I just read about the new Forever Stamp that has been approved by the Postal Service. Basically, you can buy as many 41 cent stamps as you want, and they'll be good forever.
Any thoughts on stocking up? Guaranteed to go up in value, no taxes on the increases...
Here's a great little chart: link Seems like the rate of increase has been fairly steady since stamps hit 8 cents back in 1971. That makes an average rate of 33 cents / 36 years, or about 1 cent/year. Assuming historical trends continue, this means the annual rate of return over the next few years would be about 2.5%, and would decrease as time went on.
Not worth it!
psychtobe
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 12:19a
cashmonkey said: Well, let's look at historic stamp prices.
Here's a great little chart: link Seems like the rate of increase has been fairly steady since stamps hit 8 cents back in 1971. That makes an average rate of 33 cents / 36 years, or about 1 cent/year. Assuming historical trends continue, this means the annual rate of return over the next few years would be about 2.5%, and would decrease as time went on.
Not worth it!
I agree with your conclusion but not your method.
41 cents = 8 cents (1 + annual average rate of increase)^36
annual rate of increase = 4.6%
still not worth it! (unless you count this as part of your fixed income portfolio - like an I bond or a TIP).
41 cents = 8 cents (1 + annual average rate of increase)^36
annual rate of increase = 4.6%
still not worth it! (unless you count this as part of your fixed income portfolio - like an I bond or a TIP).
You're fitting a linear function with an exponential! The stamp price has been going up as a constant function of time, so fitting it to a constant rate of return doesn't make sense. Forever Stamps would have been a great investment back in 1971, when the annual rate of increase was 1 cent/year = ~12.5%. These days, though, that 1 cent/year is just 2.5%.
Nitpicking, of course, but it's the principle that counts.
frootmall
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 12:35a
But if the cost of a forever stamp is the same as the cost of a regular stamp, it makes sense to buy forever stamps instead of regular stamps. You are no worse off buying them and in case you have any left over when the rate goes up, you save the cost of extra postage. It also makes sense to buy what you'll need for a few months just before the rate goes up, since you'll recoup your investment in a short time.
But given historical rates of postage increase, you would not have made out very well stocking up for the long term.
xpguy
Senior Member - 3K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 12:35a
This is a good investment if you buy up all the forever stamps before the next rate increase (say the day they announce a rate hike to 43 cents)
xpguy
Senior Member - 3K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 12:45a
on a separate note you can usually buy stamps at 5% to 10% off face value on eBay with a bunch of smaller denominations, or just use your 5% off Cash Back card at the grocery store
tooshy
Frivolous Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 12:53a
Of course the post office will be the big winner...every which way. No thank you.
xpguy said: This is a good investment if you buy up all the forever stamps before the next rate increase (say the day they announce a rate hike to 43 cents)
They sound like they are going to be for sale before the actual rate hike takes affect. However they will still be sold for 41c. If so, could it be that as soon as they announce a rate hike again, lets say to 43c, the forever stamps will go up immediately, while the increase to 43c takes a few months? OR would it take at least some time to put it into affect?
xpguy
Senior Member - 3K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 1:30a
interesting observation...Since the forever stamps don't have any prices printed on them, the day they announce the next price hike (we assume from 41 cents to 43 cents) they could just start to sell them at the higher price (43 cents). But something tells me that the USPS isn't that efficient (with their computer systems and vending machines and such) and that you could probably still buy forever stamps at the 41 cent rate even after they announce the next hike to 43 cents (and before the new rate is in effect)
Fortunately, the post office can't announce a sudden rate hike.
Rate hikes have to go through the Postal Rate Commission, periods for written comment, and public hearings. You'll know months ahead of time if there are any rate increases being planned, if you pay attention to the news.
davef139
Senior Member - 3K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 8:48a
frootmall said: Fortunately, the post office can't announce a sudden rate hike.
Rate hikes have to go through the Postal Rate Commission, periods for written comment, and public hearings. You'll know months ahead of time if there are any rate increases being planned, if you pay attention to the news. Yeah I belive this next increase was annouced last Nov. I think the forever stamp increases with each new increase also. While you may be able to invest early, mind you this is only good for FCM 1oz im not sure but most people dont mail out that much mail, and the ones who do are getting it discounted. I see the resale value of these being pretty hard and not worth the effort/risk of selling Theres a few discussions on the auction forums also.
stallion1031
Senior Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 9:00a
tooshy said: Of course the post office will be the big winner...every which way. No thank you.
