ellory said: By the way, could someone explain to me why an aeronautical engineer is the paragon of financial acumen? It's like an electronical engineer, they're really, really smart.
Look at Step 1. This is a newscast promoting this stuff. Watch Step 1 from the news. Who wouldn't want to live at the corner of "W Promised Land Ave and S American Pride St."
According to Google maps, there is a corner of Promised Land Ave and American Pride St. From 1st Lady Ave, you take a right on Forefather's St, and then right on Promised Land Ave.
If you reach Proud Patriot St, you have gone too far.
kenmoreland said: kenmoreland said: According to Google maps, there is a corner of Promised Land Ave and American Pride St. From 1st Lady Ave, you take a right on Forefather's St, and then right on Promised Land Ave.
If you reach Proud Patriot St, you have gone too far.I'm sold then! I want to live there too. I am sending my $3500 check so they can UFF me first thing in the morning
kenmoreland said: According to Google maps, there is a corner of Promised Land Ave and American Pride St. From 1st Lady Ave, you take a right on Forefather's St, and then right on Promised Land Ave.
If you reach Proud Patriot St, you have gone too far.
OMG, you're not joking. You Americans crack me up.
Now I have to go looking for an intersection of Beaver Ave. and Hockey Road in my own country.
abwhitney said: i've been copying my FIL but as it's end of quarter, he's a bit busy with the 2nd quarter report due.
abwhitney, its a week now. still waiting. Quarter is over. When can we expect you back with your FIL National Bank CFO's analysis?
Frankly I'm a little disappointed. I thought this might have been the first "advocate" of U1st to stay around more than two days. They all promise to come back, but once we put the light on them , they scurry away like roaches.
Long awaited... and the news for U1st is not good. The news for us? Exactly the points we have made. And I'll take a Kiplinger's review, any day, over the infomercial trade mags that UFF has issue them "awards"
Don't Fall for This Mortgage Pitch Prepay your home loan yourself and skip the $3,500 software fee. By Pat Mertz Esswein, Associate Editor From Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, May 2008
You may have received e-mails touting a system that promises to help you pay off your mortgage early. This mortgage-acceleration package -- which includes a software program -- relies heavily on the use of a home-equity line of credit. The software analyzes your financial data to reveal when and how much extra you should prepay.
The Money Merge Account system, sold by United First Financial, costs $3,500. For the price, you may also receive a recruiting pitch. United First is a multilevel marketer that encourages salespeople to bring others aboard, passing the profit up the food chain.
With or without expensive software, the fact is that the more discretionary income you can commit to prepayment, the quicker the mortgage becomes history. We suggest you keep your $3,500 and do it yourself without having to fend off a pushy salesperson.
For example, divide your monthly payment by 12 and pay that much extra each month. Doing so would allow a homeowner with a $230,000 mortgage at 6% to cut about 5.5 years off a 30-year mortgage (see our How Advantageous are Extra Payments? calculator).
Is prepaying your mortgage even a good idea? That depends on whether you have better things to do with spare cash. You could create a reserve fund so that you don't have to borrow in an emergency or stash the money in a tax-deferred college- or retirement-savings account.
Salespeople challenge whether you'll follow through on your own -- as if spending $3,500 for software will ensure that you'll use it. Tell that to couch potatoes whose high-end exercise equipment gathers dust.
The silence is deafening. I hope the Google ranking of this thread doesn't suffer. It's too important as a resource for prospective UFF clients, to prevent them from becoming UFF clients.
In the meantime, UFF agents love to remark about an article in "Personal Real Estate Investor Magazine", and that this magazine can be found in Barnes & Noble and Borders.
UFF agents are not nearly as fond of that article in that May issue of Kiplinger's Personal Finance linked by ellory above.
