It is hard to believe that there is not an active discussion on what the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will do at upcoming meetings.
Seeing the enormous impact and power that rates set by the FOMC have, it would be interesting to hear FW members views' on what is going to happen.
Let's refer to them as the FOMC instead of the "Fed" since the FOMC consists of twelve voting members: the seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank presidents. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOMC
A lot of traders and exchanges are putting the odds that the FOMC will pause next week. Most notably, Bill Gross of PIMCO fame. There is a nice contrarian view here, though it was posted (8/2/06) before the latest unemployment numbers (8/4/06)
Users like you can add images, links and other relevant information about this topic.
posted: Aug. 4, 2006 @ 11:48a
jairocon
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Aug. 4, 2006 @ 12:09p
Based on the job report today and how the eur/usd moved I expect a rate pause on tuesday. It seems that the economy is indeed slowing down, and there is no reason not to pause for a moment and take an extended look for the FOMC.
Bernanke could go for another rate increase to establish himself as a tough inflation fighter. Also, all the inflation numbers are still higher than the FOMC likes. If this happened, I think the markets would be ecstatic because the FOMC has to take a break now or at the next meeting.
If they don't raise the rate now, the markets will be unclear as to what will happen next meeting. But, if they do raise the rates, they will be drawn and quartered in the press. Tough choice.
asharerin
Senior Member
posted: Aug. 4, 2006 @ 1:59p
In my mind Bernanke has no idea where the US economy is at. I don't believe anybody does. Has inflation been stifled for now with an obvious slowing economy or is stagflation starting to rear its ugly head?
That jobs number was horrible. 100k new jobs is the bare minimum to keep the economy going so watch that jobs number in coming months. We also have to remember the effects of interest rate hikes lag the current data. Most people believe 4.00-4.25% is probably the neutral rate so we are well ahead of that. Im thinking the FOMC has gone too far with their hikes already.
But this problem all goes back to "bubbles" Greenspan. We "cheated" our way out of this last recession with ultra low artificial rates and as a result mutliple bubble markets have been born. Someday pain must be felt somewhere for the economy to right itself again. You don't get something for nothing. The US dollar could help rememdy this with another big downleg but the asian countries won't let this happen.
So what do we have left? A national economy heavily manipulated by the FOMC and foreign central banks. Are they stronger than natural market forces? History tells us the market always wins handily against artificial intervention at some stage.
My biggest concern is the negative US savings rate for 15 straight months and current government spending. It really is terrifically unsustainable in the medium term. The US consumer must keep spending but how much more debt can be piled on before reality hits? If inflation isn't squelched can the FOMC keep raising rates without crippling the US consumer and bursting the housing bubble?
Yeah Bernanke inherited a doozy alright. Normally the FOMC would be happy to risk a recession against inflation but this time it might be much worse than a recession if they get it wrong.
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 4, 2006 @ 11:56p
OP, there actually has been a semi-active discussion about FOMC policy as part of the T-bill thread, since the short term Treasuries are very sensitive to expected rate changes.
I usually observe the Fed Funds futures contracts. They are a good guide but of course no guarantee. Here are some links:
The spreadsheet indicates a 22% for a rate hike to 5.50% right now and a 78% chance it'll stay at 5.25%.
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 5, 2006 @ 12:10a
All predicitions on what the FOMC will do in August have been very volatile recently. I've seen almost daily swings on what people think will happen. A few days ago I've heard the unexpectedly high PCE (inflation) will seal the deal for another rate hike, then even more recently the unexpectedly slowing jobs growrth was supposed to cause a pause. I don't think anyone really knows at this point, including the FOMC itself. One thing that I have learned is not to listen to predictions of any experts or analysts - they change their mind every day based on new data. That said, an analyst for Deloitte has suggested on CNBC's Worldwide Exchange a few nights ago that the Fed will raise in August, and will begin lowering early in 2007 and arrive at 3.5% eventually. Interesting theory but I'm sure it's just speculation. However, feds funds futures are heading in the direction of lower rates for the January 07 to July 07 contracts.
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 5, 2006 @ 12:22a
asharerin said: So what do we have left? A national economy heavily manipulated by the FOMC and foreign central banks. Are they stronger than natural market forces? History tells us the market always wins handily against artificial intervention at some stage.
