|
-
-
xpguy
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Jul. 30, 2006 @ 11:37a
It's the min to open and min balance to earn APY. You don't have $10 to leave in the bank? |
-
-
Clocks
- Senior Member
posted: Jul. 30, 2006 @ 11:41a
xpguy said:It's the min to open and min balance to earn APY. You don't have $10 to leave in the bank?
Of course I do. Sometimes the min to open and min to avoid fees are different. |
-
-
xpguy
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Jul. 30, 2006 @ 12:11p
I don't know of a bank where the min to open was actually less than the min to avoid fees (i.e. min to open $100, min to avoid fees $1000). |
-
-
LK238
- Ancient Member
posted: Jul. 30, 2006 @ 12:20p
walletfart said:Yikes, I wouldn't consider going to one of the branches. They are in Compton on Crenshaw Blvd, and in Massachusetts in Roxbury. Is this a gangsta-owned bank or what? 
"In the past two years, we have financed over $350 million in loans, including churches, affordable housing, office buildings and retail stores - most in low to moderate income communities such as South Central, Compton, Liberty City and Roxbury."
According to the FDIC they have been FDIC insured since 1982. The primary regulator is the FDIC. They list eight branches and a main office at 133 Federal Street in Boston. |
-
-
walletfart
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Jul. 30, 2006 @ 12:24p
LK238 said:walletfart said:Yikes, I wouldn't consider going to one of the branches. They are in Compton on Crenshaw Blvd, and in Massachusetts in Roxbury. Is this a gangsta-owned bank or what? 
"In the past two years, we have financed over $350 million in loans, including churches, affordable housing, office buildings and retail stores - most in low to moderate income communities such as South Central, Compton, Liberty City and Roxbury."
According to the FDIC they have been FDIC insured since 1982. The primary regulator is the FDIC. They list eight branches and a main office at 133 Federal Street in Boston.
I know, I opened with them, it's just a little awkward seeing a bank that caters for the "ghetto" in a sense. But that's exactly what they're main mission statement is, so I guess it's good to be helping out.
Also, I read their earnings sheet and the # of loans overdue or charged off has decreased significantly in the last few years. The trend was to the better so I felt like they're doing a good job operating in those environments. Plus, FDIC insured of course. |
-
-
AlwaysWrite
- Thrifty Member
posted: Jul. 30, 2006 @ 7:18p
Alcibiades said:walletfart said:Yikes, I wouldn't consider going to one of the branches. They are in Compton on Crenshaw Blvd, and in Massachusetts in Roxbury. Is this a gangsta-owned bank or what? :-Well, as they say its the "First Black-Owned Internet Bank", guess they are located in areas that have traditionally been considered black even though there are many more Mexicans there than blacks these days. Crenshaw Blvd doesnt go through Compton; mostly Lomita, Torrance, Gardena, Los Angeles, and Beverly Hills
Not to put too fine a point on it, but Crenshaw Blvd. doesn't run particularly close to Beverly Hills. That realtor trying to sell you property in "Beverly Hills" with a Crenshaw address is lying. 
For most people, it's probably irrelevant if they're just using it as an online-only bank. |
-
-
SlimJr
- Senior Member
posted: Jul. 30, 2006 @ 7:39p
AlwaysWrite said:For most people, it's probably irrelevant if they're just using it as an online-only bank.
Exactly, I don't think are any benefits and I don't find it humorous how people have to point out that an African American owned bank has branches in the "ghetto". Whtat exactly was this conversation trying to prove? |
-
-
walletfart
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Jul. 31, 2006 @ 12:09p
SlimJr said:AlwaysWrite said:For most people, it's probably irrelevant if they're just using it as an online-only bank.
Exactly, I don't think are any benefits and I don't find it humorous how people have to point out that an African American owned bank has branches in the "ghetto". Whtat exactly was this conversation trying to prove?
Sorry if that insulted anyone. I brought it up from a financial perspective. Generally, you (or maybe just I) don't associate wealth/banking/financing with low-income areas. So, it's a little awkward that a bank is specializing in those areas.
If they're paying the best rate and are legit, it's good enough. I'm moving my money there. |
-
-
Alcibiades
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: Jul. 31, 2006 @ 12:34p
AlwaysWrite said:Not to put too fine a point on it, but Crenshaw Blvd. doesn't run particularly close to Beverly Hills. That realtor trying to sell you property in "Beverly Hills" with a Crenshaw address is lying. Crenshaw Blvd ends at Wilshire Blvd; guess thats actually Koreatown, past Beverly Hills and just past Hancock Park at that intersection. |
-
-
Clocks
- Senior Member
posted: Jul. 31, 2006 @ 12:44p
I am still on the fence. I have GMAC and that is at 5.10%. Not sure it is worth opening a new account at this point. It seems like a nice deal though.