Something else that UFF agents don't like: Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine was founded in 1923 and is a widely respected publication, with a circulation of over 1,000,000. Personal Real Estate Investor Magazine was founded in 2003 (only 80 years later) and has a circulation of 27,500, mostly in Arizona. It's a local real estate magazine. Good luck finding it "next to BusinessWeek and Fortune"
You guys crack me up, what a bunch of paranoid, self boasting individuals, I guess the news channel is in on this scam too right? It's a conspiracy right, I feel sorry for your wives, If you have one.
jeckyllisland said: You guys crack me up, what a bunch of paranoid, self boasting individuals, I guess the news channel is in on this scam too right? It's a conspiracy right, I feel sorry for your wives, If you have one.Yet another example of UFF douch bag.
jeckyllisland said: You guys crack me up, what a bunch of paranoid, self boasting individuals, I guess the news channel is in on this scam too right? It's a conspiracy right, I feel sorry for your wives, If you have one.
That's a great advertisement for UFF. Did you really take the time to sign up for FW to post that? I hope you come back with something more substantial, because it is always entertaining to read what the shills say.
By the way 1. Who boasted? 2. Some of us are women. Both women and men hate to be scammed 3. Of all the pro-UFF arguments, yours is the least cogent. Not easy, given the quality of supporter posts. Gold medal for you
ellory said: abwhitney said: i've been copying my FIL but as it's end of quarter, he's a bit busy with the 2nd quarter report due.
abwhitney, its a week now. still waiting. Quarter is over. When can we expect you back with your FIL National Bank CFO's analysis?
Frankly I'm a little disappointed. I thought this might have been the first "advocate" of U1st to stay around more than two days. They all promise to come back, but once we put the light on them , they scurry away like roaches.
Just a reminder that abwhitney was going to come back with an analysis from his "accountant" after April 15th. And, of course, no sign of the CFO FIL
Any one want to view these videos and do a synopsis? As I pay for my bandwidth usage, I am not going to waste it on the U1st propaganda, but it would be useful what the "candid interview" with the founders reveals
ellory said: Any one want to view these videos and do a synopsis? As I pay for my bandwidth usage, I am not going to waste it on the U1st propaganda, but it would be useful what the "candid interview" with the founders reveals
I'd rather pay for your bandwidth than lose brain cells to UFF re-education, but I'll try to make it through one of them tonight.
The shills are touting their scam on AM 'talk' (talk = pay for time) radio...much like television infomercials...
Someone at work sent me the link to a UFF touter...so I replied back to her with the Kiplinger's link and the Australian report link. She said that a UFF person came back and tried to refute the Kiplinger's report with the Real Estate Investor magazine! Unreal. He's supposed to be 'doing more research' and getting back to her b/c there's 'no way' that his software doesn't do what it claims - I'm just amazed at these folks' persistance...though $2500 a pop isn't chump change.
As for their claim that 92% of people are 'on track' to achieving their goals...how is that measured? Seriously, is it an objective measure as in 'this is what your principal would have been and this is what your principal is now' measure or is it the 'algorithm based software' saying you're on track? B/c honestly, this company is NOT going to be around in five years for folks to be able to take advantage of their 'guarantee.'
LisaS said: The shills are touting their scam on AM 'talk' (talk = pay for time) radio...much like television infomercials...
I'm not surprised. They have to find a new medium where they don't run into opposition. Radio is a one-way form of communication, so we can't refute the ridiculous claims on radio.
That said, anyone with Internet access should at least Google them before committing, and I'd hazard to guess they lose a lot of sales with those searches. UFF agents must hate the thought of potential clients going home to "sleep on it" and discovering this forum or others. I can envision a lot of hard sales tactics being employed to close deals on the spot.
I don't think business is good for these people. UFF agent Mark Goldsmith of Oceanside, CA flipped out when I pointed out some truths to him. He PM'ed me: "...and my brother who works for the FBI,we will have a little fun with your ip address."
These are not the words of a schill whose business is booming. They're frustrated with us, and they can't refute the obvious fact that the MMA software is mostly useless. But at least they have relatives in the FBI on their side.
