A November Treasury Department report states that the interest payment on the federal debt for Fiscal Year 2009 will be about $450 billion, making it the fourth largest expense in the federal budget behind Medicare-Medicaid, Social Security and defense spending.
The federal fiscal year runs from Oct. 1 through Sept. 30. The Treasury Department report presents the budget estimates for the full fiscal year 2009, which the interest payment and federal department budget projections are based upon.
If President-elect Barack Obama and the Democratic congressional leadership enact a proposed $1 trillion stimulus plan in early 2009, it could add about $50 billion to those annual interest payments, budget experts told CNSNews.com on Monday.
According to the Treasury Department report, released on Dec. 10, the federal government expects to pay $449,070,000.00 in interest on Treasury debt securities for FY 2009.
The Health and Human Services budget, which includes Medicare and Medicaid, will cost $739,241,000.00 for the fiscal year; Social Security Administration, $699,976,000.00; and the Defense Department-Military budget, $656,722,000.00. (Estimates by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget are nearly identical.)
Chris Edwards, director of tax policy studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, told CNSNews.com on Monday that the money paid by the Treasury for interest is different than other expenditures, because it does not directly benefit taxpayers.
“It represents money that can’t be used for tax reduction or spending programs,” said Edwards.
If the Obama administration is able to enact a $1 trillion stimulus package, taxpayers can expect to see $50 billion added to the annual payment, because the federal government usually borrows at an interest rate of about 5 percent, said Edwards and Brian Riedel, the latter who is a senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday that Obama's team is considering a stimulus package for the faltering U.S. economy that could reach $1 trillion over two years.
“The fact that we are borrowing a trillion dollars means that someone has to pay that back,” said Edwards. “The economic fact is that while Americans are consuming a trillion more in stuff this year, people in later years will have to pay for it.”
Have you ever wondered who the Federal Reserve owners are?
The first thing to understand is that even though the Fed's name makes it sound like a government organization, it's not.
Take a peek in your phone book. Instead of being listed in the government pages, the Federal Reserve is listed right next to another private corporation in the business section called Federal Express.
That's right, the Fed is actually a private corporation run in secret by a few high level international bankers.
FEDERAL RESERVE OWNERS ARE THE BANKSTERS Can we nail down who is in this little group of powerful Federal Reserve owners?
Here's a look into who was involved in setting up the Federal Reserve in 1913.
Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin (Rothschild and world economy) Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York Lehman Brothers Bank of New York Goldman Sachs Bank of New York Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family Tree)
soxfan1
Eeyore
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 10:50a
The fed was set up to loan money short term to banks. I'm not sure why you're surprised that it in fact is owned by banks.
catanpirate
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 11:01a
Uncle Sam better start listening to the Dave Ramsey Show
Have you ever wondered who the Federal Reserve owners are?
The first thing to understand is that even though the Fed's name makes it sound like a government organization, it's not.
Take a peek in your phone book. Instead of being listed in the government pages, the Federal Reserve is listed right next to another private corporation in the business section called Federal Express.
That's right, the Fed is actually a private corporation run in secret by a few high level international bankers.
FEDERAL RESERVE OWNERS ARE THE BANKSTERS Can we nail down who is in this little group of powerful Federal Reserve owners?
Here's a look into who was involved in setting up the Federal Reserve in 1913.
Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin (Rothschild and world economy) Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York Lehman Brothers Bank of New York Goldman Sachs Bank of New York Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family Tree)
Now lets look at Wikipedia and see what we can find on the fed. usually Wikipedia is a better source of information than the tin-foil hat sites frequented by the tin-foil hat loving users who post this stuff...
