ok, i'm not financial wizard, but after looking at this calculator im starting to think this MIGHT make sense, depending on what kind of position you want to put yourself in and for how long?
i know bank of america does 2nd mortgages with no closing costs.
i'd be looking for like 30k for 2.5 years. i would use this 30k to paydown my existing 1st mortgage. if you use that calculator up there with these values
so based on these calculations, the NET total interest I would save by doing this would be $15200.
now... you may ask, why not just pay an additional $1100 (the amount of the monthly payment that would be on the 2nd mortgage) extra on top of my current 1st mortgage payment? http://www.xinc.net.au/calculators/extra_repayments.html
loan amount: 118,000 interest rate: 6 loan term: 15 freq: month extra cont: 1100 start after: 5 years
this yields, interest saved: $18300, and 71 months taken off my payments. the only problem with this however, is that I would need to be making these payments consistenly til the end of the loan, so in this case 10 years * 12 months = 120 months - 71 months = 49 months of consistent extra payments.
or if i do the 2nd mortgage I would be left with
10 years * 12 months = 120 months - 48 months cut down of term = 72 months left
out of those 72 months, for 30 months I would have to make a consistent payment of $1100 to pay off the 2nd mortgage, but would net $15200 in total interest savings.
so here is the summary, which is a better options:
SCENARIO 1: do a 2nd mortgage result: for 30 months pay consistently $1100 on the second mortgage, will leave me with a total of 72 months on my mortgage and a total net interest savings of $15200.
SCENARIO 2: extra repayment result: for 49 months pay consistently $1100 in addition to what I currently pay. this will leave me with a total of 49 months on my loan, of which all 49 will require that consistent payment of $1100. this will yield a net interest savings of $18300
I didn't review all your math, but you can't borrow at 8% to pay off 6% debt and come out ahead. You're missing a time value of money calculation somewhere in there.
berlinsmommy
Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 3:14p
Or, if you can make the extra $1,100 payment, put it in a HYS for 2.5 years. If you get ~5% interest, you will have close to $28k, a very nice little cushion for a rainy day!
When I read your title, I thought this was some sort of fancy math to help out subprime borrowers to stave off the inevitable for a few more years. (Take out 2nd mortgage, use proceeds to make payments on both mortgages, etc...)
Personally, I always look at total cost, but apparently OP is trying to look at something.
Usually the loan is not truely $0 closing costs, but rather $0 out of pocket where as the closing costs are rolled into the principle of the loan.
berlinsmommy said: Or, if you can make the extra $1,100 payment, put it in a HYS for 2.5 years. If you get ~5% interest, you will have close to $28k, a very nice little cushion for a rainy day!
For the same reason that OP should not borrow at 8% to pay down 6% debt, he should not invest for 5% while not paying down the 6% debt.
LustfortheMoment
Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 3:56p
It makes ZERO sense for you to "finance" any of your 6% mortgage with 8% paper. Since you have sufficient cash to make your planned second mortgage payments, I would simply fold them into your existing loan.
anthonyu
Happy Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 4:03p
While I agree that 8% vs 6% might be too much, the savings would be realized, in general, because of the difference between an amortized loan vs. simple interest loan. Isn't HEL also amortized and a HELOC is simple interest?
berlinsmommy
Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 4:10p
anthonyu said: While I agree that 8% vs 6% might be too much, the savings would be realized, in general, because of the difference between an amortized loan vs. simple interest loan. Isn't HEL also amortized and a HELOC is simple interest?
Not always. I have a HEL with a fixed rate that is simple interest through a credit union.
kitsapfreeloader
Tired Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 4:12p
You can't always believe the result an online calculator gives you. I did a few quick calculations in excel (nothing fancy) and came up with the following:
Option 1: $118000 at 6% for 15 years with no extra payments
$995.75 per month for 180 months Total Payments = $179235
Option 2: At beginning of year 5, take out $30000 at 8% for 2.5 years and pay towards principal on first loan
$995.75 per month until end of loan $1106.65 for 30 months for second mortgage Total Payments = $164290 SAVINGS: $14945
Option 3: At beginning of year 5, pay extra on first mortgage for 30 months, then return to normal payments
$995.75 per month for 60 months $995.75 + $1106.65 per month for 30 months $995.75 per month until end of loan Total Payments = $162994 SAVINGS: $16241
In reality, the payments and interest would probably vary from my calculations by a few dollars. But the way I figure, paying extra toward your 1st mortgage should save you about $1300 over your odd "borrow at 8% to pay off 6%" scheme. Add closing costs to that and your plan makes even less sense.
anthonyu
Happy Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 4:16p
berlinsmommy said: anthonyu said: While I agree that 8% vs 6% might be too much, the savings would be realized, in general, because of the difference between an amortized loan vs. simple interest loan. Isn't HEL also amortized and a HELOC is simple interest?
