It seems like yesterday that AOR's and rewards credit cards were the major topics at FWF. Are rewards credit cards going the way of AORs? Some hope so.
WASHINGTON—The debate over credit card interchange fees—the percentage of credit card transactions that card companies collect from retailers—has been heating up as financial services firms and retailers square off in Washington.
The discussion centers on H.R. 2382, also known as the Credit Card Interchange Fees Act, which supporters—mostly retailers, grocery stores and convenience stores—say would rein in rising fees. The bipartisan bill is sponsored by Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and Rep. Bill Shuster, R-Pa.
“There is an arms race to create cards with higher fees and more bells and whistles,” said the National Retail Federation’s general counsel Mallory Duncan. “The market checks that would normally exist to curb this escalation in fees are diminished because the card companies know that every merchant is required to take these expensive new cards or lose their ability to accept any cards. The Welch-Shuster bill would allow the most expensive cards to be refused, and while we expect that few merchants would actually refuse cards if this were passed, it would make the card companies think before they reflexively introduce cards with higher fees.”
The American Bankers Association disagrees, arguing that the bill would dismantle a fair and efficient 50-year old electronic payments system. “The value delivered through this payment system to consumers, merchants and financial services organizations far exceeds the costs,” the ABA said in a statement. It continued, “Merchants get enormous benefits—particularly the ability to maximize sales, guaranteed payments and the ability to avoid losses from bad checks, employee theft, and costs associated with billing and collections and managing and depositing cash.” The ABA called the “penny or two on each dollar” a “very small price to pay for all of these benefits.”
But the Merchants Payments Coalition, a trade group made up of various merchants supportive of the bill say that interchange fees in the U.S. are much higher than they are in other countries and warn that they may increase without new guidelines. Further, the MPC claims, only about 13 percent of interchange fees actually go toward covering the costs that they were originally implemented to cover.
“Most consumers don’t know it, but every time they swipe a rewards card with its miles and concierge services, they are driving up the price of everything they buy even higher,” the NRF’s Duncan said. “This particularly hurts less-privileged Americans who don’t have rewards cards or can’t get cards at all because Visa and MasterCard rules effectively require that everyone pay the credit card price even if they are paying with cash, check, debit card or even food stamps.”
Retailers, the NRF says, have been unable to offer consumers a lower cash price for merchandise because of road blocks set up by the credit card companies. “The result is that the average household paid an estimated $427 in higher prices last year, up from $159 in 2001,” the NRF says, blaming rewards-type cards.
The ABA’s argument is that the bill would actually increase annual fees for consumers and effectively end rewards popular programs.
The Credit Card Interchange Fees Act is currently before the House Financial Services committee, chaired by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Ma.
To enter a coupon code in your post please enter the following info:
Coupon Code:
Coupon Offer:
Merchant:
Expires (optional):
Restrictions (optional):
saving...
Quick Summary is created and edited by users like you... Add FAQ's, Links and other Relevant Information by clicking the edit button in the lower right hand corner of this message.
The AOR threads are pretty much gone. If we get rid of the rewards CC threads then this forum will be filled with worthless drivel by trolls of the likes of BrianBrianBrian!
catbertsf said:yeah sure. those big retail chains r known to pass savings to us average consumers instead of fattening their bottom lines.
Typical misunderstanding of how capitalism works. In a free market economy, Companies try to maximize profits, but then other companies come in freely and compete and gradually the economic profit approaches zero.
Can you give one example of where a big retail chain increased profits and maintained that larger profit margin without competition?
BTW this isnt a txt msg lol plz use full words n captlzashun
Message edited by: tripleB on 2009-10-11 02:14:19 CDT
Glitch99 said:Oh, brother. Another instance of "The banks are making a profit off its customers so we're going to put an end to it by playing the "choice" card."
Not to merge topics, but DaveHanson - where do we stop? Overdraft fees, interchange rates, what next? As I said, a dangerous precedent.......Like I said in the other thread, you can't categorically support all regulations or none regulations in banking. You have to weigh the cost-benefits of each issue based on its own merit.
