click to close
help
edit

Forums
Finance

FHA 203k Archived From: Finance

  • Text Only
  • Search this Topic »
  • switch to 'Classic' view
  • Page :
  • 1
alert mods    

I'm looking into getting a foreclosure that was under construction and is incomplete. I've talked to multiple lenders and from what i've learned is that since the property may not be upto code (in addition to an incomplete kitchen) I can't qualify for a regular Mortgage and the current owner (bank) isn't willing to negotiate on how to proceed with the repairs (being sold as-is), the only option I've heard of so far is a FHA 203k rehab loan.

Do any of you guys have information on that? I'm trying to figure out rate differences over regular mortgages and the hassle involved (For reference) http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/203k/203kabou.cfm) and any other information / advice you guys would have. Thanks a bunch

Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.

alert mods    

I have heard horror stories about people buying houses not up to code. I'd be sure that the issues are things you will be able to fix and bring up to code. Also, that you can afford to fix it.

It is going to be challenging to get a mortgage on a non-conforming property (definitely more $$ down and a higher rate).
Good luck and definitely use this fact to bring down what you pay for it!!!

alert mods    

I have no current info, but I can relate that it is how I bought my house in 1998. From my experience, if you go that route be prepared for extra paperwork, having inspectors review the work to be done and the work that was done, dealing with contractors left and right, and just having it take extra time. There were, and I suspect still are, few lendors that will do these loans, plus few people that know how the loans work, so if the person that handles your mortgage at the bank takes a three week vacation there will be no-one to give you any info for three weeks (yes this happened to me - the bank stalled for a week before they would admit to this - go Wells Fargo ).

You'll need to itemize everything to be done, by whom, and for how much. Also, if you plan on doing any work yourself you will have to be extra determined as they will be suspicious of that and you'll have to convince them you can and will do the work (I did half the work myself). If that doesn't scare you off, and you're willing to live in a house under repair for months (or more), then this can be a very rewarding way to go. I was able to buy a house I wouldn't normally have been able to for a $3K down payment, and its now worth over $400K.

alert mods    

Have you asked the bank that currently owns the property if they would be willing to make the loan to you? Afterall it is going to be very hard for them to find a buyer for an unfinished house and it is in the bank's interest to move the property.

alert mods    

PhrugalPhan said:I have no current info, but I can relate that it is how I bought my house in 1998. From my experience, if you go that route be prepared for extra paperwork, having inspectors review the work to be done and the work that was done, dealing with contractors left and right, and just having it take extra time. There were, and I suspect still are, few lendors that will do these loans, plus few people that know how the loans work, so if the person that handles your mortgage at the bank takes a three week vacation there will be no-one to give you any info for three weeks (yes this happened to me - the bank stalled for a week before they would admit to this - go Wells Fargo ).

You'll need to itemize everything to be done, by whom, and for how much. Also, if you plan on doing any work yourself you will have to be extra determined as they will be suspicious of that and you'll have to convince them you can and will do the work (I did half the work myself). If that doesn't scare you off, and you're willing to live in a house under repair for months (or more), then this can be a very rewarding way to go. I was able to buy a house I wouldn't normally have been able to for a $3K down payment, and its now worth over $400K.

LOL - I've been told to contact Wells Fargo as well, apparently (as others have stated) very few lenders do the FHA 203k. The work required is relatively minimal (discounting the 'bringing up to code' aspect).
I originally thought the procedure was getting pre-approved for the loan followed by negotiating w/the owner (bank in this case) and if we agreed on a price, have the lender inspect it, getting a list of required repairs and costs built into the loan prior to closing. Following closing I would have a specific time period for repairs. Is that accurate?

And yep thats my motivation as well, the area I'm looking at I can only afford older townhomes and this is a newer SFH - the negatives being it has no basement and I have no clue how shoddy the work was (the previous owner did some of the work himself, not sure how much )

alert mods    

chimeer said:Have you asked the bank that currently owns the property if they would be willing to make the loan to you? Afterall it is going to be very hard for them to find a buyer for an unfinished house and it is in the bank's interest to move the property.
No I haven't , I talked with their listing agent who wasn't particularly co-operative :\

alert mods    

An FHA 203k loan is actually a very difficult loan to set up front. First find a lender that does them (I.E. Wellsfargo). The lender will want you to get a quote from a contractor detailing exactly what it is going to cost to do the repairs. I cant remember if FHA requires that a Licensed General Contractor has to manage the job or if a home owner can do it themselves. (Like I said these are suck a pain that as a lender I dont do them, not worth my time) Next you will submit repairs quote to an FHA 203k Inspector and he will look over your quote and scope of work and then inspect the house to see if you have enough repairs to bring the house to FHA lending approval. He can agree or say you need to do more. The FHA 203k inspector can be very expensive from what I remember they started at about $1000 and went up from there.

Then you will take your "Approved Costs to Repair" and show that to your appraiser. He will then add that in to current market conditions and give you a new appraised value on the after repair value of the home. As long as the ARV is enough to meet your Sales price plus repairs you should be ready to go. If not its a no go. This is a long process that the bank may not want to put up with on a foreclosure and you may be out a bunch of money upfront and then cant purchase the house. I am not saying to not do it but make sure you are really getting a really good deal before proceeding.

Did you say you were only speaking with the Listing agent???? First thing is to stop right there!!! A listing agent will not look out for you. You need a buyers agent to help negotiate for you and look out for your interest (i.e. market value and ARV of the house). This will cost you nothing. The seller is paying for all selling fees. If you dont use a buyers agent the seller still pays the same fee that the listing agent gets all of. Ofcourse they want you to work with them only because they get double the fee.

