|
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 18, 2007 @ 8:31p
wassy said: The real deal is that the rates are not set by Citi or Fidelity, or any firm for that matter they are set by the issuers.
I think you need to learn or look up what an "Dutch Auction" is as the issuers does not set the rates on ARS. It is an Auction just like with T-Bills. ALL ARS rates are set by Dutch Auction. Cash Management products who rate is not set by an Auction is VRDN but thoses are institutional cash management products.
wassy said: ALL are about the same. the reason that some issues appear higher today is because the reset dates might be different.
Again I dont know where your getting your information from either. Looking at both Fidelity and Citibank ARS from today. Fidelity range on Ca tax-free/AMT Exampt 7 day range from 3.05-3.43%. Citibank range on the same issue is from 3.08-3.31%. Interest rate is determinded 100% by auction if 1 issue has more agressive bidding than others that day the rate will be much lower on that issue. Citibank range on 7 day taxable ARS is between 5.02-5.26%.
Also you keep talking about ARPS which are debt sold on closed end mututal funds which can not be compared to Muni/GSE ARS. I would not buy an ARPS/PARS if you paid me 10% you know how many ARPS or PARS have defaulted? 1 in last 5 years. Do you know how many Muni or GSE ARS have defaulted? None in 20 years. I dont want to buy leaverage debit from a bond fund. I prefer to buy debit directly from a Muni/GSE who in general dont default because they have taxing authority even if they do default like OC, CA they end up paying everyone back at par. You only loose the interest due from time they file BK till they pay you back your capital and not your capital itself.
wassy said: Money Markets try to get their yields reflected high for print in the papers so you put money with them. Also, they re jigger their portfolios as their maturities roll over.
Again sorry to disagre with you but by law MMF are not allowed to hold PARS, ARPS, or Muni/GSE ARS because they require an auction to be held and you need to find a buyer at auction to get out of your position. While there has never been a failed auction it is possible.Tax-free MMF by law either hold Muni Short term discount notes avaible from all investments banks or VRDN which has demand insurance so you can get in or out at any time and Taxable MMF holds GSE/Corp short term discount notes or taxable VRDN. For example Citibank Private bank sells VRDN with T+1 and BOA requires T+5.
Most of these instruments are sold in either $25,000 or $100,000 increments. I have not seen $5000 on these yet, but it is possible Fidelity or others might internally break them up. THey are book entry anyway, so they never leave in physical form. They might also not transfer from one firm to another in odd lots. Worse, however, is that if the issue is transferred, the new firm probably won't be willing to redeem it at your request, since $5,000 is not a valid tradeable qty. remember, they trade in $25k and $100k denominations.
Again not sure were your getting your information would like me to post underwriting docs for 10-20 issues that allow min investments of $5K and because it allowed by the underwriting terms of the Bonds does not matter if the underwritter get bought by another bank/brokerage firm they must honor underwriting terms. Also almost most ARS have min $25K buy in. Most of the ones that require $100K min are 1 day resets and even thoses a lot of them really only require $25K but Fidelity or Citibank raises the min purchase amount on there own. BTW all of Citibank issues trade in $25K blocks. Fidelity and Etrade tho offer a couple of issues with that do trade in $5K blocks. Every underwritter is free to set the terms of ARS when they underwrite the bond. |
-
-
wassy
- New Member
posted: Jan. 18, 2007 @ 8:44p
Well then, I stand corrected. So much for thinking I knew the right answers about these - lol . thanks for the time you have spent ammassing all these details. You certainly know alot about these (I am trusting your accuracy LOL!)and now I've learned a bit too. That's what forums are for... thanks again. |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 19, 2007 @ 10:49a
If you look at Fidelity rates today they are much lower than they were yesterday. Biggest drops were on the 1 day paper but 7 day paper that resest on friday tends to reset lower normally too. basically it because people are moving there cash into these instruments ahead of the weekend. Thus the bidding is more agressive. If you look at some of the oder history there are people buying blocks larger than $1Million on some issues. You will see on monday rates will go up again to 5.25%+ for taxable and 3.40+ for tax-free. |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 22, 2007 @ 9:49a
dolmar said:If you look at Fidelity rates today they are much lower than they were yesterday. Biggest drops were on the 1 day paper but 7 day paper that resest on friday tends to reset lower normally too. basically it because people are moving there cash into these instruments ahead of the weekend. Thus the bidding is more agressive. If you look at some of the oder history there are people buying blocks larger than $1Million on some issues. You will see on monday rates will go up again to 5.25%+ for taxable and 3.40+ for tax-free.
