Users like you can add images, links and other relevant information about this topic.
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 9:51a
GreenBack
Senior Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 10:01a
The irony of capitalism is that completely free markets will result in a big hangover ... and demands for regulations afterwards. Pure greed left to its own devices maybe good for some individuals but not good for the country as a whole. Plus, it's smokes and mirrors to call our corporate world capitalistic at the management level. The CEOs fill the boardroom with their buddies, reward one another and get bailouts in times of crisis in the form of golden parachutes.
wesd
Senior Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 10:01a
Bailouts do NOTHING to change the underlying supply/demand scenario. Houses are still grossly overpriced and will continue to fall in value. Oil prices are on a downhill plunge as well. What this means? All the gov't money (our money) in the world cannot force people to purchase things their salaries cannot afford.
Well, we have always encouraged investing over saving in this country. We spend more than we earn, we consume more than we need, as a result we became fat and poor. And stupid. And that collective stupidity has come back to bite us in the ass. We will probably get some new rules and regulations to help prevent this from happening in the future.
ceobeaver
Senior Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 10:05a
Brutal. Before the government gives any of these companies $1, they should make every exec who made more than $1M in one year payback 90% of their earnings.
Bailing these companies out takes away the downside risk of doing business. This is a dangerous precedent we're setting. In effect saying "Increase your revenue however you want, and don't worry if its risky, we'll be here to catch you if you fall."
WTF?
ppatin
Focused.
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 10:09a
I'm so disgusted with this that I may end up voting Libertarian as a protest vote come November.
Hammerin' Hank Paulson just said, "Your future and your children's future depends upon our ability to make the financial system sound."
Translation: YOU are going to pay for all our worthless toxic paper that cannot be sold to anyone else because that market is dead. UFB in your face racketeering. Now they are going to try to herd all our moron congresspeople into a stampede to hand over another trillion dollars of our money before they leave office.
The complete socialization of our entire financial system. And all the "small-government", right-wing neo-cons are buying into this as if it's completely natural. Yet mention Universal Healthcare, which would be infinitely less expensive and infinitely more beneficial (especially if the insurance companies could be removed from the equation), and they're up in arms decrying the Democrats' attempt to "socialize" medicine. Utter hypocrites!
"Free Market America" Larry Krudlow was near orgasmsic last night after the announcement of this bailout idea & short selling ban. Frickin' pompous hypocritical ahole.
curtisekarr said: The complete socialization of our entire financial system. And all the "small-government", right-wing neo-cons are buying into this as if it's completely natural. Yet mention Universal Healthcare, which would be infinitely less expensive and infinitely more beneficial (especially if the insurance companies could be removed from the equation), and they're up in arms decrying the Democrats' attempt to "socialize" medicine. Utter hypocrites!
i'm a conservative. And I think this is utter crap.
IMHO, anyone claming to be a conservative, and is for these massive bailouts. Should have there conservative title taken away.
fozzy
Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 10:32a
Dealguy123 said: ppatin said: I'm so disgusted with this that I may end up voting Libertarian as a protest vote come November.
Obama in '08! The Republican party is a disgrace. I'm voting democrat until we get a real republican back in office.
It will be the Democratic congress that passes this. I am not saying Republicans are not without their faults, but blaming them or directing your anger only at them over this is crazy.
fozzy said: Dealguy123 said: ppatin said: I'm so disgusted with this that I may end up voting Libertarian as a protest vote come November.
Obama in '08! The Republican party is a disgrace. I'm voting democrat until we get a real republican back in office.
It will be the Democratic congress that passes this. I am not saying Republicans are not without their faults, but blaming them or directing your anger only at them over this is crazy. And the President can easily veto this.
Dealguy123
Senior Member - 2K
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 10:39a
fozzy said: It will be the Democratic congress that passes this. I am not saying Republicans are not without their faults, but blaming them or directing your anger only at them over this is crazy.
The point here, is that the Democrats have ALWAYS been for this bulls**t. However, the republican party actually used to stand for free market capitalism. I can no longer vote for a party that LIES DIRECTLY TO MY FACE and says they stand for X and they do Y. Sorry, but the republican party needs to lose (and lose big) and regroup and come back stronger. They've lost their way, and there's no reason any "conservative" should vote for them. Voting for the republican party at this stage merely encourages the same socialist BS to continue. No thanks. When you stray from the path and lose your way, you need a shock to set you straight. Winning provides no such shock.
HumDoHamaraDo said: fozzy said: Dealguy123 said: ppatin said: I'm so disgusted with this that I may end up voting Libertarian as a protest vote come November.
