if don't have i think 10k combined in Vanguard accounts, u will get hit 20 maintainence fees for each MF that you own. very misleading if you ask me...
mrpuddles
Addicted Member
posted: Dec. 27, 2006 @ 6:41p
This should help (I have both):
Fidelity Pros: Full service brokerage, lower stock purchase fees, lots of B&M locations. Fidelity Cons: High expense ratios, don't close funds until too late, high manager turnover.
Vanguard Pros: Low expense ratios, Index fund selection, Active funds have management teams. Vanguard Cons: Fees if you don't meet minimums for index funds or funds in IRAs, other fees.
You might consider FirstTrade, but I'm sure they will change their fee structure like Scottrade did. Leaving you with a hefty bill when you sell those MFs/stocks down the line.
dcharles
Member
posted: Dec. 27, 2006 @ 7:13p
kaiotes said: if don't have i think 10k combined in Vanguard accounts, u will get hit 20 maintainence fees for each MF that you own. very misleading if you ask me...since they are very clear regarding their fees, i fail to see how this is misleading.
Mordoch
Member
posted: Dec. 27, 2006 @ 7:49p
kaiotes said: if don't have i think 10k combined in Vanguard accounts, u will get hit 20 maintainence fees for each MF that you own. very misleading if you ask me... This is wrong when talking about Roth IRAs. You need 5,000 dollars in a fund by one year after you initially invested in it to avoid any fees, otherwise you get charged 10$ for each fund in maintenance fees per year.
However, the Vanguard Star Fund has a 1,000 dollar minimum at which point you can avoid fees, and happens to do a rather good job of diversifying your investment.
bandigit
Member
posted: Dec. 27, 2006 @ 8:52p
great link intex45 thanks.
okay so i used the IRA Express feature on Vangaurd.com
it picked out the Target 2045 fund for me.
i figure it's a pretty solid + no brainer way to do it.
cost $3000 to start but i have wanted to do one for way too long and just haven't gotten it done so I think this will do well for me.
Vanguard has the lowest cost, but their best fund (healthcare) requires a lot of $ to join. Vanguard can nickel and dime you with fee if you don't have the minimum balance. If you're are a set n forget type of investor, then Vanguard may the best in the long run. Once your individual fund exceeds $50K, you can join the Admiral tier for slightly lower expense ratio.
Fidelity has more quality MFs, but the management fee is a little higher. I find the traders to be quite informed about the general daily stuffs. If you tend to bounce from funds to funds to chase the market, or intend to trade stock agressively, then go with Fidelity.
Look at total costs -- expense ratios plus annual maintenance fees -- because Vanguard can be cheaper overall even if they charge $20/year, due to their expense ratios being so low.
In addition to Vanguard Star, there's Fidelity's 4-in-1 index fund that's similar, including with an expense ratio about as low.
As far as starting small, it is hard to go wrong with a Sharebuilder.com account. It costs $4 for a scheduled trade. ~$16 for a market trade.
dionx
Happy Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 12:05a
i opened a Vangard Target Retirement 2045 this November. i contributed the max $4000 and already up $140 over 2 months. the $10 fee for having less than $5000 balance in the fund was negligible. i already had plans to contribute the max $4000 for 2007, but there was a chance that the earnings alone on the original $4000 could have met the minimum $5k balance to avoid fees.
Celeritas
Happy Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 7:31a
I have been with Fidelity for more than 10 years and i think they are one of the best brokerage houses around.
They have superior customer service (i don't know about vanguard because i have never had an account with them)
They have a very good website where one can do research for mutual funds, stocks, ETFs.
With IRAs, i strongly suggest ETFs because they are a lot less expensive than Mutual funds.
Also, how do you have an IRA at work? Do you mean 401k?
mrng
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 8:13a
I am in a similar situation, wanting to open an IRA for the first time for myself and my wife. I have read many posts on IRAs archived here.
I also had a dilemma , where to open and with what funds.
This is what I decided and needed some feedback, before I went ahead.
- This is going to be a passive , buy and hold strategy accounts - I am going to use AIP (automatic investment plans) for dollar cost averaging. - I prefer ONLY low cost index funds.
