|
-
-
JesseLivermore
- Tired Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 12:54a
We got slammed by the AMT. On a separate note, some people in here have either found the Holy Grail of incredibly brilliant tax planning, that has escaped even true financial geniuses, or I have no idea what's up... I mean, less than 15% tax liability on gross incomes in excess of 100k, and in some cases 300k or more??? |
-
-
kenmoreland
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 1:09a
scott1961 said:lorcha said:
but again, you benefit much more from the government's protection of your property rights than some poor sap's child tax credit. Have to disagree with that, This is America and every citizen is granted the same rights and protections. Sure I could do better but that would only be because I could afford better legal consul. If anything I am cheaper to maintain than the poor saps, You will never see me on cops shirtless and drunk. This is an interesting thread. What about the National Parks? Every American benefits from the National Parks, but some benefit more than others. People with means may be able to enjoy Yellowstone this year or next. People living pay check to pay check may get satifaction knowing their children's children may enjoy Yellowstone. If I am ever on Cops, shirtless and drunk or otherwise, I hope it is from Yellowstone. |
-
-
tim1
- Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 1:24a
Gross Income 74k 47k deductions (401K, Mortgage,$2700 Property tax, 33k medical expenses for IVF) Married no kids 19k agi could have done the Traditional IRA for the wife to go even lower...but with those medical expenses, can't really afford not to put ALL my after tax money toward paying those down. paid approx $1900 federal $600 state
Effective tax rate about 3% could be considered higher effective rate if you add in $2700 property taxes + $2700 sales taxes (bought a vehicle) or lower if you subtract $1200 Free Government Cheese |
-
-
kamalktk
- Ancient Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 5:52a
JesseLivermore said: On a separate note, some people in here have either found the Holy Grail of incredibly brilliant tax planning, that has escaped even true financial geniuses, or I have no idea what's up... This is the thread to get around the income bragging unwritten rule, and it comes with it's own special makin' stuff up bonus, tax rates. |
-
-
lorcha
- Cranky Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 9:11a
kamalktk said:This is the thread to get around the income bragging unwritten rule, and it comes with it's own special makin' stuff up bonus, tax rates.Yeah, I still don't think I'm going to reveal my AGI, but I'll post my tax rate once it's computed. |
-
-
camiolo
- Thrifty Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 9:52a
5.4% federal, 2.7% combined Multi-states $23.5k in Wage Income $15k in Traditional IRA Withdrawal (I'm 28, but no penalty due to school expenses) $39k AGI Next year my rate will prob go up, since I only worked for 3 1/2 months this year. |
-
-
doshspy
- Addicted Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 10:26a
It seems that calculating one's tax rate would have to include all taxes paid, not just federal/state taxes. ie tax on gas sales tax property tax alcohol/tobacco taxes transportation(tolls, airlines etc) etc |
-
-
kamalktk
- Ancient Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 10:47a
lorcha said:kamalktk said:This is the thread to get around the income bragging unwritten rule, and it comes with it's own special makin' stuff up bonus, tax rates.Yeah, I still don't think I'm going to reveal my AGI, but I'll post my tax rate once it's computed. Just the tax rate and what types of deductions and credits were used could be useful, but saying "oh I made a million and only paid 10%" doesn't really help anyone. |
-
-
onetwo3
- Happy Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 1:13p
Total income, including interest/dividends = $74k Federal Tax liability = $449 = .6% State Tax liability = $1300 = 1.5% Total tax liability = 2.1% 3 kids, 401k, mortgage interest, property taxes .... |
-
-
echo4747
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 1:17p
Federal 22.82% State (NEW YORK)6.5% $5019.00 in AMT |
-
-
BrlDsguise
- Frivolous Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 2:24p
onetwo3 said:Total income, including interest/dividends = $74k Federal Tax liability = $449 = .6% State Tax liability = $1300 = 1.5%
Total tax liability = 2.1%
3 kids, 401k, mortgage interest, property taxes .... You had taxable income of $4,500 left after exemptions/deductions on your federal return? Or tax credits? |
-
-
calvinandhobbes
- Thrifty Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 2:34p
only in america can people make upper middle class money and pay no federal income taxes. too many people in this thread make similar money and have comepletely different effective tax rates. i don't mind a graduated rate table, but effective rates should be very close for people making the same money, regardless of where they live of how big their family is. government subsized procreation is crazy. |
-
-
ShavenYak
- Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 2:56p
Galun000 said:I think the most fair tax is a consumption tax.
