benefit you. But save yourself some money and aggravation and read a few basic books first. A good one is by Robert Bruss, who also has a couple of weekly columns in the real estate section of many major newspapers. I had the opportunity to lunch with Mr. Bruss many years ago and his advise prompted to buy my first piece of income property. He’s solid, practical, and writes about real life business, not some pie-in-the-sky-make-a-million-on-a-no-money-down-deal-and-jet-to-my-beach-compound-and-do-a-latenight-infomercial bullsh!t.
There are many basic principles in several different segments of CRE, but the common underlying technique to assure success is to buy below market. This will usually entail dealing with distress property, which means usually dealing with people in distress. If you’re uncomfortable with that aspect, then you may not want to get involved in the field.
That doesn’t mean that the only way to succeed is to plunder and pillage, in fact many times you’ll be a great comfort and savior to the sellers. But be forewarned that 85% of the deals means getting down into the trenches.
You can profit from buying “retail”, but usually only if you have appreciation bail you out. Now real estate has an excellent history of appreciation, but as many have found out, it’s not wise to bank on it. The main adage in CRE is that you probably won’t fail if you only do deals where you can make money when you buy, and not count on making it when you sell. By that I mean that if you find a house with a current market value of $100k, and you can buy it for $75k, then you have a pretty good cushion and can probably ride out most market downturns and still hold onto the property until the market conditions improve enough for you to sell at a profit. And in the meantime not be "upside down" and supporting a negative cash flow with your money taken from other investments or salaries.
I’m currently working on a deal involving a couple who are trying to “flip” house bought from another couple who just went through a nasty divorce. Unfortunately the buying couple joined (for a steep membership fee) some real estate investing firm who told them they would be the cash partners in any deals the couple could find.
So the couple found a pretty good $300k deal and put up $10k option money, quite a sum for them, in fact they called it their "bread & butter money". Well the “investment firm” didn’t come through with the promised funds, so the couple is out $10,000 if they can’t find a buyer who can close by January 8th! Oh, and by the way, the property needs about $53,000 in work before it can be brought to the retail marketplace! Needless to say they’re sweating bullets.
I’m checking out the place tomorrow with 3 different brokers to see if the fixed-up retail price can support the acquisition, finder's fees, fix-up, marketing, and my desired profits. We’ll see…. |
Message edited by: MaxMojo on 12/18/2001 01:10:47
-
-
MaxMojo
- Addicted Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 18, 2001 @ 10:29a
Your main problem with investing in a new development is that there are still units being built that will be your competition should you decide to sell anytime soon.
A tactic I've heard about is to get in there as soon as a developer starts construction and offer to buy one of the model units, then lease it back to the builder. Developers are always looking for cash and might make you a good offer. They usually load the model with every option, keep it clean, and replace carpet and paint frequently.
In a good market the price of the model will increase as the development is being built out. When it's completed you may benifit from having bought a unit at cheap pre-construction prices and then owning, and possibly selling, selling at completion prices.
I've never done this, but it sounds very do-able. |
Message edited by: MaxMojo on 12/18/2001 11:53:08
-
-
DaveHanson
- Senior Member - 6K
rated:
posted: Dec. 18, 2001 @ 12:13p
Another excellent post, thanks MaxMojo. I'll look up those books.
Would be interested to hear your experiences/comments on how you financing your real estate deals. |
-
-
MaxMojo
- Addicted Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 18, 2001 @ 11:27p
I mentioned that I’m getting into creative real estae pretty much full time, and I thought I’d post a progress report every now and then, if the rest of you don’t mind some long rants.
As a bit of background info, my wife & I have bought, and still own, some income property. We bought most at pretty close to retail, but the Real Estate gods took pity on our ignorance and innocence and have blessed us with appreciation and strong rents. This has enabled me to take time off from my former life long career and focus on CRE for a while. I was pretty much burned out on the gig and a break looks good to me.
Well today my partner & I went out to the middle of nowhere and checked out the 300k property I mentioned in an earlier post. While we were driving in circles looking for the place, out in the middle of nowhere, we see two other cars, also lost. We talk to them and it’s the agent that I lined up and his client, who is looking for a large secluded place for her drug rehab house.
Eventually we find the property, and I get out and ask the agent to wait a few minutes while we go inside, I did this so we could talk to the person who has the contract and her agent, who were already at the place waiting for us.
I say hello and quickly asked the agent, a young guy, what he thought the place would fetch, with a quick, quick sale. He said 500k if we could wait to sell right, and 475k with a quick sale. We then hustle him out and tell him we’ll call him later.