The interchange controversy should be fought in courts. There is no need to change the law but there might be reason to challenge visa and master card's business practices based on trade laws. If visa/mastercard prevails, then it is fine by me.
The excessive debit card fees is a different issue. I kind of support davehansen's suggestion. You guys view the fees are pure zero sum games. I think they have overall negative impact to the economy, beyond the zero-sum transfer between the bank and bank customer.
This particularly hurts less-privileged Americans who don’t have rewards cards or can’t get cards at all because Visa and MasterCard rules effectively require that everyone pay the credit card price even if they are paying with cash, check, debit card or even food stamps.” It is interesting to me that places like Sams and Costco limit the credit cards they accept (likely to reduce fees). Furthermore, several liquor stors I patronize have a cash price (approximately 5% less). What is stopping WalMart/Kroger/Best Buy/etc from giving this 5% discount and forcing the credit card companies to renegotiate their fees?
biomedeng said:This particularly hurts less-privileged Americans who don’t have rewards cards or can’t get cards at all because Visa and MasterCard rules effectively require that everyone pay the credit card price even if they are paying with cash, check, debit card or even food stamps.” It is interesting to me that places like Sams and Costco limit the credit cards they accept (likely to reduce fees). Furthermore, several liquor stors I patronize have a cash price (approximately 5% less). What is stopping WalMart/Kroger/Best Buy/etc from giving this 5% discount and forcing the credit card companies to renegotiate their fees?
I think this would lead to a healthier economy, because it would encourage people to spend only what they have. We seem to be moving in this direction already. When you think of AOR, banks have been doing this but on a larger scale, and with taxpayer money. I see smaller banks starting to compete for people's deposits. Not all will make it, but some will. I'm thinking one trend we are already seeing is people "borrowing" from big banks though rewards cards, and then "saving" at smaller banks. I think this is great, because it transfers money from "too big to fail" to "small enough to care".
biomedeng said:This particularly hurts less-privileged Americans who don’t have rewards cards or can’t get cards at all because Visa and MasterCard rules effectively require that everyone pay the credit card price even if they are paying with cash, check, debit card or even food stamps.” It is interesting to me that places like Sams and Costco limit the credit cards they accept (likely to reduce fees). Furthermore, several liquor stors I patronize have a cash price (approximately 5% less). What is stopping WalMart/Kroger/Best Buy/etc from giving this 5% discount and forcing the credit card companies to renegotiate their fees?
One would have to taken into consideration the added cost of handling cash...
Cash requires armed guards to carry it out. It's more likely to be stolen. Requires higher insurance. Takes longer for cashiers to count out. Thus requires additional cashiers to keep the same flow of customers as would occur with faster CC lines.
It might be cheaper for a WalMart to accept CC and pay the 3% fee than to accept cash. Smaller stores on the other hand, who dont have such a volume of customers and can bring the cash to the bank themselves and likely do not report all the cash as taxable income, are the ones hurt by CC transaction fees. For those stores, they may give a 10% to 20% discount for cash.
Cash also sometimes gets miscount or misplaced. With CC's, everything is electronic. An easier and efficient way of managing flow of funds.
Personally, I think it's rather ridiculous on what CC's charge for interchange fees. I'm looking at starting my business and it's something I'll have to build into my GP. I can see why other smaller shops limit credit cards or give a cash discount price.
Good points about cash being less secure, and more likely to have theft or inaccuracies. Probably a better strategy for merchants would be to stop accepting more expensive cards. It will probably take a larger merchant like WalMart to get something like this started.
The Sams/Costco "warehouse club" thing cuts both ways - they restrict to only lower-interchange-fee cards, but the cards they do accept (Discover is a good example) often give much lower rewards to customers if the item was bought at a warehouse club.
Message edited by: fw9999 on 2009-10-11 10:55:55 CDT
The merchants do have a point that they don't really have a choice as to whether or not to accept credit cards and have little negotiating power when it comes to terms. There isn't "competition" among the big credit card processors because there are only a few of them, there are high barriers to entry into the field, they tend to have very similar fees and terms, and tend to raise them simultaneous. That isn't competition, that is price fixing.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.