1. these guys are desperate and will lie about anything 2. if it were true, an FBI agent messing with someone for personal gain is an invitation for criminal charges, not to mention the biggest potential windfall you will ever see.
calvinandhobbes said: 2. if it were true, an FBI agent messing with someone for personal gain is an invitation for criminal charges, not to mention the biggest potential windfall you will ever see.
Nah, I'm Canadian. I don't go around suing people who say stupid things to me. Besides, Mark confided in me that he is deep in debt, and doesn't have a lot of money coming in. He is actually a pretty tragic figure. This was part of his message to me:
Mark Goldsmith said: I have a $500,000 home how much money would i need to send monthly to pay it off in 12 years with an interest rate of 8.2% 30 year neg am loan???
THAT, is not a good mortgage to be in.
I replied:
cphansen said: I'll assume you mean $500,000 mortgage. Amortized over 30 years, the base monthly payment is $3,738.78. To pay it off in 12 years, you need to send an additional $1730 every month.
He came back:
Mark Goldsmith said: I don't have 1730.00 to send every month. Have a good day.
Mark Goldsmith said: Why would i wasn't a 6% mortgage it's still going to be for 30 years, I'm not going to refi, trust me i'll have it paid in 8.2 years, using the banks money and not my own. Good luck to you.
So, Mark is deep in debt, and thinks he has found a magic pill. He's either paying 8.2%, or paying off the loan in 8.2 years. He can't do math (which explains why he's so deep in debt and accruing interest charges faster than he can pay) and is extremely defensive. He may honestly believe that the MMA will help him pay off his mortgage in 8.2 or 12 years.
What I can forget, and I shouldn't, is that there are a lot of very desperate people out there. The foreclosure numbers are rising, and each "number" is actually a person. Scary stuff. People are very willing to suspend disbelief in those circumstances. UFF looks like a life preserver to them. It's actually a rock.
How many more of these scams are they? And frankly HEAP makes a poor case of why anyone should spend $1000. When $60 Quicken does far more Equity Acceleration Plans to Watch Out For
As indicated in other parts of this web-site, the H.E.A.P™ concept is not a new one, it’s just one that is not well known. It is starting to become more well known by “vendors” pitching plans that we believe are NOT client focused and instead are advisor focused.
An advisor focused plan is one that tries to maximize dollars an advisor can make from a client that doesn’t know any better.
Look at the following e-mail from an advisor looking at the H.E.A.P™ vs. one of the advisor friendly programs.
“Yes I would like to find out more (about H.E.A.P™) but to be honest if I could make a $2250 commission vs. only $1000 …… then I would stick with this one from ……..”
The name of the company has been omitted as has the name of the advisor who wrote the e-mail.
Does any more need to be said? Some advisors and marketing firms have maximum profit as a goal vs. client first advice that will help advisors keep their clients for the long haul.
1) Watch out for any program that costs $3,500.
We have to give them their due, they have a really slick marketing package and a very powerful sales pitch. Their program is sold on the benefit to the consumer (which is a savings of $100,000 plus for most) and for that a cost of $3,500 is reasonable. The firm will even let you finance the $3,500 (how nice of them).
As you will learn if you chose to learn about H.E.A.P™, the program is really not that difficult and to charge $3,500 for the advice and accompanying software in our opinion is an outrage (and really was part of the motivation to create H.E.A.P™).
Part of the sales pitch is a wonderful software package a consumer is provided with. It could be the best software in the world, but it’s not worth $3,500 for the simple reason that you don’t even need software to implement H.E.A.P™ or any other similar program. We believe most consumers will want the H.E.A.P™ software to help them budget the program, but the first year cost is $1,000 or less not $3,500.
If you run into this program and want to discuss it with a H.E.A.P™ trained advisor, please e-mail info@heaplan.com and someone will contact you.
2) Stay away from any program that REQUIRES you to refinance your primary mortgage.