The Federal Reserve System (also the Federal Reserve; informally The Fed) is the central banking system of the United States. Created in 1913 by the enactment of the Federal Reserve Act, it is a quasi-public (government entity with private components) banking system that comprises (1) the presidentially appointed Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C.; (2) the Federal Open Market Committee; (3) twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks located in major cities throughout the nation acting as fiscal agents for the U.S. Treasury, each with its own nine-member board of directors; (4) numerous private U.S. member banks, which subscribe to required amounts of non-transferable stock in their regional Federal Reserve Banks; and (5) various advisory councils. As of February 2006, Ben Bernanke serves as the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
There are 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks (not to be confused with the "member banks") with 25 branches, which serve as the operating arms of the system. Each Federal Reserve Bank is subject to oversight by a Board of Governors. Each Federal Reserve Bank has a board of directors, whose members work closely with their Reserve Bank president to provide grassroots economic information and input on management and monetary policy decisions. These boards are drawn from the general public and the banking community and oversee the activities of the organization. They also appoint the presidents of the Reserve Banks, subject to the approval of the Board of Governors. Reserve Bank boards consist of nine members: six serving as representatives of nonbanking enterprises and the public (nonbankers) and three as representatives of banking. Each Federal Reserve branch office has its own board of directors, composed of three to seven members, that provides vital information concerning the regional economy.
here is a pdf on understanding the fed --- kind of basic --- don't click unless you want to load 1.91 mb federal_reserve_InPlainEnglish_pdf
it is really annoying when people show up in forums and start spreading propaganda that I can't understand or digest ---- nut-cases need to find a different forum
...
broke25engineer
Broke Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 1:05p
When we couldn't repay our debt, we can nuke our creditor if they dare to collect the debt .
.....
if they nuke us back too, then we help solve the world's over population problem
Here's a look into who was involved in setting up the Federal Reserve in 1913.
Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin (Rothschild and world economy) Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York Lehman Brothers Bank of New York Goldman Sachs Bank of New York Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family Tree)
OMG... Teh JOOS.
smackfu
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 1:16p
OTOH, now people are lending us money at 0%, so that cuts the interest payments a bit.
Have you ever wondered who the Federal Reserve owners are?
The first thing to understand is that even though the Fed's name makes it sound like a government organization, it's not.
Take a peek in your phone book. Instead of being listed in the government pages, the Federal Reserve is listed right next to another private corporation in the business section called Federal Express.
That's right, the Fed is actually a private corporation run in secret by a few high level international bankers.
FEDERAL RESERVE OWNERS ARE THE BANKSTERS Can we nail down who is in this little group of powerful Federal Reserve owners?
Here's a look into who was involved in setting up the Federal Reserve in 1913.
Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin (Rothschild and world economy) Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York Lehman Brothers Bank of New York Goldman Sachs Bank of New York Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family Tree)
I don't understand that when someone posts something like this, people jump on them and call them stupid? The people who believe that the fed isnt' corrupt are the real sheeple. And the fact that the same banks who setup the fed back in 1913, are now some of the banks who recieved billions in federal aid, being controlled by an ex-ceo of goldman sachs... Ok people, keep your blinders on.
I can't believe how many people come out of the woodwork to defend the fed. Seriously, what is it you like more manipulated soaring bubbles or the devastating crashing? Or is it the ubiquitous devaluation of your savings and wages? Maybe it's the never ending cycles of debt that have ensnared most people and governments on all levels?
It's because people don't want to be wrong. When you prove someone wrong, they get angry and don't want to hear you. Besides, who wants to look something up or research stuff? It's much easier to just sit in front of the TV.
Don't you think this is important? You go to public school for a minimum of 13 years (in USA). They don't teach you about compound interest, money creation, how to buy a house, fiat currency, fractional reserve lending ... you know, the ***KING IMPORTANT STUFF.
The Federal Reserve is a private bank. They caused the stock market crash, got the Federal Reserve act passed in 1913 under the guise that they would prevent crashes (bull). Now buckle your seat belt for a heck of a ride we (American's) are in for.
I think that the $450 billion in interest is tax-deductable
duncan36
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 2:29p
Who needs roads and schools I like my tax money going to bankers. For all the people who hate tax money going to social services do you think tax money going to international banking is a better use of your money than housing the homeless or giving healthcare to children?
broke25engineer said: When we couldn't repay our debt, we can nuke our creditor if they dare to collect the debt .