Not always. I have a HEL with a fixed rate that is simple interest through a credit union.
So if he gets a simple interest HEL, he can potentially save a little even if it is 8% vs 6%.
mauricer
Senior Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 4:19p
ok to respond to a few things...
1. CLOSING COST: i worked for BOFA (specifically with home loans/equities) and yes, the closing cost really is 0. the interest is usually prime +/- .25 on average depending on your LTV and a few other things )ie: do u have checking with them, will u do direct payments... can each take another .25 off your interest rate.
2. SAVINGS VS PAYING DOWN: it would not make sense as someone pointed out to instead of paying down a 6% loan to put into 5% savings.
3. AMORTIZED VS STANDARD INTEREST: my math was done with both examples being amortized loans. HELOANS are generally amortized. Here is the thing though
I rather be paying an amortized loan of 30k at 8%, than paying a 118k loan amortized at 6%. meaning, if you take that amortized 30k at 8% and use it to paydown 30k from that amortized 118k loan at 6%, you will realize about $15-18k savings - dependent on which of the 2 scenarios of the ones i mentioned in my original post you do.
like i said, im not a financial analyst by any means so i may be missing something somewhere, that's why i posted this here to share some thoughts and ideas.
mauricer
Senior Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 4:39p
also, keep in mind that it's important to note at what time you make this downpayment. doing it after 10 years would be pointless, since during the amortization process by that time you will owe so much less in interest (the amount of your regular payment that goes to principal vs what goes to interest) that the downpayment won't have much effect in terms of total interest savings going forward.
based on an amortized loan for 30k at 2.5 years my total interest paid will be approx $3200. do an amortization table to see the results. this means that to put a 30k downpayment towards my mortgage it would cost me $3200. by doing so however, im taking 4 years of interest payments off (as of today, which is probably 6% of about 90k principal) of my original loan of 118k.
jayK
Senior Member - JayK
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 5:02p
mauricer said: 2. SAVINGS VS PAYING DOWN: it would not make sense as someone pointed out to instead of paying down a 6% loan to put into 5% savings.It depends. By paying down your mortgage, you are investing an ever-increasing amount of money into a single asset: your house. Keeping your portfolio diversified among a number of asset classes is a best practice.
For example, what happens if you pay down your mortgage to 0 ahead of schedule, and interest rates rise so savings accounts are returning 7%? Don't forget that a 6% mortgage is quite low if you look at historical figures.
mauricer
Senior Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 5:24p
ha, jayk.. you bring up a good point as well and actually something i was thinking about.
2 issues:
what makes more sense, investing the money or using it to paydown or borrowing money out of my retirement for a year (no penelties etc).
issue with that is, what can i make with that same money in the market (my opportunity cost). can i make more money with it in the time period that I borrow it for versus the total amount of money i would save by using it to paydown my mortgage? by taking the money out of my retirement i would be paying 8% in interest to myself. anybody know of any potential issues with this, tax related or anything else? it's just a thought....
I can yield probably around 8% in the market, my retirement stuff is somewhat limited as far as what kinds of investments i can play with so that's why i say 8% yield.
on 30k of retirement cash i could come out with about $2400 during the 12 months of time i would borrow the funds for. this whole scenario is kinda unrealistic though, because i cannot afford a 30k loan for 12 months - even if it's to myself lol. (it could pnly be for 12 months bc after 12 months i would get penalized)
a lesser amount however, like 12k.. i could probably do. so with 12k i would yield $960 during the 12 months in APY, or instead save on my 1st mortgage interest during the life of the loan in the amount of $8750 and cutting the term down by 20 months. which one makes more sense? unless im completely overlooking something... using the 12k from my retirement for a year (assuming no penelties, and the interest paid is to my self in the amount of 8%) doing so would probably give me the best results.
granted its $8500 in savings versus the original discussed 15-18k by doing a loan, but it's another option i guess?
JAYK: "what happens if you pay down your mortgage to 0 ahead of schedule, and interest rates rise so savings accounts are returning 7%?"
well, if i paydown my mortgage ahead of schedule - which is my biggest expense - that will leave me to dump all my income into those new 7% earning savings, no?
