|
-
-
Freno911
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 26, 2007 @ 3:28p
ifyouhavetoask said:richfish13 said:120k a year put you in the top 1% of income earners in the world. Yeah, 120k, man that guy has it rough.
It's not about income.
It's about control of your own life.
A successful doctor or lawyer, who runs their own practice, is in control of their own life, and is considered upper middle class.
Making $120,000/year by working at Apple Computer, is nothing more than agreeing to trade your life for X number of dollars per year. That's not freedom, and that's not independence.
A big part of your social class involves your ability to control your own destiny. If you're investing in a 401k plan, and your boss can fire you, you aren't free. You're trading your freedom for money. That's not "upper" anything. You can't just say, "Oh, you work in a cubicle for Company X, so you don't enjoy your work, your life sucks, you are in a low social class." Not everyone who works in a cubicle feels like they are "selling his life" for X amount of money; some of us actually enjoy our jobs. You don't have to own your own practice to be in control of your own life; I own a specific skill set that I can sell to the highest bidder and I feel very much in control . |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
-
-
MikeR397
- Senior Member - 2K
rated:
posted: Jul. 26, 2007 @ 3:32p
scott1961 said:Venturion said:MikeR397 said:Right now, I'm getting paid for my entertainment which is more than most can say . Actually, I believe that's called defrauding your employer... no offense implied, I'm doing it now as well...  My entertainment is following these fun arguments on FW, also doing it at work , I plan on firing myself immediatelyYes scott, I am filing a formal complaint against you to your CEO  On another note, d$mn you FW for soaking up all attention. I think I might be addicted. Anyone else feel this way? I need to get out and get some exercise. |
Message edited by: MikeR397 on 2007-07-26 15:45:02 CDT
-
-
ifyouhavetoask
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Jul. 26, 2007 @ 3:36p
Freno911 said: You can't just say, "Oh, you work in a cubicle for Company X, so you don't enjoy your work, your life sucks, you are in a low social class."
Not everyone who works in a cubicle feels like they are "selling his life" for X amount of money; some of us actually enjoy our jobs. You don't have to own your own practice to be in control of your own life; I own a specific skill set that I can sell to the highest bidder and I feel very much in control . And there's nothing wrong with that. However, it's not upper middle class, regardless of how much money you make doing it. Some people are happy digging ditches or cleaning houses. |
-
-
MikeR397
- Senior Member - 2K
rated:
posted: Jul. 26, 2007 @ 3:40p
czarandy said:MikeR397 said:ifyouhavetoask said:You're day trading your retirement fund?Ifyouhavetoask, not to argue over semantics, but it's not really day trading. I am buying and selling more about once every 2/3 weeks (whatever, you can call it day trading if you want ). The reason I am doing this now is because:
1)I have ZERO $ commissions 2)I pay ZERO $ in ANY capital gains I ever make. 3)I have that kind of time this summer at my job before I start law school. 4)The accounting for frequent trades in a Roth is much less of a headach. 5)I made 9.5% return on my principal in the month of June alone. How much did you make?
Next, keep in mind I am 22 years old, and just opened my Roth 4 months ago (so I have a starting principal of 4k). If I had a substantial Roth, I would likely not actively trade most my stocks like this. Furthermore, I am investing in indicies (actually ETF's of indicies so I can get the $0 commissions). The rules of my Roth game consist of the following:
1) Buy only ETF's based on broad indicies (foreign and domestic) or very well diversified mutual funds 2) Sell when I make a short term profit that looks abnormal to me (completely subjective, usually around 3%+) 3) Buy after a short term loss that looks abnormal to me (again, subjective, such as if it falls 3%+ in a day/week) 4) If I buy, and it drops, I will be patient until it rebounds and I profit. These are well diversified indicies/mutual fund ETF's and in the long run, I stand essentially no risk of not making a solid return.