.....
if they nuke us back too, then we help solve the world's over population problem
Except 75% of our debt is held by us.
Nationwide
Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 4:02p
Fact is, the Federal Reserve IS private, charges the US billion$ to borrow it's own money, & creates $ out of thin air. These are facts I only recently learned and important info the fatwallet community needs to know. Here's the Consumer Price Index (CPI) 1800 to present. Ask yourself, why was there no virtually no inflation from 1800 from to 1913 (& tremendous prosperity I might add)? After creation of the FED in 1913 and then moving off the silver/gold standard we've had steady inflation. A 2008 dollar buys about 9 cents worth of an 1800 dollar, amounting to a hidden tax thru inflation. Educate yourself, here's a few links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KV9yDLhKbjg http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr091002b.htm http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin2.htm http://endthefed.us/ Thankfully someone is buying T-Bills, otherwise the whole house of paper dollars might collapse.
A November Treasury Department report states that the interest payment on the federal debt for Fiscal Year 2009 will be about $450 billion, making it the fourth largest expense in the federal budget behind Medicare-Medicaid, Social Security and defense spending.The way people focus on absolute numbers like this without considering our ability to service the debt reminds me of the monkeys at the zoo staring at something shiny. Yes, $450 billion has a lot of zeros, but that number alone is meaningless. As a % of federal tax revenue, interest payments are much lower than they were just 10 years ago (10% now vs ~15% in 1998). That is the number that matters. Our ability to service our debt is significatly better now than it has been for the better part of the last 50 years.
JTFH said: I can't believe how many people come out of the woodwork to defend the fed. Seriously, what is it you like more manipulated soaring bubbles or the devastating crashing? Or is it the ubiquitous devaluation of your savings and wages?Nonsense. Have you looked at volatility or studied the lack of economic progress made by this country (and the world, for that matter) before the Federal Reserve came to be? The economy of the 1800s was much closer to the economy of 2000 BC than the economy of today (source), and it was marked by extreme swings between bust and boom. You whine about the "devaluation" of the dollar, yet ignore that our wages and income have grown faster than inflation.
I'll take the relative stability and predictable inflation that the Fed has brought any day, thankyouverymuch.
Nationwide said: Fact is, the Federal Reserve IS private, charges the US billion$ to borrow it's own money, & creates $ out of thin air. These are facts I only recently learned and important info the fatwallet community needs to know. Here's the Consumer Price Index (CPI) 1800 to present. Ask yourself, why was there no virtually no inflation from 1800 from to 1913 (& tremendous prosperity I might add)? After creation of the FED in 1913 and then moving off the silver/gold standard we've had steady inflation. A 2008 dollar buys about 9 cents worth of an 1800 dollar, amounting to a hidden tax thru inflation. Educate yourself, here's a few links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KV9yDLhKbjg http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2002/cr091002b.htm http://www.newswithviews.com/Vieira/edwin2.htm http://endthefed.us/ Thankfully someone is buying T-Bills, otherwise the whole house of paper dollars might collapse.
Let me get his straight, you think that inflation didn't exist because someone didn't use the word inflation and didn't use a pretty little table or chart to track it? The concept of inflation was thought about as early as the 1700s by Richard Cantillon when he noticed an increase in the flow of money in an area, say a town, led to an increase of prices and there were mentions of it by others, whose names escape me at the moment, before that. That's over simplifying it quite a bit, but believe me, economies have been experiecing the affects of inflation long before there was an understanding as to what inflation was and certainly before it was tracked accurately.
