Edit

Forums
Finance

0% APR on gas, supermarkets, drugstores till 2011 with Citi Diamond Prefered Card. Archived From: Finance

  • tweet this
  • Post to Facebook
  • Text Only
  • Search this Topic »
  • Classic
  • Go to Page :
  • 134 5 67
alert mods    

I called the application line, and was unsurprised to find a completely clueless CSR who said confidently that the minimum monthly payment on this card was...get this...10%!

Next, I called main Citi customer service, and lucked out with someone who was very competent (passing all my little "test prompts" with ease and screwing up nothing.) He confirmed what I suspected after rechecking my own T&C's...that Citi has been switching ALL their cards (business too) to a policy of the greater of (1.5% OR 1% + finance charges) for their minimum payments. Of course, since this is 0%, you'd be looking at 1.5%. That makes the deal MUCH more attractive than a straight 3% minimum over time.


CreditGuy said:3) It's not a question about whether this card is better or worse than another card. If you can get more or other 0% BT cards, go for it. Why wait? Why try to predict what will be available years from now? 0% BT cards are gifts; they're profitable now. You don't have to choose. Get as many of those suckers as you can.Generally I agree with your analysis, CreditGuy. The problem is that it assumes there's no "opportunity cost" to jumping on every tasty offer that comes along.

Sadly, those costs are significant. This deal is a case in point: many FWers who find this deal hot will be unable to get approved for it because they didn't "keep some powder dry" RE their credit profile: e.g. very high inquiries, number of new lines, etc. By carefully applying for only the very tastiest of new offers--and then "nursing" them along over time to the kind of huge lines that allow massive leverage--one dramatically improves the odds of being accepted for new offers like these.


alert mods    

It the minimum payment is 1.5%, than quickly rerunning with the new minimum payment yields yields the data attached below. This is much more attractive now, but note that you do need large credit lines to make this work, especially if you spend $600/month. On the other hand, you do need to consider whether this will create problems with 0% offers. I still think getting this card is not a bad idea since it will work as a pretty good insurance poly, and worst case it can always be converted or combined later if you need to get a different Citi card.

Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 5%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $1969.73
Cash Back without card: $1103.52
Difference: $866.21


Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 5%
Monthly Purchases: $600
Max CC Balance: $22045.22
Cash Back with card: $3939.46
Cash Back without card: $2215.73
Difference: $1723.73


Interest Rate: 7%
Tax Rate: 5%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $2865.77
Cash Back without card: $1161.49
Difference: $1704.28


Interest Rate: 7%
Tax Rate: 5%
Monthly Purchases: $600
Max CC Balance: $22045.22
Cash Back with card: $5731.54
Cash Back without card: $2335.83
Difference: $3395.70


Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 10%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $1866.85
Cash Back without card: $1096.76
Difference: $770.09


Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 10%
Monthly Purchases: $600
Max CC Balance: $22045.22
Cash Back with card: $3733.70
Cash Back without card: $2201.74
Difference: $1531.95


Interest Rate: 7%
Tax Rate: 10%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $2715.73
Cash Back without card: $1151.68
Difference: $1564.05


Interest Rate: 7%
Tax Rate: 10%
Monthly Purchases: $600
Max CC Balance: $22045.22
Cash Back with card: $5431.46
Cash Back without card: $2315.53
Difference: $3115.93


Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 25%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $1558.21
Cash Back without card: $1076.46
Difference: $481.74


Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 25%
Monthly Purchases: $600
Max CC Balance: $22045.22
Cash Back with card: $3116.41
Cash Back without card: $2159.79
Difference: $956.63


Interest Rate: 7%
Tax Rate: 25%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $2265.61
Cash Back without card: $1122.23
Difference: $1143.38


Interest Rate: 7%
Tax Rate: 25%
Monthly Purchases: $600
Max CC Balance: $22045.22
Cash Back with card: $4531.21
Cash Back without card: $2254.61
Difference: $2276.61


Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 35%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $1352.45
Cash Back without card: $1062.93
Difference: $289.51


Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 35%
Monthly Purchases: $600
Max CC Balance: $22045.22
Cash Back with card: $2704.89
Cash Back without card: $2131.81
Difference: $573.08


Interest Rate: 7%
Tax Rate: 35%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $1965.53
Cash Back without card: $1102.60
Difference: $862.93


Interest Rate: 7%
Tax Rate: 35%
Monthly Purchases: $600
Max CC Balance: $22045.22
Cash Back with card: $3931.05
Cash Back without card: $2213.99
Difference: $1717.06


alert mods    

Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 35%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $1352.45
Cash Back without card: $1062.93
Difference: $289.51
$15/month in cash rewards * 60 months is $900. Is $162.93 extra explained by investing the rewards ?


alert mods    

Worth a shot to ask them to apply this offer to my Diamond Card now?