If you look at Fidelity or Call Citibank today rates are much higher.
Fidelity has 4 issues above with a rate of 5.35%+ which puts APY at 5.50% and 2 issues at 5.40% which APY at 5.53%. All of these issues are 28 day issues tho.
Citibank has 1 issues at 5.31% 7 day. 2 issues at 28 days with rates of 5.34% and 5.38%.
All of the above are basically yeilding APY between 5.46-5.53% well above any savings account or short term non Promo CD. |
-
-
ScootyPuffSr
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Jan. 22, 2007 @ 10:15a
On my screen the 5.40% APR resets are 50K minimum but that is still pretty hot. Rated AAA by both agencies gives me confidence, thanks OP. |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 22, 2007 @ 10:24a
ScootyPuffSr said:On my screen the 5.40% APR resets are 50K minimum but that is still pretty hot. Rated AAA by both agencies gives me confidence, thanks OP.
Yeah you right ScootyPuffSr Fidelity 28 day issues do require 50K Looking at Citibank issues tho only $25K and is also AAA rated by both agencies. Maybe that is why Fidelity issues reset between 2-6 points higher on same 28 day period.
These ARS/Floaters should be able to beat or match most high yeild savings accounts over the long run as more times than not they should reset higher than savings accounts. |
-
-
CMEtrader
- Thrifty Member
posted: Jan. 22, 2007 @ 3:58p
2 Questions: When I look at the Fidelity new offerings today, there are ARS with a "last auction date" that go as far back as JUL 2006 for short-term (7 and 28 day resets). Why would the last auction for these be so long ago when they are supposed to be reset? (oddly, when I look at the "recent trades" data, it seems that these same ARSs have been bought and sold repeatedly over the last few weeks).
Also, where can I find info on payment schedules for these ARS instruments? i.e. how/when interest payments are made (I assume each security has its own schedule) There doesn't seem to be any info regarding this on the Fidelity site. If I buy an ARS on the reset date and sell it on the next reset date is interest accrued, or paid when I sell? If I sell between payment dates, do I get a prorated interest payment later (and lose the opportunity to earn interest on my interest until I am paid), or do I sell the security at par plus accrued interest to the next buyer?
Everything I am looking at on Fidelity's site seems to be safe AAA rated short-term liquid instruments, but are there any differences between issues (other than rate and reset frequency) that need attention. I realize that there are differences between taxable/tax exempt, state-specific, and AMT issues we discussed before. But, if I'm considering two Illinois federal/state tax exempt ARS that are not subject to AMT, and both have the same reset frequency and both pay the same rate, should I be looking at any other factors? |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 22, 2007 @ 5:21p
could just be a glitch in Fidelity system not sure to be honest.
Look under each issue for example I clicked on 5 all of them had the following "Pay Frequency:---" which means they pay the interest each reset but one had "Pay Frequency: Monthly" even tho it was a 7 day reset which means that issues trades with accured interest.
I look at credt rating and trade history. Issues that trade less often seem to be more stable. By less often I mean issues that do have $10 millions between buy and sells each auction but most people do hold order. The rate will not shoot up or down as much on issues like these. |
-
-
CMEtrader
- Thrifty Member
posted: Jan. 22, 2007 @ 6:33p
Thanks dolmar, always appreciate your input/expertise |
-
-
RichTJ99
- Senior Member
posted: Jan. 24, 2007 @ 11:12p
This is great information indeed.
Here is a question though. If the ARS generates a commission for the broker, and the VRDN generates a far less commission, why doesnt everyone invest in the VRDN's (aside from the minimum)?
The rates are typically higher in the VRDN (right?).
Variable Rate Demand Notes |
-
-
Divot25
- Member
posted: Jan. 24, 2007 @ 11:24p
dolmar said:wassy said:Again sorry to disagre with you but by law MMF are not allowed to hold...Muni/GSE ARS because they require an auction to be held and you need to find a buyer at auction to get out of your position. While there has never been a failed auction it is possible.
Do you know what liquidity facilities are?</blockquote> |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 1:45a
Divot25 said:Do you know what liquidity facilities are?
The underwriter of ARS is under no obligation to to provide a Liquidity Facilites. If no buyers are found at auction in theroy you could get suck holding your postion for another term. While many underwriters will buy your postion at auction they are under no obligation to do so. That is the main difference between ARS and VRDN. You claim to have worked for MMF and you dont even know the difference between ARS and VRDN.