Nationwide said: Fact is, the Federal Reserve IS private, charges the US billion$ to borrow it's own money, & creates $ out of thin air.You forgot to mention that the Fed returns all profit to the Treasury every year. THOSE BASTARDS! These are facts I only recently learned and important info the fatwallet community needs to know.Let me guess- you stumbled across some blogs and videos on youtube and got all huffy thinking you now have some special inside insight into our monetary policy? Here's the Consumer Price Index (CPI) 1800 to present.Once again, you are ignoring wages. CPI alone is pretty meaningless. Ask yourself, why was there no virtually no inflation from 1800 from to 1913 (& tremendous prosperity I might add)?Tremendous prosperity? Surely you jest. Real US GDP per capita (in 2000 dollars) grew from ~$1200 to $4900 between 1800 and 1900 (a factor of 4x). In 2007, real GDP per capita (again, 2000 dollars) was $38k- a factor of close to 10x from 1900 (source). The United States did not become a major player in the global economy until WWI, and didn't become an economic superpower until after WWII. After creation of the FED in 1913 and then moving off the silver/gold standard we've had steady inflation. A 2008 dollar buys about 9 cents worth of an 1800 dollar, amounting to a hidden tax thru inflation.Good thing our income has grown by even more than that. Phew.
Nationwide
Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 5:03p
cheezedawg said: You whine about the "devaluation" of the dollar, yet ignore that our wages and income have grown faster than inflation. No, I don't believe our wages have grown faster than inflation. Here's a graph of REAL WAGES showing an overall 8% decline from 1964 to 2004. But yes, certainly we've made huge productivity & technological advances since the 1800s. But they did have a superior monetary system - real precious metal coins and paper currency backed by the same. The Federal Reserve System is totally unnecessary, and in fact, the cause of most of our current economic woes. Many of our founding fathers warned us about central banks. Thomas Jefferson, Lincoln (who financed a war without the FED), Andrew Jackson all expressed grave concerns regarding central bankers.
chief100
Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 5:43p
xmatrikx said: cosmiverse said: FEDERAL RESERVE BANK SCAM
Have you ever wondered who the Federal Reserve owners are?
The first thing to understand is that even though the Fed's name makes it sound like a government organization, it's not.
Take a peek in your phone book. Instead of being listed in the government pages, the Federal Reserve is listed right next to another private corporation in the business section called Federal Express.
That's right, the Fed is actually a private corporation run in secret by a few high level international bankers.
FEDERAL RESERVE OWNERS ARE THE BANKSTERS Can we nail down who is in this little group of powerful Federal Reserve owners?
Here's a look into who was involved in setting up the Federal Reserve in 1913.
Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin (Rothschild and world economy) Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris Israel Moses Sieff Banks of Italy Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York Lehman Brothers Bank of New York Goldman Sachs Bank of New York Chase Manhattan Bank of New York (Controlled By the Rockefeller Family Tree)
I don't understand that when someone posts something like this, people jump on them and call them stupid? The people who believe that the fed isnt' corrupt are the real sheeple. And the fact that the same banks who setup the fed back in 1913, are now some of the banks who recieved billions in federal aid, being controlled by an ex-ceo of goldman sachs... Ok people, keep your blinders on.
What should the Feds do? Try to reduce the deficit? Hoover tried that during the recession of '29. What was the result? I might add that some of the things the Feds buy will last 20 or maybe 50 years. So why should it be paid for in just one year? If a building or maybe a weapon system--whatever--is going to last 5 years or 50 than why should we have to pay for it in just one year? It should be financed over its useful life.
Zaos
Shopaholic Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 6:27p
Bankgeek said: I might add that some of the things the Feds buy will last 20 or maybe 50 years. So why should it be paid for in just one year? If a building or maybe a weapon system--whatever--is going to last 5 years or 50 than why should we have to pay for it in just one year? It should be financed over its useful life.
I might add that some of the things we buy will last 2 or maybe 5 years. So why should it be paid for in just one year? If a LCD TV or maybe a car--whatever--is going to last 2 years or 5 than why should we have to pay for it in just one year? It should be financed over its useful life.
