I'm closing (supposed to be anyways) on a second house next week. If you're doing this or in the process of it, get all of your money moved for closing well in advance to where it needs to be! I was not aware of the ridiculous guidelines and have made a few mistakes this week:
1) I had moved some of the closing money into a reward checking account in my wife's name less than two months ago. This appears as a gift, therefore the spouse must gift the money back to me for closing and we are limited to gifted amount caps?? fannie mae guidelines I'm told. Not sure yet.. but I think 6%. Only my name is on the mortgage/title which is why this was a problem. 2) Did a five figure cash deposit to have funds available in the bank for closing. Should have guessed this.. but big no no, those funds are not eligible for closing again due to fannie mae guidelines I'm told. "no way to trace it, it could be a loan". 3) Received additional gifted funds from family. They want the statements showing how they gave you the money so make sure anyone gifting you money is prepared to provide these details. 4) Moving money around just to get it all in one account for closing. Be prepared to provide a fully detailed history of where those funds originated from, and every transaction in between to trace the entire process.
Silly stuff, but I've only ever done a construction-to-perm, and refi's before so I had no idea "full doc" meant literally tracing all your funds. So if you're someone who moves money around, does things with their spouses and thinks you can easily move money around between each other without a problem.. be prepared to run into some last minute snags.
Users like you can add images, links and other relevant information about this topic.
posted: Jul. 2, 2009 @ 7:52p
staci86
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 2, 2009 @ 8:21p
Moving money around does not automatically disqualify a loan. Underwriting guidelines require that the money be sourced and seasoned - that is, the underwriter must be able to see where it came from, and how long it has been in your accounts (to prevent undisclosed gifts and borrowing).
If anyone runs into this problem prior to closing, they need to gather all of their account statements, and explain the situation to their loan officer. If the money can be shown to have been in the borrower(s) account(s) for a certain period (two months for most loan programs), then there should be no problem. A competent loan officer will be able to explain the situation to the underwriter and demonstrate that the transferred funds do in fact belong to the borrower, have belonged to the borrower for the required period of time, and were sourced appropriately.
oppsie
Member
posted: Jul. 2, 2009 @ 8:31p
I'm running into something similar as I move toward closing on a house, but my loan officer has merely requested statements proving transfer of the money (meaning statement from previous account showing transfer). If you are in limbo between statements, ask the depositing bank to provide you with a letter of explanation to give to your lender. I haven't had a problem getting these in the past.
PolarDude
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 1:55a
Showing the cash withdrawal statement, and the cash deposit statement should change their tune. A sternly written letter fron an attorney demanding damages if that doesn't work.
I have purchased 4 different homes and I move money around I just have to show where it came from. To ensure they aren't other loans, gifts, etc. I made sure I had kept records of everything, I didn't think it that hard...but then I always keep records of everything so that its easy to go back and make copies. We received a refund for 5900 for a TV we purchased it was defective and we were told the manufacturer couldn't even get the parts (TV was 6 months old) We were refunded the money for our TV I had to show where the money came from and why. I had kept the letter giving us the refund along with a copy of the check.
cp102 said: I have purchased 4 different homes and I move money around I just have to show where it came from. To ensure they aren't other loans, gifts, etc. I made sure I had kept records of everything, I didn't think it that hard...but then I always keep records of everything so that its easy to go back and make copies. We received a refund for 5900 for a TV we purchased it was defective and we were told the manufacturer couldn't even get the parts (TV was 6 months old) We were refunded the money for our TV I had to show where the money came from and why. I had kept the letter giving us the refund along with a copy of the check.
I had the same experience. When I was moving around money all I had to do was show where the money came from and that i was the owner of the money.
ilikebtmoney
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 8:13a
PolarDude said: Showing the cash withdrawal statement, and the cash deposit statement should change their tune. A sternly written letter fron an attorney demanding damages if that doesn't work.
Yeah that's the problem, I've been accumulating the cash over time. There's not one or two transactions that show this buildup. Sell some old junk on craigslist.. paid in cash, empty out the cash in the wallet from people giving me cash when I put the dinner check on my cc, etc. So they said no go.
Not a real big deal in my case as there's enough money to close without it.. just a nasty surprise
kgotze
Member
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 1:21p
my mortgage broker was able to use non-retirement securities to show sufficient assets, even though these weren't the source of all the cash I was using for the down-payment (some Gift from parents)
if you are refi'ing the freddie/fannie they don't check squat. 660 middle scores(both parties), VOE, 1 paystub/statement, no 30+ lates on mortgage in last 12 months. that's it. maybe DTI of mortgage but not total DTI.
you can google around and find all the guidelines for underwriting on the net if you know what to look for each bank
staci86
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 2:53p
ThursdaysChild said: Almost all of my accounts no longer send paper statements. Am I correct that lenders will accept print-outs of online statements? According to agency guidelines, lenders are supposed to accept printed statements.