What makes you believe that FOMC policy has no control over the economy? Isn't it hard to fight the guy that controls your cost of doing business?
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 5, 2006 @ 4:31p
OP, since the this thread has been a little "under the radar" so far, may I suggest you add something about "Fed" or "Ben Bernanke" etc. to the title? It's quite possible that many people have no idea what the FOMC is but know the term "Fed" very well. (and they may be searching for threads containing "Fed" rather than "FOMC"). No doubt there are more people interested in this topic than the ones that have posted so far.
Thanks for the rec to the T-bill thread, I will check it out soon.
Melody0
Member
posted: Aug. 7, 2006 @ 11:53a
Look, rates are very low. Very low! 5.25% fed rates historically are very low. economy is doing just well enough. everything is getting expensive(inflation). i hope to see the rates - fed funds at 8% in the coming future.
yes no one sees that know. but u will see in the coming yeaRS
Melody0 said: Look, rates are very low. Very low! 5.25% fed rates historically are very low. economy is doing just well enough. everything is getting expensive(inflation). i hope to see the rates - fed funds at 8% in the coming future. This is far above what the FOMC views as neutral, neither advancing or hindering the economy. I think most economists view neutral territory somwhere around 4%, +/- 0.5%.
If they raise the rates to 8% that means they are doing some serious inflation fighting. There is no indication that this would need to be done in the coming years.
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 7, 2006 @ 12:17p
Melody0 said: Look, rates are very low. Very low! 5.25% fed rates historically are very low. economy is doing just well enough. everything is getting expensive(inflation). i hope to see the rates - fed funds at 8% in the coming future.
yes no one sees that know. but u will see in the coming yeaRS
But I think that's precisely the reason that rates are low - the economy is just doing well enough, not a 90's style explosive economy; so raising rates further, which discourages spending, and presumably slows the economy, would not be very effective. But if the economy is not the cause for high inflation, then there must be other (uncontrolled?) factors causing inflation - how to deal with them and how does tightening monetary policy affect them?
Buddy of mine does an interesting analysis of the Treasury curve, given that Treasuries are zero-risk and therefore should provide an implicit forecast of implied future borrowing rates, based on expectation of an efficient market that eliminates arbitrage.
(Basically Treasury rates should reflect expected borrowing costs over their term, so given that the Fed rate is higher now than the curve, there is an expectation that rates should float lower within the horizon of the T-Bill/T-Note's term)
He proceeds to run out the analysis to find what combinations of hikes / future cuts would generate the current Treasury curve, with interesting results. Even with an expected pause, current curve implies at least 3 cuts within the next 2 years.
Certainly a different spin on the age-old question of trying to figure out how interest rates work.
One can argue whether political / geo-political considerations might not be fully priced into the Treasury curve, but there's enough debt trading that the market can be considered to reflect much, if not all of the current economic information available. What is left is market psychology, which may or may not be correctly captured by analyses such as my buddy's, above.
Jay
markkundinger
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 7, 2006 @ 8:42p
I'm still thinking that there's going to be another rate hike on tuesday. Why? There's been signs of economic slowdown, but not inflation slowdown. So, despite the fact that inflation lags economic activity, I think the Fed will need to keep a hawkish tilt to keep the threat low. Because, during my inglorius career as an econ major, I decided that, since the 70's, if the Fed ever has to choose between fighting inflation and economic growth, they're going to fight inflation.
If that's the case, it would mean the analysis at accruedinterest (which was nifty, btw) is demonstrating that market psychology is slightly askew.
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 7, 2006 @ 9:43p
Some of you may be interested in this recent article by the Cleveland Fed:
It has some graphs showing how far fed funds futures were off from the actual target rates set at FOMC meetings 90, 60, and 30 days ahead. It shows that (Fig.3), with improved communications over the years, markets have predicted FOMC policy with an average of better than 5 basis points in the days just before the meeting. (interestingly it looks like their average prediction was no better 30 days out than the day just prior to the meeting - maybe a sign that looking at too recent data is irrelevant?)
It also shows (Fig. 1) that markets have historically overpredicted the end of a tightening campaign 90 days out - which would not be consistent in this case - August FF futures predicted we'd be below 5.25% right now, 3 months ago.