Present value using 6% discount rate of $118,000 15 year mortgage with 6% interest = $118000.00 Present value using 6% discount rate of your scenario to take $30000 2.5 year 8% 2nd HEL to pay 1st loan = $118623.28 You are going to lose $623.28 in today's dollars by trying this plan.
For you 401k loan plan: What happens when the market is down and you lose your job? You get the choice between paying off you loan immediately or paying the 10% penalty. It sounds like it has some risk.
mauricer
Senior Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 7:57p
byex, words well said.
as far as loosing my job i have 20+ years seniority so i would hope others would get the boot before I did. plus I have a union behind me so that always helps.
i am more concered about present value/time value of money etc. ill have to do some investigation.
can u show ur calculation for the loss realized (approx 600)
SimpleMoney
Senior Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 8:30p
The ONLY way to come ahead here would be to refinance your 6% loan at an interest rate thats HIGHER than 10%. If you only get an 8% loan thats not worth it. Try and get a 10% or higher interest rate loan for the second mortgage. Then if possible refinance to a 3rd mortgage for 15% or higher a few years later.
mauricer
Senior Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 8:37p
im not sure that your understanding my logic behind this. did you do the math calculations on those links provided?
i understand that 8% is greater than 6% and that this seems to make NO sense what so ever. but doing these simple calculations seems to show otherwise.
the only thing im really curious to is what REALLY makes more sense, doing the 30k down right away or simply doing the 1100$ additional payments.
zzyzzx
Senior Member - 3K
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 8:50p
It would make more sense for you to get a 2nd job to help pay off the mortgage.
1. To calculate present value PV on $118000.00 first mortgage only:
PV(1st mortgage) = [(1 - ((1+r)^-n))/r]*PMT = 118000.00 r = .06/12 interest rate per pay period n = 180 months PMT = 995.75 payment on $118,000 15 year mortgage at 6% interest rate
2. To calculate PV on 2nd mortgage situation: PV(1st mortgage with fewer payments) + PV(2nd mortgage) = 96049.65 + 22917.35 = 118967.00
PV(1st) same formula above: r = .06/12, n = 132, PMT = 995.75
PV each individual payment on 2nd HEL: (PMT /(1+r)^n) where PMT = 1106.65, r = .06/12, n = month of payment (PV of Payment in 60th month = 1106.65 / (1+.005)^60 = 820.44) = SUM(2nd mortgage payments) = 820.44+816.36+... = 22917.35
Note: I simplified my previous answer to lump all 2nd mortgage payments as being in month 60. This calculation should be more accurate. The r = the same for both all calculations because it is a discount rate (NOT the rate you are paying on the mortgages). The idea is to look at how much that stream of payments is worth given a certain discount for how much less money will be worth to you years from now compared with today. A higher PV is worth more to a lender, a borrower wants as low PV as possible.
I hope this makes sense.
mauricer
Senior Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 9:44p
yea i remmber this from finance 295... ill have to take a look at these calculations when i have more time.
LustfortheMoment
Senior Member - 1K
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 9:55p
mauricer, you're going in circles. Speak with a loan officer at any bank and present your premise. You'll feel better. If you still insist that you can make money on this scheme, then go for it.
WalStMonky
Happy Member
posted: May. 11, 2007 @ 10:55p
Try making sure that you're paying the same amount of principal each month. I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure you'd get better results if you just increase the principal payment to the 6% loan to equal the principal payment to the 8% loan.
mhesidence
Dismembered Member
posted: May. 23, 2007 @ 1:17p
Too much math makes my head hurt.
Simple solution.
1) Get HELOC and pay down 1st mortgage. 2) Apply for 0% BT cards and pay down HELOC.
Even easier just apply for 0% BT cards and put the money in FNBO Direct, both 1st mortgage and FNBO Direct is at 6% anyway.
delzy said: Ha Ha, you've all been trolled. This was a bait and follow-on for the stupid computer program masters1 sells for $3500.
