• Page :
  • 1
  • Text Only

Several discussions have sprung up recently about how business credit is reported and analyzed by the issuers. However, there don't seem to be too many data points in the forum about business utilization and correlations with adverse action. DaveHanson and others have outlined arguments for keeping indiviual (and especially overall) personal utilization at <50% to avoid adverse action, but does this rule of thumb also apply to business lines which do not report to the personal CRAs?

There a few nuggets here, but I think a specific thread devoted to this topic is warranted.

So, I suggest starting a poll to gather the collective experience of FWFers.

I'll start...

Type of business: S-corp
Number of biz lines: 11
Number of biz lines with balances: 6
Total biz balances: $131K
Utilization across biz lines: 73%
Other relevant information: ?
Adverse actions? None so far, but most of these lines are brand new.

EDIT: Added "Type of business" to see if it matters.



I also have limited history, but feel comfortable maxing out business cards. There's no credit report, so all they have to go on is whatever cards I have with them and my personal report. As long as my personal report is in shape, I have little fear of adverse action. I'd be interested in hearing from those with more experience.


I also have several business cards which I've maxed out for AOR purposes (around 95%). I've had no adverse action from any of them, including Citi or Chase.


JohnGalt69 said: I also have limited history, but feel comfortable maxing out business cards. There's no credit report, so all they have to go on is whatever cards I have with them and my personal report. As long as my personal report is in shape, I have little fear of adverse action. I'd be interested in hearing from those with more experience.

You may be correct for sole proprietors without a tax id. However, there are business CRAs (e.g., Experian Business) which the credit issuers may be consulting when reviewing business lines. Is there a distinction between EIN (e.g., corporations) and SSN-based businesses for this topic? I'll add that to the format of the poll.


I took Chase and Advanta and BofA business cards to 98% utilization for BT with no adverse actions. Yet.
Total about $100K


JohnGalt69 said: There's no credit report, so all they have to go on is whatever cards I have with them and my personal report.
Aside from Experian, as lhendricks mentioned, Equifax also provides business credit reports. There might also be a D&B file on you although it seems more for net30 type accounts. Your D&B file would become more important if you wanted to obtain credit without a personal guarantee.

I've never had any adverse business credit actions but I think business credit is a lot less sensitive to utilization. When an individual owes 50k it's expected that they've spent the money somewhere and must now pay it back out of their regular salary; when a business charges 50k it's presumably in pursuit of profitable activities rather than simply "spent". I only have a few business credit cards and I've taken some up to 90% with no noticeable effect.

When opening accounts with wholesalers or suppliers the inquiries never show up on my personal report so I presume they're checking a business report. I've never checked my own reports (or received a rejection referencing one) so I don't actually know what's recorded.


You can check your business credit via Dunn and Bradstreet for free via this link:

e-update D&B

Although most business credit cards do not report to D&B. Only my net 30 accounts show up.


I'm replying at OPs request, but wish I had more helpful advice to offer...

I've found business credit to be much murkier than personal credit. Here's what I do know:

-Business cards almost never report utilization to your personal credit (as well they shouldn't).

-I routinely max out business cards, and don't worry about 90%, 50%, or other breakpoints. Like others here, I've seen no adverse actions as a result.

-Business cards vary significantly WRT where they inquire and how they report. Capital One and WaMu business, for example, really treat them like personal cards with a business attached (i.e. they pull personal, not business credit; they grant CLs based on same, and they don't report to the business CRAs). Other issuers, like Citibank, do indeed inquire and report to business credit agencies (generally D&B or Experian business). Rarely do front line CSRs know exactly what their policies are, or course (sigh).

-Certain issuers treat business and personal lines very differently, while others see them as more or less coming from the same "bucket" of overall credit lines. Sometimes you can even reallocate from business to personal if you have the right CSR help you, but that's YMMV also.

Hope that helps some.

I'd like to know much more than I do about the fine points of business credit and underwriting at the various banks.


I am a Sole Proprietorship. Where's supercreditman?


Dear DaveHanson,

what utilization percentage do you use for business cards?


SOme biz cards do report like US Bank biz cards report to Equifax business.


agentpt5 said: Dear DaveHanson,

what utilization percentage do you use for business cards?


2 posts up:

"-I routinely max out business cards, and don't worry about 90%, 50%, or other breakpoints. Like others here, I've seen no adverse actions as a result."


Sole Prop
Number of biz lines: 6
Number of biz lines with balances: 5
Total biz balances: $138K
Utilization across biz lines: 85.9%

Adverse actions? none yet aor conducted with this criteria.


