|
-
-
brokestudent
- Broke Member
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 1:51p
asdf83 said:A couple coments about the super savers.
Some of you are probably just compulsive. Some of you just arn't living enough. some of you are clearly just rich, or living off the family. also you have to consider interest at income
If you're posting a number greater than 50% its not very useful with out a little background.
I disagree...I think a lot of the 50%+ are just DINKs...its not hard to do with two incomes. If we didn't have DHs loans we would be easily saving 50%+ We are frugal but we lead a full life - this summer we are traveling to Key West and Seattle. We are also both very proud to not have mooched off family, unlike some relatives...we are both independent in nature. |
-
-
chuzzlewit
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 1:52p
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 1:53p
Total yearly pre-tax household income (2 adults, late 20s, no kids): ~$140K Total yearly monthly expenses: ~$72K ($6K/month, incl $3K/month mortgage in CA) Yearly taxes: ~$30K
Savings: $38K/year = 27%. Includes ~$10K of pre-tax 401(k) contributions. |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 1:57p
theman2 said: Your cash does lose value in the bank. Sure, you may still have the $100 you started with at the end of the year. If $100 only buys what $95 would have last year, you have lost money in real terms.
The problem with interest income is that it is taxable at ordinary rates just like a w-2 and you pay taxes yearly on that interest. I have already agreed that the buying power loses value with inflation. The thing that has not been answered is at the end of the year what's the difference between your income being from a 1099 or W2? They are both taxed at the same rate and the person with the 1099 income has the added bonus that he did not pay the $5480 in Social Security tax and whatever Medicare would have been. Still don't know how the 1099 guy is losing money any worse than W2 guy |
-
-
batorok
- Member
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 2:22p
Scott, I think you have summed the posters thoughts up. Taxes are no different, perhaps a little less for interest only income.
It's the loss of capital supplying that interest that is costing you at the end of the year, through inflation. |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 2:37p
batorok said: It's the loss of capital supplying that interest that is costing you at the end of the year, through inflation. So the 1099 guy is worse off because he had the $100k in the bank while the W2 had to accumulate it during the year? Still not getting it, I feel inflation will effect both equally |
-
-
markkundinger
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 2:40p
Scott, different question, is all this cash (I'm assuming it's a large figure) sitting in just one bank? You may be way above the FDIC $100,000 limit.
Now, if you're got a family, there are ways to increase it, individual account for wife, joint for both, trusts for kids, etc... but anyway, if you're talking about really big amounts of money, you may want to start worrying about the (admittedly slight) risk of default by the financial institution. |
-
-
Shugady
- New Member
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 2:41p
batorok said:Shugady said:What savings vehicles are people using that allow you to get such high pre-tax saving rates (50%+)? The 401k limit is 15000.
I dont' know about everyone, but the employer match doesn't count against your max, so that helps, my employer actually "matches" about 11% of my salary if I put in just 3%, so theoretically I could put about 25% plus into my pretax 403b. If you are self employed you can get quite creative and save a lot more pre-tax.
Also, people might just be calculating like this: how much they save/total pre-tax income= savings rate.
Oops, duh. I misinterpreted the original post. Considering this, my pre-tax savings rate (total savings [including match]/gross salary) is about 26%. This, unfortunately, also happens to be my pre-tax-vehicle savings (total savings in pre-tax accounts / gross salary). Need to figure out how to save some of that after-tax money. |
-
-
summer2005
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 2:44p
great question but a fairly meaningless answer without setting out assumptions about how the % is calculated. also people at different stages in life should be able to and should save at different rates. my cames to very approx 30% withoout 'er match. i am a single parent in a fairly well paid job in a relatively cheap area (taxas vs. california or NY) so is this rate good or bad?
OP, perhaps set out some guidelines for the calculation method, lets all follow these and recalculate. just an idea.
|
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 2:51p
summer2005 said:OP, perhaps set out some guidelines for the calculation method, lets all follow these and recalculate. just an idea.
