|
-
-
PolarDude
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Jan. 24, 2007 @ 11:30a
SecondCor521 said: ...
This is my first AOR, so I am still not exactly clear on the relationship between the brand names and the issuers and the card types and all that. I was trying for a variety of issuers but I did notice a going through the apps that even when it would say "bank X" it would end up REALLY being First USA, or Chase, or something. I don't know what effect that might have on my approvals.
Scores: If I had done my own thread, I would have called it a Lazy-O-Rama as I didn't check my credit scores before and have no intentions of checking them after. I do know when I applied for my mortgage in late November, my mortgage company informed me my score was 761, and that was before my only outstanding balance dropped under 50% utilization on that card. I can check my Equifax report for free and I know I have lots of credit cards from the big issuers with high limits, no lates ever.
Age: I have one card that reports on my Equifax report that was opened in 1978. It's actually my Dad's card but it ended up on my report because we have similar names and at the time I was living at his address. I have never fixed the error because I know it helps my credit score. (I've told him about it and he's fine with it.)
Utilization: Just under 49% on one card, all the rest at zero balances. Overall utilization is about 6% depending on how they want to count my HELOC which reports on Equifax as a mortgage account.
High credit: I have a $35,900 line with Citi.
Reported income: Prefer not to say specifically. Probably about average for a FWer.
Biz: "2Cor521 Enterprises", no EIN provided, sole proprietor, 1 employee, financial services consulting.
2Cor521
Your score was probably 750+ The first USA card is really chase. The cobranded cards would be certain retail Visa/MC, and especially other banks, I think you had a couple in there. BofA has Netbank, and Citi has Keybank. I think the Citi gas cards qualify as cobranded. BofA & Chase seem generous in multiple approvals. AMEX Business has cobranded bank cards. GE is a big cobrand king. SCM got like 10 approvals in one AOR from them, the approvals ranged from a few hundred to 15k+ |
-
-
iSpecK
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 24, 2007 @ 2:45p
how much luck has everyone had getting No fee BTs after the application date? I didn't ask for BT's because
1) From reading, it didn't look like I would be able to BT into a checking account from most cards 2) I had no idea how much credit I would be approved for since I haven't applied for a new card in years and dont have a ton of existing credit
I'd like to use some offers to BT into one of my ne Citi cards (when they get approved) and then get myself some checks to deposit but this will be done after the app stage. Any tips to get CC Co's to waive the BT fee or do most of you guys just eat the $75? |
-
-
psubill78
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 7:41a
letsgetsilly said:For those of you who have participated in the app-o-rama, perhaps you have an excel sheet that you used as a template to hold all of the credit card info / call numbers, etc. I'm curious as to how you organized yourselves. Please post an excel template if you have one, or point to a better tool. Thanks.
It's called quicken baby. |
-
-
danboris
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 8:33a
I've been trying to look through the AOR threads but there are just tons and tons of them and I can't seem to find the right one for the info I'm looking for. I'm trying to understand exactly what the steps are after being approved for all the new lines of credit. I am seeing the 0% BTs into checking, check writing, investing, etc. but it's not clicking in my head how you actually get that money in your hands and invest it elsewhere. Is there a particular thread that explains the AOR process? Maybe also the right age/amount of credit history one should have before attempting? I looked through this one since it was titled "FAQ" but still don't see how it exactly works in detail. Anyone can hopefully direct me to an applicable thread or source of information so I can research more rather than asking questions that I know must be answered in other places? Thanks. |
-
-
lappyhappy
- Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 11:11a
Just got finished reading every single post in this thread as well as many other aor and bt threads but a question still remains for this newbie... Is the BT money a card gives you based on your current CL's, or is it based on how much you currently owe?
It would seem that if a CC company is doing a hard pull they will see your total CL's and utilization, which means they know how much you owe on other cards. Why would they give you BT $'s in the amount of your total CL instead of only giving you the amount which is currently owed on these other cards? |
-
-
SecondCor521
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 11:29a
lappyhappy said:Just got finished reading every single post in this thread as well as many other aor and bt threads but a question still remains for this newbie... Is the BT money a card gives you based on your current CL's, or is it based on how much you currently owe?
It would seem that if a CC company is doing a hard pull they will see your total CL's and utilization, which means they know how much you owe on other cards. Why would they give you BT $'s in the amount of your total CL instead of only giving you the amount which is currently owed on these other cards?
