|
-
-
subdude
- Member
rated:
posted: Mar. 27, 2007 @ 6:06p
scott1961 said:Most use these accounts as a place to park money so what's the big deal of the hold? So you are losing .27% for no good reason
As I stated, if you don't move money in and out often - yes, the hold policy is no big deal. I am no expert, but I find this delay highly unnecessary, let alone that it deprives me of the money I own for two weeks.
I also feel uneasy about scheduling a 100K transfer and knowing that for two weeks the money is not available, and that the only record of the transfer taking place is kept by a website running arcane insecure software.
Bottom line is - there's no free lunch, so your extra 0.27% is the reward for your willingness to make these compromises. |
-
-
jmz668
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Mar. 27, 2007 @ 6:21p
subdude said:I also feel uneasy about scheduling a 100K transfer and knowing that for two weeks the money is not available, and that the only record of the transfer taking place is kept by a website running arcane insecure software.
Bottom line is - there's no free lunch, so your extra 0.27% is the reward for your willingness to make these compromises. Except they send paper statements, you can easily print confirmation pages, the sending institution has a record of it, they pay interest from day 1.
If you need the money TODAY then the account type is wrong for you, as the only was to access it is with a transfer between banks. |
-
-
subdude
- Member
rated:
posted: Mar. 27, 2007 @ 6:37p
jmz668 said:If you need the money TODAY then the account type is wrong for you, as the only was to access it is with a transfer between banks.
Incorrect. As an example, read GMAC's funds availability policy for their MMA - your ACH deposits are available for withdrawal immediately. |
-
-
jmz668
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Mar. 27, 2007 @ 6:44p
subdude said:Incorrect. As an example, read GMAC's funds availability policy for their MMA - your ACH deposits are available for withdrawal immediately. Relevance?
Oh, there is none. One, this isn't an MMA, two, it's not with GMAC. |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
rated:
posted: Mar. 27, 2007 @ 6:44p
subdude said:
Bottom line is - there's no free lunch, so your extra 0.27% is the reward for your willingness to make these compromises. No compromise for me, I would never put money into an account like this that I thought I would need in 10 days. |
-
-
subdude
- Member
rated:
posted: Mar. 27, 2007 @ 6:54p
jmz668 said:Relevance?
Oh, there is none. One, this isn't an MMA, two, it's not with GMAC.
Do you have no analytical skills? It certainly isn't an MMA technically, but is pretty much equivalent to one in terms of what people would use for. And I mentioned GMAC for comparison only. |
-
-
jmz668
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Mar. 27, 2007 @ 7:02p
subdude said:Do you have no analytical skills? It certainly isn't an MMA technically, but is pretty much equivalent to one in terms of what people would use for. And I mentioned GMAC for comparison only. No, it's not an MMA, and most people I know with MMAs write checks out of them, monthly. This is more a longer term type of account but with a more liquidity than a CD.
BTW, Vanguard has a 10 day hold on ACHs in their MMF. |
-
-
bluechalk
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Apr. 10, 2007 @ 10:08p
I've been reading speculation that Countrywide could go bankrupt because of all its subprime mortgages. What happens in this worst case scenario? I know that their accounts have FDIC insurance. But I assume that it must take a while for the FDIC pay everybody and that no interest would be paid for this period. Does anybody know how long one might loose access to their deposits and to interest payments? |
-
-
mikeres
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Apr. 10, 2007 @ 10:35p
bluechalk said:I've been reading speculation that Countrywide could go bankrupt because of all its subprime mortgages. What happens in this worst case scenario? I know that their accounts have FDIC insurance. But I assume that it must take a while for the FDIC pay everybody and that no interest would be paid for this period. Does anybody know how long one might loose access to their deposits and to interest payments?This has been discussed before. The short answer is that you will most likely experience NO delay in gaining access to your FDIC insured deposits. There are no guarantees, but it's unlikely that there will be any disruption.
If you're too lazy to do a search of FWF for "FDIC" then I'm not going to do it for you. But if you're interested such a search will allow you to review the prior (and more extensive) discussions of FDIC insurance protection. |
-
-
bluechalk
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: May. 9, 2007 @ 1:52p
I've been moving lots of money around recently, and ran into their $250,000/month limit. It turns out this limit is for the sum of all transfers (either in or out) for all accounts associated with your login. If you have a joint account, the other accountholder can get their own login with a separate $250,000 limit. The limit is for a rolling 31 days. I made a transaction on 4/9/2007, and it limits future transactions up to and including 5/9/2007.