The last graph of Fig. 4 indicates that FF futures before a meeting are seldomly way off from the rate decision (looks like 5-10 bps), although a couple times they have been off 25, 50 or more bps. So looks like if the market gets it wrong, it gets it really wrong. Tomorrow might be a candidate to get it really wrong or really right. It'll be interesting ...
For everyone's information, fed funds futures right now are at 94.705, implying a 5.295% average rate for August, which translates into a 24% chance of a rate hike. This is slightly up from recent days...
x43b
Senior Member
posted: Aug. 8, 2006 @ 1:15p
No rate increase today. The Fed has decided to make no change.
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 8, 2006 @ 1:21p
x43b said: No rate increase today. The Fed has decided to make no change.
Lock in a longer term rate. But the wording makes it seem like this might be just a pause and more hikes still needed. Kind of stinks this way, Market tanked after announcement. So you lose in your portfolio and on getting better interest rates
Repost or not, that's pretty funny. Especially coming from a dean.
SeattleNative
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Aug. 14, 2006 @ 7:35p
The video absolutely made my day!
Any bets on the NEXT FOMC meeting? I'm cautiously guessing the FOMC might hold rates for another meeting, based on volatile energy prices. By historic standards, a 5.25% Fed funds rate is smack dab in neutral territory.....
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 14, 2006 @ 9:41p
SeattleNative said: The video absolutely made my day!
Any bets on the NEXT FOMC meeting? I'm cautiously guessing the FOMC might hold rates for another meeting, based on volatile energy prices. By historic standards, a 5.25% Fed funds rate is smack dab in neutral territory.....
Fed funds futures are pricing in a 25 bps hike in September at currently around 30% chance and for October (if there is not one in September) at around 50% chance. If you look at what the forward rates at the short end of the yield curve imply, it's curiously inverted i.e. both 1-month and 6-month rates are higher than 3-month. That might just mean that there's a lot of demand for 3-month bills right now, perhaps consistent with the notion that we'll see another rate hike in about 3 months.
hiddendragon999
Senior Member
posted: Aug. 14, 2006 @ 10:16p
mariojm said: Fed funds futures are pricing in a 25 bps hike in September at currently around 30% chance and for October (if there is not one in September) at around 50% chance. If you look at what the forward rates at the short end of the yield curve imply, it's curiously inverted i.e. both 1-month and 6-month rates are higher than 3-month. That might just mean that there's a lot of demand for 3-month bills right now, perhaps consistent with the notion that we'll see another rate hike in about 3 months.
We will see PPI and CPI numbers in next couple days. Nothing in the next 6 months will change the 3-4% core inflation rate. You could argue Fed is not targeting this inflation number, but as risk managers, they cannot ignore the upside risks. Housing is the dominant source of liquidity. By pausing here and the next couple meetings, the Fed will actually be tightening on the long-end. A perverse way of doing it, but much more effective than pulling the short-rates to 6.5% while everyone refi's into 15-30 year mortgages creating persistent liquidity.
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 14, 2006 @ 11:08p
hiddendragon999 said: We will see PPI and CPI numbers in next couple days. Nothing in the next 6 months will change the 3-4% core inflation rate. You could argue Fed is not targeting this inflation number, but as risk managers, they cannot ignore the upside risks.
Thanks for the reminder - this time I'll also start watching median CPI, which strips off the "outliers" on the CPI distribution similarly to CPI less food & energy but a little more sophisticated. Is supposedly a better indicator of the "actual" CPI over the coming months than the actual CPI itself. It's reported here by the Cleveland Fed following the CPI release. As you can see, median CPI has been accelerating all year ... my I bonds and TIPS are suddenly feeling very happy.
SeattleNative
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Aug. 15, 2006 @ 12:15a
The inverted yield curve on longer maturities is going to force the FOMC to hold the overnight-funds rate at 5.25%. Longer-maturity bond yields are what really have to go up to reduce inflationary pressure and reduce asset speculation; yanking up the overnight-funds interbank loan rate will only exacerbate the inverted-yield phenomenon which is likely to trigger an unhappy recession.
Remember in late 2000 when the Fed jacked up overnight loan rates up to 6.5%, only to compound slowing in the economy arising from the tech-sector slowdown and the California electric brownouts?