I still think the whole "keep it below 50% utilization" thing is kind of pointless regardless of business or personal lines. I've maxed out both and never had an adverse action. My pattern is to do app-o-rama, collect max signup bonuses, max out 0%, wait a year, pay it all off, wait a couple weeks for credit score to skyrocket, repeat. I don't check my score as often as some here, but I DID check it about a month ago, this was with maxed out 0% lines but after doing monthly payments on them for about 10 months, and my scores (wife & myself) were not too bad, both of them were still over 700 despite the hit from high utilization (more than 100k in loans). I just recently paid them all off and reloaded. I was actually expecting more trouble reloading, thinking the companies would finally be clamping down like Chase has done, but I had no problems getting another 130k or so in 0% money. If BOA clamps down in the future this game is over in my opinion. At least for me they were the key to maxing out the 0% deals from all the other banks. And if Chase were still in the game I'd have >$200k in 0% money this time around.


is anyone willing to share data on business income/revenue and CL? I just got a chase business card with a 15k cl and I reported my business income accurately as 20k -- the business is a rental property, a sole prop.

How strong is the relationship between reported income/revenue and CL with business cards?


I am also Sole Prop. I have about 50k in business credit that I have utilized about 97% (only for a month now though, with no business history) with no adverse action. Also, I have all my personal lines (another 60k) at 89% utilization (actually a couple are at 90-91% after the BT fees, but they will be at 89% after the first minimum pmt). I did ask the business companies if they had problems with people utilizing over 90% of thier credit and was reapeadly told that "No, as long as your are under your credit limit and making your pmts, you are fine."

Good post OP. I am interested to hear what others say so I can decide to keep these business lines out there so high or not.


Mr. Wiz-

Read the adverse action thread if you truly believe your experiences generalize to all of us.

A quick example: Chase is very much in the game for me.

Thanks for sharing.


BobbyRobert said: is anyone willing to share data on business income/revenue and CL? I just got a chase business card with a 15k cl and I reported my business income accurately as 20k -- the business is a rental property, a sole prop.

How strong is the relationship between reported income/revenue and CL with business cards?


Basically there is no relationship. They look to personal income, since you're giving a PG.

Lets try to keep this thread on track. For general business card questions, go to the Mega Business Cards thread.


if i did a mini-AOR for a few new business lines (i have one at about 90% utilization) would they accept/deny me based on my personal credit?


lhendricks92 said:
A quick example: Chase is very much in the game for me.


So what card was personally targeted/marketed to you in the past month or so since Chase changed their practices that was not available to the general public and had a capped BT fee? I'm not saying this is impossible - but I'd bet if you already did the 0% thing with Chase in the past for a decent $ amount, even if you kept it below 50% utilization, I doubt you would be targeted for a special 0% deal in the future from them. If you have evidence that suggests otherwise I'd love to see it. But even then, you would still be a year behind the guy that maxed out (near 100% utilization) their line in the previous year because you have to go 2 years to get the same profit at 50% utilization.

Also - I have read the adverse action thread. Even though its never happened to me, I don't think it would even matter if there was an adverse action. I've got about 100 credit cards, I could care less if some company closes one or two of them that I no longer use. I don't think they will close an account with a balance on it that you are paying properly, so your 0% money is fine and your regular "every day use" card is fine too. I don't know what the big deal is??? So what if your score goes down a little, if you are maxing out your 0% lines you expect that anyway, its going to skyrocket once you pay off the loans. And by the way, there are people in that thread complaining about adverse actions DESPITE less than 50% utilization.

If someone can convince me that keeping utilization below 50% is going to bring me more profits, I would go ahead and pay down to 50% today, but somehow I doubt that is going to happen.


Wiz-

Who said anything about targeted Chase offers? Why does that matter? You're already applying for new cards, so apply for a new Chase, reallocate, and BT? I still have no idea why you mentioned Chase.

As far as personal util and adverse action (wrong thread, BTW), if you have 100 credit cards, and you've been in the game for a long time, of course you can jack up individual utilization on a few BT cards with less threat of adverse action. (And there will probably be fewer consequences if one of your lenders starts to make life difficult.) More cards = lower overall utilization (and probably higher average age) = higher FICO.

This is a more dangerous course of action for someone with a thin profile who is new to the game, and therefore it's unwise to suggest your method to everyone in the forum. If you don't give a shiz about your credit score, and you want the hassle of closed accounts and reduced CLs, go for it.

I think what we're learning in this thread, is the incredible power of business credit. No one has reported any ill effects from high utilization of business lines. I for one plan to shift almost all of my BT game (and even everyday purchases) to business accounts.


crazyapps said: if i did a mini-AOR for a few new business lines (i have one at about 90% utilization) would they accept/deny me based on my personal credit?
Yes, they base thier decision after a pull on your personal credit report for business cards, even though they are not listed on there when you get them.


I now have about $195k in BT money in a FNBO 6% account. The three sources were a Chase business card, Citibank business card, and BofA business card. All are at 90% or above utilization with zero adverse consequences (so far). In fact, I am still able to apply and receive new business cards with those same banks. I just got new Chase and Bofa business cards even with all of that debt.