On a different topic, a funny thing happened is when I removed an account that had been added, removed, and added again, I got the cryptic message "If you remove the account then the account cannot be added". I called customer service and they had no idea what it meant. It sounds to me like they limit how many times you can remove and add an account, but the CSR insisted that there is no such limit. I'll eventually find out when I try to add the account again.
By the way, I've been very happy with this account. ACH transfers initiated from their website take only one day. And I've had no problem with direct debit from the account to pay my credit card bills. |
-
-
jack07002
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: May. 9, 2007 @ 2:05p
Sub-prime risk is less for big banks
I wouldn't worry that much about big subprime lending banks,like the Wells fargo(which I think is the largest),couuntrywide,HSBC etc....
exposure to sub-prime losses is offset by its large portfolio of other loans and businesses. That broader base enables them and other diversified mortgage companies to continue offering these high-cost loans to borrowers with credit problems or unreliable income, even as other lenders collapse.Large Banks have established large reserves to offset the losses its loan-servicing business suffers when homeowners refinance, paying off their old loans.Woes of the sub-prime industry have barely dented Wells Fargo,countrywide,HSBC shares.
New Century Financial Corp. of Irvine, once the nation's largest independent sub-prime lenders is different.I think we will have more of these type lenders collapse before this thing is done. |
-
-
SmallBizMan
- Member
rated:
posted: May. 20, 2007 @ 12:55a
... oh sheet ...
hope it is just weekend site maintenance ... but this is what bank.countrywide.com tells me when I log into my $100k+ Savingslink account ...
"...Currently, you do not have any active bank accounts with Countrywide..." |
-
-
RyogaHibiki
- Addicted Member
rated:
posted: May. 22, 2007 @ 5:32p
SmallBizMan said:... oh sheet ...
hope it is just weekend site maintenance ... but this is what bank.countrywide.com tells me when I log into my $100k+ Savingslink account ...
"...Currently, you do not have any active bank accounts with Countrywide..."
So was it just maintenance...or something worse? |
-
-
SmallBizMan
- Member
rated:
posted: Jun. 7, 2007 @ 1:04p
yes, apparently, just site maintenance, as on-line access was totally restored to following A.M.
g.l. |
-
-
CorporateBob
- Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 9, 2007 @ 4:32p
Just an FYI for everyone... I applied for the SavingsLink account, and was denied based on "information provided by Equifax" (in a hard pull). The reps from Countrywide refused to tell me why, just that I could obtain a copy of my report from Equifax. Is it legal for them to pull credit, deny the account, and then refuse to give a reason why (other than that it was based on the info in the report)? I always thought that they had to give a reason. It is just bizarre to be denied a savings account based on a credit report. Are they afraid that I'm going to park too much money in it? Anyway, I suppose that this adds to the warnings that customer service with these guys is not great. |
-
-
Gsolis31
- New Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 9, 2007 @ 4:38p
I would imagine they wont give out specific reasons for denial for privacy reasons. I experienced similar thing when opening HSBC during their 6% promo. Was denied ad got the free online report, saw the name of an old student loan I had consolidated (this was the holdup) and was able to reapply with the correct information, approved with no problems. I wouldn't put too much stock in this as some warning sign as this seems pretty business-as-usual. |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
rated:
posted: Jul. 9, 2007 @ 5:07p
CorporateBob said:Just an FYI for everyone... I applied for the SavingsLink account, and was denied based on "information provided by Equifax" (in a hard pull). The reps from Countrywide refused to tell me why, just that I could obtain a copy of my report from Equifax. Is it legal for them to pull credit, deny the account, and then refuse to give a reason why (other than that it was based on the info in the report)? I always thought that they had to give a reason.
It is just bizarre to be denied a savings account based on a credit report. Are they afraid that I'm going to park too much money in it?
Anyway, I suppose that this adds to the warnings that customer service with these guys is not great. They are not worried that you are going to put to much in. You should get your report right away as there might be something pretty bad on it. Also I find Countrywide CSR's very good |
-
-
CorporateBob
- Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 9, 2007 @ 5:21p
Gsolis31 said:I would imagine they wont give out specific reasons for denial for privacy reasons. I experienced similar thing when opening HSBC during their 6% promo. Was denied ad got the free online report, saw the name of an old student loan I had consolidated (this was the holdup) and was able to reapply with the correct information, approved with no problems.
I wouldn't put too much stock in this as some warning sign as this seems pretty business-as-usual. Any idea why the old student loan not reporting correctly would've caused them to deny the account? I have a copy of the report issued today... I just don't know what to look for... nothing adverse, just some high balances and a goodly # of inquiries. |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|