I dunno, stamps and mailing things seems like a pretty good deal. For 41c someone will come to my house and pick up an envelope. Then they will deliver that envelope anywhere in the US. I wouldn't deliver something down the street for 41c.
frootmall
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 9:06a
davef139 said: Yeah I belive this next increase was annouced last Nov. I think the forever stamp increases with each new increase also. While you may be able to invest early, mind you this is only good for FCM 1oz im not sure but most people dont mail out that much mail, and the ones who do are getting it discounted. I see the resale value of these being pretty hard and not worth the effort/risk of selling Theres a few discussions on the auction forums also. Thanks for mentioning that. I never even thought of reselling them, just stocking up for my own use. The cost of mailing the stamps to the buyer would probably eat up any potential profit!
markwm
Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 9:08a
Didn't Ponzi make his money by claiming he was investing in stamps or something?
markwm said: Didn't Ponzi make his money by claiming he was investing in stamps or something? Ponzi's original scheme would have made any FWer proud. His scheme involved International Reply Coupons (IRCs). An IRC is a coupon you can buy at a post office and mail to someone in a foreign country. The person in the foreign country can take the coupon and use it to pay for sending an international letter anywhere in the world. It is used to help someone in a foreign country pay to reply to your letter when you can't get any foreign stamps.
Ponzi discovered that IRCs could be purchased in certain foreign countries for a fraction of the price of mailing a letter from the U.S. and the US Post Office had to honor these IRCs. He convinced investors that he was going to make a killing stocking up on foreign IRCs and selling them in the US.
rseiler
Ancient Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 10:16a
A summary with some additional data (oh, Priority Mail, why do you hate me so?):
The rates taking effect May 14 include: - Letters, bill payments, greeting cards: 41 cents for the first ounce, up from 39 cents. - Wedding invitation (2-ounces), 58 cents, down from 63 cents. - Postcard, 26 cents, up from 24 cents. - Priority mail flat-rate envelope, $4.60, up from $4.05. - Express Mail flat-rate envelope, $16.95, up from $14.40. - Parcel Post, 1-pound package, $4.50, up from 3.95. - Bank statement, 2 ounces, presorted, 45.9 cents, down from 54.4 cents. - Utility bill, barcoded, 31.2 cents, up from 29.3 cents.
No one has mentioned inflation yet. Isn't the price of stamps following the rate of inflation pretty consistantly?
EDIT: Someone mentioned it a couple posts above me, I just cant read.
FantasticDamage
Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 10:37a
I did a proper financial calculation and indeed it's not worth it. As others have mentioned, buying those stamps days before the hike is an OK short-term gain but you're better off doing other things with your money.
(If you're really doing a lot of eBay shipping you're probably better off buying a mail scale, I would think).
xpguy said: This is a good investment if you buy up all the forever stamps before the next rate increase (say the day they announce a rate hike to 43 cents) ...then sell them for 42 cents or 2 for 83 cents.
In the reviews that I read, there is the possibility that "Forever" is not going to last very long. Perhaps 5-6 years at the most.
I expect that USPS will pull the rug out from under people who are buying large amounts of these stamps, expecting to use them for many years in the future. Buyer beware.
01LX said: xpguy said: This is a good investment if you buy up all the forever stamps before the next rate increase (say the day they announce a rate hike to 43 cents) ...then sell them for 42 cents or 2 for 83 cents.Functionally, where would you do this? Selling online is pretty much out of the question, since shipping (oddly enough) would wipe out any gains. Standing on a street corner selling stamps for a cent profit each doesn't sound too rewarding, either.
RootGears
Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 3:13p
I never really paid attention to the stamps I was using, but I have a bunch of stamps I bought two years ago that just have "First Class Mail", with the year 2005 on them. There is no denomination on them. Do these "expire" (need to add the extra stamp)?
tooshy
Frivolous Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 3:16p
stallion1031 said: tooshy said: Of course the post office will be the big winner...every which way. No thank you.
I dunno, stamps and mailing things seems like a pretty good deal. For 41c someone will come to my house and pick up an envelope. Then they will deliver that envelope anywhere in the US. I wouldn't deliver something down the street for 41c.Neither would I.
I see my remark has made a few POSTAL...lol
I love our postal service and getting free samples in the mail as well, but looking at it from what's good for my pocketbook, buying stamps ahead of need is so lame, and even with the inducement of a forever price it still does not make the purchase an investment. I'm already losing 5% on prebought stamps. I need an average of 2+ stamps per month. How clever, they won't need to bother with penny, two penny or three penny stamps like before. +1 for the USPS I thought FWers like to float on others not have others float on them.
Furthermore, based on the business model that is USPS, I'd say 41c is the correct price. Don't believe for a second that you are getting an astounding bargain. Why don't you carry that logic and say what a bargain airfare is...after all I couldn't construct a plane and fly myself 3000 miles across the sea for under $300!!
WalStMonky
Happy Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 3:58p
tooshy said: I thought FWers like to float on others not have others float on them.
For the amount that I spend in stamps they can have the float, I'll take the convenience. Sheesh, it seems like only last year that I was stuck getting 2 cent stamps to make my 37 centers work. Wait, it was just last year. I'll likely never even own a 39 cent stamp, just end up using 3 stamps to mail letters until sometime in 2008. Anyway, it's about time they did this.
tooshy
Frivolous Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 4:06p
WalStMonky said: tooshy said: I thought FWers like to float on others not have others float on them.
