|
-
-
nyarrow
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 6:27p
Slugabed said:nyarrow said:As soon as ratings agencies get a whiff of this risk happening soon, they will cut the rating on treasuries, increasing the yields we must pay. Chances of this happening...Zip.
The gov't carries a big stick on the rating agencies: since they were complicit in this credit implosion, the second one of the big three thinks about stripping the US of its AAA, you'll see nationalization in the guise of "government credit regulation to insure that derivatives and other leveraged products shall never again put the US financial system at such grave risk". The end. Ratings agencies are international, and have to maintain (at least the semblance of) credibility. They could wait to lower the ratings until it is painfully obvious to everyone else around, but at some point they would have to... |
-
-
fat419
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 6:35p
-
-
spumilia
- New Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 7:37p
Shandril said:echo4747 said:What about agricultural commodities? (wheat,corn,sugar,cotton etc.) Wouldn't these be a good in investment during periods of high inflation?
I was kinda thinking along the same line in terms of Staples. People will still need to food and that will track inflation pretty well. Even though there's been deflation lately, you don't see prices at the grocery store going down much.
Second is oil. Target by OPEC even outside of inflation and sinking dollar value is for about $100/barrel. At around $50/barrel now, I'd think that upside potential is pretty good compared to how much down further it can go. They'll have a meeting on Dec 17th and I'd be very surprised to not see further cuts in output to boost prices.
Someone mentioned I-bonds. I don't consider this viable due to restriction on amount you can buy. They have some deflation protection and obviously some inflation hedge but still if all you can buy is $10k/yr per person, it's not gonna do it for most people wanting serious asset protection.
Real estate, I'd say it's probably still too early. I don't know too many markets but in ours there are still plenty of houses available, many new ones sitting on the market for months so prices have nowhere to go but down until inventory decreases further. And since inflation is probably gonna be delayed by 6-18 months, no sense in buying right now. Now in a year or so, I think it'll likely be a very good option even if lenders are gonna require 20% down pretty consistently. Rates shouldn't be too high yet and prices would be close to bottom. You are confusing inflation-linked savings bonds (limit) with TIPS (Treasury Inflation Linked Securities)... you can buy as many TIPS as you have cash/ |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 7:49p
nyarrow said:I don't contend that Hyperinflation is extremely likely, but doesn't it make sense to defend yourself against a 10-30% risk if it doesn't involve a lot of up-front cost (or if it would still benefit you if hyperinflation doesn't hit)?I would peg the risk of hyperinflation at closer to .0001%. The preparation for hyperinflation would be pretty much the same as preparing for a natural disaster or an extended power outage, no need to go out of your way stockpiling anything additional. |
-
-
anakinskywalker
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 9:20p
tolamapS said:anakinskywalker said:this topic has been brought up two months ago in this post I made; very few seemed concerned about hyperinflation then.
Anakin
Well, there are two questions: the when and the how.
I think we won't see hyperinflation any time soon. As long as housing prices are going down, the bigger threat is that of deflation.
However, eventually everybody and their mother who went all-in into US treas, will decide to dump the treasuries, and inflation will begin. At that time, you dump dollars for hard assets like R/E, gold, oil, cars, etc. Yes, that's what I said in the USD hyperinflation preparation thread I started two months ago: that hyperinflation would become a concern in a couple of years or so. As more and more people wake up to the hyperinflation spectacle we're going to see more and more threads on this. Are we going to allow all these reposts to clog up FWF and fragment the discussions? Moderators, wake up! Anakin |
-
-
anakinskywalker
- Senior Member - 1K
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 9:23p
anakinskywalker said:this topic has been brought up two months ago in this post I made; very few seemed concerned about hyperinflation then.
Anakin who is jcole21? What does he/she know about economics, and why has he/she redded my post pointing out that this thread is a repost of a hyperinflation preparation thread already in existence for almost two months? Anakin |
-
-
fixfox69
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 9:30p
anakinskywalker said:anakinskywalker said:this topic has been brought up two months ago in this post I made; very few seemed concerned about hyperinflation then.
Anakin
who is jcole21? What does he/she know about economics, and why has he/she redded my post pointing out that this thread is a repost of a hyperinflation preparation thread already in existence for almost two months?
Anakin Discover the truth to these, as well as other pivotal q's, by subscribing to jcole21's newZletter. |
-
-
magika
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 9:43p
Occasionally I read conspiracy and urban survival sites for giggles. It is becoming harder to tell the difference between them and FWF, and that is sad. In the event of REAL hyperinflation (Zimbabwe style), you have little to worry about, because we would in short order all be dead from a nuclear war or be taken over by another country and your assets will be seized. Alternatively, society would devolve so much so that the only people with wealth are those with livestock and farmland - items that have actual utility that people can barter with. Preparing for things that most certainly will never happen in our lifetime takes a lot of time because there is a infinite number of those scenarios. While your at it, you might as well rebuild that Y2K nuclear bunker and stock up on gas masks and guns. |
-
-
Dearth
- Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 10:00p
-
-
BradMajors
- Ancient Member
posted: Nov. 25, 2008 @ 10:38p
welookgoodcom said:It's starting
NEW YORK, Nov 24 (Reuters) - The spread or risk premium on 10-year U.S. Treasury credit default swaps hit record wide levels on Monday, prompted by worries about how the cost of rescuing banks and carmakers would affect U.S. creditworthiness, CMA DataVision said.