US Treasurey Web page explaining the difference between ARS and VRDN
If you read that web page from US Goverment it states very clearly the same thing I just said above. Which is why MMF are not allowed to hold ARS but can hold VRDN as underwriter is required to buy your postion back once you give notice. That notice depending on the underwriter would be T+1 till T+5 to get out. |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 1:53a
RichTJ99 said:This is great information indeed.
Here is a question though. If the ARS generates a commission for the broker, and the VRDN generates a far less commission, why doesnt everyone invest in the VRDN's (aside from the minimum)?
The rates are typically higher in the VRDN (right?).
Variable Rate Demand Notes
Yes VRDN= Variable Rate Demand Notes
First off you need an investment banking account at an investment bank like Goldman Saks, Beer Sterns etc or a Private Bank account at like Citigroup, BOA, Chase or Wachovia as no other bank underwrite these issues. If you shop ARS from a Place like Fidelity, E-trade, Scwaab or any other discount brokerage firm the rates on 28 or 35 ARS will come close to VRDN or could reset even higher at times. Problem you have is you are dealing with one of the most expensive broker in the world. And you think your going to get a deal from them. SB Brokers are on commision and they get no salary so why would they want to tell you, find or sell you VRDN as there is Near to nothing in commision for the broker. Do you think your broker works for free? Do you work for free?
2nd opening a Private bank account requires either having a large bussiness account or a very large bank account. Normally $2-5 Million cash/brokerage depending on the bank. And again they are not full service brokers like SB. Private bank is no different that E-trade or Fedility or any other discount brokerage. They wont tell you what to buy. You have to tell them what you want to buy.
Here are a couple of VRDN listed on Citigroup Webpage.
59259NML4 METROPOLITAN TRANSN AUTH N Y DEDICATED TAX FD RFDG-SER AAA no insurance tho. Today Reset 3.52% 64982PSG8 NEW YORK ST DORM AUTH LEASE REV MUN HLTH FACS IMPT-SER 2-2 AAA Insured. Today Reset 3.45% 47206NAD4 JAY STR DEV CORP N Y CTS FAC LEASE REV NYC-JAY STREET PJ-SER A- AA no Insurance Today Reset 3.55% 64986MFA8 NEW YORK ST HSG FIN AGY REV 240 EAST 39TH ST-SER A unrated no insurance Today Reset 3.66% |
-
-
Divot25
- Member
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 5:32a
dolmar said:The underwriter of ARS is under no obligation to to provide a Liquidity Facilites. If no buyers are found at auction in theroy you could get suck holding your postion for another term. While many underwriters will buy your postion at auction they are under no obligation to do so. That is the main difference between ARS and VRDN. You claim to have worked for MMF and you dont even know the difference between ARS and VRDN.
US Treasurey Web page explaining the difference between ARS and VRDN
If you read that web page from US Goverment it states very clearly the same thing I just said above. Which is why MMF are not allowed to hold ARS but can hold VRDN as underwriter is required to buy your postion back once you give notice. That notice depending on the underwriter would be T+1 till T+5 to get out.
Edit: not worth my time. |
-
-
CMEtrader
- Thrifty Member
posted: Jan. 25, 2007 @ 10:52p
Dolmar, is it possible to buy VRDN (at BOA/HSBC/CITI/etc...) without a 1-2mil $ investment banking account? I would like to get a decent state/fed tax-exempt return on 250-350k that will stay parked for a long time (i.e. not in and out/chasing a couple of basis pts every month). The liquidity facility of VRDN seems more appealing to me (slightly higher rates too). Or is buying ARS through Fidelity the only option with an account of my size? |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 26, 2007 @ 1:42a
CMEtrader said:Dolmar, is it possible to buy VRDN (at BOA/HSBC/CITI/etc...) without a 1-2mil $ investment banking account? I would like to get a decent state/fed tax-exempt return on 250-350k that will stay parked for a long time (i.e. not in and out/chasing a couple of basis pts every month). The liquidity facility of VRDN seems more appealing to me (slightly higher rates too). Or is buying ARS through Fidelity the only option with an account of my size?
Many people on here when I first started posting about VRDN complained alot because in general retail banks wont sell VRDN to retail customers. HSBC does not underwrite any to begin with. Only retail banks who do underwrite VRDN are Chase, Citibank, BOA and Wachovia. A lot of people with Citigold and Premire banking from BOA tried to buy VRDN and got shot down by there brokers and were told they could not buy VRDN from retail bank and only private bank.
