|
-
-
wilesmt
- Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 1:53p
The only "Crap hit the fan" plan that I believe is workable is to own land and enough basic equipment to exploit that land to support yourself. Land in this sense is not a townhome in a urban environment; its rural farm acreage. Throw in a little gold/silver/guns and you would be able to survive almost anything other than a complete destruction of the earth. In short: 1) Physical assets 2) Skills to exploit assets 3) Means to defend assets You can stock pile food, water, and such, but you can only save so much. At some point you have to be able to create more of it. |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 2:06p
nyarrow said:When we essentially double our Federal debt in the matter of 3 months, and show no signs of slowing (another $800 Billion was announced today) we are likely to join the ranks of other hyper-inflationary economies like Zimbabwe very shortly...Talk about not understanding how big numbers are...read this story for a look into Zimbabwe's economic situation: http://edition.cnn.com/2008/BUSINESS/08/19/zimbabwe.inflation/index.html Several months ago, a loaf of bread in Zimbabwe cost 1.6 trillion dollars. THAT'S hyperinflation. Annual inflation in the range of 10-15% (which is a possibility in the US) is considered high inflation, a very different concept from hyperinflation. Regarding worries about deflation, the recent PPI drop was due to a fall in energy prices from historic highs. Those massive drops in energy prices will not happen again for a long time. As always, the best way to weather this situation long-term is to live within your means, maintain emergency cash reserves, and invest in a diversified portfolio. If you are constantly reallocating your portfolio to make directional bets, you will likely end up with a lower overall return at the end of the day. On the other hand, if the Fed decides to start printing a quadrillion dollars every week, then it's time to hoard food and other supplies. Of course, you'd better make sure you're very well defended, because independent militias and rogue military units will be roaming the street confiscating your supplies. |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 2:26p
Xnarg said:manuvns said:buy land in high population density areas . Real estate will appreciate due to shortage of landLike maybe downtown Detroit or south central LA?Those areas do not have a shortage of land - housing demand has dropped due to weak local job markets, leading to an excess supply of land, resulting in depressed prices. And since those local job markets will be weak forever, there is absolutely no chance demand for housing will ever go back up in those areas. |
-
-
kamalktk
- Ancient Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 2:46p
tazzy531 said:Hyper inflation? I'm getting ready for Ludicrous Inflation! You need a Helmet for that! |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 2:56p
kamalktk said:tazzy531 said:Hyper inflation? I'm getting ready for Ludicrous Inflation! You need a Helmet for that!The economy has gone to plaid! |
-
-
ChronoGN
- Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 3:15p
If you have a big warehouse or a barn, I would go and buy a bunch of old catalytic converters. |
-
-
nyarrow
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 4:03p
jayK said:Several months ago, a loaf of bread in Zimbabwe cost 1.6 trillion dollars. THAT'S hyperinflation. Annual inflation in the range of 10-15% (which is a possibility in the US) is considered high inflation, a very different concept from hyperinflation.
Zimbabwe is indeed the extreme, but we could see something more the line of the Russian currency crisis in '98 - the Rouble went from 6r to 25r to the dollar in about a month. That was due to issues relating to currency pegs, but we have other problems that could take us that direction...
Explained: I believe that the Fed intends to inject enough money into the economy to prevent a deflationary recession. There are no signs that the Fed intends to stop injecting money until we are out of this recession (Congress seems to want to help as well - they are always good at spending money).
The problem is what happens once the recovery begins - the Fed will not be able to quickly withdraw those funds from the economy without risking the recovery. This will result in inflation (I would suggest in the 10-20% range).
Right now people are buying treasuries like crazy, primarily because they are looking for safety (a "flight to quality"). Given that 70% of our federal debt (and most of the $$ supporting the Fed at this point is federal debt) is held in foreign hands (much of it owned by government or quasi-government agencies), what happens when we get to 10-20% inflation? Those foreign owners will realize that there is not safety in treasuries, and they will pull their money as quick as they can.
As soon as ratings agencies get a whiff of this risk happening soon, they will cut the rating on treasuries, increasing the yields we must pay. If we don't increase yields fast enough or happen to get to the point where there are not enough buyers, we will be in deep trouble. Unfortunately the Fed will not be able to yank interest rates high enough on the bonds without putting us back into a Recession, so they will sit (or make small changes).