You guys are great.

Robyn


alert mods    

EricGo said:Interest Rate: 5%
Tax Rate: 35%
Monthly Purchases: $300
Max CC Balance: $11022.61
Cash Back with card: $1352.45
Cash Back without card: $1062.93
Difference: $289.51
$15/month in cash rewards * 60 months is $900. Is $162.93 extra explained by investing the rewards ?


I decided that since the 0% money would be locked away, we might as well lock the rewards away also. So that's the rewards in a MMA at the specified interest rate. See my first post for all the detail.


alert mods    

don't like it guys.
if i spend $1,000 on my 5% rewards card i get an almost instant tax-free $50. however, if i spend $1,000 on this card and carry the balance, i put $1,000 on the bank and get 50 taxable bucks a year from now. in addition, i have to make minimum payments on that $1000. time value of money...
this is good only if you strongly believe that 5% Cash Back will disappear soon and/or the deposit rates will increase steadily and/or you are cash strapped. and about the $300 limit, i have a bunch of cards so no worries here.
therefore, i won't bite.


alert mods    

amerifat said:don't like it guys.
if i spend $1,000 on my 5% rewards card i get an almost instant tax-free $50. however, if i spend $1,000 on this card and carry the balance, i put $1,000 on the bank and get 50 taxable bucks a year from now. in addition, i have to make minimum payments on that $1000. time value of money...
this is good only if you strongly believe that 5% Cash Back will disappear soon and/or the deposit rates will increase steadily and/or you are cash strapped. and about the $300 limit, i have a bunch of cards so no worries here.
therefore, i won't bite.


Good point, I wonder if our financial analyst (dblevitan) took into account the interest people would earn if they kept their minimum payments in the bank?


alert mods    

cameron2003 said:
Good point, I wonder if our financial analyst (dblevitan) took into account the interest people would earn if they kept their minimum payments in the bank?


I don't think I understand what you mean. The only reason we're making minimum payments here is because the money is being held at 0%. The minimum payments have to come from somewhere. I suppose you could pay them from current income, but you may as well deposit that money into a savings account and pay from the savings account. I don't really see the big deal. And with the rewards cards, you have to pay it back every month in full or you're going to pay lots of interest. Let me know exactly what you want me to take into consideration and I'll try to figure out how to include, but right now I don't understand.


alert mods    

All this reading made me want to do the calculations for myself.

I made some calculations of my own taking into account the following:
- $500 spent in gas/groceries per month (makes it easier to compare to someone who maxes out the current citi 5% card)
- the balance grows by $500 - 3% payment per month
- I calculated interest being earned every month (so current total adjusted balance * 0.05/12) assuming 5% savings account
- I accumulated total interest for each year for 5 years and taxed each year's interest accordingly

This came out to a net of:
25% tax bracket: $1759.39
28% tax bracket: $1513.03
33% tax bracket: $1102.42

Now compare this to the current 5% citi card (assumes your rewards are put in a 5% account, and that interest is taxed)
25% tax bracket: $1602.56
28% tax bracket: $1586
33% tax bracket: $1558.4

This comes out to a a difference between the two cards of:
25% tax bracket: $156.83
28% tax bracket: -$72.97
33% tax bracket: -$455.98

While I'm sure I didn't take everything into account, this was enough to convince me the deal wasn't as good as I originally thought. Hope this helps.


alert mods    

dblevitan said:cameron2003 said:
Good point, I wonder if our financial analyst (dblevitan) took into account the interest people would earn if they kept their minimum payments in the bank?


