click to close
help
edit

Forums
Finance

401(k), Roth 401(k)

  • Text Only
  • Search this Topic »
  • switch to 'Classic' view
  • Go to Page :
  • 1 234
alert mods    

Greetings FWers.

My company has recently started offering the new Roth 401(k) account in my retirement plan. I'm 26 and I've been deferring 6% to my 401(k) since I started working here (almost 4 years ago). I'm wondering if the Roth 401(k) is a better deal in the long run. The matching is 50% of the first 6% (of the two combined accounts). So my question is, after the first 6% is matched in the traditional 401(k), should additional deferrals be made there or is the Roth the way to go when there's no more company matching? I've heard many polar opinions from several co-workers.

I can't do the exact math, because I'm not sure what my income bracket will be when I retire, nor how much the tax rate will be at that point. Anyone have strong opinions here?

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.

The Case Against Roth 401(k)
Link to spreadsheet which compares Roth 401k vs. Traditional 401k + Taxable for people who can afford to save more than the maximum contribution limit allowed under a Traditional 401k.

alert mods    

I chose to stay with a traditional 401k. My husband and I saved over $4,000 in taxes by contributing to our 401k's last year. I haven't done the math, but I feel that the 35 years of compound interest on the additional $4,000 savings would negate any taxes due when I pull the money out.

alert mods    

if they match roth401K go for it! being after tax dollars and all, you're getting more money.

alert mods    

kerstbrood said:if they match roth401K go for it! being after tax dollars and all, you're getting more money.

How do you figure? 6% of my net income is less than 6% of my gross income, so wouldn't the company match on the traditional be a higher amount?

alert mods    

Well yeah 5% of your gross is greater than 5% of your net, but I do't think that is how it works. I think if you make $2000 per pay period and want to put 1% away, $20 will be put in the account. The only difference is when the $20 gets taxed. In a traditional 401k that happend before tax, in a roth after tax. If you company will put $20 in the roth instead of a traditional 401 then they essentially pay the tax on tha $20 too. In the traditional 401k you would have to pay the tax on that $20 when you retire and start withdrawing money.

alert mods    

kerstbrood said: if they match roth401K go for it! being after tax dollars and all, you're getting more money.

That's incorrect. The company does not put the match into the Roth 401k. Instead, they'll deposit the match into a tax-deferred 401k (separate account). This is required by IRS. You do NOT get more money on the match by choosing a Roth.

alert mods    

dawndelion said:I chose to stay with a traditional 401k. My husband and I saved over $4,000 in taxes by contributing to our 401k's last year. I haven't done the math, but I feel that the 35 years of compound interest on the additional $4,000 savings would negate any taxes due when I pull the money out.If you are maxing out your traditional 401(k) every year and you still want to contribute more, consider switching to a Roth 401(k). The contribution limits are the same, but you are effectively contributing more to your Roth 401(k) dollar-for-dollar because you are using after-tax money.

For most people, the tax impact will probably be roughly the same in the long run for both 401(k) types. For simplicity's sake I use a traditional 401(k) instead of a Roth 401(k). Of course you shouldn't forget about Roth IRA contributions.

alert mods    

My company has the same thing, 401(k) offered on a pretax or Roth basis. I've decided to hedge my bets and contribute to both: 3% pretax and 6% Roth. Company will start contributing another 3% come July, I'm believe that counts as pretax contributions, taxed on withdrawal.

One thing I haven't been able to figure out, though, what happens when I quit and decide to roll all this over into my IRA? I currently have a traditional IRA but make too much to contribute to a Roth IRA, so I don't have one. Can I open a rollover Roth IRA to hold the Roth contributions & earnings from my 401(k) and roll the rest into my existing traditional IRA? Is there such a thing?

alert mods    

Although not a definitive guide, you may find the decision tree here helpful.

401(k) Type Decision Tree

alert mods    

dawndelion said:I chose to stay with a traditional 401k. My husband and I saved over $4,000 in taxes by contributing to our 401k's last year. I haven't done the math, but I feel that the 35 years of compound interest on the additional $4,000 savings would negate any taxes due when I pull the money out.There are a number of differences between traditional and roth accounts, but from a purely mathematical standpoint, a traditional account is more advantageous if you are in a higher tax bracket now than the bracket you anticipate entering upon your retirement. If the opposite is true, the roth is more advantageous. If you expect your tax brackets to remain the same, the roth and the traditional accounts will be exactly the same. You should of course keep in mind that you can make a larger effective after-tax contribution to a roth than you can to a Traditional account if you initially choose to allocate a larger amount towards your roth than the amount that would be required to be allocated towards a Traditional account.

