Edit

Forums
Finance

WARNING: IndyMac appears close to collapse Archived From: Finance

  • tweet this
  • Post to Facebook
  • Text Only
  • Search this Topic »
  • Classic
alert mods    

scott1961 said:Right. I bet they have brought in a bunch of new money with these rates.

Wachovia is also raising a huge amount of money with their CD promos (4.00% for 7 months and 4.25% for 12 months)
I went to my closest Wachovia branch the other day and there were 6 people waiting to open CDs,
so I went to another branch where there were five people waiting to open CDs,
so then I went home and opened the CD online. I guess I should have thought of that sooner


alert mods    

If we haven't already, perhaps someone should make a * note on the liquid accounts thread about the potential condition of IndyMac.


alert mods    

dolmar said:jayK said:There are rumors that Wells Fargo could potentially buy out IndyMac.

Why would Wells Want Indymac? Wells has a huge footprint in Los Angeles already and IndyMac is an LA based sub-prime lender. All the rumors I have read about or heard on CNBC if you even consider those creditable rumors state Wells Fargo has been eyeing investment banks as Wells has no investment bank division what so ever and Wells could leverage there AAA rating. Wells Fargo like BOA is a straight commercial bank and has no broker/investment bank division as both of them sub contract out there brokerage clearing business to 3rd party investment banks.

The rumors are because many of the investment are getting cheap enough it be very possible that Wells or BOA buy one of them as that would complement their business and allow them to get into the investment bank business which is a very high margin business for the brokers/banks.

Bank of America owns Banc of America securities.


alert mods    

I still have over $200 at Indymac maturing early next year...but these are held in 2 cds ..Each have over $100K but I have the title right to get $200k FDIC coverage on each. First CD is joint with wife and second CD is single with 2 beneficiaries..so the second one also has $200k coverage.


alert mods    

comptalk said:Bank of America owns Banc of America securities.

Not really an investment bank. They clear there brokerage trades via Fidelity. They really do not underwrite anything. They are on a couple of syndicates just because of there size but are never leader or senior manager and that is where the money is in investment banking.


alert mods    

mapen said:1. Desperate IndyMac raises interest rate to 4.00% (for balances over 75K)
2. FDIC insures your money
3. Profit!


FDIC can take time to repay you....officially they have 99 years.


alert mods    

I just called to change my address on an existing CD and the rep offered me a 6 month CD at 4.25% APY.

Time to bite (as long as you are under FDIC limit) ???


alert mods    

7890 said:mapen said:1. Desperate IndyMac raises interest rate to 4.00% (for balances over 75K)
2. FDIC insures your money
3. Profit!



FDIC can take time to repay you....officially they have 99 years.

I have heard from people that actually went through a bank failure that it took over 2 years so I've heard both sides. Given the state of the US financial system at the moment, I'm not taking any chances of having my money tied up for two years.


alert mods    

Thrilla said:I have heard from people that actually went through a bank failure that it took over 2 years so I've heard both sides. Given the state of the US financial system at the moment, I'm not taking any chances of having my money tied up for two years.

That's FUD. It takes no time for your insured deposits to be repaid (as evidenced last year when NetBank was shutdown). It may take some time for un-insured amounts to be paid out (as frequently you will get a portion of money over the FDIC limit back) and that can obviously take time. But if you have only insured deposits you typically don't wait at all.

I haven't heard this from anyone.. I went through NetBank experience myself and if I wasn't reading these forums or financial press I probably wouldn't even know what happened, nor would access to my money have been affected for a second.


alert mods    

Thrilla said:7890 said:mapen said:1. Desperate IndyMac raises interest rate to 4.00% (for balances over 75K)
2. FDIC insures your money
3. Profit!



FDIC can take time to repay you....officially they have 99 years.


I have heard from people that actually went through a bank failure that it took over 2 years so I've heard both sides. Given the state of the US financial system at the moment, I'm not taking any chances of having my money tied up for two years.

you get your money within 48 hrs..


alert mods    

therivler1 said:Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., says federal regulators may not be ready to protect them and that a wave of IndyMac depositors withdrawing their funds could leave the bank "in a disastrous financial situation."
I think someone needs to take Senator Schumer aside and tell him how bank runs get started.


alert mods    

Bank runs get started by bank run rumors on FW


alert mods    

1. Schumer might have a point, but the number of people affected might be small. For example, TD Ameritrade sells brokered CDs. Supposed you buy an IndyMac CD through TD Ameritrade, and then another one through, say, E*Trade. You could easily end up being above the FDIC limits, without realizing so.

This can be especially true when the said CDs are on some kind of a promotion. E.g., TD Ameritrade sends you an e-mail w/ a special CD offer if you bring in at least 20K. But in that e-mail they don't tell you the name of the bank selling the CD. Of course, eventually they tell you the name, but you can end up easily overlooking that detail until AFTER you have invested.

2. I had some NetBank accounts when they failed, but I am still trying to understand how the whole process works. As far as I can tell, FDIC tries to make sure that banks don't fail by themselves. In other words, FDIC or whoever (thrift supervisor) comes in and declares the operations of a bank unsafe, and takes over well before the bank is unable to pay. FDIC does this to make sure that depositors don't get bounced payments due to bank's insolvency, because that is likely to create more panic.

Assume a couple of banks get to a stage at which FDIC decides to take over. While FDIC is busy with these couple of banks, for some reason, a couple of more actually fail. The FDIC might not have enough processing capacity (employees, infrastructure, etc) to handle the new failures, even though they might have the capital needed to cover the shortfall between the insured portion of the deposits and bank's assets.