For the amount that I spend in stamps they can have the float, I'll take the convenience. Sheesh, it seems like only last year that I was stuck getting 2 cent stamps to make my 37 centers work. Wait, it was just last year. I'll likely never even own a 39 cent stamp, just end up using 3 stamps to mail letters until sometime in 2008. Anyway, it's about time they did this.True, I'll take the convenience too and I think it is awfully smart of the USPS to finally do something about the annoying penny, two penny, three penny stamps depending on the amount of the lastest increase. But to buy MORE stamps as an investment is what this thread is about...to that I still say no thank you. I'm still irrationally miffed about giving my money to USPS ahead of the 2+ stamps I need each month when I buy a book of stamps. But that's just me...
stallion1031
Senior Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 4:07p
tooshy said: after all I couldn't construct a plane and fly myself 3000 miles across the sea for under $300!!
No, but you can put yourself in a box and mail it with the USPS for much less.
WalStMonky
Happy Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 4:28p
tooshy, they do sell singles. I bought 5 39s + 2 2 centers for $1.99 on a Chase card last month.
ScootyPuffSr
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 4:39p
I agree with Tooshy. I bought a packet of stamps (20?) two years ago. I'm still working on using them up. The price has changed, what, twice already?
As a convenience I'd gladly purchase these stamps so I'd never have to worry about my stamps being out of date.
However, as an investment I don't think this is a very good idea.
miffy
Shopaholic Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 5:02p
frootmall said: But if the cost of a forever stamp is the same as the cost of a regular stamp, it makes sense to buy forever stamps instead of regular stamps. You are no worse off buying them and in case you have any left over when the rate goes up, you save the cost of extra postage. It also makes sense to buy what you'll need for a few months just before the rate goes up, since you'll recoup your investment in a short time.
But given historical rates of postage increase, you would not have made out very well stocking up for the long term.
Good point.
frootmall
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 5:26p
RootGears said: I never really paid attention to the stamps I was using, but I have a bunch of stamps I bought two years ago that just have "First Class Mail", with the year 2005 on them. There is no denomination on them. Do these "expire" (need to add the extra stamp)? Yes, they do. They are only valid for the amount that the were sold for. Here is a chart showing what all of the non-denominated stamps are worth. It's become confusing since they stopped putting letters on them.
Interestingly, the Breast Canser Semi-Postal has been an unofficial forever stamp. It costs 45 cents (6 cents are donated to breast cancer research). The official rules say that it is only worth what a one-ounce letter cost to mail at the time you bought it and if the rate goes up you have to pay additioal postage, but people have noticed that the design of the stamp has not changed through the last several rate hikes.
frootmall
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 5:52p
There are a couple of surprises in the new rates that have not gotten a lot of publicity. There will be three different First Class rates: letters (41 cents for the first ounce), flats (80 cents for the first ounce) and parcels ($1.13 for the first ounce). And while the rate for additional ounces falls from 24 cents to 17 cents, there is a big surprise when a letter exceeds 3.5 ounces: it must be classified as a flat (if under 3/4 inch thick) or a parcel (if over 3/4 inch thick). (See Section 221.)
Slugabed
Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 9:16p
10 - 20 years from now, will people still be using stamps?
This looks like the USPS trying to cash in like the US Mint with their blasted new coins every other year...
Swailcat
Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 10:01p
Slugabed said: 10 - 20 years from now, will people still be using stamps?
Who uses stamps today...seriously???
mickcris
Senior Member
posted: Mar. 20, 2007 @ 10:06p
Swailcat said: Slugabed said: 10 - 20 years from now, will people still be using stamps?
Who uses stamps today...seriously??? I do every once in while. mostly for mail in rebates. i started paying all of my bills online a while ago.
tokay
Happy Member
posted: Mar. 21, 2007 @ 7:06a
Swailcat said: Slugabed said: 10 - 20 years from now, will people still be using stamps?
Who uses stamps today...seriously???
I do. I make handmade cards, hand write a personal note, and send them in the mail. I know many will disagree, but for some situations an e-card/e-ChristmasNewsletter/e-vite is just not the same. Sometimes a nice piece of personal mail just brightens your whole day.
I will probably buy (and use) the forever stamp.
WalStMonky
Happy Member
posted: Mar. 21, 2007 @ 7:20a
Nastygrams are still much more effective when written and mailed.
Skipping 31 Messages...
tooshy
Frivolous Member
posted: May. 4, 2007 @ 12:50p
czarandy said: So with the new law it makes no sense at all to buy the stamps, apart from convenience.Pretty much so...at least ibonds (as miserable an investment these are) pays the inflation rate regardless how many stamps I actually use.
I would like to know why they printed 5 billion stamps???
Did management honestly anticipate the bake sale of the century??? tsk tsk
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.