For myself - Vanguard IRA Express with Target retirement fund 2035
For wife: - Fidelity Simple Start IRA with Fidelity Four-in-One Index Fund (*I didnt go with a target retirement fund, since wife 403b is also at Fidelity with the target retirement fund).
Is this ok guys ? Thanks a lot.
phreakerdeals
Broke Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 8:23a
I have relationships with both companies. I prefer Vanguard because of their excellent customer service.
If you really want to avoid the yearly fee and have $5,000 to put in, you have the option of putting 2006 money in your Roth until April 15th and then you can combine that with 2007 money.
jonesle7
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 9:08a
My entire family has switched to Vanguard over the last few years. My parents also rolled over their retirement savings to a Vanguard IRA and this allowed them to reach the Vanguard Voyager service since they had over $1 million in assets with Vanguard. Vanguard may have stopped this practice but the rest of the direct family members (grandmother, brothers and sister) were able to link their accounts to my parents account which gave each of us free access to the Vanguard Voyager service. One of the benefits from the Voyager service is that each of us gets 12 free stock trades per year. As mentioned previously the customer service at Vanguard has been excellent and the mutual fund fees are very reasonable. I hesitated for awhile before converting to Vanguard and finally realized that even with the $10 fees for the mutual funds that did not meet the annual $ threshold requirements, the expenses incurred with the Vanguard funds were less than my previous mutual fund provider. The fact that we were able to link the accounts tomy parents to obtain the Voyager service and obtain the free trades made it a no brainer. "Linking" the accounts to our parents account does not allow us to view our parents funds or our parents to view our funds, it just provides us with the free Voyager service because of our parents relationship with Vanguard. To tell you the truth I believe the fact that I was given complimentary Voyager service actually eliminated the $10 fees for the mutual funds that did not meet the annual $ threshold. I actually use Vanguard as my money market account as their rate is quite competitive and they seem to adjhust their rate fairly quickly when the Fed raises rates. Anyuway, I thought I would throw that out there in case anyone else might have parents that are with Vanguard so that they might be able to take advantage of the linkiing option. I also have Fidelity through a my employer's 401K plan and they have been really good too.
Thanks OP for posting. I was researching what brokerage to go with for a rollover 401k. As usual, the FW community has provided good information.
kcjeffery
Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 10:04a
jonesle7 said: My entire family has switched to Vanguard over the last few years. My parents also rolled over their retirement savings to a Vanguard IRA and this allowed them to reach the Vanguard Voyager service since they had over $1 million in assets with Vanguard. Vanguard may have stopped this practice but the rest of the direct family members (grandmother, brothers and sister) were able to link their accounts to my parents account which gave each of us free access to the Vanguard Voyager service. One of the benefits from the Voyager service is that each of us gets 12 free stock trades per year. As mentioned previously the customer service at Vanguard has been excellent and the mutual fund fees are very reasonable. I hesitated for awhile before converting to Vanguard and finally realized that even with the $10 fees for the mutual funds that did not meet the annual $ threshold requirements, the expenses incurred with the Vanguard funds were less than my previous mutual fund provider. The fact that we were able to link the accounts tomy parents to obtain the Voyager service and obtain the free trades made it a no brainer. "Linking" the accounts to our parents account does not allow us to view our parents funds or our parents to view our funds, it just provides us with the free Voyager service because of our parents relationship with Vanguard. To tell you the truth I believe the fact that I was given complimentary Voyager service actually eliminated the $10 fees for the mutual funds that did not meet the annual $ threshold. I actually use Vanguard as my money market account as their rate is quite competitive and they seem to adjhust their rate fairly quickly when the Fed raises rates. Anyuway, I thought I would throw that out there in case anyone else might have parents that are with Vanguard so that they might be able to take advantage of the linkiing option. I also have Fidelity through a my employer's 401K plan and they have been really good too.
Voyager accounts are for those with $250k, not $1M, and they offer a 10% discount on trades, not free trades. Having that status does eliminate the account maintenance fees, though.
Avalon259
New Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 11:22a
Just for the record, 250K to 1 million is Voyager status but if you have over 1 million you are Flagship status.
bandigit
Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 11:50a
who gave me red? this has good info.
poo poo
mrng
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 12:10p
you can click on the rating icon to see who gave you red
note you must apply for an Advantage account with Vanguard brokerage to get the 12 free trades for Flagship clients. This account is not automatic upon attaining Flagship.