You are all suckers for even responding to this stupidity.exactly, as soon as i saw this post I thought of the "mortgage accelerator" touts pushing high interest HELOCs to use as checking accts
I'm certainly not a fan of the self-promotion or the "magic bullet" software. However, I am interested in figuring out how to manage excess cash and add purchasing flexibility. I can't seem to find any customers to serve as reference (did a Google and FW search) for the FedChoice HELOC. However, it has a 5.99% fixed rate for the first three years. I have about $60K in HY (5.25%) accounts that I plan to use as a down payment for a new house. I am thinking about opening the FedChoice HELOC and putting the $60K into my current first (and only) mortgage (@ 6% 30-year). I will also recast this mortgage, effectively lowering my required monthly payment about $300/month - good for renting (cashflow) and borrowing (lower monthly DTI) purposes. Then, I can satisfy the down payment by borrowing from the HELOC, which is at a better rate than I could otherwise borrow at and without stamps/closing costs. I don't plan to sell the current house. The longer it takes to find a new home, the more money I will continue to save in liquid accounts - offsetting the decreasing duration of the HELOC's 3-YR fixed rate.
That's why I'm interested in the mortgage checking plus HELOC structure. Please tear apart my thinking - appreciate any comments/suggestions/criticisms. Thanks.
masters1
New Member
posted: May. 26, 2007 @ 5:17p
okay, okay, I get it. A lot of LO's out there troll these sites looking to sell their products. You guys are justified in taking it out on me, the lonely broker of the bunch who MUST be a shark looking to prey on some unsuspecting sap who's too stupid to know any better. Well, here's the truth - I'm not selling any stupid software - I don't think that's the best way to do it (and besides, you can do it yourself without the software.) The product I'm talking about is called the Home Ownership Accelerator. It's ONE LOAN. No software, no HELOC 2nds, just one account. You can google the product and you'll start to find more and more out there on it. I've had a good deal of success with some of my clients (not ALL - this is a sophisticated product and is not for everyone.) I've created a website for the product but obviously can't post it here without getting my whole post removed.
SO HERE's THE DEAL - I'm not begging for your business! You guys obviously have trust issues with me and that's fine. That doesn't change the fact that the product is out there and gaining momentum. I found this post by googling "mortgage checking account" to see how my ezine article was being ranked. I've had some good conversations with Venturion. I again want to state - Home Ownership Accelerator is one loan and is based off the 1 month Libor. PRIME historical average = 10.2% currently at 8.25% 1 Month Libor historical average 4.6% currently at 5.32%. I would tell you the name of the bank that is selling this but I'm afraid my post would get removed again. Check for yourselves. I don't work for the bank that sells this - I'm a broker and use this bank as one of my lenders. Can't wait to see your responses to this . . . .
-Tyler
WalStMonky
Happy Member
posted: May. 26, 2007 @ 5:25p
You're saying I can have a 1st at 5.32% right now with this program? I don't know about anyone else but my problem is with the notion that I can borrow at a 7 to 8+% variable rate to pay off a large mortgage and save money on my paycheck float. I searched with Google but didn't find any actual rates being offered.
masters1
New Member
posted: May. 26, 2007 @ 9:48p
5.32% is the index only. Every interest rate is made up of an index and a margin. You can buy this loan down to a floor of .75% in which case the fully indexed rate would be 6.07%. The cool thing about this as well is that you don't have to buy the rate down at the begining if you don't want to. you can buy it down at any time. Pretty cool. Now I'm not saying this is the end all of mortgage products. Every product has it's pros and cons. This has a lot of pros but it does come with a price. The margin at par is about 2% which this month would be around 7.30%. As I mentioned you can buy it down to .75% and that will cost you about 2.25 pts. That does make for some hefty closing costs but the break even point comes very quick and can save you a lot long term. This all varies of course depending on how much money you have left over at the end of the month. You most likely wont find rates Walstmonkey - it is a wholesale product. I think they do have som retail divisions but I don't know where.
Please provide a real testimonial from a real person who can back it up with real data.
mhesidence
Dismembered Member
posted: May. 26, 2007 @ 11:24p
masters1 said: 5.32% is the index only. Every interest rate is made up of an index and a margin. You can buy this loan down to a floor of .75% in which case the fully indexed rate would be 6.07%.
Two points.
1) FNBO Direct's rate is 6%. Just plunk your money there and avoid closing costs and 2.25 in points.
2) Its just a HELOC in the 1st lein postion. You can do the same thing with no closing costs by just getting a no closing cost HELOC. Or if you already have a good rate getting a HELOC in the 2nd postion and pay the mortgage down some. Of course, if you already have a good rate then see #1.
I suppose if you are moving and need a new mortgage anyway...nope, you can get way lower than 6.07% with 2.25 points with a traditional 30 year fixed and put savings in a FNBO Direct.
