|
-
-
lorcha
- Cranky Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 3:55p
scott1961 said:Then I think I should get better benefits since Between Fed and State I paid about $107k, Do I use any more services than someone who paid $20k? No, I just get to lose a lot of the benefits that the person paying less gets. Rebate check? NO, Child tax credit? NO, Use the Hope/Lifetime deduction for College? NO, I just get to pay 100% of bill with no loans or subsidies. I don't mind paying my fair share of taxes, Problem is I am paying way more than my fair share.Well, I think you'll find the term "fair share" means different things to different people. If you have a good, working definition for what someone's "fair share" of the tax burden is, please let me know. Regarding the benefits, you get more benefit from the government's protection than the wage-slave living paycheck to paycheck. Benefits such as police protection, enforcement of contracts, enforcement of property rights benefit you more than some poor sap whose worldly possessions all came from rent-a-center. Regarding the stimulus check, you are just being crotchety. I recognize this, because I'm crotchety about not getting one, as well. But if I'm honest with myself, I have to admit that a $600 check is not going to really make any difference in my life. The same goes for the other benefits you listed. Sure, it would be nice if they were available to everyone (look, I don't qualify for them, either), but again, you benefit much more from the government's protection of your property rights than some poor sap's child tax credit. The fact is I don't really struggle in life anymore, so I try not to be jealous of the help given to those who are. Of course, I sill reserve the right to grouse about my missing stimulus check... |
-
-
tolamapS
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 4:18p
Useful thread, but it would be more useful if people reported a bit more detail. For example, someone earning $100K as wage and salaries reported on W-2 would have a totally different tax structure than someone earning $100K gross receipts from business, reported on 1099-Misc. If the person in the second example has legitimate business expenses of $50K, then it would be hard to justify the second person's income as $100K. I am aware that the $50K of the expense might enhance the person's lifestyle, e.g., car leased under business name and charged as expense, furniture, even clothes. However, to make a fair comparison, I think the second person should report $50K income, not $100K income. Also, it is good to separate investment income from wage income, and maybe even specify the type of investment income. I know, this thread is not meant to be the questionnaire you get at H&R Block, but just saying "I made $87,567 and paid $2,986.78 in taxes" is not that informative without knowing where the $87K came from. |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 5:22p
lorcha said:
but again, you benefit much more from the government's protection of your property rights than some poor sap's child tax credit. Have to disagree with that, This is America and every citizen is granted the same rights and protections. Sure I could do better but that would only be because I could afford better legal consul. If anything I am cheaper to maintain than the poor saps, You will never see me on cops shirtless and drunk. |
-
-
EricGo07
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 5:32p
Scott, ^^ Can I offer you a tissue ? |
-
-
RS4Rings
- Senior Member - 7K
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 5:35p
EricGo07 said:Scott, ^^ Can I offer you a tissue ? No thanks, I pay some poor sap to blow my nose. |
-
-
lorcha
- Cranky Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 5:45p
scott1961 said:Have to disagree with that, This is America and every citizen is granted the same rights and protections.Ahh, but you actually own property, so you consume more protection than the average person. If anything I am cheaper to maintain than the poor saps, You will never see me on cops shirtless and drunk.I'm very happy for you, but I wasn't really counting the belligerent drunk in handcuffs to be a consumer of police services. I was more picturing you, Scott, an upstanding member of society, being protected from having to deal with said belligerent yourself, as the consumer of police services. |
-
-
Galun000
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 6:09p
I think the most fair tax is a consumption tax. You get rebates up to a certain point so the people who are really poor can cover the necessities and not pay taxes. After that, you spend more, you pay more tax. |
-
-
SUB
- Tired Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 6:21p
~14% (total tax / gross income), no state tax (FL), single, renter |
-
-
lowballer
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 6:35p
AGI: $145,896 Effective Tax Rate: 10.92% |
-
-
dolmar
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 6:51p
dsru said:My 1099-B shows my gains and interest income from bonds only. As I bought the securities with Citigroup and sold them with Citigroup so they only reported the gain on my 1099-B.