Nationwide said: No, I don't believe our wages have grown faster than inflation. Here's a graph of REAL WAGES showing an overall 8% decline from 1964 to 2004.The graph that I linked to was in real disposable income (as published by the BEA in the commerce dept). The amounts were adjusted to year 2000 dollars based on the PCE (which I personally think is better than CPI to measure inflation). But yes, certainly we've made huge productivity & technological advances since the 1800s. But they did have a superior monetary system - real precious metal coins and paper currency backed by the same.Commodity based monetary systems are not superior- there is a reason why they have been almost universally abandoned. In the case of a gold standard, tying your monetary policy to something as arbitrary and limiting as the amount of gold that people can dig out of the ground (mostly by foreign mines, btw) is just plain foolish. Good riddance.
magika
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 8:00p
As a casual observer of the tinfoil hat crowd (hey, everyone has their hobbies), the whole "OMGWTFBBQ THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS TEH EVIL!!!!!111" comes into vogue every single recession or economic slump. People want to explain the world around them and why they are not happy in life. At its core its an attempt to explain a very complex world where people cannot process the fact that the economy is mostly a result of billions of individual actors pursuing their own self interests. This realistic view of the world is too complex and hard to understand. Instead, it is much easier to process a world view where you believe that a selected few individuals conspire to control world events - always to the detriment of the population - which easily explains why you are not happy with where you are in life. That way, your life circumstances are not your fault but the product of a evil global cabal who is conspiring against you and everyone else. If you go back 200 years you could take the federal reserve conspiracy mythology and replace the word "federal reserve" with "the jews" and get almost the exact same theory.
By the way, to the OP: I never knew that Federal Express had a board of directors appointed by the government! Or did you forget to research that and educate yourself on the facts before buying conspiracy theory whole sale? The federal reserve is not a private bank, it is a quasi-public institution because its board is appointed by the government.
If anyone wants to entertain themselves, that site the OP links to is quite hilarious (and a bit sad, too). Its a for profit debt collection scam that is preying on conspiracy theorists - which as a business model is very wise, since people who believe this stuff are pretty gullible to begin with. My favorite part:
Tinfoil Hat Site said: The legend of Atlantis plays a big part in the history of the Freemasons. According to the Masons, Atlantis has passed down an ancient mystery called the "Great Plan". The Great Plan is the forming of a World Government, or the modern New World Order. According to the Freemasons, Atlantis was flourishing about 10,000 years before the great Greek civilization. Ten kings, known as the Atlantic League, ruled the land. Around 10,000 B.C., seven of the kings, who presided over the seven islands of Atlantis, decided they would conquer the three kings who ruled over Africa, Europe, and Asia. This angered Zeus to such an extent that he sunk Atlantis into the sea, killing all 60 million of its citizens.
I suppose over the years someone in my lodge forgot to mention that we found Atlantis and were using it to create a New World Order. Oh well, the bi-weekly dinner is worth it even if I somehow never find out about the conspiracy for world domination.
moneyisnteverything
Senior Member
posted: Dec. 20, 2008 @ 8:00p
062703 said: broke25engineer said: When we couldn't repay our debt, we can nuke our creditor if they dare to collect the debt .
.....
if they nuke us back too, then we help solve the world's over population problem
Except 75% of our debt is held by us.
Good point. Who else would want our debt?
Want to see something cool? Google "U.S. sovereign debt quality." There are only 10 or 15 nations in the world (plus their dependencies) which hold a AAA debt rating. The U.S. is currently one of them. Very soon, we will become a AA rated nation, joining the ranks of Japan, coincidentally the second-biggest economy in the world.
The reason is simple. Too much debt. We'll probably have over a trillion dollar a year deficit next year (blaming the current president, of course.) Our national debt is currently 10 trillion, and our GDP is now 13 trillion. Soon, they will be about equal.
I think we're lucky to still have an AAA rating, but my advice to you is dump U.S. dollars as treasuries now!!! Rates will go up (as quality goes down) almost as sure as the sky is blue.
moneyisnteverything said: Good point. Who else would want our debt?Uh, have you checked the treasury market lately?Very soon, we will become a AA rated nation, joining the ranks of Japan, coincidentally the second-biggest economy in the world.Very soon, eh? I love these wild assertions that people throw around like facts...