As the global financial crisis worsened in recent weeks, traders increased their bets on the bigger toll of the U.S. government's array of programs to help these ailing industries.
Ten-year U.S. Treasury CDS edged out to 49.8 basis points from 49.3 basis points at Friday's close, according to the credit data company.
Five-year Treasury CDS grew to 43.5 basis points versus 43.0 basis points late Friday, it said.
The risk premiums have nearly doubled from levels seen two months ago after the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
Prior to the financial crisis, default risk premiums on U.S. government debt had been running in the low-to-mid single digits. A country (or a company) with those spreads should not have a AAA rating. The UK's spreads are almost double those of the US. Corporate bonds with similar default ratings get a credit rating of A. |
-
-
pj737
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 4:33a
wilesmt said: Land in this sense is not a townhome in a urban environment; its rural farm acreage.
That's why I stay away from condos. Buy duplexes or single family homes in urban environments with accessible rooftops. They provide space for solar panels, greenroofs (where you can harvest edible plants) and a water catchment system. |
-
-
pj737
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 5:01a
Skinz said: If we continue to experience high rates of inflation the lower classes will not be able to survive.
When inflation rears its ugly head, incomes increase along with everything else.
|
-
-
WalStMonky
- Happy Member
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 5:15a
Bankgeek said:There's no way to predict the future. You should not put your money into any long term positions right now because there's too much uncertainty. I recall in 1999 everyone was 'certain' that the stock market would keep going up. I recall in 2004 everyone was 'certain' RE & Stocks would keep going up. In a number of years I will recall how everyone was 'certain' in 2008 that everything was too much of a mess to take the risk of either. In the meantime, I'm going full throttle into the animal poop market. I mean really, when you think about it, manure is not that bad a word. |
-
-
nyarrow
- Senior Member
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 7:25a
pj737 said:Skinz said: If we continue to experience high rates of inflation the lower classes will not be able to survive.
When inflation rears its ugly head, incomes increase along with everything else. Eventually, but how far behind do they lag, and are they guaranteed to keep up to the rate of inflation? |
-
-
kamalktk
- Ancient Member
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 7:36a
jayK said:kamalktk said:tazzy531 said:Hyper inflation? I'm getting ready for Ludicrous Inflation! You need a Helmet for that!The economy has gone to plaid! Not to worry, Ben Bernanke and crew are combing the desert, looking for ways to save us. |
-
-
larrymoencurly
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 8:35a
smackfu said:The problem with buying gold or oil ETFs to hedge against inflation is that you could easily lose a lot of money if the inflation doesn't materialize. Not a very smart hedge.Also didn't general commodity inflation stop 1-2 year ago, until maybe very recently? graph. Long-term performance of gold, stocks, bonds, and inflation): graph (from the cover of Jeremy Siegel's book, Stocks For the Long Run). Long-term oil prices, adjusted for inflation: graph Long-term house prices, adjusted for inflation: graph The graph about house prices was originally from the NY Times, which has a lot of interesting graphs, if you can find them, and not just about financial issues. |
-
-
larrymoencurly
- Senior Member - 10K
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 9:02a
blok said:buy real estateWhat planet? |
-
-
Skinz
- Ancient Member
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 9:42a
nyarrow said:pj737 said:Skinz said: If we continue to experience high rates of inflation the lower classes will not be able to survive.
When inflation rears its ugly head, incomes increase along with everything else.
Eventually, but how far behind do they lag, and are they guaranteed to keep up to the rate of inflation? I don't agree with that statement. Between the years of 1979-1981 the inflation rate and interest rates were at a peak, unemployment was also at its peak during those years. Prices rise before wages do usually. When gas prices skyrocketed it took months for public transportation to change their pricing structure to ensure they stay profitable. I don't know how many companies could afford to give raises when their costs are simaltaneously rising and they are already strapped for cash. |
-
-
jayK
- Senior Member - JayK
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 10:28a
Skinz said:I don't know how many companies could afford to give raises when their costs are simaltaneously rising and they are already strapped for cash.Inflation means that a company's costs are rising, but its prices are also rising, so there isn't as much of an impact on profitability as you might think outside of markets with high price elasticity of demand. |
-
-
TedMetro
- Member
posted: Nov. 26, 2008 @ 10:51a
It's dubious that you'll see hyperinflation in the U.S. anytime soon. The greater concern is deflation as noted by Business Week. Business Week Article |
Close
|
|
 |
 |
Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!
|
|
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
|
|