H.E.A.P™ or any similar type of acceleration program DOES NOT require you to refinance in order to take advantage of the benefits.
Many people refinanced a few years ago when interest rates were at an all time low and still have 25+ years left on their mortgages. If the rates on those loans are very low, why would anyone want to refinance those?
The sale’s pitch is that you MUST refinance so you can take advantage of an acceleration program to pay off the debt early. That is not true.
Then the programs out there force clients to refinance into a variable loan rate typically tied to the Prime interest rate. Today Prime is over 8% and some of the programs have Prime + loans.
To show you the power of H.E.A.P™, the plan would still work to pay off your home’s debt 10+ years early even if you went from a 6% loan to an 8%+ loan. Having said that, there is NO reason to refinance your current mortgage except…….except that if you don’t refinance your mortgage an advisor then makes no money on a new mortgage sale.
Again, like the $3,500 program, the average consumer has never heard of any of these plans that REQUIRE you to refinance your entire mortgage to take advantage of the acceleration and therefore, when the consumer is told they have to refinance even into a program tied to a Prime rate that floats, the consumer does it because they don’t know any better.
Don’t do it. Do not get rid of your mortgage and refinance into a loan with a higher rate especially if it floats (is not locked). You don’t have to do it order to use H.E.A.P™.
Frankly, the only two things they need to the above, though to make it accurate are to correct the spelling of "advisor" (you would think for $1000 per victim they could at least run spell check) and add number 3
ellory said: How many more of these scams are they? And frankly HEAP makes a poor case of why anyone should spend $1000. According to their website, $1000 is the cost for the first year... not the total cost (which isn't stated).
I have a friend who was hit up by a UFF sales woman. I told her it seemed sketchy to me and then found these threads and few other forums debating UFF. I recommended she not do it but now that I have read a little on this I am curious about the MMA concept. It seems like it's more than just prepaying your mortgage. Anyone want to give me a simplified rundown or have a link that explains it? I found this site: http://www.doimma.com/, but realized it is a one page site that is promoting UFF. They're trying to disguise it as a non-biased review, but ultimately it's a flyer for UFF. I did a whois on the domain owner and it's conveniently registered by proxy so you don't know who owns it. I'm sure it's run by some UFF affiliate or agent.
Currently, my wife and I have a 140k loan at 5.75% interest with a biweekly payment. We round our payment up, so I think we pay around $40 extra per payment. My goal is to find if I should be doing this differently. Should I investigate the MMA concept, or would I get almost as good of a financial gain by just upping my extra to say $100 every payment, or $200 extra per month.
Any help or tips for a newbie welcomed. And don't worry, I have no plans to use UFF.
nearlybroke said: I have a friend who was hit up by a UFF sales woman. I told her it seemed sketchy to me and then found these threads and few other forums debating UFF. I recommended she not do it but now that I have read a little on this I am curious about the MMA concept. It seems like it's more than just prepaying your mortgage. Anyone want to give me a simplified rundown or have a link that explains it? I found this site: http://www.doimma.com/, but realized it is a one page site that is promoting UFF. They're trying to disguise it as a non-biased review, but ultimately it's a flyer for UFF. I did a whois on the domain owner and it's conveniently registered by proxy so you don't know who owns it. I'm sure it's run by some UFF affiliate or agent.
Currently, my wife and I have a 140k loan at 5.75% interest with a biweekly payment. We round our payment up, so I think we pay around $40 extra per payment. My goal is to find if I should be doing this differently. Should I investigate the MMA concept, or would I get almost as good of a financial gain by just upping my extra to say $100 every payment, or $200 extra per month.
Any help or tips for a newbie welcomed. And don't worry, I have no plans to use UFF.
The MMA concept is to jump through hoops to prepay your mortgage. You can either do all that or...just prepay your mortgage like you are already doing. If you have read this thread then you should already know what the answer to your question is or you are a sneaky shill.