We had figured out earlier that the place would cost around 380k fixed up and carried for 4 months, so the numbers looked good. We then approached the contract holder and told her that we were bringing in a potential buyer, and if that person ended up buying the place we would probably pay a $25k finders fee, that sounded fine to her. We then called down and had the agent and buyer look through the place.
They came up and spent a good 30 minutes looking around. During that time we also check out the place. It was an incredibly poorly built place. Actually it was framed well, but the finish was unbelievably bad. It looks like they built out the walls and then ran out of money and let their 5 year old kid finish all the trim work, doors, floor covering, and plumbing with whatever scrap materials they could find in the local dump.
We were working with a 52k fix-it estimate, and that’s probably what it would cost. With that you would get a nice property with killer views, but it would still have a few rough edges.
The broker and his client left without any indication of what they were thinking.
Just then a husband & wife Realtor team that I had contacted earlier showed up. They looked around and said that even fixed up the place might not fetch $400k. They pointed out some negatives (like the badly rutted, steep, dirt access road) and then showed us sales sheets on some recent comps. All three of them were cherry mini-mansions and went for mid-400’s to mid-600’s.
In the end we felt that the $400k estimate was probably closer to the mark. We then told the contract holder that we were going to pass on the deal. She half-seriously offered us $4k just to call the various parties to try and kill the deal.
It turns out they only have $1000 at risk, a good sum to them, but losing it shouldn’t inflict a fatal financial wound.
It’s possible that the kid is correct and we walked away from 70K+ in net profit, but it just isn’t worth my time, energy, and financial risk to find out.
What lessons did I learn? Identify a market and learn it cold, stay close to home, and don’t order the garlic chicken at The Golden Wok restaurant.
But seriously it was good to get out in the world and talk deals. My partner & I were going over the possible angles on our drive, the very, very, long drive, and it’s good to stretch the brain and have the deal details, jargon, formulas, and concepts become second nature. Also talking to the agents as a real estate investor and potential seller, as opposed to just a buyer, was interesting. We pretended like we knew what we were doing, and they treated us like adults.
It all adds to our body of knowledge, and that’s a good thing.
Tomorrow we’re going to a few scheduled auctions; we’re not going with cash, just window-shopping. Then it’s a few weeks off as we attend to family festivities. Well actually I’m going to Buffalo, so how festive can that be? Actually my in-laws have an internet connection so I’ll be able to spend time here at FW! I’m also brining a copy of MS Access and I’ll spend hours trying to figure out how it works so we can use it with the foreclosure data we’ve subscribed to. The service comes with a proprietary database reader, but it’s very buggy and doesn’t work with our printer. Gee, spending my holiday in Buffalo pretending like I know squat about database stuff, Feliz Navidad! |
Message edited by: MaxMojo on 12/18/2001 23:31:13
-
-
cache
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 19, 2001 @ 2:23p
MaxMojo,
thank you for sharing your story. A couple of questions:
1. Does it work well to have partner? 2. Were you buyer's agent or seller's agent? When I bought my house, I never know how much my agent made or how much the seller's agent made. How do you find out this? |
-
-
MaxMojo
- Addicted Member
rated:
posted: Dec. 19, 2001 @ 5:13p
<< 1. Does it work well to have partner? >> Currently my “partner” & I are sharing some marketing expenses and providing support for each other. When a deal comes along we’ll decide how to partner at that time depending on the deal details. For instance we probably will not partner on any long term holding properties, but may combine funds in order to purchase at a foreclosure sale.
I should note that partnerships are a very dangerous condition legally and liability-wise. Furthermore you and another can legally become a partnership without that being your intent.
We will probably structure any future partner deals as a joint venture between our separate corporations. << 2. Were you buyer's agent or seller's agent? >>
I am not a licensed real estate agent or broker, so I was acting as neither. I would have characterized my participation as being an “investment consultant.” In hindsight what we did was very foolish, it was a situation where had any kind of deal been established, any injured party could have claimed that what we had was a “partnership”. And as previously mentioned that is a very risky business entity. Arguably the most dangerous entity, short of a criminal conspiracy.
Of course here it would be wise to note that I am not an attorney either. |
-
-
OhRock
- Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 6, 2002 @ 12:59p
I've seen some of you mentioning www.realtor.com in this thread and after researching for a while I realize that it is a realtor tool and the prices there are not final prices: right?
Well, my question is: is it possible to get those prices? Maybe through another realtor? How does it really work?
We have a Lawyer friend that does a lot of closings, etc I wonder if we could get some help from her.
Do you have any ideas on how to get those prices? any suggestions?
I've seen one condo for 150k at realtor.com and for 190k in the local media....any suggestions, other than becoming a realtor?
Thanks in advance!
OhRock |
Message edited by: OhRock on 01/06/2002 13:00:33
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|