Our economy has been astonishingly resilient in absorbing the shocks of energy-price spikes. The 5.25% overnight-funds rate is NOT "cheap money" in such a manner as to feed inflationary pressures - BUT if the latest CPI and PPI numbers get grimmer, that could change. Right now, it looks like we are facing inflation of about 3.6% (a full percentage point higher than predicted at the beginning of the year) - so this is definitely tied to the psychology of the markets.
anakinskywalker
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Aug. 15, 2006 @ 3:50a
opmnxtc said: anakinskywalker, which thread was this video posted in before?
I just searched (using the search function) for it and didn't find it anywhere.
I'm absolutely positive I'd seen both these links on FWF:
in the same FWF thread... (was it the thread on real estate bubble ? I'm not sure...)
Now the search function is not finding it... So either the search function is buggy, or someone edited the posts and removed the links ?
Anakin
RS4Rings
Back in Rehab
posted: Aug. 15, 2006 @ 10:15a
I think our pause just got a little longer, Was a fun ride the last two years. Glad I locked in a bunch on a couple of one year CDs at 6.12% last month
"The Labor Department said prices at the wholesale level edged up by the smallest amount in five months in July as falling food prices helped offset another rise in energy costs. The 0.1 percent increase for the month was well below the 0.5 percent jump in June."
mariojm
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Aug. 15, 2006 @ 9:07p
scott1961 said: I think our pause just got a little longer, Was a fun ride the last two years. Glad I locked in a bunch on a couple of one year CDs at 6.12% last month
"The Labor Department said prices at the wholesale level edged up by the smallest amount in five months in July as falling food prices helped offset another rise in energy costs. The 0.1 percent increase for the month was well below the 0.5 percent jump in June."
PPI doesn't correlate well with (core) CPI. Forecasts I've seen are putting the core CPI at 0.3% for tomorrow, which is higher than targeted 0.2% value. Year-over-year would be around 4.2% per forecast, slightly down from 4.3% in June but still quite high. But, you might be right that reduced PPI might show up as reduced CPI in months ahead as reduced cost increases trickle down to consumer level. I'm wondering how many months of high inflation the Fed would want to go while observing the effects of their tightening policy without raising further. Looks like right now fed funds futures market is looking at an October increase.
ThursdaysChild
Missed.
posted: Aug. 15, 2006 @ 9:54p
OP: could you add to your original post the dates of the next several FOMC meetings? Thanks.
After two tepid inflation reports, the bond market now seems to have established a new consensus for where the economy is headed. There is now close to 40bps of inversion between Fed Funds and the 2-year, meaning that the market expects multiple Fed Funds cuts in the near future.
After two tepid inflation reports, the bond market now seems to have established a new consensus for where the economy is headed. There is now close to 40bps of inversion between Fed Funds and the 2-year, meaning that the market expects multiple Fed Funds cuts in the near future.
Interesting data point, but "the market" can be pretty irrational at times. I would also imagine that demand for T-Bills would drop (and rates would go up) if everyone is locking in longer-term rates.
After two tepid inflation reports, the bond market now seems to have established a new consensus for where the economy is headed. There is now close to 40bps of inversion between Fed Funds and the 2-year, meaning that the market expects multiple Fed Funds cuts in the near future.
Interesting data point, but "the market" can be pretty irrational at times. I would also imagine that demand for T-Bills would drop (and rates would go up) if everyone is locking in longer-term rates.
I think the blogger bases his findings on "rational expectations theory" which the FOMC supposedly subscribes to, and if I understand it correctly, it basically says "if we expect something to happen, it will come true" i.e. current expectations are the basis for future policy. Let's say the Fed decides to let inflation get out of hand in favor of not killing the economy, then bond investors couldn't trust anymore that the Fed will keep inflation low at all cost; long term yields would shoot up and inflation will become high, just because we expected it. Also, the blogger usually explains that his analyses are based on what's currently priced into the market, not a real forecast.
About T-bill rates... they actually have been high relative to the other rates in recent weeks. Most longer yields have dropped substantially (0.4-0.5%) from their highs 7 weeks ago, while T-bills stayed relatively the same with smaller drops, and the 1-month bill got a good boost the last couple of weeks.
Skipping 307 Messages...
ThursdaysChild
Missed.
posted: Jan. 28, 2009 @ 2:25p
The Fed agreed — with one dissent — to keep the targeted range for the federal funds rate between zero and 0.25 percent. The funds rate is the interest banks charge each other on overnight loans. Economists predict the Fed will leave rates at that range through the rest of this year.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.