One reason why I'm able to get away with this maybe the fact that I have a couple years of history of very high monthly spending on most of of my credit cards. Low to mid six figures per month of business spending divided among several credit cards.


I have never seen or heard of any adverse on business cards. I had business cards for many years. However I see more line increases automatically and otherwise on personal cards. No matter how established my business is, paying on time etc. I seem to think that If I opened another company or two, that I could get business cards on those new companies with ease and within a short period of time, a year or so have big credit with those cards. They look at personal stuff for almost every one of these cards. In the underwriting process I think personal credit is the top factor on most of the cards.

Rob


Don't want to get off topic - but really there isn't much to add to this topic - everyone has reported that high % utilization with business credit has not led to adverse actions... and really my comments have not been off topic - basically just expressing my opinion that adverse actions shouldn't be a concern anyway.

If you are doing an app-o-rama you are going to try to get every possible card that you can and it doesn't matter if its business or personal (OK, so maybe you want to start with the business cards first).

To answer your questions - I mentioned chase only because they recently put an end to new cards with capped fee 0% offers lasting >3 months (that may change of course at any time). You implied that this was something targeted at me because of high utilization, which is not true.

Regarding adverse actions - again, if you go to that thread you will see people complaining about adverse actions despite <50% utilization. I never suggested that the 0% game was for people who haven't extablished good (and numerous) lines of credit. Someone like that should concentrate on an app-o-rama targetting sign up bonuses only, and credit line increases, before doing the 0% game.

lhendricks92 said: Wiz-

Who said anything about targeted Chase offers? Why does that matter? You're already applying for new cards, so apply for a new Chase, reallocate, and BT? I still have no idea why you mentioned Chase.

As far as personal util and adverse action (wrong thread, BTW), if you have 100 credit cards, and you've been in the game for a long time, of course you can jack up individual utilization on a few BT cards with less threat of adverse action. (And there will probably be fewer consequences if one of your lenders starts to make life difficult.) More cards = lower overall utilization (and probably higher average age) = higher FICO.

This is a more dangerous course of action for someone with a thin profile who is new to the game, and therefore it's unwise to suggest your method to everyone in the forum. If you don't give a shiz about your credit score, and you want the hassle of closed accounts and reduced CLs, go for it.

I think what we're learning in this thread, is the incredible power of business credit. No one has reported any ill effects from high utilization of business lines. I for one plan to shift almost all of my BT game (and even everyday purchases) to business accounts.


MarketVViz said:
To answer your questions - I mentioned chase only because they recently put an end to new cards with capped fee 0% offers lasting >3 months (that may change of course at any time). You implied that this was something targeted at me because of high utilization, which is not true.


There are plenty of new Chase cards with capped fee BT offers. Links are all over this forum, including in my own recent AOR thread. If Chase is denying YOU capped BTs, then doesn't that suggest something specific to your situation? Whether it has anything to do with your utilization, I have no idea. I'm still trying to understand your comments about Chase.

MarketVViz said: Regarding adverse actions - again, if you go to that thread you will see people complaining about adverse actions despite <50% utilization.

Are you saying that personal utilization is irrelevant for adverse action? Again, that seems highly unlikely based on the data in this forum.


lhendricks92 said: MarketVViz said:
There are plenty of new Chase cards with capped fee BT offers. Links are all over this forum, including in my own recent AOR thread. If Chase is denying YOU capped BTs, then doesn't that suggest something specific to your situation? Whether it has anything to do with your utilization, I have no idea. I'm still trying to understand your comments about Chase.

OK - I guess I didn't look hard enough. At the time of my app-o-rama all of the chase links I found went to cards with 3% uncapped fee. I just did a quick message search and even found SiS talking about the 3% uncapped fee w/ Chase this month. But digging deeper I now see the Chase cards with $75 cap so thanks for bringing that to my attention, that could make me a lot of money (if my score isn't too shot already to get approved - heh). Still though, what I see that I don't like is basically they moved to a two-tier model - you MIGHT get 12 months 0% or you might only get 3 months at 0% depending on what they feel like giving you after reviewing your application. I've love to hear reports from people who have already done recent 0% deals with Chase and the results of their approvals with this two-tier system.

MarketVViz said: Regarding adverse actions - again, if you go to that thread you will see people complaining about adverse actions despite <50% utilization.

Are you saying that personal utilization is irrelevant for adverse action? Again, that seems highly unlikely based on the data in this forum.


No, what I'm saying is that it isn't the only factor. Keeping below 50% utilization won't neccesarily help you avoid an adverse action as reported in the adverse action thread. According to this guy Chase closed his UNUSED/NEW accounts because of:
Rapid increase in revolving balances
Too many accounts opened recently
Too many request for reviews of credit.