Realize also that before this crisis, over 1/3 of every tax dollar went to pay interest on the national debt. Given that current bailout efforts have increased debt levels significantly, the need for more money to keep the government running will be huge. They will raise taxes and cut programs, but it will not be acceptable to the public to go too far with those approaches.
The only easy option remaining will be for the government to start "printing money" more directly to pay off the debt (and I think the geniuses in Washington will take the easy route vs a government default or failure).
jayK said: As always, the best way to weather this situation long-term is to live within your means, maintain emergency cash reserves, and invest in a diversified portfolio. If you are constantly reallocating your portfolio to make directional bets, you will likely end up with a lower overall return at the end of the day.
On the other hand, if the Fed decides to start printing a quadrillion dollars every week, then it's time to hoard food and other supplies. Of course, you'd better make sure you're very well defended, because independent militias and rogue military units will be roaming the street confiscating your supplies. It is defiantly important to live within your means, but I have been unable to imagine a "diversified portfolio" that will work well if inflation gets above "high inflation" and into the "hyperinflation" realm. Part of the reason hyperinflation is so difficult is that it is nearly impossible for either businesses or individuals to plan ahead and make good long-term investments. This would be particularly difficult for the US, as we have focused so highly on efficiency ("just-in-time inventory", etc) that we don't have much slack left in our economy... Personally, I believe that now is the time to plan for what you and your family will need in a hyper-inflationary time. It may not be time to invest tens-of-thousands of dollars to cover this, but there are a number of things we can do right now that won't hurt too bad if things somehow manage to improve. Some examples: - Do you have security concerns around your home that you wanted to resolve anyway? Now may be the time to invest in raising that wall a bit or installing a better security system. - If you don't want to eat canned food, I'm sure the food pantrys will be happy to take a donation of a few hundred dollars worth in 12 months. - Having a gun around the house (stored safely) is not too expensive, and gives you some security (I'm not advocating a large arsenal) - Getting plans together on where you would go or how you would live takes some time, but doesn't cost much and would be invaluable if necessary. There are many more examples, but a good starting place is to go over lists like this, and see what makes sense to do now (what may have value even if things don't go so bad, and what would be particularly worthwhile for you or for trade if they do): http://www.thepowerhour.com/news/items_disappearfirst.htm |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 4:22p
nyarrow said:The problem is what happens once the recovery begins - the Fed will not be able to quickly withdraw those funds from the economy without risking the recovery. This will result in inflation (I would suggest in the 10-20% range). ... It is defiantly important to live within your means, but I have been unable to imagine a "diversified portfolio" that will work well if inflation gets above "high inflation" and into the "hyperinflation" realm. Part of the reason hyperinflation is so difficult is that it is nearly impossible for either businesses or individuals to plan ahead and make good long-term investments.Again, 10-20% annual inflation is not even close to crossing into the hyperinflation realm...typically hyperinflation involves at least 100%+ annual inflation. There is so much USD-based interdependency built into today's global economy, it would be impossible for the USD to hyperinflate without some kind of catastrophic global disaster. And if such a disaster occurs, martial law will probably be declared and supplies will be pooled (including yours, unless you can fight off the US military). It's funny to hear people suggest buying a gun to protect their stash of food - once your neighbors get hungry, you will be dealing with a (possibly armed) mob, and that's assuming no govt intervention. As long as the govt can cut spending and increase revenue enough to tide us over until GDP starts growing again, we should be fine in the short-term, since our debt-to-GDP ratio is not that bad. There will likely be some painful spending cuts and possibly tax hikes, but nothing that would cause riots. The biggest worry in my book is stagflation, where GDP growth flattens. |
-
-
JesseLivermore
- Tired Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 4:24p
Look at what happened when gasoline went up with oil in the stratosphere - the economy weakened, people cut back on everything, and people even stopped driving as much (by 12 billion miles in the U.S.). We have such a supply of goods, and such a relatively high living standard compared to past generations that hyperinflation will simply crush the economy as we quit spending any money on all but the most basic necessities - and even those things may suffer deflation, rather than inflation, as we find ways to maximize efficiencies on those (parents will move in with their kids, young adults will move back with their parents). You can't get water from rock. |
-
-
nyarrow
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 4:35p
jayK said:Again, 10-20% annual inflation is not even close to crossing into the hyperinflation realm...typically hyperinflation involves at least 100%+ annual inflation. There is so much USD-based interdependency built into today's global economy, it would be impossible for the USD to hyperinflate without some kind of catastrophic global disaster. Agreed - 10-20% is not hyperinflationary itself. However, a 10-20% rate of inflation may be enough for all of the investors who bought in looking for the "safe" investment to leave when better options become available or safety is no longer the first concern. This would cause extreme pressure (and likely downgrades) on treasuries. For the impacts of that, look through my previous message.