Can anyone that had recently opened an account with them talk about their experience. Is it fast and easy? I still have nightmares from the HSBC debacle. |
-
-
walletfart
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 1, 2006 @ 10:22a
Clocks said:I am still on the fence. I have GMAC and that is at 5.10%. Not sure it is worth opening a new account at this point. It seems like a nice deal though.
Can anyone that had recently opened an account with them talk about their experience. Is it fast and easy? I still have nightmares from the HSBC debacle.
I posted above a bit about opening. I just did the application and am waiting on funding to enter my account.
I chose this account because no hard pull, online verification, electronic funding, no fees and basically no minimums. I see this as very non-committal and one of the highest rates.
The online application is simple, they ask you for the standard info like SSN/drivers license #, they will then prompt you with some challenge questions from your credit report (e.g. which company is your mortgage with) with multiple-choice to verify you more.
After that, you can fund the account electronically. They will want to verify the account that you are funding from. To do this, you can either do instant verification (at least with my bank you could), but they wanted your online username/password to do this, and I didn't feel comfortable giving that to them. The slower way is that you can do deposit verification, which is what I did. It only took 1 day for my deposits to hit my account (applied on Sunday, deposits posted on Monday - hoping this is indicative of their ACH in general).
After you do deposit verification, you log back into the link, verify the deposits, and then that says your account is ready to be funded after application completion.
I'm waiting on the funding to be completed now, but if I remember, will post the results.
I don't see any downside to this from here, it's a big jump over ING, and it supposedly helps out low income areas. |
-
-
SlimJr
- Senior Member
posted: Aug. 1, 2006 @ 10:47a
I'd like to get this account, but I think I'll wait until I get more than a .10% premium over ED. I've already got the ED account and I get 1 day transfers versus the 5-7 day transfers people are getting with this bank. Plus I have GMAC for check writing. With 3-6 month TBills and 5.5%-6% CD specials it gets hard for me to justify keeping too much liquid anyway. Especially when I (like a lot of people I think) have clearly defined due dates for other people's money.  |
-
-
Clocks
- Senior Member
posted: Aug. 1, 2006 @ 12:08p
I am still on the fence also.
Walletfart - please keep us up-to-date once you are fulling functional. I wonder how fast there transfers are, etc......thanks |
-
-
jpsmoney
- Ancient Member
posted: Aug. 1, 2006 @ 3:54p
-
-
Clocks
- Senior Member
posted: Aug. 1, 2006 @ 7:18p
-
-
Alcibiades
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: Aug. 1, 2006 @ 8:44p
jpsmoney said:another person's experience "No offense Cali people, but a bank located on Crenshaw was a little surprising."
That girl is a bourgeouis prima-donna ... there are probably 100 bank branches along Crenshaw; its a major street in a major city. |
-
-
walletfart
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 2, 2006 @ 2:36a
jpsmoney said:I'd watch out -
another person's experience
follow up
Yikes, that's a little scary, but also kind of overstated I think. A lot of the banks have similar stories (look in HSBC thread e.g.) of accounts taking a while to open and access.
I only did starting funding with $10 (the minimum) in case of any problems, so if I run into problems accessing the bank, it's not too much loss (except giving someone my personal info again). Also, she mentions 6 months inactivity fee, but that is not on their Truth in Disclosure, so I'm not sure if she has all the facts straight. |
-
-
bowesb
- Thrifty Member
posted: Aug. 2, 2006 @ 6:16p
jpsmoney said:I'd watch out -
another person's experience
follow up
I've had similar problems. I opened the account, promptly received and reported my trial deposits, and received a welcome letter with my account number. I next tried to enroll in the online banking and it said that I would be notified when I was approved. Why do I need to be approved for access to an account for which I've already been approved and have funded? I called their online support number and was told that the approval takes 10-20 business days! I think I could drive from Delaware to their California headquarters, land a job with them, approve my own account access, quit, and drive back in under 20 business days. At least my money is (allegedly) sitting at a good rate while I wait.
Edit: I just gained online access today. This is after money was deducted from my funding account on the 24th of July. (I was told on the 22nd that the funds would be credited to my new account within 3 business days). |
-
-
harlock001
- Frivolous Member
posted: Aug. 8, 2006 @ 9:45a
walletfart said: Generally, you (or maybe just I) don't associate wealth/banking/financing with low-income areas. So, it's a little awkward that a bank is specializing in those areas.
Keep in mind that WalMart became what it is today by putting stores where no one else would bother. |
-
-
Alcibiades
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: Aug. 10, 2006 @ 8:21p
harlock001 said:Keep in mind that WalMart became what it is today by putting stores where no one else would bother.They also did a long list of other things right. |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|