|
-
-
deallover
- Ancient Member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 3:56p
Shandril said:The funny thing is that on the panel GM CEO argued that they're currently burning thru $5B/month and that they expect their portion of the bailout to provide them with $10-12B. Quick math means this massive bailout will keep them burning cash for 2 extra months. Do they seriously think they can turn around, restructure, and recover from this recession by March 09?
To me it sounds like an addict who'd say anything to get you to loan them money for their next dose. "I'll use the money to clean myself up and find a job."
Throwing money at the big 3, is like giving the patient a pain killer instead of trying to cure the infection. They probably need government guaranteed access to capital, but not until they clean their house first. And if they were willing to do that on their own, they would have already. By now, there are very few people who believe the story of magically returning to profitability on antiquited business models, with poor management, and insane contractual obligations. Barney Frank a.k.a. Joker, stated on radio this morning that, upto $140B can be handed to TRIO since we did that to save AIG. I am convinced that, a full blown revolution will be required to uproot all these corrupt bas***ds... As soon as TRIO gets the bailout, AIRLINE industry is already lining up for $50B or so..... and party will continue... Soon every single big corporation will be owned by US government....without any benefit to the taxpyer, whose money is wasted on them.... |
-
-
MOWSTER
- Addicted Member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 4:03p
Let them sweat it all out like the rest of us. HO HO HO.... |
-
-
Johneverd
- Senior Member - 4K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 4:19p
Can the current economy absorb yet another big blow without falling into a tailspin? My concern about losing the Big Three is not so much the jobs that will be directly lost, but the overall affect that this would have on the stock market and on consumer confidence. Saving the domestic automakers should be done if for no other reason than to keep us as far away as possible from the precipice that leads to a depression. And I agree, restructuring contingencies must be tied to the loan to ensure future profitability. Allowing the Big Three to hang themselves once the economy recovers, though undesirable, is at least not as scary a prospect. Sometimes a dead dog is still dead, no matter how long you try to blow air into its lungs. Will Detroit supply 100+ MPG vehicles, true quality craftsmanship and competitive pricing within 5 years? If not then it may be too late for them. |
-
-
hope69
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 4:32p
erinm said:
UAW worker do NOT make $80-90/hour in wages and benefits. The UAW worker makes as much or less than a non-UAW worker in wages and benefits. Simple googling will tell you this.
The $71-73/hour number you hear GM tout is the amount if you figure what their pension plans are currently paying out to retired workers. They considering that part of the current employee's benefits, even though the current employee sees none of it. This is GM's problem because they adopted "pay-as-you-go" pensions, rather than setting the money aside annually way back before the retired workers were retired.
Many UAW workers are skilled. They are pipefitters, electricians, millwrights...
I encourage you to do a little research before you throw out figures you know nothing about. Let's see, most of those UAW workers don't have college degree, what you called skilled workers shouldn't get more than 20 USD per hour because the work they do can be taught with in a few month and most people can do it. Don't forget the job bank program that GM have 12,000 people sitting on their asses and getting paid 30+ per hour. I would suggest you do some google of your own before you claim how little GM union workers get paid. Finally, how do you define "fair" pay? We are in a global market and if we are to make it in this world we have to bring down the cost of labor. Those union workers need to go back and get retrained into doing something that people in other countries can't do. |
-
-
Pun
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 4:41p
hope69 said:erinm said:
UAW worker do NOT make $80-90/hour in wages and benefits. The UAW worker makes as much or less than a non-UAW worker in wages and benefits. Simple googling will tell you this.
The $71-73/hour number you hear GM tout is the amount if you figure what their pension plans are currently paying out to retired workers. They considering that part of the current employee's benefits, even though the current employee sees none of it. This is GM's problem because they adopted "pay-as-you-go" pensions, rather than setting the money aside annually way back before the retired workers were retired.
Many UAW workers are skilled. They are pipefitters, electricians, millwrights...
I encourage you to do a little research before you throw out figures you know nothing about.
