Edit

Forums
Finance

Zero Sympathy for Student Loan Borrowers: The Next Subrpime Crisis Brewing Underneath the Radar Archived From: Finance

  • tweet this
  • Post to Facebook
  • Text Only
  • Search this Topic »
  • Classic
  • Go to Page :
  • 12 3 457
alert mods    

Is there statistics on loan payback per school/degree?

Day time TV is filled with ads for "schools"

- Cooking
- Video Game programming (nope, not kidding)
- "medical assistant"

.. the list goes on..


alert mods    

http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2009/06/supreme-court-takes-student-loan.php

In United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa, the Supreme Court will decide on the requirements for discharging student loan debt via bankruptcy proceedings.

The results likely will not suddenly enable students to discharge their loans in bankruptcy.


alert mods    

The government subsidized student loans, making them available to anyone with a pulse. Artificial demand for a college education was created as a result of the ready availability of money that could be used for that purpose. Tuition increased at a rate far in excess of inflation as all that money found a home. Turns out we don't need as many highly educated administrative assistants as we once thought. Unemployed graduates default in large numbers. Caring people log on to fatwallet.com to let us know we have created a permanent underclass. People call for government to forgive the student loans.

The circle of life in the people's republic of america.


alert mods    

So what, I'm some kind of monster for having many Stafford loans consolidated at 2.2% interest to the tune of $86,000 in a CDs averaging over 4%? I thought this was America?


alert mods    

nycll said:greling said:When I borrowed Direct Loans from the federal government, I was given entrance and exit counseling and clearly read my terms and it was understood just how much I owed, at what interest rate, and that I would have to pay them back. When I approached Sallie Mae for a private loan, they wouldn't even tell me the interest rate. They just wanted me to sign and bragged about how much "Cash Back" I'd get. Thank goodness I decided to pass. I later found out they wanted me to pay 16.9%. And with a 710 FICO!Something doesn't add up. Private student loans generally price in between secured consumer borrowing (such as car loans) and credit card. Ball park figure is Libor + 5%-6%. Even when Libor was 7%, that would only make the rate 12-13%.l It might be some sleezy sales people trying to take advantage of you, or you didn't do comparison shopping.

Hmmm.... I got quoted waaay before LIBOR was even being offered an option for student loans. I was offered Prime + 8.9% with a FICO of 710, at a time when credit was so easy to obtain that people were doing AOR every week on FW and piggybacking their kids like crazy. Thank God I turned them down and accepted direct loans at a variable rate of 8.75. I now have them locked in at 6%.

Oh, and some of my private student loan debt (most definitely not from Sallie Mae!) was transferred to credit cards at low fixed rates. I did the responsible thing. However, I know some students for whom such is the only option available for them to get a fair deal. And such balance transfers are becoming more and more common each day.

But not all students can even do that. Some have stilld pre-payment penalties.

That is a different scandal. All FFELP lenders competed to get on the financial aid officers' preferred card. It is as much the fault of the colleges as the lenders. At the end because of the competition students still got better loan terms in FFELP loans than ED direct loans.

B.S. You must work for Sallie Mae to say this. Every "competitor" at my school was either a subsidy owned by or was Sallie Mae. Nelnet, Nellie Mae, Wells Fargo, Bank of America... All of these companies outsources their loan programs to Sallie Mae. You had a choice between like seven different lenders who all serviced through Sallie Mae. You didn't hear about direct loans unless you pressed for it and asked for them. Financial aid officers were being eagerly pressed to offer you expensive private loans instead.

And before Congress got pressured and passed a law, some lenders had originally made it impossible for you to even consolidate your loans outside of them. So much for "competition"!

No, it is the best lending program in the US history...


Hmmm.... "Best lending program in history", eh?

If we truly want to stimulate the economy, we can start by reforming the student loan industry.

Student loans are the only form of consumer debt lacking standard consumer protections. In 1997, student loan companies such as Sallie Mae successfully lobbied Congress to amend the Higher Education Act and remove consumer protections, making defaulted student loans among the most lucrative and easy debts to collect.

The loan companies actually have a vested interest in debtors defaulting on their loans and have great leeway to collect on those loans.

Harvard Professor Elizabeth Warren was quoted in a Wall Street Journal article as saying that "student loan debt collectors have power that would make a mobster envious."