Obama in '08! The Republican party is a disgrace. I'm voting democrat until we get a real republican back in office.
It will be the Democratic congress that passes this. I am not saying Republicans are not without their faults, but blaming them or directing your anger only at them over this is crazy. And the President can easily veto this.The president just addressed the nation. I don't think he is going to veto anything.
nycll said: Hank G also said AIG was a national treasure. Whatever works I guess.With warrants for the government to own 80% of AIG, isn't it in effect, a national treasure?
HumDoHamaraDo said: fozzy said: Dealguy123 said: ppatin said: I'm so disgusted with this that I may end up voting Libertarian as a protest vote come November.
Obama in '08! The Republican party is a disgrace. I'm voting democrat until we get a real republican back in office.
It will be the Democratic congress that passes this. I am not saying Republicans are not without their faults, but blaming them or directing your anger only at them over this is crazy. And the President can easily veto this.
this is why I dislike bi-partaisanship, it always gets use the 'best' ideas. NCLB, New medicare rules. Bailouts of wallstreet.
All of them are in bed togther. Left, right, new york cries, rest of the country empties its wallets.
michal1980 said: IMHO, anyone claming to be a conservativ]e, and is for these massive bailouts. Should have there conservative title taken away.Only social conservatives have voices now.
michal1980 said: HumDoHamaraDo said: fozzy said: Dealguy123 said: ppatin said: I'm so disgusted with this that I may end up voting Libertarian as a protest vote come November.
Obama in '08! The Republican party is a disgrace. I'm voting democrat until we get a real republican back in office.
It will be the Democratic congress that passes this. I am not saying Republicans are not without their faults, but blaming them or directing your anger only at them over this is crazy. And the President can easily veto this.
this is why I dislike bi-partaisanship, it always gets use the 'best' ideas. NCLB, New medicare rules. Bailouts of wallstreet.
All of them are in bed togther. Left, right, new york cries, rest of the country empties its wallets. About time the Blue states got something back, they have been subsidizing the red states for too long.
DavidScubadiver said: nycll said: Hank G also said AIG was a national treasure. Whatever works I guess.With warrants for the government to own 80% of AIG, isn't it in effect, a national treasure? National money pit?
ppatin
Focused.
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 10:53a
DavidScubadiver said: nycll said: Hank G also said AIG was a national treasure. Whatever works I guess.With warrants for the government to own 80% of AIG, isn't it in effect, a national treasure?
ppatin said: DavidScubadiver said: nycll said: Hank G also said AIG was a national treasure. Whatever works I guess.With warrants for the government to own 80% of AIG, isn't it in effect, a national treasure?
Isn't a national treasure supposed to have value?
shhhh! don't burst the new bubble of national treasures!
Come on, Guys ... AIG has value. Its office building alone is very nice. They have fine balance sheet. Its a cash-flow problem. Everything will be fine, just fine.
astrochimp
Thrifty Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 11:16a
Something ELSE to simmer on...
Guess how much MONEY the people in charge made while making all these Terrible decisions and SCREWING all this crap up?
We are bailing out Millionaires who were purposely ignorant in some cases.
ceobeaver said: Brutal. Before the government gives any of these companies $1, they should make every exec who made more than $1M in one year payback 90% of their earnings.
FatFreddie said: Hank Greenburg just said, "Your future and your children's future depends upon our ability to make the financial system sound."
Translation: YOU are going to pay for all our worthless toxic paper that cannot be sold to anyone else because that market is dead. UFB in your face racketeering. Now they are going to try to herd all our moron congresspeople into a stampede to hand over another trillion dollars of our money before they leave office.
I sent the following message which is not perfectly written and has too much emotion in it. If someone wants to adjust it or provide us with a more lucid letter to write our reps, please do so!
----------
Hello,
As one of your constituents, I'd like to express my grave concern over the government's handling of our current financial issues. Why would we use taxpayer dollars to bail out obviously poor financial decisions made by supposed financial experts? This is a slap in the face to responsible citizens who practice sound financial management and save for the future. We need to be willing to go through economic troubles in order to purge privately made decisions.
Executives continued to receive their multi-million dollar compensation even though their institutions performed horribly. Now, I am having to pay for the mistakes of financial "experts" and those individuals who spend irrationally, even though I am innocent.
I hope that you will vote for accountability, and not burden those of us who are responsible with the negative outcomes of others' poor decisions. Please do not support bail outs like we are seeing here. You have to take downturns in stride with upturns, and sometimes these downturns will be severe.