I'm just trying to take advantage of the peaks and troughs during the eventual upward ride 
Do you really think there is that much inefficiency in the market?Real answer: No, I am mostly a believer into the efficient market theory for the most part. This does not mean I do not think I cannot OCCASIONALLY "beat the market" or take advantage of a unique opportunity that others are/cannot. However, if EMH really exists, then why is the AOR game still open and how am I (as a student) making more than the average american income from AOR profits alone? This is an opportunity in a niche market that is open for exploiting. If the markets were truely efficient, then everyone would be doing this and eventually the opportunity would shut itself out. See "Arguments concerning the validy of the hypothesis" here |
-
-
76hhma
- Senior Member - 10K
rated:
posted: Jul. 26, 2007 @ 3:44p
I kinda expected that there would be folks coming out on a down day like today and claimed great market timing (like sold all yesterday or sold at the very peak or went short just recently). It may be the same folks coming out on a bullish day and claim victory for their 100% coverage on hot stocks/funds. The prudent measure is still to keep one's asset allocation/diversification and stay the course. That was how many millionaires made it. |
Message edited by: 76hhma on 2007-07-26 15:45:30 CDT
-
-
longwood8
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Jul. 26, 2007 @ 4:00p
Lawyers at my firm start, fresh out of law school, at $145k. After five or six years they are making mid six figures via a paycheck, reduced by their 401k contributions. I boss them around and can fire them at will. Some leave to become GC at fortune 100 companies and make seven figures, while still drawing a paycheck and putting money in a 401k. Others make partner, but that is just a title until you make equity partner. Partners still get paychecks. Even an equity partner that does not continue to carry his weight can be de-equitized. Any mentally sound person would see their lifestyle and income and define them as upper middle if not upper class. |
Message edited by: longwood8 on 2007-07-26 16:07:28 CDT
-
-
NukeMedDude
- Senior Member - 1K
rated:
posted: Jul. 26, 2007 @ 4:59p
All I can say is, I hope this market continues to tank. I'm 100% short in my play portfolio, and have made a killing recently....it's nice to see triple digit declines. On the other hand, it was a great day for buying as well. Put money into all my ETF's and mutual funds for dollar-cost averaging purposes. Play both sides of the fence. |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
rated:
posted: Jul. 26, 2007 @ 4:59p
longwood8 said:
Any mentally sound person would see their lifestyle and income and define them as upper middle if not upper class. Right, That just seems so basic and simple that it leads me to believe ifyouhavetoask is not sound. |
-
-
germanpope
- Frivolous Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 27, 2007 @ 8:21p
bump --- still going down --- Anyone worried yet? |
-
-
ChumChurum
- Senior Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 27, 2007 @ 9:05p
germanpope said:bump --- still going down --- Anyone worried yet? Start average-cost purchasing DIA or SPY. |
-
-
ellory
- Thrifty Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 27, 2007 @ 10:14p
germanpope said:bump --- still going down --- Anyone worried yet?I always worry. But I keep investing. Dollar cost averaging |
Message edited by: ellory on 2007-07-27 22:15:46 CDT
-
-
germanpope
- Frivolous Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 27, 2007 @ 10:22p
not that anyone cares, and this was dumb luck but I actually called the top and move my entire retirement plan into cash at the peak before the correction I need a re-entry point now |
Message edited by: germanpope on 2007-07-27 22:24:34 CDT
-
-
76hhma
- Senior Member - 10K
rated:
posted: Jul. 27, 2007 @ 11:00p
germanpope said:not that anyone cares, and this was dumb luck but I actually called the top and move my entire retirement plan into cash at the peak before the correction
I need a re-entry point now 1. Will you be correct twice in timing the market? That is the question 2. Do you have an asset plan and strategy for your long-term investment like retirement investment? |
-
-
germanpope
- Frivolous Member
rated:
posted: Jul. 27, 2007 @ 11:23p
deleted: post discusses individual mutual fund |
Message edited by: germanpope on 2008-10-25 09:53:01 CDT
-
-
Dealguy123
- Senior Member - 2K
rated:
posted: Jul. 27, 2007 @ 11:39p
germanpope said:not that anyone cares, and this was dumb luck but I actually called the top and move my entire retirement plan into cash at the peak before the correction
I need a re-entry point now The SPX index cracked its next support level today ~1470, and the next support is another 100 pts down for the spx, which means the Dow will be in the 12k range. I personally think we're headed lower than that and won't start buying till we dip well into 12k for the dow. Btw, props on a good timed move. Despite what some people think, it is possible to time some buying/selling. Is there some luck involved? Sure, but it is possible. I stopped buying in my 401k 3-6 months ago and sold approaching the Dow at 14k and after the Dow dropped post-14k, but before the large sell off. I am fortunate to be sitting in 75% cash in my 401k and will hold out to buy in. I'm short a lot in my cash acct and a little in my roth so those are doing great. I am still holding long positions but I'm more short than long atm. I believe in TA (technical analysis) and the "breakout" the spx experienced when the Dow hit 14k was barely a breakout, and I saw the quick pullback as bearish. Add to that the fact that I've been a housing bear since winter '04 and it made sense to me. EDIT: Oil at $77/barrel isn't helping either.. |
Message edited by: Dealguy123 on 2007-07-28 00:00:38 CDT
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|