The student loan companies can garnish or seize Social Security and disability payments, and even raid personal bank accounts without a court order. A number of people have actually been driven to suicide by their collection tactics.

The only people benefiting from this situation are the CEOs and corporate officers of companies like Sallie Mae. The outrageous profits they make would be better off circulating in local economies.

You're better off paying for school with a credit card or even a payday loan! At least you'd know your lending terms upfront and be offered borrower protections.

Lesson learned: Reform is badly needed.


alert mods    

Bankgeek said:Greling said: 91.8% of 2009 college grads living at home and 80% of 2008 grads jobless.
The government keeps saying that if you have a college degree you're less likely to be unemployed.

The catch is that you can never be counted as "unemployed" in government numbers until you actually landed a first job to lose, so there are literally millions of young people unemployed-in-fact but not "unemployed" in government numbers who are slipping underneath the radar.


alert mods    

My generation (Y) is getting screwed over in more ways than one. First you guys start running up the national debt to the moon. Then you guys declare multiple wars (that we and not you have to fight) and put us into an endless spiral of deficit spending. Then you wreck the Social Security system to the point that there's going to be nothing left by the time we see it. Then you destroy the environment, the water and the air we breathe. Then you inflate the hell out of the real estate market to where even a small rural home becomes unaffordable in most places. Then you prey on us with credit cards before we can set foot on campus. Now you ruin college financing and force us to carry on a more burdensome debt than you've ever known in your lifetime, all the while wrecking the economy into an oblivion and outsourcing every entry-level job there is.

You say to us, "You're smart. You guys have degrees. You'll figure something out. You'll invent something to fix it all... Something betta than that computer!"

Just you wait... I want you to explain it all years later to that 40-something art history grad with no chance of retiring in her lifetime, as she tucks you into bed at that luxurious retirement resort. I want you to tell her why everything happened to her the way it did, and do your best at convincing her how THANKFUL she should be and why she shouldn't put that pillow over your face....


alert mods    

staci86 said:
The student loan programs are among the best and most useful debts that one can take, and the various Federal loan guarantees are one of the few successes of a government acting beyond a strict interpretation of the Constitution.


I fully agree with almost everything you said. I think it's also the first time I've heard someone on FW say that hard majors might want to take on more loans and less work since it'll be more profitable in the long run. There is one point of disagreement I have though...


6. The student used their new found freedom and cash to buy beer, pot, and condoms. Enough said.

I agree on the first two, but condoms might be one of the most financially responsible decisions made. Much cheaper to spend $10 on condoms than thousands in child support, as we've heard in the recent thread


alert mods    

Hi there. (85.40kB)

Speaking of condoms and debt, girls like this model student from the attached video is part of the reason I went to school. She could convince me to spend foolishly.

Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.

alert mods    

SUCKISSTAPLES said:But if loans for a music degree were at 15% while loans for a med degree were at 3%, wouldnt that just make it even HARDER for the music degree grad to ever payback the debt?

Let me get it straight... Are you arguing that one's risk profile should not include the likelihood of repayment because it would make it that much harder for the person who decides to take a lower likelihood of success career path to repay?


alert mods    

greling said:My generation (Y) is getting screwed over in more ways than one. First you guys start running up the national debt to the moon. Then you guys declare multiple wars (that we and not you have to fight) and put us into an endless spiral of deficit spending. Then you wreck the Social Security system to the point that there's going to be nothing left by the time we see it. Then you destroy the environment, the water and the air we breathe. Then you inflate the hell out of the real estate market to where even a small rural home becomes unaffordable in most places. Then you prey on us with credit cards before we can set foot on campus. Now you ruin college financing and force us to carry on a more burdensome debt than you've ever known in your lifetime, all the while wrecking the economy into an oblivion and outsourcing every entry-level job there is.

You say to us, "You're smart. You guys have degrees. You'll figure something out. You'll invent something to fix it all... Something betta than that computer!"

Just you wait... I want you to explain it all years later to that 40-something art history grad with no chance of retiring in her lifetime, as she tucks you into bed at that luxurious retirement resort. I want you to tell her why everything happened to her the way it did, and do your best at convincing her how THANKFUL she should be and why she shouldn't put that pillow over your face....