In the disclosures you sign, there is a form which will grant your lender authorization to verify your bank accounts and the funds in them.
Because any deposit that needs to be verified will be verified, the statement you present to the lender should not matter. If your loan officer gives you a problem, remind him that the VOD will be run anyway.
ilikebtmoney
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 3:05p
The saga continues.. I have some $5,000 deposit from a month and a half ago in one of my checking accounts.. honestly can't recall what it is for/from to provide the documentation on. I've qualified more than 2x the amount needed for closing already, but they're still going through everything. This is a nightmare. Closing is going to end up being delayed, and maybe now not even approved for this ridiculously stupid thing.
Here's an uncashed check for $70,000. Keep it. There's a bunch of them ! And a summons. It's yours. Pretty pathetic, Ty. Pathetic? Maybe for you, Lacey. For me, there's a subtle perfection in everything I do. I've got my own standards, my own way.
ilikebtmoney said: I have some $5,000 deposit from a month and a half ago in one of my checking accounts.. honestly can't recall what it is for/from
ilikebtmoney
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 3:30p
hahaha.. I JUST watched that movie.
lampy2k4
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 3:36p
5 figure cash deposits = scrutiny in every direction. I've been warned about keeping my accounts stable and quiet for months before closing by my mortgage broker 10 years ago. I've done it before every closing ever since.
Their concern is that you are borrowing money from someone else to pay your down-payment. That's a big no-no, as your real debt-to-equity would not be what is shown in documentation, substantially increasing lender's risk. This is why they want documentation on any deposits and statements about any "gifts" from their givers.
The same mortgage broker also advised me not to "show" any inconsequential accounts I have to reduce the number of questions about what is happening in them, as long as you have other accounts with "enough" assets in them.
lampy2k4 said: The same mortgage broker also advised me not to "show" any inconsequential accounts I have to reduce the number of questions about what is happening in them, as long as you have other accounts with "enough" assets in them.
Right. I NEVER SHOW THEM all my bank accounts, just 2-3 with large deposits. usually these are savings accounts/CDs with no activity, never show the "transactional" accounts with frequent money flow
You can avoid all these problems this way.
ilikebtmoney
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 3:45p
Yeah at this point it's silly.. I've provided months of documentation, there's way more than enough $$$$, but because I can't "show" the source of all the deposits it's completely held up U/W. They won't approve the file on an otherwise perfect file, and it's supposed to be submitted to title Monday for closing mid next week. It has nothing to do with the fact there's not enough "approved" funds at this point, just lots of "untraceable" funds. Lovely!
Definitely will NEVER make this mistake again.
staci86
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 4:01p
The reason it is held up is because the loan was underwritten with the full amount of deposits, not what is needed to close. Depending on the criteria of your loan, those post-closing funds may be needed for approval. Loans submitted to an automated underwriting system must have every penny verified if the AUS calls for verification.
Your loan officer could fix the problem by re-running DU/LP/TOTAL with liquid assets limited to the exact amount of funds you can properly document, and then calling the underwriter to explain that she has new findings reflecting asset requirements for which proper documentation has already been submitted. Once the underwriter verifies that those funds have been properly sourced and seasoned, there should be no problem in approving your loan. "Extra" funds in the account are no concern; they simply need to verify the existence and acceptability of the funds your loan was qualified with.
(Ignore this if you applied for a HELOC, a Jumbo, or another proprietary [non-Fannie/Freddie/FHA/VA] mortgage product.)
If for whatever reason OP wasn't able to do what SIS & others suggested above (show them only accounts with large deposits & little money movement), I'm curious - his item number 1 in his original post - if he had put those funds in a JOINT Rewards checking account (he & the wife) instead of just in the wife's name, would that have improved the situation?
Also, for OP's item number 3 in his original post, would setting up a joint account a couple of months ago (he & the relatives this time) made things more kosher? I honestly don't know whether it would or not - just wondering.
ilikebtmoney
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 7:51p
fw9999 said: If for whatever reason OP wasn't able to do what SIS & others suggested above (show them only accounts with large deposits & little money movement), I'm curious - his item number 1 in his original post - if he had put those funds in a JOINT Rewards checking account (he & the wife) instead of just in the wife's name, would that have improved the situation?