I have a felling smaller investment banking firm tho like Pipper Jaffery, RBS or other reginal investment firms I am sure tho would open an account for $300K+. And as long as you dont day trade them I am sure they wont mind. I think only time they might get pissed is if you calling them ever day to liquidate $110K and then buy $100K back because you needed $10K.
Btw 28 and 35 ARS pay close to same yeild as 7 day VRDN. I have seen some 35 day ARS paying a higher yeild over VRDN but what I personally do is buy 7 day VRDN and 14-28 day discount notes. Both thoses instruments pay higher rate than same period ARS. For Example 28 discount note might pay 3.75% vs 28 day ARS and 7 day VRDN might pay 3.60%. Just not sure how willing an investment bank might be to sell you short term discount notes in small quanity. Most of the discount notes require between $100-$250k and a few require $500K or $1 Million mins. You would need to call in ever time they mature to roller over your issue. So it would be a high maintaice account I assume for what most of them consider a small account. |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Jan. 26, 2007 @ 10:37a
Fidelity has an 28 day issue reseting for 5.43% while I understand it is only A2/A rated I dont think it going to default or anything any time soon. This ARS has $25K min.
A rate of 5.43% = an APY of 5.61% which is well above most savings account and even VRDN too. |
-
-
feuerball
- Thrifty Member
posted: Apr. 6, 2007 @ 6:02p
This thread has been an interesting reading but i wonder if these VRDN's are really worth the effort compared to just buying the best of class MMF? If you indeed have to manage 1M$ in liquidity the alternative to managing VRDN's yourself would be to purchase institutional MMF. Those are yielding around 5.3% now and have expense ratios of 0.2%. So basically you are paying 2000$/ year for managing 1M$ in assets. For that you don't really have to worry about anything, the assets should be well diversified, and in the unlikely case that your money market fund would break the buck because of a default more likely than not the fund management would make you whole to keep their reputation intact. Sounds like a 0.2% expense would be good deal to me. |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Apr. 13, 2007 @ 1:17p
Feuerball you are paying a lot more than $2000 in management fees on $1 million. You need to understand MMF funds are quoted in 7 day APY. ARS/VRDN/Discount notes etc as a matter of fact all bonds are quote as rate.
So an APY of 5.30% = a rate of 5.18%. Most institional MMF today are paying an APY between 5.25-5.29% while VRDN are paying 5.32-5.64% and Fidelity has a couple of 28 day ARS with min $50K buy in amounts paying a rate as high as 5.46% today. So that is really a difference between of 20-50 basis points. If you compare them to Discount Notes which pay a higher rate than VRDN the difference is 40-70 basis points.
VRDN have little to no risk as you can put them to underwriter at any time with no risk to priciple as longer as the underwriter does not file BK. ARS tho are subject to dutch auction so they have a little more risk but are still pretty much risk free as most ARS carry insurance and letters of credit from underwriter. |
-
-
NorCalSci
- Ancient Member
posted: Apr. 24, 2007 @ 5:58p
Please bear with me as I'm new to these investment tools. If everything works out right I may buy into an ARS this week through Fidelity.
When I check the Fidelity site I see hundreds of resets and it is difficult to sort through all the issues. I have not yet been able to look "during trading hours" which is apparently 4 am to 8 am Pacific time.
For those of you who have looked at Fidelity during that trading time, does the site look different? Or is it the same list of hundreds of resets with some of them having a new icon that lets you select "Trade" ?
For my bracket a Federal tax free rate is not effective but I am in a high tax state (9.3%) so state tax free usually helps.
There are a huge number of resets in the 3.xx% rate zone and some in the 5.xx% rates.
If I want to invest $25K this time around is it true that I would be just looking for the highest 5.xx% reset available with a 28-day period, and with a minimum investment of "25" ??? Beyond that, it seems a CA reset would be advantageous but I don't see many with 5%+ rates.
Is there anything else special here other than the slight differences in ratings?
1) Highest rate 2) Number of days (28 seems good to me...) 3) Good rating 4) CA if possible 5) Minimum of $25K
I also noticed the following note at Fidelity:
"Note that currently only Buy orders may be placed online on Fidelity.com for Municipal Resets. Sell or Hold orders may be placed with a Fidelity representative at: 800-544-5372. "
So this means I can buy in commission free. To terminate my position into my Core Account do I need to call in? Will I need to pay a commission to close my position over the phone?
Thanks in advance for your help, and for this very informative thread. |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|