Every day I wake up and thank god for the double standard.
calvinandhobbes
Thrifty Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 11:19a
michal1980 said: Higher home prices (we cant let them fall in value)
Plus harder to get loans/ higher interest rates. (You want to borrow money, LOL you can but it will cost you)leave it to michal to post that two competing interest will simulateneously occur. If interest rates go up, that drives home prices down as loans get more expensive. If loans are harder to get, that means fewer people can buy homes, demand falls, prices go down. But magically, you state prices will go up.
I'll provide a slightly different opinion than everyone else:
The "bailout" for AIG was actually a loan, not free cash. The government is likely to turn a nice profit on the AIG deal, at an 11.5% interest rate. Other banks would likely enter the same deal in a healthy market- they just don't have the cash to put up right now.
With this new $1 Trillion deal, if the government is going to buy these assets, it should be for pennies on the dollar. We should not be covering the banks losses, just allowing them to have liquid money to cover short term obligations. If we can buy the assets for bottom dollar (which again, other companies would if they had the cash right now), then the govt/taxpayers will make money rather than lose money.
arun44445
Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 11:21a
We don't really live in a capitalistic economy. Its capitalism for the poor/middle class & Socialism for the Rich.
"The government is likely to turn a nice profit on the AIG deal, at an 11.5% interest rate"
Yeah right, when was the last time the government made any money?
Remember Savings & Loan "The ultimate cost of the crisis is estimated to have totaled around USD$160.1 billion, about $124.6 billion of which was directly paid for by the U.S. government—that is, the U.S. taxpayer—which contributed to the large budget deficits of the early 1990s. - A similar "fund" was setup then - but its much bigger now"
arun44445 said: We don't really live in a capitalistic economy. Its capitalism for the poor/middle class & Socialism for the Rich. Some people like to call it trickle-down economic theory.
calvinandhobbes said: michal1980 said: Higher home prices (we cant let them fall in value)
Plus harder to get loans/ higher interest rates. (You want to borrow money, LOL you can but it will cost you)leave it to michal to post that two competing interest will simulateneously occur. If interest rates go up, that drives home prices down as loans get more expensive. If loans are harder to get, that means fewer people can buy homes, demand falls, prices go down. But magically, you state prices will go up.
get a clue.
they can.
for example, banks see the end of the tunnel with the fed buying bad paper away from them. No longer feel pressured to sell foreclosed propeties. At the same time tighten standards and increase rates.
Yes that would cause fewer home sales. But if you are no longer forced to sell right this second, you can get a better return.
Right now alot of the failling property values has to deal, with a glut of foreclosed homes, and banks desperate to sell. The glut would still remain, but the desperation is being taken away.
At the same time, we have already seen interest rates bounce up.
puckah18
Greedy Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 11:26a
"Capitalism without failure is like Christianity without Hell." - Warren E. Buffett
arun44445
Member
posted: Sep. 19, 2008 @ 11:29a
"Paulson & Bernake will win Nobel Economic prize for averting Worldwide Financial meltdown."
-YEAH BY PRINTING MORE MONEY Their 1.5 Million Nobel Prize will be worth significantly less after the bailout.
Inflation affects Salaried Employees, As worth of the Dollar goes down, Prices of Goods increase - Salaries seldom increase. So again we have to pay for it by spending more money on goods rather than saving etc.
" King: Republicans on the Hill today are blasting the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve for orchestrating that $85 billion bailout of AIG. What do you think of that?
Orman: I think that's a great thing for them to yell about. Of course, we had to do that. What is the matter with them? Don't they understand? I get that the taxpayers are going to have to pay for it but do you have any idea -- do they have an idea -- what would have happened if that institution had gone down? That was a massive institution within 130 countries with about 113,000 employees in every aspect all over the world, so I don't know. I'm personally grateful that they bailed them out. It was a deal. The government is going to make a serious sum of money on that. The taxpayers will, in the end, make money -- 80 percent of this company for $85 billion for one of the biggest insurance company out there. Again, I have to say that was one of the best business deals I've ever seen in my life."
I just cant believe that my tax dollars are paying for some old white dude to have a corporate jet and an Armani suit. They gamble with their money, lose, and we bail them out.
What if we taught this exact same lessons to our kids?
Moreover, why didn't they sell the reservation at eBay to recoup some of that deposit?I doubt there is a large buyer's market for lavish corporate retreats sold with a week's notice. The resale value of the retreat was probably far lower than the intangible benefits to the morale of AIG employees.
As a taxpayer do you think I give a crap about the morale of AIG employees? They can go put on cinderblock shoes and jump in the river for all I care.
Senior management of AIG is all toast. Federal prison within a few years, wait and see.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.