Agreed...I included the following in my post:
- Total yearly pre-tax income - Size of household, ages, # of kids - Location - Total yearly monthly expenses - Estimated taxes - Savings (pre-tax income - expenses - taxes) - Savings % (savings/pre-tax income)
I added this list to the quick summary, feel free to edit it. |
-
-
RhizzleBop
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 2:53p
Listen guys: Scott is not in a bad position right now and he's not feeling the effects of inflation. You can lead a horse to water but you can not make him drink. Scott has already found the water (fatwallet finance) and if he wants to drink he eventually will. I just hope thats its not when he suddenly realizes he doesn't have it as easy as he did due to lost inflationary value. Maybe he has such a large sum that he wont reach that point in his life time. If thats the case then he'll die feeling as though he were right.
If I were guessing, I'd say he's an older gentleman who just doesn't quite get the inflation game and I say, if he's happy then let him be. Maybe he'll figure it out one day, or it wont matter. Lets not drive him away from the forum. |
-
-
InspectorFox
- Senior Member
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 3:06p
scott1961 said:100%, Paycheck gets directly deposited right into a savings account. How do you manage your day to day expense??? |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 3:14p
RhizzleBop said: If I were guessing, I'd say he's an older gentleman who just doesn't quite get the inflation game and I say, if he's happy then let him be. Maybe he'll figure it out one day, or it wont matter. Lets not drive him away from the forum. Older gentlemen? Thanks a lot, My screen should give my age away, 44 then again we have so many young people here maybe I am considered old. Don't worry about driving me away I enjoyed the debate, I have so many people telling me the same blabeley blab blab about how I am losing money and I guess I used this forum to defend my point of view. Just right now I enjoy the comfort of fully insured accounts and am still burnt out from day trading during the Dot-Com days. |
-
-
batorok
- Member
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 3:17p
scott1961 said:batorok said: It's the loss of capital supplying that interest that is costing you at the end of the year, through inflation. So the 1099 guy is worse off because he had the $100k in the bank while the W2 had to accumulate it during the year? Still not getting it, I feel inflation will effect both equally
Scott, please dont' think I'm trying to insult you or drive you away, just trying to illustrate the concept. Example: Person 1: 600,000$ bank account earning 4.6% interest neting 2300 in interest yearly to live off of. Person 2: Monthly salaried job paying a 2300/mo.
fast forward 20 years. Person 1: montly income still 2300$ Person 2: annual employer cost of living wage increases of 3% to account for inflation: 4154$ monthly income
amount of stuff person 2 can buy in real 2006 terms=2300$, amount of stuff person 1 can buy= almost half that.
Cost of peace of mind of having 600,000 secure in the bank vs. risking it in the stock market: about 260,000$ over twenty years.
cost of sleeping well at night not thinking about potential losses? Perhaps priceless to Scott.
Welcome to FWF and enjoy. I'm 36. The few posters that reveal much about themselves here tend to be younger (20s's), with some scattered in the entire range of ages and income/net worth. |
-
-
LankyBiscuit23
- Member
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 3:24p
autologic said:I'm curious to know more about the people who are saving 50% or more of their pay.
1. Why are you saving so much? Are you in a transition period and saving specifically for something, some kind of life goal to accumulate wealth, desire to retire early?
2. How are you managing to save such a large portion of your pay? Are you low income but living off mom and dad? Are you middle income and living well below your means? Are you well off ($100K+) and living below your means? Do you have a second job (or fleabay stuff) to make extra money to save?
I understand the need to have a safety net and desire to retire early with a comfortable amount of money. But beyond that I don't see the point of dieing on top of a huge pile of money.
I'm closely related to the Why are you so poor thread.
I save above 60%,(30% pre-tax 457, 7% other retirement, 10% roth ira, 15% savings) which includes no sort of company match(since I don't work for private industry). The rest of the salary goes to various bills (and taxes).