NearlyBroke, read the first page of each of the three or so threads on UFF in this forum. After doing so, if you have a specific question not yet answered on those three pages, I'll try to answer it.
I am a sneaky shill, w00t! Actually, I'm an obnoxious web programmer . I have read quite a bit on the forum but there's a ton of double talk going on (mainly by shills as you know) so wanted to find an unbiased overview of the basic concept of the plan. I just want to make sure I am not over-simplifying it in my head. I checked our mortgage and we are being pretty aggressive on the loan, so I don't think we will be changing anything. I will reiterate my advice to my friend to keep her $3500 and prepay if she can.
Here's also an outsider's view on this whole thing. I wonder if there are not very many US complaints against these programs because they are packaged in such a complex, obtuse manner that it takes users some time to realize they've been duped. In Australia it sounds like they cracked down on it after it had been around for 10+ years. I found this article very interesting here: http://www.butterhomes.com/blog/index.php/mortgage-accelerator-under-fire-australian-securities-and-investments-commission-taking-action-against-mortgage-brokers. Carolyn Bond's comments (CEO at the Consumer Action Law Center in Melbourne, Australia) are particularly enlightening, and there's a link to a court action. Makes me wonder if in 5 or 6 years you see complaints start to skyrocket in the US. Another interesting read are the comments. Seems like Chris Butterworth tried to review numbers with Cliff Smith of UFF and eventually Cliff simply dropped the correspondance. Chris had to assume it was because Cliff couldn't refute his data.
Yep, everything here has been covered to death. The UFF agents are rehashing the same points, trying to wear down those who have already proven that (a) the MMA is not optimal, (b) you can achieve better results with a simple DIY approach.
Anyone who reads the Quick Summary on the first page of this thread, and even skims through the thread, will have answered for themselves the questions you have asked. UFF agents have been known to pass themselves off as interested third parties, only to "discover" the MMA is the best thing since sliced bread. That's why we're guarded - I don't believe any objective 3rd party who reads a page of this thread would describe it as a "debate", when some UFF agents themselves have to admit that the MMA is not optimal, but is simply a $3500 behaviour tool.
Those of us who have put time in to debunking the MMA don't see any income from our efforts - just personal satisfaction from steering perfect strangers away from a poor financial choice. UFF agents, at this point, are just trying to wear us down. Not by the quality of their replies, but by sheer volume.
Edit: Yes, the Chris Butterworth correspondence is very telling. I've been challenging any UFF agent to compare detailed monthly results for a few months now, and I've had no takers. Some agents told me they can't simulate the monthly money movements. If so, how can they have so much faith that the MMA works as advertised? Only one UFF agent even recently decided to send me a UFF report on a client (names removed) and suggested the DIY approach couldn't beat the MMA. In 5 minutes, I prepared a plan to beat the MMA by 3 months, using the same assets, liabilities, and income. Now I'm being told that I didn't win the challenge because my plan of fiscal responsibility isn't "realistic". By that measure, the MMA isn't realistic, either. UFF agents have a tremendous amount of faith in the product, where "faith" is defined as "belief that does not rest on logical proof or material evidence."
Do you have biweekly "mortgage" or "payment". Mortgages written as truely biweekly are exceedingly rare.
If it is as you said a biweekly "payment", you are not likely getting the best bang for your "extra payment" buck. You should look at the fine details of your biweekly payments. Typically, the payments are accumulated in a low/non interest bearing account and then applied at some point as an extra principal payment amount.
Very often you are charged a fee for this less than optimal privilege. More often this is more of a profit center for the bank and/or third party than it is of benefit to you.
The simplest and most effect way to achieve the biweekly effect is to pay 1/12 of your mortgage payment as an extra principal payment. While this may not have the convience of matching your pay cycles, when combined with a hi-yield account, will result in the most efficient payment.
The advantage of any monthly income/expense float is limited to monthly interest applied to the average daily balance of the float. The float interest can either be based or HELOC or hi-yield account. A MMA (Money Merge Account) is essentially the former and is only of advantage in unique interest rate environments.