Let's see, most of those UAW workers don't have college degree, what you called skilled workers shouldn't get more than 20 USD per hour because the work they do can be taught with in a few month and most people can do it.
Don't forget the job bank program that GM have 12,000 people sitting on their asses and getting paid 30+ per day. I would suggest you do some google of your own before you claim how little GM union workers get paid.
Finally, how do you define "fair" pay? We are in a global market and if we are to make it in this world we have to bring down the cost of labor. Those union workers need to go back and get retrained into doing something that people in other countries can't do. "Most people can do it" Actually ALL people can do it. True, according to erinm, employees at McD and Burger King should get similar pay because they ALSO have to raise children, buy a house, send kids to college, etc. Erinm, you just made me realize that I should go ask for a 300k raise in salary. I need to send my kids to private school and the new Lamborghini Gallardo does look good in my garage. My cousin works for one of the MTA union and it's sickening how much these high school dropouts make. $32/hr for driving a bus, $60+ on holidays/overtime not including pension, health, benenfits. "Pay as you go"?@!?! they are paying now toward their pension later. You think our SS funds are being nicely stacked on our backyard for the golden day? FYI This is how every pension works. |
-
-
ganda
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 4:44p
kamalktk said:ganda said:Pun said: Average salary of a GM line worker is about 125k-150k/year with benefits.
Damn straight! You only have to *visit* the Detroit metropolitan area where these fatcat lineworkers live to see what a vibrant, prosperous place it is. Is it our problem if they blew the money on H and B instead of more proper investments? Hillary and Barack?  It's socialism for corporations when it suits them, but always capitalism for hardworking taxpayers who actually pay their bills and live within their means  |
-
-
Pun
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 4:46p
Average GM worker Salary with benefit: $150k a year @ $73/hr Average Dentist Salary $113k a year what's wrong with this picture? |
-
-
catanpirate
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 4:48p
Pay your bills, deadbeat. |
-
-
ganda
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 5:06p
Pun said:Average GM worker Salary with benefit: $150k a year @ $73/hr
Average Dentist Salary $113k a year
what's wrong with this picture? That's there's no source. You could just be pulling numbers out of your butt. Septic tank pumpers make $142,000 p.a. |
-
-
Dealguy123
- Senior Member - 2K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 5:24p
geo123 said:The only portion of your post I don't necessarily agree with is your expectation that this recession will last years. On average US recessions last approximately 9 months (8-16 months being the range; last time it was a 16 month long recession was in '81-'82) and it would not surprise many of us if we are already 3-4 months into it. This recession certainly doesn't have to conform to the average timelines, so I guess we'll see. I do agree with the rest of your post though. Well, we can agree to disagree on this. I'm much more pessimistic than you (with plenty of reasons to support it), but honestly hope you're right. For the life of me though, I can't see how things turn around anytime next yr. I'm not sure when the last time we had a global recession was (if ever), but I can't think of any time in history that compares to now besides the 20's and 30's. I haven't seen widespread deleveraging taking place from corporations all the way down to consumers in my lifetime.  Looks like we're seeing a deflationary spiral imo.. problem is, we're so levered in many aspects that there's no way to stop it. We essentially have a 0% EFF rate (Japan anyone?) and private sector money creation has ground to a halt and US consumer balance sheets are weak. If I'm wrong, and we pull out of this thing in <2 years, I'll gladly change my tune and eat crow. |
-
-
dealhunter999
- Ancient Member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 5:30p
See GM 2007 Annual Report, Page 62 78/hour, includes all costs associated with hiring employees: salary, employer part of social security, employer contributions to pension plan, 401(k), health care and other benefits, holiday and vacation pay, etc. According to the referred report, these costs will go down to $26/hr when the 2007 National Agreement (the contract agreed with the unions last year) is fully implemented. The same report mentions $15/hr for new employees, and $28/hr for existing employees as "base wages". |
-
-
ganda
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 5:45p