1. In general, I save so much so that I don't have to when it matters the most. Folks in their early 20s should praise the power of compounding interest and stack away as much as possible. I do so that when that new wife and little lankybiscuit comes around, I don't have to put a second thought about maxing out anything if i don't want to.
2. I manage to save in such a healthy manner because I don't have any major responsibilities, I'm middle income (Engineering) but live at home and live well below my means. I offer "cost of living" money to my parents since I know my presence adds to the household costs, other than the fact that my income being almost the same as theirs put together(non-college graduates).
I'm changing jobs soon(increased pay) and will be on my own, household wise. I've already planned to save at least 49% duing that time and so forth also (20% 401K, 4% HSA, 6% IRA, 17% Savings) and this is in addition to a new mortgage. It's all really because I don't want MY cash to go to taxes and don't have a need for it now. |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 3:25p
batorok said:scott1961 said:batorok said: It's the loss of capital supplying that interest that is costing you at the end of the year, through inflation. So the 1099 guy is worse off because he had the $100k in the bank while the W2 had to accumulate it during the year? Still not getting it, I feel inflation will effect both equally
Scott, please dont' think I'm trying to insult you or drive you away, just trying to illustrate the concept. Example: Person 1: 600,000$ bank account earning 4.6% interest neting 2300 in interest yearly to live off of. Person 2: Monthly salaried job paying a 2300/mo.
fast forward 20 years. Person 1: montly income still 2300$ Person 2: annual employer cost of living wage increases of 3% to account for inflation: 4154$ monthly income
amount of stuff person 2 can buy in real 2006 terms=2300$, amount of stuff person 1 can buy= almost half that. Maybe if I never made any changes but that wont happen. The main reason I am here is to find the best bank deals. I stay very short term so if inflation rises the rates I get in my bank accounts will also. 3% gain for the worker? My 1099 INT went up over 50% in the last year |
-
-
ForTheFuture
- New Member
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 3:41p
We're a mid 20s married couple with an infant child. Our pre-tax income is in the lower 100ks Savings as percentage of pre-tax: 53% Savings as percentage of post-tax: 69%
I've explained our reasons for saving so much in the Why are you so poor? thread. |
-
-
theman2
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 4:12p
Last year I invested 80+% of my pre-tax income. I maxed out my Roth and put the rest in a brokerage account which is 100% invested in mutual funds. Additions will be put into ETFs to gain some diversification and lower-fee investments over the next few years.
With housing markets where they are in northern-CA, I'm saving as much as possible so that I can buy a house if prices adjust. If housing does not become more affordable, I will continue to save so that I can move somewhere cheap.
The downside to my current situation is that I live at home with the parents. Next year, I will be able to save less than 50% of my income because I am ready to rent. I will be paying much more in taxes so that will lower my savings rate as well.
Edit: I am not spending as much money as I could obviously but I still feel my level of happiness is much higher than the friends that I have who consume above their means and are heavily in debt as a result. Before you impusle buy something, wait a week or two and decide if you still want it. Often it no longer is so desirable. |
-
-
funkyfresh
- Broke Member
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 4:52p
scott1961 said:3% gain for the worker? My 1099 INT went up over 50% in the last year
the worker's wage increases are compounded each year. in contrast, interest is spent so the principal doesn't increase and in real terms actually decreases. |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
posted: May. 12, 2006 @ 5:04p
funkyfresh said:scott1961 said:3% gain for the worker? My 1099 INT went up over 50% in the last year
the worker's wage increases are compounded each year. in contrast, interest is spent so the principal doesn't increase and in real terms actually decreases. I never said my principle increased, Just the amount of earned interest. A year ago I was averaging probably a little over 3% while now it's a bit over 5%. And a 3% gain per year for workers is not a given. During the slow period a couple years ago I did not give raises for 3 years, Many large companies even cut pay or at least froze wages and cut O.T |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|