Also, for OP's item number 3 in his original post, would setting up a joint account a couple of months ago (he & the relatives this time) made things more kosher? I honestly don't know whether it would or not - just wondering.
Yes, if it was a joint account it wouldn't be a problem. They haven't been questioning our joint (primary) checking account on those levels.
If you knew you were getting a gift months ago, no need to do a joint account at all.. just have the money sitting in your account. The reason it needed to be a "gift" was because they were just making this money available to my use now, as we're buying the house.
From what I learned, you can have gifted or do just about anything as long as it's 61+ days before you start the loan process. I had to go back 60 days and provide full details for everything up to that point. Otherwise, this is what happens.
ilikebtmoney
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 7:54p
staci86 said: The reason it is held up is because the loan was underwritten with the full amount of deposits, not what is needed to close. Depending on the criteria of your loan, those post-closing funds may be needed for approval. Loans submitted to an automated underwriting system must have every penny verified if the AUS calls for verification.
Your loan officer could fix the problem by re-running DU/LP/TOTAL with liquid assets limited to the exact amount of funds you can properly document, and then calling the underwriter to explain that she has new findings reflecting asset requirements for which proper documentation has already been submitted. Once the underwriter verifies that those funds have been properly sourced and seasoned, there should be no problem in approving your loan. "Extra" funds in the account are no concern; they simply need to verify the existence and acceptability of the funds your loan was qualified with.
(Ignore this if you applied for a HELOC, a Jumbo, or another proprietary [non-Fannie/Freddie/FHA/VA] mortgage product.)
That's exactly how this ended up. It's a standard fannie mae conventional mortgage. It was recalculated after they "disqualified" some deposits. No big deal in my case, but I imagine a lot of people aren't keeping or able to show a lot of liquid funds beyond closing costs so if these kind of situations were to come up, it could cost them the house.
I found this out recently too with our refinance. There was an $8,000 transfer from one account to another. Ridiculous, the scrutiny. We have plenty of equity and well more than $8,000 in that account, the refinance was only to lower our rate.
One more thing. When sending in the bank statements always be sure to send that last page that explains "How to balance your account". Silly me assumed they weren't interested in that page. They were, and I had to find it again and send it in. When I asked if they were going to balance it for me I didn't even get a smile.
cp102 said: I have purchased 4 different homes and I move money around I just have to show where it came from. To ensure they aren't other loans, gifts, etc. I made sure I had kept records of everything, I didn't think it that hard...but then I always keep records of everything so that its easy to go back and make copies. We received a refund for 5900 for a TV we purchased it was defective and we were told the manufacturer couldn't even get the parts (TV was 6 months old) We were refunded the money for our TV I had to show where the money came from and why. I had kept the letter giving us the refund along with a copy of the check.
Damn, a $5900 TV?
hoserboy
Frivolous Member
posted: Jul. 3, 2009 @ 11:53p
cme10ae said: One more thing. When sending in the bank statements always be sure to send that last page that explains "How to balance your account". Silly me assumed they weren't interested in that page. They were, and I had to find it again and send it in. When I asked if they were going to balance it for me I didn't even get a smile. +1
Unluckily for me, my last two months' statements had an even number of "real" pages, and I'd already thrown out that last page. I had to go back almost a year to find a statement with an odd number of "real" pages so that the wall of text was printed on the back of a "real" statement page, and I could show what it looks like. Hopefully it is good enough, but you'd figure they'd have seen enough statements already from other people to know there's nothing useful on it.
staci86
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 4, 2009 @ 12:08a
ilikebtmoney said: That's exactly how this ended up. It's a standard fannie mae conventional mortgage. It was recalculated after they "disqualified" some deposits. No big deal in my case, but I imagine a lot of people aren't keeping or able to show a lot of liquid funds beyond closing costs so if these kind of situations were to come up, it could cost them the house. I'm glad to hear that everything worked out well.
Stories like this reinforce the need to find a loan officer who knows what she is doing, not merely a telephone clerk working for some second rate lender. Problems like this are completely preventable if the loan officer is competent and knows how to do the job. In this case, the loan officer should have reviewed the bank statements prior to submitting the file to an automated underwriting system, and should have done so with only the funds that would pass underwriting review. If those funds prove to be insufficient, the loan can always be re-run with the full balance, which may necessitate delaying closing.
Glitches like this are why so many people think that a loan requires 4-6 weeks to prepare and close. If the loan officer is competent, and the borrower (and seller, if any) is qualified, motivated, ready to close, and cooperative in preparing the necessary documentation, it should typically take 2 weeks, maybe 3.
