My parents own and live in a home in the suburbs. To make a living, they rent a storefront in the inner city and run a business there. It is a small business and they did not have liability insurance as they could not afford the premiums. Several years ago after a particular heavy snowfall, a man slipped and fell in front of the storefront breaking his leg even though a large clear path free of snow and ice was made by my parents. Our videos show that this person chose to walk on the surrounding snow and ice and not on the path. At the hospital where he was treated, he admitted to having had liquor before the accident. Furthermore, he fell on a Sunday which is off-business hours. Even with all that, he is suing my parents. My parents have worked 40 years and the only thing they own is their home which is a mixed-use property with commercial and residential units. They bought it three decades before and now it is valued at close to a million dollars. After they were served with court papers, my parents decided to transfer their home to me, their only daughter, in preparation of the worst case scenario: a judgement awarding the plaintiff. Unfortunately the worst case scenario is entirely probable as our lawyer told us the skin tone of the plaintiff will match the skin tone of the jury (the jury is pulled from the denizens of the city and this particular city having experienced white flight is now predominantly one color) while ours will be of a different skin tone. Our lawyer is saying this not because he is racist or cynical, but because he has been handling these types of cases for decades and he has noticed a pattern of judgement to say the least. I think it is very unfair that this meritless claim (the person was drunk for chrissakes!) will be given consideration by a partial jury and will endanger my parent's life work of savings so I have no problem with my parents trying to protect their only asset. Specifically, my parents went to the county register of deeds and transferred the title of the property to me.
My main question is this: Will doing this transfer of title to kin protect the property from any judicial claims of the plaintiff if they win the judgement? If not, what are other things we can do?
My second questions is: What are the tax ramifications of this move?
Message edited by: shkmiami on 2009-11-06 17:06:32 CST
shkmiami said:the only thing they own is their home which is a mixed-use property with commercial and residential units ... Specifically, my parents went to the county register of deeds and transferred the title of the property to me ... Will doing this transfer of title to kin protect the property from any judicial claims of the plaintiff if they win the judgementAnd your lawyer recommended this? It is not that simple. Bankruptcy of some type could be simpler.
Message edited by: xoneinax on 2009-11-06 15:54:46 CST
xoneinax said:shkmiami said:Specifically, my parents went to the county register of deeds and transferred the title of the property to me ... Will doing this transfer of title to kin protect the property from any judicial claims of the plaintiff if they win the judgementAnd your lawyer recommended this? It is not that simple. Business Bankruptcy could be simpler.
Our lawyer did not recommend this. He is only working on the liability case. If this isn't as simple as my parents thought, I guess they will have to get a different lawyer specializing in judicial claims and asset protection. I just thought I'd get some more information and input from the fatwallet community before my parents have to pay another set of retainer fees.
xoneinax said:shkmiami said:At the hospital where he was treated, he admitted to having had liquor before the accidentAnd this is written in the medical report?
What exactly does the plaintiff want? Payment for his medical bills; I am guessing MedicAid paid for him, so what is he out?
The plaintiff admitted to hospital staffers that he drank and it is in the medical report. The plaintiff is suing in civil court reserved for cases over $100,000. He doesn't have a job. So I guess he wants to be compensated for pain and suffering.
Not only would transfering title to a trust probably been smarter, any transfer of title after the papers were served could open the door to penalties for willfully hiding assets.
Even sadder it will be if your parents primary residence would have been protected by some state law, but now has been made fair game due to the transfer.
I'm not a lawer, I don't know for sure if everything I said is fact (in fact the answer to OP's question probably varies from state to state). But I am guessing that by blindly moving million dollar assets around, one opens the door to losing everything.
xoneinax said:shkmiami said:My second questions is: What are the tax ramifications of this move?Property taxes will change
That sounds scary. I haven't received anything from the county's property assessment dept. yet though. Should I be proactive and contact them or just wait?
shkmiami said:That sounds scary. I haven't received anything from the county's property assessment dept. yet thoughProperty taxes vary drastically from state to sate, but all you probably will get is a bill for whatever property tax is due this coming year.
Message edited by: xoneinax on 2009-11-06 16:01:19 CST
gatzdon said:If OP is only renting a store front and not the entire building/property, how is it that OP is being sued and not the building owner???
Oh believe me, everybody is being sued. The owner of the building, as well as a business next to my parent's business as they were open at the time of the accident.
Not only would transfering title to a trust probably been smarter, any transfer of title after the papers were served could open the door to penalties for willfully hiding assets.
Even sadder it will be if your parents primary residence would have been protected by some state law, but now has been made fair game due to the transfer.
I'm not a lawer, I don't know for sure if everything I said is fact (in fact the answer to OP's question probably varies from state to state). But I am guessing that by blindly moving million dollar assets around, one opens the door to losing everything.
Good Luck (and get a lawyer)
Thanks for the advice. I will tell that to my parents.
shkmiami said:Several years ago after a particular heavy snowfall, a man slipped and fell in front of the storefront breaking his leg even though a large clear path free of snow and ice was made by my parentsKeep the video showing your parents proactively clearing that path. Did he slip on a sidewalk? Does not sound like it. Sidewalks are typically owned by the city.
Message edited by: xoneinax on 2009-11-06 16:03:17 CST
shkmiami said:Oh believe me, everybody is being sued. The owner of the building, as well as a business next to my parent's business as they were open at the time of the accidentPlaintiff is filing 3 separate civil suits, each for over 100k?
I am an insurance company lawyer in Brooklyn. Your lawyer should prepare a motion for summary judgement on liabilty using video and still pictures, weather records, and medical records showing plaintiff was drunk. Your parents may have their business structured in a way that protects their home I.e. a corporation. A lot also depends on what the severity of the injury is, time between snowfall and fall was , local law, etc While the question of whether your parents did a adequate job is one for the jury, the videoay change the issue to assumption of risk because he walked on uncleared area by (drunken) choice. You can transfer assets pre judgement but that area is not my expertise
xoneinax said:shkmiami said:Several years ago after a particular heavy snowfall, a man slipped and fell in front of the storefront breaking his leg even though a large clear path free of snow and ice was made by my parentsKeep the video showing your parents proactively clearing that path. Did he slip on a sidewalk? Does not sound like it. Sidewalks are typically owned by the city.
It's a really big city sidewalk, about ten feet from the face of the storefront to the street. The business proprietor is required to make a pathway in front of the store three that is three feet wide after a snowstorm which my parents did. The plaintiff is shown walking not on the pathway, but on the snow, and then falls down at the edge where the snow meets the pathway.
Message edited by: shkmiami on 2009-11-06 16:49:01 CST
xoneinax said:shkmiami said:Oh believe me, everybody is being sued. The owner of the building, as well as a business next to my parent's business as they were open at the time of the accidentPlaintiff is filing 3 separate civil suits, each for over 100k?
Ilebowitz said:I am an insurance company lawyer in Brooklyn. Your lawyer should prepare a motion for summary judgement on liabilty using video and still pictures, weather records, and medical records showing plaintiff was drunk. Your parents may have their business structured in a way that protects their home I.e. a corporation. A lot also depends on what the severity of the injury is, time between snowfall and fall was , local law, etc While the question of whether your parents did a adequate job is one for the jury, the videoay change the issue to assumption of risk because he walked on uncleared area by (drunken) choice. You can transfer assets pre judgement but that area is not my expertise
The case is in full discovery mode right now. There is a deposition scheduled soon so I wonder if it is too late to do a motion for summary judgement. I'll have to ask our lawyer. My parents' business is a proprietorship, so they have full exposure to this.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.