My Gen Y little brother had a job in engineering within 3 months of getting his degree, lives frugally, in fact lives with Dad, but...bro pays most of the bills for for disabled Dad. Dad is one of "you guys" who, despite frugality, barely managed to afford to house, feed, and clothe us. Dad could not afford to pay for our college. Less than a year later little bro's got enough saved to pay off about half of his 22K (Direct) Student Loans.

Whiners blame other people for their problems (Generation Yner?), winners make lemonade.


alert mods    

One can make lemonade and whine about other's idiocy at the same time.


alert mods    

ZenNUTS said:Is there statistics on loan payback per school/degree?DOE keeps track of defaults 1 year after graduation/termination of student status by school.

Day time TV is filled with ads for "schools"

- Cooking
- Video Game programming (nope, not kidding)
- "medical assistant"

.. the list goes on..
I am sure the list goes on but DOE guarantee only extends to "title IV" educational institutions. One of the eligibility requirement is to have a cohort defautls rate not out of line.


alert mods    

Bankgeek said:Greling said: 91.8% of 2009 college grads living at home and 80% of 2008 grads jobless.
The government keeps saying that if you have a college degree you're less likely to be unemployed.


Do you think things are any better for 2008/2009 high school grads? Their college degree isn't making them unemployed or live at home.

EvilCapitalist said:SUCKISSTAPLES said:But if loans for a music degree were at 15% while loans for a med degree were at 3%, wouldnt that just make it even HARDER for the music degree grad to ever payback the debt?

Let me get it straight... Are you arguing that one's risk profile should not include the likelihood of repayment because it would make it that much harder for the person who decides to take a lower likelihood of success career path to repay?

It almost pains me to say this, because I'm a bleeding hard pinko liberal, but you're right. Loan rates should be higher for loans which are less likely to be repaid. And if this causes fewer people to go into music, then colleges will have to decide if music is important, and if it is, they will have to lower tuition to make it attainable for students.

And to add another problem to the mix- cheap student loans have fueled the growth of for-profit craphole "colleges" with 10% graduation rates and $50k tuition rates- like University of Phoenix, DeVry, ITT and the Art Institutes. When I was in grad school, we used to laugh about picking a college based on which one had the best jingle; once I got out into the real world and started doing volunteer work on weekends, I found out how many people are suckered in and take out enormous loans for classes taught by masters-level grad students paid $10/hr.


alert mods    

dblevitan said:
I agree on the first two, but condoms might be one of the most financially responsible decisions made. Much cheaper to spend $10 on condoms than thousands in child support, as we've heard in the recent thread

This brings me back to my point about students not being thrifty. Many colleges have student health clinics or relationships with Planned Parenthood which provide condoms for free. These programs also sometimes provide heavily discounted hormonal BC. Students can save $10-20 per month just by using the resources their tuition provides.

What a man with big student loan checks might spend in hopes of using those free condoms is another story entirely.


alert mods    

CapEx said:IcemanPk said:CapEx said:I honestly believe that the best and only way to fix the student loan problem and the cost of education is to simply do away with all government financial aid. We need desperately to stop the number of people pursuing further education and all the financial aid system does is further inflate college costs while encouraging young people to basically mortgage their lives for an 'education'.

#1, you're a complete idiot and your post shows your lack of education.

#2, educate young folks in high school about finances. That's one area where high school does not prepare young adults for life after school.

#3, I just have to remind you that you are an idiot.


I'm not sure when you went to college, but it's complete joke. Bonus point, curving all exams, and weighting good scores more continually push average GPAs up year after year. The fact that people actually even consider it to be worth the cost is laughable. A lot of degrees don't even have a positive NPV anymore. Hell, I work somewhere where all the administrative assistants have college degrees for their 30k/yr jobs.

Educate kids about finances all you want, but that won't reduce the debt load caused by the 'need' for kids to go college. Financial aid makes this problem considerably worse, just like Medicad/Medicare significantly increase health care costs for everyone.

ETA: This isn't necessarily the case for degrees that actually require a formal education (ie. engineering, science, and math), but those are the areas where kids aren't going because the other areas are 'easier'.

What you originally stated was stop people from going to school and that federal loans should be stopped. That does nothing but prevent people who need aid to attend school to better themselves.