Stories like this reinforce the need to find a loan officer who knows what she is doing, not merely a telephone clerk working for some second rate lender
This is what I need.I am also trying to get a loan for a foreclosed home in Arizona..Can anyone recomend some great hassle less.(if there is such a thing).I have hit a few bumps with Penfed and ING,stupid things. Can anyone also give FHA info in Arizona.The home is aprx. $500k we have 20% down if needed/775 fico,I dont know the FHA limits or stipulations? I would Also like to know of any creative financial ave. Any suggestions.I to have just done construction loans that turned into a reg. loan and a few refi's.so go easy.
staci86
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 4, 2009 @ 2:20a
mminauro1 said:
This is what I need.I am also trying to get a loan for a foreclosed home in Arizona..Can anyone recomend some great hassle less.(if there is such a thing).I have hit a few bumps with Penfed and ING,stupid things. Can anyone also give FHA info in Arizona.The home is aprx. $500k we have 20% down if needed/775 fico,I dont know the FHA limits or stipulations? I would Also like to know of any creative financial ave. Any suggestions.I to have just done construction loans that turned into a reg. loan and a few refi's.so go easy. 20% down on a $500k home is $400k, which is within conforming loan limits. Your credit is great, and you don't have to worry about PMI. Provided your employment is acceptable, your income sufficient, and you can show some post-closing liquidity, there should be no problem with your loan.
You don't need FHA. Based on your LTV and credit score, your best deal will be with a standard agency (Fannie/Freddie) loan, available at any one of several thousand commercial banks or mortgage banks. Pick a few that you trust, and begin shopping.
mminauro1 said: Stories like this reinforce the need to find a loan officer who knows what she is doing, not merely a telephone clerk working for some second rate lender
This is what I need.I am also trying to get a loan for a foreclosed home in Arizona..Can anyone recomend some great hassle less.(if there is such a thing).I have hit a few bumps with Penfed and ING,stupid things. Can anyone also give FHA info in Arizona.The home is aprx. $500k we have 20% down if needed/775 fico,I dont know the FHA limits or stipulations? I would Also like to know of any creative financial ave. Any suggestions.I to have just done construction loans that turned into a reg. loan and a few refi's.so go easy.In THREE THREADS I have told you to ask your realtor for a competent LOCAL mortgage broker who gets deals closed.
Dont keep applying online and depending on loan staff CSRs to help you.
featherz
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 4, 2009 @ 4:51a
On the primary loan I took out last year I moved money ALL OVER the place and even opened a new account to put it in, since we were moving states and our old accounts were based in the old state (harder to get certified funds, etc). However, I waited until after I had submitted the statements showing the money parked in the original location, told the mortgage person I was going to move it and where, then I moved it. I moved a huge chunk from my own personal account into a joint account with my husband and no one ever said boo.
No cash deposits, but as long as they knew the money was HERE and now it's THERE they had no problem with it. And for both this transaction and my recent refinance I just printed out my online statements for the bank accounts needed (not every account I have, since there's no need for that).
yup the only thing i had to sign was the reason why i had applied and got for 4 cards in the last 12 months.. most of them were near a year old too. just said i was utilizing low rate balance transfer offers to maximize debt cost.
ilikebtmoney
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 4, 2009 @ 9:15a
Surprisingly they didn't get me on that one. I did a noticeable AOR in October, paid them all off in March early (for planning this purchase) and there's lots of cards open w/ $0 balances. FICO came in at ~755ish mid so they didn't go further into those lines.
dmk112
Member
posted: Jul. 11, 2009 @ 9:44p
Anyone have advice on how to avoid this if parents are letting us borrow some $ for a downpayment? Get it in small amounts?
No just get it at least 120 days before the beginning of the mortgage app, so you can show 2-3 bank statements with the $$ sitting in your bank account
Incarnate
Senior Member
posted: Jul. 12, 2009 @ 8:11a
dmk112 said: Anyone have advice on how to avoid this if parents are letting us borrow some $ for a downpayment? Get it in small amounts? Mortage fraud.
ilikebtmoney
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Jul. 12, 2009 @ 2:53p
Incarnate said: dmk112 said: Anyone have advice on how to avoid this if parents are letting us borrow some $ for a downpayment? Get it in small amounts? Mortage fraud.
Fraud? Not necessarily if the "borrowed" money is without written terms and a set payment schedule. Maybe he's going to pay them back with the profit of the sale years from now? In that case it does not effect his cash outlay or ability to pay on that mortgage as he's "hiding" credit.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.