The bottom line is that benefit of this float for most people is in the range of $10-$20. As been said many times in this thread, the overwhelming benefit of any pre-payment effort is the AMOUNT of the pre-payment and not any marginal benifit from any income/expense float. No matter what anyone says, it always comes down to pure mathematics.
cp, I understand why you're guarded and hope I was being too dense when I asked obvious questions. Hopefully the link I gave and Australian court action reference will help your cause.
btuttle, I actually found we have a single payment. For some reason I thought it was biweekly, but my wife reminded me we decided against that because the bank was going to charge us more to set it up that way. But we are prepaying a good amount over our mortgage each month so I think I am going to keep our payments the same.
nearlybroke said: btuttle, I actually found we have a single payment. For some reason I thought it was biweekly, but my wife reminded me we decided against that because the bank was going to charge us more to set it up that way. But we are prepaying a good amount over our mortgage each month so I think I am going to keep our payments the same.
It's interesting to learn about the small differences between mortgages in Canada and the States (OK, maybe "interesting" isn't the right word)
When I first got involved in this UFF discussion, I wondered why bi-weekly payments were looked down upon. My mortgage used to be paid in bi-weekly installments, and there is a small benefit to that plan. But it seems many American banks charge to set up the payments that way. There was no charge for this at my Canadian bank.
This advice can be tweeked with a little extra effort to get a better result. When I was prepaying on my mortgage in chunks, I became curious if there was a better time of the month to make the extra payment. I discovered that my interest was always calculated by the outstanding balance on the 1st of the month. Therefore, I began to horde my prepayment for the entire month, earned daily interest, then made sure that prepayment arrived on the last day of month, and had my regular payment autodraft on the first. The net effect, I earned interest on my prepayment, and didn't have to pay the interest on the prepayment amount for that entire month even though the mortgage company only got the money one day earlier.
btuttle said: NearlyBroke
The simplest and most effect way to achieve the biweekly effect is to pay 1/12 of your mortgage payment as an extra principal payment. While this may not have the convience of matching your pay cycles, when combined with a hi-yield account, will result in the most efficient payment.
With over thirty years experience in the insurance and investment business, I agree there is much confusion in regards to the simple analysis and the real software. Most have evidently only investigated the simple spreadsheet analysis which shows extra discretionary income going into the system and canceling out interest. On the surface, by just looking at an analysis, I would tend to agree that it doesn't make much sense to spend $3500 to tell me extra payments of ??? each month will pay off my mortgage quicker.. That is where most stop their investigation. They do not investigate the real software and what it really accomplishes. I will cut to the chase for everyone: 1. The analysis is a simple spreadsheet which really just takes the discretionary money each month and applies it to the mortgage. It does not take into account any floating of money and the "interest cancellation effect of depositing your income into a line of credit. (By the way, this product works with HELOCS, lines of credit, and even credit cards.) It works with most "open ended" financing instruments. This analysis can be matched with any free internet mortgage accelerator calculator.
The Projection of future performance of any product (insurance, investments, etc.) is just that, a projection. The assumption of investments, banking, and insurance industry product proposals assume that life remains the same for the next 5, 10, or 15 years. I think it is safe to assume that our financial life changes on a DAILY BASIS. Our discretionary income changes each month. Even if income stays the same, cost of living and daily changes in life affects our net monies available. The Money Merge Analysis and all other projections from investments and insurance products are really just a photograph of the day it was completed. All these products assume that life remains the same for the term of the projection. This has been industry standard for as long as I can remember. We all know life changes daily!
2. The Money Merge Account Software is much more than a mortgage accelerator. The software is really a debt management tool. Other software like Quicken, Money, Quick Books, and others bring the past up to the present. The Money Merge Account software takes you from the present to the future, all by the simple click of the mouse.