I don't think I understand what you mean. The only reason we're making minimum payments here is because the money is being held at 0%. The minimum payments have to come from somewhere. I suppose you could pay them from current income, but you may as well deposit that money into a savings account and pay from the savings account. I don't really see the big deal. And with the rewards cards, you have to pay it back every month in full or you're going to pay lots of interest. Let me know exactly what you want me to take into consideration and I'll try to figure out how to include, but right now I don't understand.


Oh forget it, I think I had a brain cramp. I think your numbers are right, far as I can tell. One last idea though: If we indeed can only have so much credit card debt at any one time, it makes more sense to have the debt on a card that we dont have to give up rewards on. If you believe the debt we can have is pretty much limitless, then it doesnt matter.


alert mods    

Ok so my calculation is based on neglecting minimum payment due. But that will only make the problem worse...

APR=4.88
$1000 in gas/groc/drugs purchased in a month
fed tax rate=25%
state tax rate=5%
combined after tax return=.7

0=(1000*(1+0.0488/365)^days-1000)*0.7-50-(50*(1+0.0488/365)^days)*0.7

The magical power of goal seek tells me that the break even day is 899 days later!

So forgoing the reward means you only break even after 2.5 years for a given purchase? This seems less hot than before. If you take the BT for 1 year you could only take advantage for 1.5 years before you would need to stop? Still profitable but less than I thought.

Did I make a mistake? I know it is only approximate but the numbers would get worse when you account for minimum payemtns.


alert mods    

amerifat said:don't like it guys.
if i spend $1,000 on my 5% rewards card i get an almost instant tax-free $50. however, if i spend $1,000 on this card and carry the balance, i put $1,000 on the bank and get 50 taxable bucks a year from now. in addition, i have to make minimum payments on that $1000. time value of money...
this is good only if you strongly believe that 5% Cash Back will disappear soon and/or the deposit rates will increase steadily and/or you are cash strapped


You're forgeting year after year of 0% interest in your analysis, adjusted for minimum payments. Speaking of cash strapped, this is a great tool for allowing you to fund your Roth IRA's for the duration of this offer if you couldn't afford to otherwise. When the promo ends, at the minimum you will have built up some tax free earnings if you are still cash strapped and have pay off your card with your Roth contributions.

If you fit the right profile, this deal is golden. I should do well with this offer since I have: high fixed everyday expenses, a low tax rate, and an interest in rate gaming/hunting.


alert mods    

timetosave said:All this reading made me want to do the calculations for myself.


Although I didn't independently verify your numbers, I like your assuptions/calculations better than mine. However, as others have said, you can do the BT to start this card to "guarantee" it is worth your time because for most FWFers 12 months 0% APR is all they are getting out of most cards anyway.

Ok, so we are at break even for the inquiry hit/new card, so far so good. Now if you look at my analysis for a 30% tax bracket you see the break even point would be approximately 2.5 years (actually a little after that once you account for minimum payments like you did but I'm feeling lazy). So you could then use this card for purchases for say 12-15 months. Then for the remaining 33~36 months you could throw this card in your desk and treat your balance like a BT.

To summarize, it doesn't have to be all or nothing. However, this also neglects the highly disputed opportunity cost that during years 2-5 you are carrying a higher utilization. So in theory if you don't do this deal and take the 5% reward straight out it is possible that you could have gotten more BTs money because you aren't carrying this debt. I'm not saying you would be floating a higher total amount, just that perhaps you could have had an equivalent amount to the purchase balance from BT blances and gotten your 5%. maybe


alert mods    

Dave you are correct. I changed a few more things and it made this offer seem worse.

However, this was not factoring in the opportunity cost of investing the money from the 0% BT upfront. This would obviously add to the card's appeal, but then again, there are a number of other cards with the -% BT. I was trying to find out if it would be worth using for all my gas/groceries as a substitute for my current citi 5% card. I'll try to post my spreadsheet later where people can specify things like:
- credit line used for BT
- monthly spending
- tax bracket

One interesting thing is that spending $500 a month in purchases left me with a total balance of ~$14k at the end of the promotion. After a while the 3% a month starts to hamper the growing balance.... obviously. a Tradtional BT is better because you can immediately put the credit line to use.