fsx100 said:Each GM car includes $3000-5000 in BLOATED UAW retiree benefits and pensions. Thats one of the MAIN reasons that GM (and Ford/Chrysler) is uncompetitive. GM/Ford/Chrysler's crappy products need big rebates before most people will consider them. If their products weren't crap they wouldn't need to sprinkle bloated $3000-5000 rebates on their turds, and this would all be a wash. Decent product = no rebates = more profit = honoring your contracts = no begging taxpayers. |
-
-
JesseLivermore
- Tired Member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 6:11p
dealhunter999 said:See GM 2007 Annual Report, Page 62
78/hour, includes all costs associated with hiring employees: salary, employer part of social security, employer contributions to pension plan, 401(k), health care and other benefits, holiday and vacation pay, etc. According to the referred report, these costs will go down to $26/hr when the 2007 National Agreement (the contract agreed with the unions last year) is fully implemented. The same report mentions $15/hr for new employees, and $28/hr for existing employees as "base wages". Thank you for this factual post. The fact is that new hires will make roughly the same or less than those who work for non-union plants for Honda, Toyota and Nissan in the southern factories. $15 per hour is not exactly a lot. It's the retirees and older workers that are killing the big 3 on the cost side. The fact that these new wages are $15 per hour clearly demonstrates a move in the right direction. I know many people think all cars made by the Big 3 are crap, but it's simply not the case. Without getting into that, however, the question boils down to whether Americans believe making tangible products is an American industry worthy of trying to save. It is my humble opinion that a country that makes nothing of tangible qualities, such as cars, aircraft, etc. quickly loses its economic and military power, and that it's nothing short of a national security issue to ensure a nation has strong manufacturing base. The Big 3 must do better in terms of breaking union labor pacts, improving the quality of their vehicles to the point where they at least meet the levels that the Japanese attain, and they need to understand that the 30 year leash they were granted should have been enough time to get their act together, and this is the real deal now - do or die. But it's a critical industry. And to abandon them this one time after bailing out those who did far worse (AIG, FRE, etc.) would be a mortal sin - especially given that it can be done at a fraction of the cost. |
-
-
FriendlyPeon
- Tired Member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 6:13p
I thought it was structured as a loan, similar to the one Chrysler previously received years back and paid back with interest to the government? |
-
-
Battleshipnote
- Senior Member - 3K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 7:53p
Pun said:Average GM worker Salary with benefit: $150k a year @ $73/hr
Average Dentist Salary $113k a year
what's wrong with this picture? Dentist didnt recognize he could make more on the free market as an auto worker? |
-
-
nycll
- Geeky member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 8:03p
both the auto worker and the dentist should become plumbers  |
-
-
shahhere
- Senior Member - 5K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 8:22p
-
-
StevenColorado
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 8:27p
geo123 said:
The bankruptcy code does also allow you to terminate and re-negotiate union contracts, which is one of the big things that makes life difficult for GM/Ford, but in practice it's not so easy. Unions would threaten to organize massive strikes that could cripple these companies and both political and public pressure on these companies is to continue employing all the workers, paying pensions and healthcare benefits to the retirees, etc... The CEOs are paid enough money that they should have some balls. Striking at a company filing BK would kill the golden goose instantly. If the union threatens a strike, just laugh in their face. |
-
-
Metric
- Tired Member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 8:41p
ganda said:fsx100 said:Each GM car includes $3000-5000 in BLOATED UAW retiree benefits and pensions. Thats one of the MAIN reasons that GM (and Ford/Chrysler) is uncompetitive.
GM/Ford/Chrysler's crappy products need big rebates before most people will consider them. If their products weren't crap they wouldn't need to sprinkle bloated $3000-5000 rebates on their turds, and this would all be a wash.
Decent product = no rebates = more profit = honoring your contracts = no begging taxpayers. Our over valued dollar also helps imports. I dont get this bailout, 25b seems like a piss in the ocean when you burn billions each mth. |
-
-
Dow1000
- Member
posted: Nov. 19, 2008 @ 9:01p
Where were these guys when GM and the rest were making vulgar SUV's by the millions and the mobster UAW was extracting ransom wages? |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|