I don't think that is accurate. the 1099B doesn't report the gain...just the proceeds from sale (doesn't matter whether you bought and sold with the same broker). Citi may have given you a gain/loss summary, but the the gain is not on the 1099B, just the sale; and the interest is on the 1099INT. Not sure how many times I need to say it. My 1099-B has only interest from bonds. I buy cash management bonds via Citigroup PB. The reason interest is on a 1099-B is because all my interest is generated in a brokerage account and not bank account. The few gains shown on my 1099-B are "gains from zero coupon bonds I sold before they mature". I am not as stupid as you think that I do not understand if I bought a zero coupon two years ago for $20k sold it this year for $22k that gain shown on my 1099-B $XX interest and XX long capital appreciation. |
-
-
drew2
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 7:06p
Gross Income: 117k Effective Fed tax rate 3.95% Effective State tax rate 4.33% |
-
-
aeiouy
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 7:13p
lorcha said:dolmar said:I paid well over $20k in taxes and more than likely paid more taxes than everyone who has posted so far except Scott.This is definitely false.
54k in taxes 36k in taxes Also, my tax liability will be way over 20k, but I have no idea what it is yet because I only just got all my stuff to my CPA on 3/31 (the deadline to get taxes filed by 4/15). Mine are going to be between 35k and 50k, finishing up right now. But it is all tied into my business. Which makes estimating gross income very confusing. I could give numbers for gross income that would not be within 400% of each other depending on how I listed things. So I will just bow out, realizing I am going to pay a lot of taxes, regardless. |
-
-
jennatx
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 7:18p
lorcha said:dolmar said:But the person paying $10k on $50k of income is more than likely getting some benefits while the person paying $15k on $100k is getting no benefits at all. Did you ever think of that? People paying large amounts of taxes are subsidizing the other people. First of all, even if you make $100k/yr, you still get plenty of benefits: the highways, the military (you may not like what they're doing in Iraq, but it's their job to protect the homeland as well), the FBI, the Coast Guard, the National Guard, the National Parks Service, and many, many, many more. Way too many to list.
Regarding progressive taxation vs. flat taxation, I think I still have to come down on the side of progressive. I'm not sure what my '07 effective tax rate will be yet, but let's estimate 20%. There's just no getting around the fact that paying 20% of my income in taxes hurts me a lot less than it would hurt someone who was trying to raise a family of 4 on $45k/yr. But there is no family of 4 paying 20% taxes on an income of 45K per year... they would only have 0 tax liability and thousands of refundable credits. And no one is paying $10K on $50K of income. No deductions needed. It is those middle class families in the mid 100K income level who will start finding our tax system is excessively progressive as the marginal tax rates don't nearly reflect reality with the loss of child credits, deduction phaseout, no roth iras, loss of stimulus pkg, amt threats, etc. 14% tax on full gross here. 16.5% on AGI. |
-
-
nucor
- Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 7:45p
damn you AMT, effective tax rate is 21% |
-
-
kiasuchick
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 7:51p
nucor said:damn you AMT, effective tax rate is 21% No AMT for me but I'm at 20.5% on around $112k gross, $84k AGI. Is the fact I don't have a house screwing me??? |
-
-
WhiteGuy
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 8:31p
It looks like making under 90k is the key to a very low tax rate. Anyone here make between $90,000-$100,000 and have a tax rate they will share? |
-
-
Freakazoid
- Thrifty Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 9:10p
nucor said:damn you AMT, effective tax rate is 21% Right there wit ya. effective rate = 22.1% (theoretically drops 1 pt if there was no AMT) |
-
-
mhudson
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 9:56p
-
-
czarandy
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 10:31p
Income: < $40k Federal tax rate: 10.1% State tax rate: 2.4% |
-
-
sm0kkie
- Happy Member
posted: Apr. 2, 2008 @ 11:52p
Effective Fed tax rate: 15.55% Effective State tax rate: 1.83% Renter, no kids. I didn't itemize but geesh, I need to get that Fed rate down. Any ideas other than purchasing a house? |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|