You get rebates up to a certain point so the people who are really poor can cover the necessities and not pay taxes. After that, you spend more, you pay more tax. Why do all the consumption tax proposals include some kind of rebate or "prebate" system? Wouldn't it make more sense just to not have the tax apply to foods, medicines, and gasoline (and whatever other necessities aren't coming to my mind)? Anyway... Gross Income: 116,521 Federal Tax: 7,607 (6.53%) 2 incomes, 1 kid. 10% 401k contribution, FSAs, mortgage interest, no other substantial deductions. The numbers for 2006 were much better. We had the points on the new house to deduct and the tax credit for the Prius. Something like 2% effective tax rate IIRC. |
-
-
ShavenYak
- Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 3:19p
JesseLivermore said:On a separate note, some people in here have either found the Holy Grail of incredibly brilliant tax planning, that has escaped even true financial geniuses, or I have no idea what's up...
I mean, less than 15% tax liability on gross incomes in excess of 100k, and in some cases 300k or more???
Assume $120k income for a family of 3.
$120k gross -12k 401k -4k healthcare premiums -8k FSA accounts -10k personal exemptions (3,400 x 3) -18k mortgage interest (300k at 6%) -6k state/local income and property taxes = 62k taxable income $8,500 tax - $1k child credit = $7,500 tax = 6.25%
No financial plan needed.
calvinandhobbes said:only in america can people make upper middle class money and pay no federal income taxes. too many people in this thread make similar money and have comepletely different effective tax rates. i don't mind a graduated rate table, but effective rates should be very close for people making the same money, regardless of where they live of how big their family is. government subsized procreation is crazy. $3400 exempted from income and a $1000 credit each year isn't much of a subsidy when you look at what children cost to raise. |
-
-
lorcha
- Cranky Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 3:26p
ShavenYak said:Why do all the consumption tax proposals include some kind of rebate or "prebate" system? Wouldn't it make more sense just to not have the tax apply to foods, medicines, and gasoline (and whatever other necessities aren't coming to my mind)?It's not with the consumption tax proposals, per se. Look at most state consumption taxes--they tend to have different rates for different goods and/or services. The "prebate" idea is specific to the FairTax proposal. The reason for it is the FairTax wants to eliminate using the tax code to encourage, discourage, subsidize, or punish specific behaviors. FairTax wants to use the tax code strictly for revenue generation purposes; so it sets the tax rate at a flat 30% for all goods and services. The "prebate" is necessary to ensure that the tax policy remains progressive. |
-
-
calvinandhobbes
- Thrifty Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 3:41p
ShavenYak said:$3400 exempted from income and a $1000 credit each year isn't much of a subsidy when you look at what children cost to raise.Well, that's tax on roughly $10000 income, per child, that you don't have to pay that we have to make up for a choice you made, not me. I'll pay for my choices, you pay for yours. I'm not saying the subsidy pays for raising a child. Far, far from it. But why on earth should we pay for your choices? If somebody wants 3, 4, or 5 kids, great, go for it. But do so if you can afford it. Same with mortgage interest deduction. Sure, housing is a boost to the economy, but so is every legitimate business. I like scuba diving. Should my gear be tax deductible since it helps the economy? What about those that can't dive or don't want to. Why should their taxes be higher to account for my expenses. Everyone's tax rates are higher to make up for all the credits and deductions. I'd love to see them all eliminated, and see the real rates fall. Sure, your taxes would go up and mine would fall, but why should different people with equal income pay VASTLY (read: 3 times) different tax rates? It's insane. |
-
-
calvinandhobbes
- Thrifty Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 3:44p
ShavenYak said:Why do all the consumption tax proposals include some kind of rebate or "prebate" system? Wouldn't it make more sense just to not have the tax apply to foods, medicines, and gasoline (and whatever other necessities aren't coming to my mind)? to keep it simple. the ONLY advantage IMO of the sales tax is it is simple to implement. if you tax different goods differently, then you run into what we have now with all the stupid credits and deductions that make taxes so painful versus income*rate= tax owed. a graduated rate table is still quite simple. it's the 8 billion deductions/credits/classifications of incomes that complicate it and result in ridiculously different tax rates for equal income individuals. (note: I am firmly anti-sales tax due solely to it's regressiveness). |
-
-
do178b
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 3:50p
19.2% federal tax. No Kids. No mortgage. No AMT (barely). I suprised how little tax some of you pay. I got to figure out how you guys do that. |
-
-
NccOps
- Senior Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 3:52p
0% Married, 3 kids, home, plenty of charitable contributions help keep it low. |
-
-
ehrenrej
- Thrifty Member
posted: Apr. 3, 2008 @ 6:27p
8.3% Federal 2.3% State $15.5K 401k $3k FSA One child property taxes and mortgage interest for 11 months (moved in December; paid January 2007 in December 2006 assuming I would move in 2007) I guess I need to up my charitable donations in 2008. EDIT: Wrong State Tax Rate |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|