The Advantage account is also free for Flagship, plus you get to link your Vanguard money market account as your brokerage cash accountso you get free check writing in any amount, not just the usual $250 check minimum, with high interest rate, currently 5.11% for Prime MM.
StartingMoney
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 2:52p
I like Fidelity mainly for the ability to consolidate my other financial accounts with them. I use a money market fund as a checking/savings account, I have a Roth, and I just got the 1.5% Fido card. Sooner or later I'll start putting some money into other taxable investments, so I'll have a Roth IRA, a checking/savings account, a taxable brokerage account, and a credit card that pays 1.5% back into the account.
Also, I'm a college student so my permanent address is the same as my parents', who have retirement accounts at Fidelity. Their balance counts toward the household balance which qualifies me for lower commissions. There are also no fees at Fidelity.
Question: Didn't fidelity lower most of their expense ratios to match Vanguards on the index funds?
Also, I thought ETFs worked out to equivalent fees with funds. Is there really a difference between an S&P 500 fund and the ETF version?
Choice of Vanguard and Fidelity seems like 6 of one, half dozen of the other to me. Both are good firms, good reputations. And yes, they both make a ton of money so they're expenses in there somewhere.
Note that I only have fidelity and I'm a terribly inactive investor. I'm in the process of consolidating everything there so if I do move in the future it won't be so bad. That's three years in the making now.
Sham03
Member
posted: Dec. 28, 2006 @ 4:37p
Mordoch said: However, the Vanguard Star Fund has a 1,000 dollar minimum at which point you can avoid fees, and happens to do a rather good job of diversifying your investment.
Agreed, I purchased the STAR fund April this year, and to date it has gained 7.15% back on the initial investment. Very satisfied with Vanguard.
luvdoublebrats
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 29, 2006 @ 2:04p
I have both Vanguard and Fidelity. Vanguard is the market leader on index funds, extremely cost effective, and superior customer service. Everyone that I have ever spoken to at Vanguard seemed like they had been there for 20 years, and very knowlegeable, and super helpful.
With that being said, I have most of my money sitting at Fidelity. They too have superior customer service, and wide range of investment options. I noticed that they dropped my trading fee from 15.95 to 10.95 recently.
So, here's my advice, if you're interested in just opening up a Roth IRA, you might be better off with Vanguard. However, if you're looking for a one-stop shop, ( perhaps you will open up a self directed IRA) who can give you superior service at good prices, I would reccommend Fidelity.
Sham03 said: Mordoch said: However, the Vanguard Star Fund has a 1,000 dollar minimum at which point you can avoid fees, and happens to do a rather good job of diversifying your investment.
Agreed, I purchased the STAR fund April this year, and to date it has gained 7.15% back on the initial investment. Very satisfied with Vanguard.
The REAL question is how does that compare with the overall market during that time frame? After all, the Dow was up what - 16% this year? As of yesterday, STAR underperformed Vanguards Total Market Index Fund by about four points (11.9% vs 16.1%).
clubalien
Member
posted: Dec. 29, 2006 @ 5:28p
atleats it your star fund was a positive move I bought a fund and it lost money the first day and the secound day it lost money again Symbol Last Change % Change Volume Quantity Market Value Unit Cost Cost Gain/Loss PRFDX 29.5500 -0.1200 -0.40 134.59 3,977.13 29.7199 4,000.00 -22.87
Mordoch
Member
posted: Dec. 29, 2006 @ 6:23p
jlawrence01 said: The REAL question is how does that compare with the overall market during that time frame? After all, the Dow was up what - 16% this year? As of yesterday, STAR underperformed Vanguards Total Market Index Fund by about four points (11.9% vs 16.1%). I noted that the fund provided good diversification, which is different than necessarily getting the largest returns.
A key reason it underperformed the Vanguard Total Market Index is that a bit over 37% of the fund is in bonds or short term reserves rather than stocks. In a good stock market bonds will usually significantly under perform stocks. The benefit to bonds is that when the stock market does badly, those bonds generally will hold their value unlike stocks in that situation. This means the STAR Fund will usually do substancially better in a major stock market correction than the Vanguard Total Market Index would.