Some CC companies will allow you to "BT" money to yourself so you can go on vacation, pay your tax bill, make home improvements, or whatever they think you think you need or want additional money for. In other words, they want you to go into more hock so you'll end up paying them more interest in the long run when (they hope) you fail to pay off the balance within the introductory offer period.
They will give you a CL that they're willing to risk on you based on their evaluation of your creditworthiness as defined by your credit score. The amount that you can then BT will be any amount up to your CL. Note that if you borrow 100% of your CL and there is a BT fee on top of that, then you may get charged an over limit fee. For example, if you have a $10,000 CL and there is a BT fee of $75, then you should never BT more than $9,925. Even then, there are many here that advocate only using a percentage of your CL, such as 90%, 70%, or 50%. If you have a high utilization on any card it makes you look bad to the CC companies and you will not be as successful in your AORs as you otherwise might be.
2Cor521 |
-
-
lappyhappy
- Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 11:52a
SecondCor521 said: Some CC companies will allow you to "BT" money to yourself so you can go on vacation, pay your tax bill, make home improvements, or whatever they think you think you need or want additional money for. In other words, they want you to go into more hock so you'll end up paying them more interest in the long run when (they hope) you fail to pay off the balance within the introductory offer period.2Cor521
AH ok... so as I understand it there are basically two types of cc companies you'll deal with on an aor/bt:
Type A: Doesn't care what you do with the money, they just want to have you be in debt to them (these types will have no problem making the BT check out to you)
Type B: Only want the funds to go toward paying off other cards (in these cases you must have a "believable" account to which they can send the funds.) But this leads back to my original question... in the case of this type of company, would they still be making the BT in the amount of the total CL or just in the amount that you owed on the cards whose balances you want to transfer? (I'm assuming by your previous post that it would be in the amount of the CL but I still can't understand from the side of the CC company why this would be.)
SecondCor521 said: They will give you a CL that they're willing to risk on you based on their evaluation of your creditworthiness as defined by your credit score. The amount that you can then BT will be any amount up to your CL. Note that if you borrow 100% of your CL and there is a BT fee on top of that, then you may get charged an over limit fee. For example, if you have a $10,000 CL and there is a BT fee of $75, then you should never BT more than $9,925. Even then, there are many here that advocate only using a percentage of your CL, such as 90%, 70%, or 50%. If you have a high utilization on any card it makes you look bad to the CC companies and you will not be as successful in your AORs as you otherwise might be. 2Cor521
Very good advice, I'll be sure to watch out for this. |
-
-
SecondCor521
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 12:22p
lappyhappy said:SecondCor521 said: Some CC companies will allow you to "BT" money to yourself so you can go on vacation, pay your tax bill, make home improvements, or whatever they think you think you need or want additional money for. In other words, they want you to go into more hock so you'll end up paying them more interest in the long run when (they hope) you fail to pay off the balance within the introductory offer period.2Cor521
AH ok... so as I understand it there are basically two types of cc companies you'll deal with on an aor/bt:
Type A: Doesn't care what you do with the money, they just want to have you be in debt to them (these types will have no problem making the BT check out to you)
Type B: Only want the funds to go toward paying off other cards (in these cases you must have a "believable" account to which they can send the funds.) But this leads back to my original question... in the case of this type of company, would they still be making the BT in the amount of the total CL or just in the amount that you owed on the cards whose balances you want to transfer? (I'm assuming by your previous post that it would be in the amount of the CL but I still can't understand from the side of the CC company why this would be.)
My understanding is that all CC companies are really "Type A". In theory, they could cross-check your BT request against the balance reported on the your credit report. In practice, they don't do this. I can think of a few reasons:
1. Your balance might have changed between the time they pulled your credit report and the time you request the BT. 2. The people at the CC company who do the BT requests are in a whole different area of the company from the people who pull your credit report. 3. They really don't care what you do with the money; what matters is that you owe them and they hope to get interest from you.
Practices by CC company do differ as to whether they will give you the money by letting you do a real BT to a credit card, deposit it directly into your checking account, or send you physical checks which you can write out to whomever you wish. I don't have a ready explanation as to these differences. They may vary by customer and by CC company and possibly by credit card.
The easy ways I know of to get money from a BT are:
1. BT to a Visa debit card attached to my checking account. This apparently works because to the company giving you the BT money it looks exactly like a traditional BT. They can't tell from the Visa number that it's going to a checking account instead of a credit card account. 2. BT to a Citi card that has a zero balance, then requesting Citi send you a refund check for your "overpayment". 3. Direct deposit to checking account, if available from the CC company.