High utilization is only one factor (and maybe not even the most important one). This probably would not have happeneed if he had older accounts and high lines and numerous lines before doing the 0% game. My other points are:
1) Adverse actions shouldn't be a big deal, they really don't matter much in the grand scheme of things. Use up your rewards as soon as you can on any account so you don't lose them.
2) There are plenty of us with high % utilization that haven't had any adverse actions. The things that trigger adverse actions are evident in the thread just mentioned.


What credential would I need to apply for a business card?

Can it be as simple as listing my first and last name as the company name?

If so, and the company is a sole proprietorship, would I need to obtain a business license?

Even if my business is to simply buy and sell stuff on eBay?


i sure would love to know which of the following matter, in order, to what degree, and with which issuers:

individual utilization
utilization across all lines with an issuer
overall utilization
income
debt to income ratio
length of credit history
age of accounts
etc.
etc.

i don't think anybody knows, which is why people use rules of thumb, like <30,50,70,90% for utilization.

that being said, i agree with you that personal utilization is not the only factor for adverse action. what seems useful about this thread, again, is that business utilization may NOT be a factor.


Three weeks ago, I did an AOR. Today, D&B left me a voice mail message, requesting that I call it back because several companies inquired my company's D&B report.


Anyone know what is this all about?


I talked to D&B and I guess D&B just want to confirm that I made credit requests, which triggered their inquires.

It appears that banks pulled both personal credit report and D&B credit report before approving new business credit cards.


If a payment is missed on a business account, does it have adverse affects, like how a personal account would? I know for a personal account, the company is waiting for you to miss a payment on any of your accounts so they can cancel the 0% and start charging interest. Is this the same case for business accounts?


lhendricks92 said:
I'll start...

Type of business: S-corp
Number of biz lines: 11
Number of biz lines with balances: 6
Total biz balances: $131K
Utilization across biz lines: 73%
Other relevant information: ?
Adverse actions? None so far, but most of these lines are brand new.

EDIT: Added "Type of business" to see if it matters.

I added my experience in Summary for other's use.


Type of business: Sole proprietorship
Number of biz lines: 10
Number of biz lines with balances: 5
Total biz balances: $75K
Utilization across biz lines: 84%
Other relevant information: Currently being investigated by USAA.
Adverse actions?

I may have the first adverse action on a business account. Chase has requested for the BT funds to be returned ($35,500 total - $25k business, $10.5k personal) from my bank, USAA. It should be noted that my accounts are currently frozen by USAA and are in the process of being unfrozen (hopefully this will happen some time soon). USAA has not yet complied with the request and I have contacted the individual at Chase that requested the BT reversal.
The personal account is at 75% utilization and the business account is at 98% utilization. I have made the minimum payments on both accounts for two months.


I doubt there would be any adverse action due to high utilization of the business accounts since business credit cards are not reported to CRAs (except Capital One?). Adverse action or not is based on your personal credit report. I at a time had less than 20% utilization on my personal credit, but more than 90% on my business credit, no adverse action ever. However, there might be adverse action if you max out the credit lines of the personal account as well as business account with the same creditor since the creditor can pull the account information (personal & business) and see the a clear picture of the cardholdher's utilization on the same branded cards.

One more thing worth to note is you might be able to reallocate the CLs from personal to business, or vice versa. I did that to my Chase accounts. For Discover, you can do it within first 30 days of your new card issued (either business or personal). I also have BofA and Citi personal/business accounts but not sure if the lines are reallocatable between the two.


abracadabra11 said: Type of business: Sole proprietorship
Number of biz lines: 10
Number of biz lines with balances: 5
Total biz balances: $75K
Utilization across biz lines: 84%
Other relevant information: Currently being investigated by USAA.
Adverse actions?

I may have the first adverse action on a business account. Chase has requested for the BT funds to be returned ($35,500 total - $25k business, $10.5k personal) from my bank, USAA. It should be noted that my accounts are currently frozen by USAA and are in the process of being unfrozen (hopefully this will happen some time soon). USAA has not yet complied with the request and I have contacted the individual at Chase that requested the BT reversal.
The personal account is at 75% utilization and the business account is at 98% utilization. I have made the minimum payments on both accounts for two months.

I am sorry to read about your ordeals in the "BT goes wrong" thread. USAA still hasn't thawed your account? Your last post in that thread indicates that your accounts are gradually seeing the light. Good luck!


tazmania99 said: I doubt there would be any adverse action due to high utilization of the business accounts since business credit cards are not reported to CRAs (except Capital One?).CapOneBiz doesn't show up on my personal credit report. I've had the card for 3 months now, with 2 statements printed at about 30% utilization and besides the initial triple-bureau pull by CapOne, there's nothing else on my report from them.




Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2012