Are there any FW members who were around during the S&L crisis. How soon did the deposits get paid out?


alert mods    

mnsweeps said:Thrilla said:7890 said:mapen said:1. Desperate IndyMac raises interest rate to 4.00% (for balances over 75K)
2. FDIC insures your money
3. Profit!



FDIC can take time to repay you....officially they have 99 years.


I have heard from people that actually went through a bank failure that it took over 2 years so I've heard both sides. Given the state of the US financial system at the moment, I'm not taking any chances of having my money tied up for two years.


you get your money within 48 hrs..

That should read you "typically" get your money within 48 hours. Oficially they do have several years to repay you, but they do work to ensure all funds are available as soon as possible.


alert mods    

jayK said:There are rumors that Wells Fargo could potentially buy out IndyMac.

Link? And I certainly hope not!!!!


alert mods    

flyboy said:That should read you "typically" get your money within 48 hours. Oficially they do have several years to repay you, but they do work to ensure all funds are available as soon as possible.

Brokered CDs and accounts over $100k w/ multiple beneficiaries or in the name of a trust ** may ** take more than the usually weekend. This is because a) FDIC must wait for the brokerage firms to provide them a complete list of who holds the CDs (Indy's records will only say, for instance, TD Ameritrade Brokered CD $1MM, E*Trade Brokered CD $10MM, etc.), and b) FDIC must check to see if the beneficiary is a qualifying beneficiary for FDIC coverage purposes.


alert mods    

dolmar said:comptalk said:Bank of America owns Banc of America securities.Not really an investment bank. They clear there brokerage trades via Fidelity. They really do not underwrite anything. They are on a couple of syndicates just because of there size but are never leader or senior manager and that is where the money is in investment banking.In the first quarter, BoA ranked #1 in global equity and related, #3 in global MBS, #1 in global equity - US, #8 in global IPO's, #1 in global convertibles, #1 in US-market equity and related, #3 in US market common stock, #4 (tied) in US market IPOs, #6 in US market follow-ons, #1 in US market convertibles, #3 in overall US-market debt and equity, #3 in US market MBS, and #1 in US non-convertible preferreds, among other things; they were also #9 as financial advisor on completed deals with US targets. That is a major investment bank. How they clear retail trades is really not terribly important.


alert mods    

pizza


alert mods    

mnsweeps said:Thrilla said:I have heard from people that actually went through a bank failure that it took over 2 years so I've heard both sides. Given the state of the US financial system at the moment, I'm not taking any chances of having my money tied up for two years.

you get your money within 48 hrs..

A FDIC spokesman says that depositors have lost access for up to 6 days.

I do remember the person I was speaking with did indicate the funds that took two years to be returned were above the FDIC limit.


alert mods    

LH2004 said:dolmar said:comptalk said:Bank of America owns Banc of America securities.Not really an investment bank. They clear there brokerage trades via Fidelity. They really do not underwrite anything. They are on a couple of syndicates just because of there size but are never leader or senior manager and that is where the money is in investment banking.In the first quarter, BoA ranked #1 in global equity and related, #3 in global MBS, #1 in global equity - US, #8 in global IPO's, #1 in global convertibles, #1 in US-market equity and related, #3 in US market common stock, #4 (tied) in US market IPOs, #6 in US market follow-ons, #1 in US market convertibles, #3 in overall US-market debt and equity, #3 in US market MBS, and #1 in US non-convertible preferreds, among other things; they were also #9 as financial advisor on completed deals with US targets. That is a major investment bank. How they clear retail trades is really not terribly important.

Not sure where you getting your info from:

Bond Report

Fixed income deals they did not rank in top 10 if you only counted how many deals they were lead or senior manager on. They ranked #10 in total deal flow because they were part of the syndicates in many deals.

Preferred Deals

Click on any of the latest preferred or convertibles over the last 6 months. Except for there own BAC preferred they are not listed on many deals as Lead Manger or Book Runner but they are listed only under Co-Manager. While I understand they have there finger in a lot of deals as Co-Manager the Lead Manager and Book Runner are ones making all the fees from the issuer. BOA is almost never Lead Manager or Book Runner.

Equities

Click on Past deals or future deals. How many times is BOA listed as Lead Manager or Book Runner? Not often but BOA is listed as Co-Managers just like every other $hitty little investment bank. The only difference is BOA tends to be listed as Co-Manager on just about every deal. So they are collecting placement fee's that is it vs the Lead Managers and Book Runners are collecting fee's from the issuer for bring the deal to market.

Compare that Citi or Goldman who is listed as either Lead Manager or Book Runner on a lot deals and almost never listed as Co-Manager. And in many deals where BOA is listed as Co-Manager Citi and Goldman are listed as Sole Book Runner. BOA is listed as Co-Manager just because of there size and amount of customers they have but they are not collecting fee's from underwriting the deal but just for placement. Look at Visa deal where BOA was original owner but yet the 2 book runner were Citi and Goldman.

So maybe if your definition of a big investment bank is a bank who does no underwriting and is just part of tons of syndicates as big investment bank then maybe BOA is a big investment bank and I guess all the underwriting investment banks are doing it wrong then as they tend not to be listed as Co-Manager on tons of deals as they do not want to simply collect placement fee but rather collect underwriting fee's. By that definition then I guess Fidelity is a huge investment bank and so is Schwab as both of them are in tons of syndicates and collect tons of revenue for placement but almost nothing for underwriting or bring the deal to market.


 Close

Sign Me In
Nickname: 
Password: 
Remember My Login Information:

Forget your login information?

Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!



Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2009