I have a question for the economics experts here. Why is the national debt bad or even important? I understand that the US treasury sells bonds to finance deficit spending. If the economy keeps growing faster than the debt and productivity keeps rising (along with wages), can't the government just keep rolling over the debt to the next generation of bond holders. I can see a scenarios where this is not sustainable such as if population growth slowed or even reversed. Assuming population will continue to grow, the government doesn't have to ever pay down the debt. Is this correct or a giant ponzi scheme (like that Madoff guy)?
The problem is the national debt is growing much faster than GDP. If the trend doesn't get reversed, and I am not saying it won't, the US will lose the ability to borrow in its own currency.
National debt is supposed to increase in a recession via deficit spending, and reduce in good times from budget surplus. GWB inherited a surplus in 2000. Instead of paying down the debt, he used the surplus and borrowed whole bunch more money to pay for the tax cuts and more spending. Imo most of his stimulus went to the real estate bubble, i.e., squandered.
theboogeyman said: I have a question for the economincs experts here. Why is the national debt bad or even important? I understand that the US treasury sells bonds to finance deficit spending. If the economy keeps growing faster than the debt and productivity keeps rising (along with wages), can't the government just keep rolling over the debt to the next generation of bond holders.
Our debt can be rolled over into infinity, we never have to repay it. Also the repayment of debt in itself is contractionary.
Nationwide
Member
posted: Dec. 21, 2008 @ 12:01a
cheezedawg said: You forgot to mention that the Fed returns all profit to the Treasury every year. Yes, but not the underlying regional banks (NY, Cleveland, Boston, etc) who profit hugely off the American taxpayer. The Federal Reserve Notes in your wallet were created by the FED who exchanges them for an interest-bearing govt bonds. Historically, we've had "United States Notes" created directly through the US Treasury and backed by the silver held there. There was no interest paid on these bills by the govt (more correctly, by the taxpayer) to the Federal Reserve.
cheeze, your 'disposable income' graph shows income along with spending - both have risen fairly steadily (with a meager savings rate below 1%). Like you, I'm thankful to be living in this great country of opportunity. But Inflation is a clear and present danger according to the Wall Street Journal, and I submit to you, WE'D ALL BE MUCH RICHER WITHOUT THE FED!
didn't you Ron Paul guys figure out already that the election is over and you were overwhelmingly rejected by the American people? or are you getting ready to worm up again in a few years in a different party? give it a rest ... Obama is the president-elect
Xnarg
Senior Member - 5K
posted: Dec. 21, 2008 @ 9:45a
Note to self after reading thread: Invest in a firms which sell foil hats.
Nationwide said: cheezedawg said: Because the Federal Reserve returns most of that back to the Treasury?
By the way, the scene has changed A LOT over the past year. Here is an interesting overview of the Fed's latest release of their balance sheet.No, that's miniscule. But yes that's a better econbrowser link. Look, whoever owns the govt securities receives the interest. When government borrows more money, it has the fed create money in return for US securities (bonds,T-Bills). But who gets these securities? Well other countries & individuals purchase some, which I have no problem with (aside from the huge amount of borrowing) but most of them go the PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS. They're receiving the interest payments. They are receiving our tax payments! They are profiting off the American worker. This is the unnecessary piece. The 1984 Grace Commission report states: "With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their Government."The fact the govt has to issue bonds (because it overspends its revenues) could be a bad thing. But it makes absolutely no difference who owns the bonds and collects the interest payments after they are issued. Yes, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve are appointed by the president (some say he's handed a list of approved picks), but look at where all these people come from, the top banks & investment houses. Talk about putting foxes in charge of the henhouse! There's no 'governing' going on here - this is Wall Street looking out for it's own. The Federal Reserve's Board of Governors Incestuous RelationsHmmm. Since the Fed serves a BANKING function, I guess it would be better to load up the Board of Governors with stock boys and gas station attendants. Who the hell do you think are the best candidates for a top BANKING position, if not people with high-level BANKING experience?
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.