The USD hyper-inflating would be a global issue. However, the rest of the world could recover much faster by moving away to some new "global" currency (or more than one). The dollar is fundamental to our economy (and the debt is ours), but it is less fundamental to the rest of the world. How long would it take to hurt if China, Europe, or the Middle East started to require that we pay them in other currencies?
jayK said: And if such a disaster occurs, martial law will probably be declared and supplies will be pooled (including yours, unless you can fight off the US military).
It's funny to hear people suggest buying a gun to protect their stash of food - once your neighbors get hungry, you will be dealing with a (possibly armed) mob, and that's assuming no govt intervention.
There are a number of scenarios not quite so extreme where a gun may come in useful. Economic uncertainty breeds crime, and not all of it comes from armed mobs or the government (defending your stash against either of those is a fool's suicide). A gun is meant to provide defense against the small time criminal / burglar, and would give you more leverage to join together with a defensive group (read: your neighbors) if necessary. Edit: fix grammar |
-
-
LordEcount
- Greedy Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 4:52p
ardentazn said:Would moving money out of the country be a good idea??? such as converting to RMB, HKD, etc... 2x leveraged ETFs started by ProShares today, in both directions, for EUR/USD and JPY/USD. Good hunting: News Release |
-
-
ptiemann
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 4:52p
jayK said:Again, 10-20% annual inflation is not even close to crossing into the hyperinflation realm...typically hyperinflation involves at least 100%+ annual inflation. hyperinflation is not measured annually. It's more like on a monthly or even shorter basis. Prices doubling every 16 hours? Now that's hyperinflation. Yes, that has happened. |
-
-
mttatkns
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 4:55p
JesseLivermore said:Look at what happened when gasoline went up with oil in the stratosphere - the economy weakened, people cut back on everything, and people even stopped driving as much (by 12 billion miles in the U.S.).
We have such a supply of goods, and such a relatively high living standard compared to past generations that hyperinflation will simply crush the economy as we quit spending any money on all but the most basic necessities - and even those things may suffer deflation, rather than inflation, as we find ways to maximize efficiencies on those (parents will move in with their kids, young adults will move back with their parents).
You can't get water from rock. Actually with hyperinflation, we would not quit spending but spend money as soon as we receive it since its value would substantially decrease over time. Though I will reiterate that hyperinflation is not likely to happen and most of those saying it will do not seem to understand what actually IS hyperinflation. Second, your post makes no sense as you seem to be saying that hyperinflation will lead to deflation? Finally, as far as getting water from rock, have you heard of Moses? See Numbers 20:11. It may require an act of God, but after all our money does say "In God We Trust" so that means that our current leaders may be expecting divine intervention. |
-
-
Skinz
- Ancient Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 5:10p
I think the hyperinflation we will experience in the next few years will be very short before changing over into chaos and a long period of deflation. If we continue to experience high rates of inflation the lower classes will not be able to survive. They will have to resort to ancient methods of survival where the stronger man wins (Fighting for land, stealing, killing). Things are so overvalued in this country, kids these days are going to college to become "Professionals" to earn large salaries and live the American dream. College admittance rates and curriculums have become a joke. I expected to be surrounded by the brilliant minds of my generation; instead I am surrounded by kids who are in 5-10k credit card debt and our majoring in Finance or Accounting. In a 300 level finance course today someone was shocked to learn that our currency isn't pinned to gold. I'm sure more kids would want to be plumbers, electricians, carpenters, work in manufacturing, any respectable labor position but with the cost of living these days it doesn't seem feasible that you can survive making 50k a year. For some reason deflation is always seen as a bad thing but after the high inflation period we just went through I am all for prices falling to more realistic levels. |
-
-
JesseLivermore
- Tired Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 5:14p
mttatkns said:JesseLivermore said:Look at what happened when gasoline went up with oil in the stratosphere - the economy weakened, people cut back on everything, and people even stopped driving as much (by 12 billion miles in the U.S.).