3. Here are some examples of what a person can expect from the software: a. If I have a change in income (increase or decrease) – know the exact effect on my financial future. b. If I have small or large changes in my budget – learn what impact that has on my financial future. c. “What If” Scenarios – If I deposit more money into the lines of credit, learn how my future is affected d. “What If” Scenarios – If I want to purchase an item or have to pay something on an emergency basis, instantaneously know the “True Cost” of the proposed spending and how it will affect my financial future. e. Have the ability to plan into the future based upon personal goals and family desires. f. The software will always keep me informed of the month and year I could be out of debt based on how life travels. G. The affect of extra principle payments and how that accelerates the principle portion of the monthly payment on the closed end loan (1st Mortgage) H. The affect of borrowing the banks money at a low net rate of interest
Here is a detailed example: Let’s say that an income earner loses a job. The family is upside down by 1000 per month to break even on their bills. Under normal circumstances, a great amount of stress is created because of the UNKNOWN IMPACT of how the family will survive through the ordeal. The Money Merge Account will give them the information of the truth right away. I have experienced that knowing the truth is easier to accept that the unknown. "Know the truth and the truth will set you free." The unknown creates great stress. The Money Merge Account will tell them when they will be out of money based upon the current lifestyle and spending habits. They can then take that current situation to see how additional changes in the monthly budget and what happens when another job is obtained down the road. This can all be accomplished instantaneously by the click of the mouse. There is nothing else in the world that will do this. This places the planning power in the hands of the consumer. They say the #1 reason for divorce ismoney; #2 reason is stress (probably from #1). I cannot help but think that if those people would have the instant knowledge of how their current financial decisions and circumstances affect their financial future, the truth, maybe stress levels would drop to acceptable levels and there would be less divorce.
The Money Merge Account is a great day to day educational tool. As stated in other opinions, a majority of Americans are not schooled in finances, compound interest, budgeting, and the effects of tax write-offs. Frankly, there are many out there who think they are, but in fact, do not have a clue. The Money Merge Account continues to educate the consumer by giving instant knowledge of how today’s financial decisions, big and small, affects their financial tomorrows. It helps them become more accountable for our financial decisions by giving them knowledge. In a world bombarded with buy now and pay later mentality, this tool is needed to help the consumer combat the effects of wrong decisions and impulse buying. The Money Merge account Software gives the user the ability to make informed and educated financial decisions on a regular basis.
In closing, this really is: A “One of a Kind” financial tool to help individuals and businesses manage their debt in order to pay the least amount of interest on all of their debt instruments; while at the same time giving instant knowledge to make daily financial decisions based on how those decisions affect their financial future…. ALL INSTANTANEOUSLY and by the simple click of the mouse. THIS IS THE REAL TRUTH OF THE MONEY MERGE ACCOUNT
"That's lot of writing that said almost nothing". Nice comeback!
What I like about people like you is that when the truth is told, you have nothing of substance to say. You want to side step this issue and make attacks like "a bad web site". I did not know that a one page calender qualified as a true web site.
If you want to make a point, I challenge you to answer each section of my statements with something of substance that will benefit everyone. I challenged Chris Buttersworth a few months ago and he did not accept my challenge.
JamesHughbanks said: "That's lot of writing that said almost nothing". Nice comeback!
What I like about people like you is that when the truth is told, you have nothing of substance to say. You want to side step this issue and make attacks like "a bad web site". I did not know that a one page calender qualified as a true web site.
If you want to make a point, I challenge you to answer each section of my statements with something of substance that will benefit everyone. I challenged Chris Buttersworth a few months ago and he did not accept my challenge.
Nice projection. Why don't you just admit that your product sucks, you are in it to make a buck for yourself and you have no scruples ripping people off?
It's funny that you expect people to spend time answering your wall of text, tit for tat when EVERYTHING you said has been debunked multiple times in this huge thread that you obviously have read very little of.
You have been answered almost as if the people on this board could read the future. Just scan a few pages back.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.