To say it in a different way, it makes absolutely no difference whether you pay tax on your contributions up front and then let the interest accrue on that after-tax amount or whether you do not initially tax contributions but then tax everything at the time you withdraw the money. The ONLY thing that matters in this case is whether the tax bracket is lower at the time you contribute the money vs. when you withdraw it.

alert mods    

kerstbrood said:if they match roth401K go for it! being after tax dollars and all, you're getting more money.Just like the Traditional match, the Roth match is ALWAYS deposited into a traditional account. So, NO, you are NOT getting a greater match if you go with the Roth versus a Traditional account.

alert mods    

thok said:One thing I haven't been able to figure out, though, what happens when I quit and decide to roll all this over into my IRA?Traditional 401(k) plans are rolled over into a traditional IRA, and a Roth 401(k) rolls over into a Roth IRA, even if you are above the income limit for Roth IRA contributions.

alert mods    

jayK said:thok said:One thing I haven't been able to figure out, though, what happens when I quit and decide to roll all this over into my IRA?Traditional 401(k) plans are rolled over into a traditional IRA, and a Roth 401(k) rolls over into a Roth IRA, even if you are above the income limit for Roth IRA contributions.

The limits are eliminated in 2010.

For the billionth time, roth vs traditional is just a tax hedge. Nothing more nothing less.

alert mods    

geo123 said:kerstbrood said:if they match roth401K go for it! being after tax dollars and all, you're getting more money.Just like the Traditional match, the Roth match is ALWAYS deposited into a traditional account. So, NO, you are NOT getting a greater match if you go with the Roth versus a Traditional account.

I didn't know.
I figured if they match & deposit it in the roth then the company is paying the taxes on the match.

alert mods    

dmlavigne1 said:For the billionth time, roth vs traditional is just a tax hedge. Nothing more nothing less.

Hence, my decision to split 3%/6%. With the 3% company match that puts me 50/50 in Roth vs. traditional. That way I can only be half wrong.

alert mods    

jayK said:thok said:One thing I haven't been able to figure out, though, what happens when I quit and decide to roll all this over into my IRA?Traditional 401(k) plans are rolled over into a traditional IRA, and a Roth 401(k) rolls over into a Roth IRA, even if you are above the income limit for Roth IRA contributions.That's absolutely correct. A direct rollover is never affected by the income limits, tax brackets (a rollover is not a taxable event), etc...

alert mods    

thok said:dmlavigne1 said:For the billionth time, roth vs traditional is just a tax hedge. Nothing more nothing less.

Hence, my decision to split 3%/6%. With the 3% company match that puts me 50/50 in Roth vs. traditional. That way I can only be half wrong.
We've previously had an extensive discussion on the topic of splitting or not splitting contributions between Roth and Traditional accounts.. To quote LH2004 from that thread: "A lot of people like the idea of splitting between Roth and traditional accounts. I do not. Diversification is a good thing -- when you have no information about which investment is better. Everybody has SOME information about whether their tax rate will go up or down, even if they don't have a very definite opinion, and should use the information they have.

Splitting between Roth and traditional accounts makes sense, of course, if you don't have all options available (like, if Roth is better for you, but you have only a traditional 401(k)). But for those who have a choice, splitting for the sake of splitting would be like splitting your money between two mutual funds that cover the same areas, one of which has a higher expense ratio...

And, no, there is no reason to let the fact that you already have $5000 in a traditional account decide what you do with future money (except in unusual situations, like where a higher balance would let you avoid some fee)."

alert mods    

dmlavigne1 said:jayK said:thok said:One thing I haven't been able to figure out, though, what happens when I quit and decide to roll all this over into my IRA?Traditional 401(k) plans are rolled over into a traditional IRA, and a Roth 401(k) rolls over into a Roth IRA, even if you are above the income limit for Roth IRA contributions.

The limits are eliminated in 2010.

For the billionth time, roth vs traditional is just a tax hedge. Nothing more nothing less.

what about being able to save more pre-tax dollars with a Roth, for those people who can't control their spending and need money to be taken from them ?

alert mods    

dmlavigne1 said:For the billionth time, roth vs traditional is just a tax hedge. Nothing more nothing less.If you are just talking about mathematical considerations, the above statement is absolutely correct. For some people, there are additional not entirely mathematical considerations that they need to take into account, however. For instance, the fact that Roth accounts have no required minimimum distributions can be extremely important to a lot of people who want to leave a large inheritance to their families.

Further, if you are planning on retiring early but can't or don't want to take advantage of the 72(t) distributions from your Traditional accounts (because, for instance, you are still working, so your Traditional withdrawals will not all be substantially equal as is required by 72(t) to avoid the early withdrawal penalty), a Roth account can be advantageous.

 Close

Sign Me In
Nickname: 
Password: 
Remember My Login Information:

Forget your login information?

Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!



Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.