We have such a supply of goods, and such a relatively high living standard compared to past generations that hyperinflation will simply crush the economy as we quit spending any money on all but the most basic necessities - and even those things may suffer deflation, rather than inflation, as we find ways to maximize efficiencies on those (parents will move in with their kids, young adults will move back with their parents).
You can't get water from rock. Actually with hyperinflation, we would not quit spending but spend money as soon as we receive it since its value would substantially decrease over time. Though I will reiterate that hyperinflation is not likely to happen and most of those saying it will do not seem to understand what actually IS hyperinflation.
Second, your post makes no sense as you seem to be saying that hyperinflation will lead to deflation?
Finally, as far as getting water from rock, have you heard of Moses? See Numbers 20:11. It may require an act of God, but after all our money does say "In God We Trust" so that means that our current leaders may be expecting divine intervention. Actually, everything I said is consistent with the economic law that 'the best cure for high prices is high prices,' and that any hyper-inflationary period would burn itself out and be short lived.
...by 'short lived,' I mean time measure in roughly a year or less...and by 'hyper-inflationary,' I'm speaking of 8% but likely closer to 12%+ inflation per annum (some undeveloped or developed parts of the world would consider that normal, but is 'hyper' by western standards, where we've targeted less than 2% as normalized). |
-
-
HumDoHamaraDo
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 5:18p
The next 2 to 4 years the following should happen: 1. There won't be anarchy....guns & MREs are not a smart idea 2. Lots of people will become very poor and lots of people will become very wealthy.... depends if you are in the correct side of the trade 3. Hyperinflation (100% plus) will not happen, but inflation will easily get into double digits 4. It will suck |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 5:41p
nyarrow said:Agreed - 10-20% is not hyperinflationary itself. However, a 10-20% rate of inflation may be enough for all of the investors who bought in looking for the "safe" investment to leave when better options become available or safety is no longer the first concern.So where would these investors move their money to? Why would safety no longer be a concern? If safety remains a concern, what investments would be considered safer in this environment?
The USD hyper-inflating would be a global issue. However, the rest of the world could recover much faster by moving away to some new "global" currency (or more than one).I disagree. Pegging to a different currency would not resolve the fundamental root causes of this economic crisis.
The dollar is fundamental to our economy (and the debt is ours), but it is less fundamental to the rest of the world.In the current state of the global economy, when looking on a macro level, the USD is just as fundamental to China and other creditor nations as it is to the US. It's basically a symbiotic relationship. |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 5:43p
ptiemann said:hyperinflation is not measured annually. It's more like on a monthly or even shorter basis.There are several formal definitions of hyperinflation, one of which is inflation exceeding 50% per month.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation
Prices doubling every 16 hours? Now that's hyperinflation.
Yes, that has happened.Has it happened in any developed country since globalization took hold? |
-
-
Slugabed
- Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 6:00p
nyarrow said:As soon as ratings agencies get a whiff of this risk happening soon, they will cut the rating on treasuries, increasing the yields we must pay. Chances of this happening...Zip. The gov't carries a big stick on the rating agencies: since they were complicit in this credit implosion, the second one of the big three thinks about stripping the US of its AAA, you'll see nationalization in the guise of "government credit regulation to insure that derivatives and other leveraged products shall never again put the US financial system at such grave risk". The end. |
-
-
nyarrow
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 6:25p
HumDoHamaraDo said:The next 2 to 4 years the following should happen: 1. There won't be anarchy....guns & MREs are not a smart idea ... 3. Hyperinflation (100% plus) will not happen, but inflation will easily get into double digits
I don't contend that Hyperinflation is extremely likely, but doesn't it make sense to defend yourself against a 10-30% risk if it doesn't involve a lot of up-front cost (or if it would still benefit you if hyperinflation doesn't hit)? It doesn't take anarchy for crimes, etc to increase. A large increase in the size of the poor population would do that, and I see that happening already... |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|