Basically it takes one year to get a 5% return on your money with this card (and this is 100% taxes), but this doesn't grow that fast because of the 3% min payment (if thats what it really is). The current citi 5% card gives you this 5% instantly tax free (and only the interest earned on this money is taxed).


alert mods    

timetosave said:I made some calculations of my own taking into account the following:
- $500 spent in gas/groceries per month (makes it easier to compare to someone who maxes out the current citi 5% card)
- the balance grows by $500 - 3% payment per month


Again, this is incorrect.
It's 1.5% per month, not 3% per month.

As dblevitan noted just above you, "This is much more attractive now.."


alert mods    

slimcustomer said:amerifat said:don't like it guys.
if i spend $1,000 on my 5% rewards card i get an almost instant tax-free $50. however, if i spend $1,000 on this card and carry the balance, i put $1,000 on the bank and get 50 taxable bucks a year from now. in addition, i have to make minimum payments on that $1000. time value of money...
this is good only if you strongly believe that 5% Cash Back will disappear soon and/or the deposit rates will increase steadily and/or you are cash strapped


You're forgeting year after year of 0% interest in your analysis, adjusted for minimum payments. Speaking of cash strapped, this is a great tool for allowing you to fund your Roth IRA's for the duration of this offer if you couldn't afford to otherwise. When the promo ends, at the minimum you will have built up some tax free earnings if you are still cash strapped and have pay off your card with your Roth contributions.

If you fit the right profile, this deal is golden. I should do well with this offer since I have: high fixed everyday expenses, a low tax rate, and an interest in rate gaming/hunting.



i realized that i assumed a year only at 0% and wanted to edit my post but then i got lazy. anyway, you need a healthy credit limit on this one.
do you realize that some people will overeat, overmedicate and overdrive just for the sake of this 0%?
"honey, but we have 0% for 5 yrs on this one, buy more pepsi, chips and mylanta! now we can buy an suv, gas is FREE* for 5 yrs!"


*not free


alert mods    

FYI, you can get 0% APR on a BT for about a year (till Aug 07) with this card, with no transaction fees if you do it at the same time as you apply.

I have a Chase 5% rewards card with 0% on purchases for a year that lasts 8 more months or so...If I was to apply for this, I'd take a BT first till Aug 07 and keep using the Chase card for the rewards+0% until it runs out, then switch to using this card.

People who apply and get this, please post information on what purchases qualify and don't. The important one for many people in the DE/PA/NJ area is Wawa...some have gas and some don't, but many people spend lots of money on prepared foods there.

-D


alert mods    

excel spreadsheet

theres an excel sheet that should end all the problems with this.
you can enter the amount of gas and the amount of groceries you purchase in a month and enter the expected interest rate for each year for 5 years and change them accordingly. I also included a calculationf or instant 5% CashBack accumulating interest as though you had just put it in an interest bearing account as well. Hands down the 0% deal is a good deal assuming minimum pmt of 1.5%
i set it up so that you could change the minimum pmt as well. This should be the end all to everything

for instance
assuming 700/mo spending and the appropriate credit limit you could wind up with 6400 cash vs 2778 CashBack + accumulated interest this is with tiered interest rates over the next 5 yrs being 5% 5.5% 6% 6.5% 7%

im going to get in on this and switch most of my citi cars credit lines over to this card.


alert mods    

Nice spreadsheet there are a few things people have forgot about also.

Maximum limit on 5% rebates isn't it around $300/YR?

Also the max CL is around 25k or so most posters have claimed thats the general limit they give out for unsecured. So then in March 2010 it will kind of negate itself and plane out for the rest of the 0% offer which the interest would stay at a constant marker of 25k


alert mods    

andy2812 said:This seems like a very good deal if you're diciplined enough to only use the card on qualifying purchases. By putting the money in a 5% account, without taking compounding into account, you're basically earning 5% on the money every year until you pay it off in 2011. That comes out to 20%-25% until you pay it off on any charges made this year. With the current 5% cards, you earn 5% this year and that's it. Seems like a no brainer to me.

let's not forget that the 5% savings rate will either go up or down depending on the Fed. this card is tempting nevertheless. If anything, I can stick it to the Man (oil men or women)


 Close

Sign Me In
Nickname: 
Password: 
Remember My Login Information:

Forget your login information?

Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!



Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2009