But as far as I know this is your only option in the lending market to do this type of home purchase at this time. Do expect higher rates than normal for FHA (.25% to .50%). There are rate hits for the lender to mitigate their risk.

And also understand what the FHA maximum loan amount is in your state. Here in Texas it is $272,000, your state could be higher.

alert mods    

Chase Mortgage did one with my friend through their UnionPlus affiliation.

alert mods    

PhrugalPhan: Would you happen to know how low of a price would seem worthwhile.

For the property I'm looking at they've currently listed the property for 500k (3000 sq ft, no basement) where a similar but fully finished property with 3500 sq ft with a basement sold for 600k. According to my realtor they might except an offer in the 470-480 range but to me thats still very steep for the risks I'll have to take and hassles to go through.

alert mods    

Thanks for the detailed information Colt2001 (and everyone else). I talked with Wells Fargo and they're estimating it'll cost b/w 0.5 - 1% over regular rates and also charge a 1% origination fee which the regular lender I talked to didn't

alert mods    

In the earlier part of this decade Renasant Bank had an in-house alternative to the 203k. It is (was?) much more lax than the 203k as far as contractors, doing work your self, etc etc. A relative used it to redo a house he purchased that had a fire. He did not want to hire a general contractor, which doesn't fly with the 203k. It seemed like a neat product - not sure if it is still around.

http://www.renasantbank.com/ - only in AL, MS and TN

alert mods    

I guess the other way to do this is to buy the house with cash and then refinance once it's fixed up. At $500k, getting cash would probably be tough. Also if it doesn't qualify for a conventional loan, just sit it out and watch the property. In my area, there's two ways the banks go, either they spend the 10-20k that will bring it up so that it qualifies for a loan or they say cash offer only. The ones that are cash offers keep going down in price as no one has that much cash. Also I've heard of banks taking 100k less when it was a cash offer. Typically they won't take more than 20-30k off, they will usually just lower the price every 30 days or so by a certain amount, 3-5% typically.

The other type of loan you might be able to do is a cost to cure type conventional loan. Not all banks were doing them, the last I heard that did it was Chase. Typically if it needs 50k worth of work, they hold 150% of that in escrow or 75k in the attorney's account. Once you finish the work, you get the 75k back. Means you have to have lots of cash because you have to come up with the 75k and you probably need to have the 50k to do the work before you can get your 75k back. They typically expect it to be done in 30 days, but if it takes longer, it's not that big a deal, the attorney is holding your money so people are usually pretty motivated to get it back as soon as possible.

Also as it's a foreclosure, I would definitely get a buyer's agent. The bank knows it's going to pay the full commission and doesn't really care whether the listing agent sells it or a buyer's agent. The listing agent probably has a bunch of other foreclosures also and probably doesn't have that much time to devote to you as the buyer. Also they represent the bank so they can't exactly make any recommendations like inspectors or attorneys as it would be a conflict of interest.

Oh and there are horror stories about houses not up to code. Once the local building department finds out about it, sometimes they love giving it to the bank and require all sorts of work to be done with permits being pulled. They could even pull the occupancy permit and make you get it again which can require all departments like plumbing, electrical, health, etc signing off on it before it's granted.

alert mods    

I love hearing "not to code". You can't get a loan on this type of property. There's less competition and you can get a serious deal on it.

alert mods    

syyid said:PhrugalPhan: Would you happen to know how low of a price would seem worthwhile.

For the property I'm looking at they've currently listed the property for 500k (3000 sq ft, no basement) where a similar but fully finished property with 3500 sq ft with a basement sold for 600k. According to my realtor they might except an offer in the 470-480 range but to me thats still very steep for the risks I'll have to take and hassles to go through.

I'm not sure what you're asking, but I am not in the market now, so I don't know what prices are (mortgage rates, or home prices - other than local comparible homes to mine). The only thing I would disagree about with Colt2001 (btw his explanation was much much better than mine) was the price of the FHA inspector. I don't remember the price, but in my case I thought it was close to comparible to regular inspectors. But considering these FHA inspectors have to go through lots of training, and have a huge checklist, they are usually worth the extra cost. I know mine found tons of problems with a house I was considering (decided not to buy it), and helped with the house I did end up getting.

Oh, and re-reading what I wrote, there was one other thing I forgot. Unless the work is not in the living areas of the house, they expect you to include costs for living in a rental while the work is going on. I know how remodels go (they can go on forever!), so I wasn't going to do that. That also took some convincing of them that I would really live there while the work was being done, when we were working up the loan numbers. We had no kitchen for two months - an interesting way to live - but we survived.

alert mods    

Their asking price is too high. If they are asking $500K then I think $300-$350K is the max you should pay. If you can you should really get a competent appriaser to give you and appraisal of before and after repairs. Also, make sure to put a contingency for inspections in your offer. An inspection is very crucial in a property with things not up to code.
I think getting a buyer's agent realtor is a good idea. Make sure the realtor is not lazy. If they do not go see the property they will end up giving you really bad advice.
If you check the FHA site for foreclosures in your area you should be able to get the name of a company that does inspections for FHA by looking at some of the reports. I have noticed that inspectors that inspect FHA properties area little more prepared int hat they are used to inspecting properties not up to code and have equipment and tools that allow them to still inspect

 Close

Sign Me In
Nickname: 
Password: 
Remember My Login Information:

Forget your login information?

Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!



Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


  • © 1999-2008
  • Message Board Statistics RSS Feed Information
Sign up for free today, because you don't want to miss out on any more cash back than you already have! There are currently 1,027,184 people just like you registered to earn Cash Back From FatWallet. Be the next! Sign up to join the discussion & earn Cash Back from FatWallet:
close