HTH,
2Cor521 |
-
-
lappyhappy
- Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 12:35p
SecondCor521 said: My understanding is that all CC companies are really "Type A". In theory, they could cross-check your BT request against the balance reported on the your credit report. In practice, they don't do this. I can think of a few reasons:
1. Your balance might have changed between the time they pulled your credit report and the time you request the BT. 2. The people at the CC company who do the BT requests are in a whole different area of the company from the people who pull your credit report. 3. They really don't care what you do with the money; what matters is that you owe them and they hope to get interest from you.
Makes sense
SecondCor521 said: The easy ways I know of to get money from a BT are:
1. BT to a Visa debit card attached to my checking account. This apparently works because to the company giving you the BT money it looks exactly like a traditional BT. They can't tell from the Visa number that it's going to a checking account instead of a credit card account. 2. BT to a Citi card that has a zero balance, then requesting Citi send you a refund check for your "overpayment". 3. Direct deposit to checking account, if available from the CC company.
Awesome. Many thanks for the great explanations. |
-
-
Deshi
- Happy Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 1:32p
I have a noob question. I am thinking about APP-O-RAMA.
I heard somewhere that when doing app-o-rama, it helps to do soft inquiries through a credit monitoring service.
How does that help? Can somebody point me to right direction or link? Thanks in advance.
The reason I am interested in smoothing the impact on my score is I want to do App-O-rama for gathering some quick cash for immediate need and then apply for a joint loan within a month for business purpose (3 partners with great credit)
Any helpful comment is highly appreciated. |
-
-
iSpecK
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 1:45p
It is highly advised that you DON'T do an AOR if you are applying for other credit within 6 months
several hard inquiries will show up on your credit report as a result of the AOR.
Bumpage refers to doing soft pulls on your credit report through a credit agency by pulling your own credit several times
YMMV with this approach as different lending agencies view these inquiries differenrly
if you have never tried this before you really should not try this right now, before asking for a loan |
-
-
flwsoldier
- Thrifty Member
-
-
danboris
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 2:17p
Just to make sure I'm understanding correctly...does it work like this? Arbitrary numbers, estimates, just the main idea please.
For example, you apply for 10 credit cards, lets say each has a 5k credit limit. Now to be safe and not make your credit utilization too high, let's say you allocate 90% of each limit as a balance transfer to your Check/Debit Card account, which is your checking account. There's $45,000 you just put into your checking account, minus let's say...$100 per balance transfer, so that's $44,000 to your checking. Let's say you deposit all this into a money market account with an average 5% annual yield. Not counting it being calculated monthly, but just 5% yearly, that's $2200 made for free per year on interest from that money. All the while we'll be making an average, I dunno, 3% minimum payment on each balance for each card per month, so subtract (an overestimated) $100/month (continually decreasing) per card. So over the course of the year, you pay back $12,000 in minimum payments, you pay back the remaining $32,000, and you have your $2200 for free. This is all of course overestimating monthly payments, rather low credit limits, and a very conservative rate of return. The money made should be much higher than this. It all works as long as you can pay the minimum payments for each card.
Basically this how it goes? |
-
-
SecondCor521
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 3:33p
danboris said:Just to make sure I'm understanding correctly...does it work like this? Arbitrary numbers, estimates, just the main idea please.
For example, you apply for 10 credit cards, lets say each has a 5k credit limit. Now to be safe and not make your credit utilization too high, let's say you allocate 90% of each limit as a balance transfer to your Check/Debit Card account, which is your checking account. There's $45,000 you just put into your checking account, minus let's say...$100 per balance transfer, so that's $44,000 to your checking. Let's say you deposit all this into a money market account with an average 5% annual yield. Not counting it being calculated monthly, but just 5% yearly, that's $2200 made for free per year on interest from that money. All the while we'll be making an average, I dunno, 3% minimum payment on each balance for each card per month, so subtract (an overestimated) $100/month (continually decreasing) per card. So over the course of the year, you pay back $12,000 in minimum payments, you pay back the remaining $32,000, and you have your $2200 for free. This is all of course overestimating monthly payments, rather low credit limits, and a very conservative rate of return. The money made should be much higher than this. It all works as long as you can pay the minimum payments for each card.
Basically this how it goes?
Yup, more or less. Note that the amount of effort required is essentially the same independent of credit limit -- you can make $4400 in your example if you assume a $10k credit limit -- which is partly why there is so much effort devoted here to getting high limits. Also note that the minimum payments can be paid from the money in the money market account, so you don't even have to pay those out of current cash flow if you don't want to.