Now if you're young and willing to accept the risks and not just panic and sell when a major market correction occurs, a more aggressive portfolio with a greater portion of the assets in the Vanguard Total Market Index may make sense since stocks do outperform bonds somewhat over the long term. However, in a ROTH IRA there are not the same capital gains issues if you switch to a different Vanguard Fund in the future, and a key retirement issue is simply starting to invest early enough in the first place. The STAR Fund is definitely not a bad place to start for those with only a limited amount of money they are able to invest in a Roth IRA for the short term.
lindisfarne
New Member
posted: Dec. 29, 2006 @ 8:59p
Most funds are up this year! The stock market has done well. The question is, how well did your fund do compared to the others?
Edit: Ooops. Was replying to an earlier post (the one from the guy who said "it was up $140"), didn't hit quote, and found out someone had said essentially the same thing.
kurfali
Member
posted: Dec. 30, 2006 @ 11:40p
Fidelity is excellent. I am very happy with their customer service (and i can be a pain), they are prompt in replying when you email them. They are continuously improving, etc., and I have been with them for years now, 401k, roth, rollover, etc. I manage my own plus several of my immediate family's funds..brother, etc. They have excellent research too. I avoid ETFs because I am too cheap to pay transaction fees. My ETF "plays" are executed differently. I invest in their Spartan funds which are VERY low cost, like 1/10th of 1 percent or so, and it canNOT be raised without shareholder approval. Other companies waive those fees, but they can restore them anytime. I'd be happy to share additional info - just personal experiences, whether it is about Fidelity, general investments, etc. I am &*^% retentive enough to even have taken out an annual subscription to Morningstar (which you can do thru Fidelity, which is much cheaper than other ways of subscribing". Remember, you MUST open your ROTH by the end of the year, so you only have a day, if that. You can fund it up to 4/15, but you have to open it this year. hope this helps, this is my first post on FW.
Some folks have said, their funds have gone up such-and-such. That is irrelavent. If the domestic market is up, chances are your funds will too.
Both are very good, IMO. My wife has Vanguard, and I have Fidelity. I joined Fidelity b/c of exposure to them from a previous employer Raytheon, which btw is looming under a case action lawsuit. Cha ching, $$ from a settlement. Anyhow, I like some funds from Vanguard so I will buy though my wife, and vice versa, my wife likes Fido funds and I buy for her. The disadvantage to this is separated total household assets. Advantage, the best of both, sticking with the company itself instead of a third party broker. Although I do stocks on choicetrade.
UncaMikey
Happy Member
posted: Jan. 13, 2007 @ 1:09p
mrpuddles said: Fidelity Cons: High expense ratios
For those of us who only invest in index funds, this is not true. Fidelity index funds have an expense ratio of 0.10%, and that drops to 0.07% if you have over $100K. These low exp ratios apply to their SP500, Total Mkt, Extended Mkt, and Int'l (MSCI EAFE) Index funds.
I have all my investments at Fidelity, very convenient and great service, but I am sure either company would be fine.
BTW, Fidelity does not have an emerging mkt index fund, so I bought the Vanguard emerging market ETF -- very cost effective way to combine the best of both, IMO.
I have Fidelity and a co-worker has Vanguard. You can't go wrong with either, but I think the Fidelity website is better. A lot more "banking" type options. I would have to rank Fidelity's customer service among the best I have dealt with. Always get someone fast, and they are always knowledgeable. Fidelity also has online chat for service, which I do not believe Vanguard has. They are still both safe choices.
To compare funds' exp ratio most of the time is meaningless. The important thing is the total return (if taxable, tax efficiency as well), not the exp ratio.
Skipping 54 Messages...
craig10x
Senior Member - 5K
posted: Jun. 3, 2007 @ 12:45p
your welcome Scooty It's been awhile since i did that (about 3 years ago) but i did recall that there is no fee to redeem shares when you buy other fund family mutual funds through fidelity brokerage...just the one time $75 transaction fee to buy...
If it is a NTF (No Transaction Fee) fund then there is no fee from fidelity at all....however, in that case, i think if you redeem early (like within 6 months) then Fidelity grabs the $75 when you redeem....but that only applies to the NTF funds that you buy outside of fidelity)...
Just wanted to clarify the two different situations with that...
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.