Try as I might I can't think of a single reason to get this loan in the current rate enviornment. Maybe if there were some hint rates will start to drop.
masters1
New Member
posted: May. 27, 2007 @ 12:51a
Delzy - have you been burned a few times or what? I'm not trying to sell this to you guys - just let you know there are other options. As I said before I'm a broker so I have no reason to promote one bank over another. Only products matter and I feel this one is better in most instances. That doesn't mean I wont be open to hear about the HELOC combo product. Mhesidence - There are a lot of scenarios this wont work for and a lot that it will. You don't have to pay the 2.25 pts - it just gives you the lowest rate possible. As I mentioned before, if you take it at par the rate is around 7.3% - still cheaper than Prime. I think the HELOC option is hands down much cheaper closing cost wise. But rate is only one part of the equation in my mind - The speed at which I lower my balance as well as the payment flexability are also important.
Here's a thought - if you strip away the closing costs and make them both even, which product would each of you rather have? The one loan scenario certainly seems less complex but does have a higher rate. Then again, you're actually paying two rates with the HELOC scenario so you would have to find the blend to compare apples to apples, right? The thing I don't like about a traditional 1st mortgage is that no matter how much you prepay it, your amortization schedule already has all 360 payments calculated out - so your no saving any interest in the begining. Prepaying only cuts time off the back whereas with the HELOC the savings are instant. Am I wrong about this?
masters1 said: okay, okay, I get it. A lot of LO's out there troll these sites looking to sell their products. You guys are justified in taking it out on me, the lonely broker of the bunch uh , are you the OP of this thread using another screename? BC i cant see where anyone commented about you, or took anything out on you, since you just started posting in this thread.
mhesidence
Dismembered Member
posted: May. 27, 2007 @ 1:42a
masters1 said: Mhesidence - There are a lot of scenarios this wont work for and a lot that it will. You don't have to pay the 2.25 pts - it just gives you the lowest rate possible. As I mentioned before, if you take it at par the rate is around 7.3% - still cheaper than Prime.
Not hard to get a HELOC at prime - 1, which is 7.25%. Its not suprising the this program and a HELOC have nearly the same rates since they are nearly the same type of loan.
I think the HELOC option is hands down much cheaper closing cost wise. But rate is only one part of the equation in my mind - The speed at which I lower my balance as well as the payment flexability are also important.
Here's a thought - if you strip away the closing costs and make them both even, which product would each of you rather have? The one loan scenario certainly seems less complex but does have a higher rate. Then again, you're actually paying two rates with the HELOC scenario so you would have to find the blend to compare apples to apples, right?
No need to bother with blended rate. 30 year fixed is full point lower than this mortgage accelorator, penfed is 6.25 no points. Put "savings" into FNBO Direct at 6% and you don't even need to bother with a calculator to see you'll be better off than your loan at 7.30% less your savings. Okay, if you have enough savings to zero or almost zero out the mortgage then you'll come out ahead by "principal*.25%"
Works pretty much the same if you use a HELOC in the second postion and a standard 30 year fixed in the 1st lein postion. Just periodicly "pay down" the 1st loan when you accumlate enough savings in the HELOC. Since the fixed loan is lower than the mortgage accelorator and the HELOC is about the same rate, you are bound to come out ahead.
The thing I don't like about a traditional 1st mortgage is that no matter how much you prepay it, your amortization schedule already has all 360 payments calculated out - so your no saving any interest in the begining. Prepaying only cuts time off the back whereas with the HELOC the savings are instant. Am I wrong about this?
Yes, you are wrong or at least confusing in the way you state it. When you prepay principal in a traditional first mortgage you no longer pay interest on it. For example you pre-paid $1000 on a $100,000 30 year fix rate loan in the first month and it takes off 9 months and saves $4980 in interest. You can plug it into any decent mortgage caclulator and see the results.
mbustamonte said: This thread is almost hilarious. you really need to sit with someone that has gone through the process, understands the math and all factors need to calculate.
YOU MUST BE WILLING TO LEARN!
This should really shake you up; Did you know you can borrow at 10% (interest only) and reduce your interest cost on a 5.5% Fixed rate loan and pay it off in 1/3 the time?
WOWWA!For that to be true, your average balance of the interest-only loan must be almost 1/2 the balance of the fixed rate loan. Sorry, but most people dont have the cash flow required to be able to pay down their entire mortgage balance for two weeks every month.
A $1k or $2k per week paydown (before redrawing to pay your bills) on a $100k+ mortgage isnt going to have nearly the "amazing" results that you present as being a given.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.