2Cor521
Edited 20070125 for word choice. |
Message edited by: SecondCor521 on 2007-01-25 16:22:33 CST
-
-
SuperMxyz
- Happy Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 5:10p
SuperMxyz said:What's to stop a person from just keeping their 0% money and letting their credit slip or possibly negotiating a smaller cash payoff? Sorry if this has been covered, if it has please point me in the right direction.
What if you're approaching retirement age and haven't saved any money besides home equity. Say at this point you have $500k on credit cards and sell your house to liquidate 200k equity. Couldn't you live in a retirement home or rent with your 700k (in CDs or a shoebox) and be able to live much more comfortably than if you only had 200k equity and no cash? What are the credit companies going to do, take your social security money?
Will this be the retirement plan of the future?
Can anyone answer this? It got buried in the last few pages with no responses. Children aren't liable for the money. If you die with credit card debt, it may be taken out of your estate but why would you care if you have no estate? |
-
-
NorCalSci
- Ancient Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 5:32p
SuperMxyz said:SuperMxyz said:What's to stop a person from just keeping their 0% money and letting their credit slip or possibly negotiating a smaller cash payoff? Sorry if this has been covered, if it has please point me in the right direction.
What if you're approaching retirement age and haven't saved any money besides home equity. Say at this point you have $500k on credit cards and sell your house to liquidate 200k equity. Couldn't you live in a retirement home or rent with your 700k (in CDs or a shoebox) and be able to live much more comfortably than if you only had 200k equity and no cash? What are the credit companies going to do, take your social security money?
Will this be the retirement plan of the future?
Can anyone answer this? It got buried in the last few pages with no responses. Children aren't liable for the money. If you die with credit card debt, it may be taken out of your estate but why would you care if you have no estate?The retirement plan of the future??? You mean for weasles???
So let's see... You fail to plan for your retirement so you hatch a plan to steal as much money as possible from financial institutions instead???
Just think of the possibilites if you were to open that up to stealing from your neighbors, actually robbing banks, slip and fall "accidents", writing bad checks.
Would you print your own money, too? |
-
-
SecondCor521
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 5:34p
SuperMxyz said:SuperMxyz said:What's to stop a person from just keeping their 0% money and letting their credit slip or possibly negotiating a smaller cash payoff? Sorry if this has been covered, if it has please point me in the right direction.
What if you're approaching retirement age and haven't saved any money besides home equity. Say at this point you have $500k on credit cards and sell your house to liquidate 200k equity. Couldn't you live in a retirement home or rent with your 700k (in CDs or a shoebox) and be able to live much more comfortably than if you only had 200k equity and no cash? What are the credit companies going to do, take your social security money?
Will this be the retirement plan of the future?
Can anyone answer this? It got buried in the last few pages with no responses. Children aren't liable for the money. If you die with credit card debt, it may be taken out of your estate but why would you care if you have no estate?
A few reasons spring to mind:
1. Anyone responsible enough for long enough to convince CC companies to loan them $500k is probably not going to change to become this irresponsible. 2. I'm not strong on the law, but I'm sure the CC companies could easily obtain a judgment against you for monies owed them. Good luck trying to hide money in a place where you can get to it to pay rent, buy groceries, etc. but a court can't get to in order to satisfy the judgment. 3. If you died with unsecured debt outstanding, it would be a claim against any proceeds from your estate. If you didn't have a large enough estate to pay your unsecured debt, yes, it would be wiped out. Your kids would inherit nothing, which would only be an issue if you wanted to leave them something. Many parents, I think, would want to leave something to their kids. 4. You wouldn't be able to negotiate a smaller cash payoff unless the creditors were convinced you didn't have the money to pay them back. 5. If anyone could prove you did this intentionally, I think you could be prosecuted for fraud, which for $500k certainly would mean prison time. 6. At the very least you would have collection agencies on your back for the rest of your life.
2Cor521 |
-
-
cardjuggler
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 11:03p
danboris said:Now to be safe and not make your credit utilization too high, let's say you allocate 90% of each limit as a balance transfer to your Check/Debit Card account, which is your checking account. Great summary. Two notes: 50% is safe, 90% (especially across all cards) is risky, above 90% even more so. And, BT to Check/Debit card sometimes works but often has problems. That's why there's a whole thread on alternatives. |
-
-
SecretSaver
- Member
rated:
posted: Jan. 26, 2007 @ 8:54a
OK I was hoping someone could point me to a link here on FW that has all the best 0% offers and/or bonuses available for someone getting ready to do an App-O-Rama.
Thanks,
SecretSaver |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|