If you want to discuss education reform feel free. Do I think all university programs need to be 4 years? No. Do I think people who are going in to med school need to take history of basketweaving? No. Do I think people need low rate loans to move in to higher education. Yes.

Make you point clear. You may have learned how to do that is you paid attention in writing 101.


alert mods    

greling said:I was offered Prime + 8.9% with a FICO of 710, at a time when credit was so easy to obtain that people were doing AOR every week on FW and piggybacking their kids like crazy. So you did know better. And if you really looked you would have found Prime+3% type of private loans from the like of Citi and BofA. The P+8.9% is not representative.

B.S. You must work for Sallie Mae to say this. Every "competitor" at my school was either a subsidy owned by or was Sallie Mae. Nelnet, Nellie Mae, Wells Fargo, Bank of America... All of these companies outsources their loan programs to Sallie Mae. You had a choice between like seven different lenders who all serviced through Sallie Mae. You didn't hear about direct loans unless you pressed for it and asked for them. Financial aid officers were being eagerly pressed to offer you expensive private loans instead.

And before Congress got pressured and passed a law, some lenders had originally made it impossible for you to even consolidate your loans outside of them. So much for "competition"!
Your school's financial aid office is rotten.

I don't work for sallie mae or any lenders. But I can tell you sallie mae doesn't service nelnet, Wells, bof A's FFELP student loans. More importantly, the privately offered FFELP loan terms (Stafford) are generally better than ED direct loans. The former usually has less fees and features of ACH rate reductions, etc.

Hmmm.... "Best lending program in history", eh?

If we truly want to stimulate the economy, we can start by reforming the student loan industry.

Student loans are the only form of consumer debt lacking standard consumer protections. In 1997, student loan companies such as Sallie Mae successfully lobbied Congress to amend the Higher Education Act and remove consumer protections, making defaulted student loans among the most lucrative and easy debts to collect.

The loan companies actually have a vested interest in debtors defaulting on their loans and have great leeway to collect on those loans.

Harvard Professor Elizabeth Warren was quoted in a Wall Street Journal article as saying that "student loan debt collectors have power that would make a mobster envious."

The student loan companies can garnish or seize Social Security and disability payments, and even raid personal bank accounts without a court order. A number of people have actually been driven to suicide by their collection tactics.

The only people benefiting from this situation are the CEOs and corporate officers of companies like Sallie Mae. The outrageous profits they make would be better off circulating in local economies.

You're better off paying for school with a credit card or even a payday loan! At least you'd know your lending terms upfront and be offered borrower protections.

Lesson learned: Reform is badly needed.
I assure you the vested interest of the student loan lenders is not to have higher defautls. Here is one of the smaller lender going out of business.

Sallie Mae is hurting. It couldn't sell itself to a group of PEs. If you want to start a grassroot movement, you should start by pushing transparency at your school's financial aid office(s). Since most schools are non-for-profit organizations, I don't know why there are no full and big font disclosure of the exact terms of the relationship between the school and lenders.


alert mods    

notfree said:nycll said:
Let's think for a moment if you don't have student loans, how do you finance college education. Option 1, we make high education free, like France, Germany, UK, China, etc. This will raise everyone's tax, and may lower US universities quality since they are among the top of the world,


Just an FYI, but higher education is definitely not free in China. In fact as a percentage of per capita GDP, I would suspect it is significantly more expensive in China than the US.
Source?


alert mods    

staci86 said:What a man with big student loan checks might spend in hopes of using those free condoms is another story entirely. Whether free or not, the condom is the best medical breakthough in human history. It must have saved more lives and money than penicillin.


alert mods    

greling said:Bankgeek said:Greling said: 91.8% of 2009 college grads living at home and 80% of 2008 grads jobless.
The government keeps saying that if you have a college degree you're less likely to be unemployed.


The catch is that you can never be counted as "unemployed" in government numbers until you actually landed a first job to lose, so there are literally millions of young people unemployed-in-fact but not "unemployed" in government numbers who are slipping underneath the radar.
Not true. If you are looking for a job you are counted as unemployed. But if you are backpacking in Europe or bartending in Thailand, you are not.


 Close

Sign Me In
Nickname: 
Password: 
Remember My Login Information:

Forget your login information?

Not Already A Member?
Sign Up Now!



Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2009