• Go to page :
  • 1 2
  • Text Only

The Fed is going to ban overdraft fees on ATM and debit-card transactions unless consumers have overdraft protection accounts setup.

Fed bars ATM card overdraft fees



The Feb?


largeeyes said: The Feb?
Perhaps a relative of The Cheat?


Hopefully they'll fare better than Virgil Starkwell robbing a bank with a gub.


You can keep the snarky comments to yourselves.


I wish the Mar would ban the Ides!

Will be interesting to see what retaliatory steps the banks take to recoup this lost revenue stream IF the ban goes through. It will probably be similar to the preemptive rate jacking the cc industry is doing in response to their new legislation.


Nonaii said: edit: HA! never fails, i grammar/spelling nazi someone and fark up myself hehe. queue should be cue.
While we're nitpicking, "by" should be "be."


They should ban excess profits!


bakalao2k said: You can keep the snarky comments to yourselves.
That is one option, yes. The other option is that we can share them here. Most of us seem to be choosing the latter.


Stuff like this makes me kind of angry. Now the banks will take adverse action that will affect a much larger percentage of the population, including FWF members to recoup the lost revenue instead of just making easy money off some retards.


End of Free Checking?


lgyeresi said: Stuff like this makes me kind of angry. Now the banks will take adverse action that will affect a much larger percentage of the population, including FWF members to recoup the lost revenue instead of just making easy money off some retards.
Although from the sound of it, they aren't really banning overdraft fees. They're making overdraft protection an opt-in system. I imagine the banks will still convince PLENTY of people who aren't good at handling money to take their overdraft offer.


motsuka said: End of Free Checking?See the thread on Citi eliminating monthly fee waivers for direct deposit/billpay.


motsuka said: End of Free Checking?

citi is doing it.

dont worry, dave hason will come in and tell us how everyone paying for checking is better for the country then just the deadbeat over drafters doing it.


PMonkeyDishwasher said: lgyeresi said: Stuff like this makes me kind of angry. Now the banks will take adverse action that will affect a much larger percentage of the population, including FWF members to recoup the lost revenue instead of just making easy money off some retards.
Although from the sound of it, they aren't really banning overdraft fees. They're making overdraft protection an opt-in system. I imagine the banks will still convince PLENTY of people who aren't good at handling money to take their overdraft offer.

Agreed. They'll probably just do an automatic opt-in with a mailer to opt out (like the annual privacy policies you get where you can mail in a form to keep the credit card companies from sharing your info with marketing partners).


Interesting the Fed would do this. Considering they are owned by the member banks and such. Must be a reason...


So.. people will get charged a NSF fee?

What's the difference?


I still don't understand why you can't have a debit card, attempt to make a purchase with it, if not enough money, then transaction fail.

That's the product I want and the "retards" want. Why won't the market give it to us?


PMonkeyDishwasher said: lgyeresi said: Stuff like this makes me kind of angry. Now the banks will take adverse action that will affect a much larger percentage of the population, including FWF members to recoup the lost revenue instead of just making easy money off some retards.
Although from the sound of it, they aren't really banning overdraft fees. They're making overdraft protection an opt-in system. I imagine the banks will still convince PLENTY of people who aren't good at handling money to take their overdraft offer.

Doesn't sound like a bad idea to me, the opt-in system I mean. Naturally they'll probably have an easy time of convincing some people that opting in will mean they won't be stuck in the middle of Nowhere without being able to gas some lonely night.


tyrone3971 said: I still don't understand why you can't have a debit card, attempt to make a purchase with it, if not enough money, then transaction fail.

That's the product I want and the "retards" want. Why won't the market give it to us?

ING Direct's checking account is that way. There are no overdraft or NSF fees. While they automatically open an overdraft LOC for you, you can close it (ask them to reduce it to 0), and if used they only charge the interest. If you exceed that, I assume transactions will be declined, as there are no NSF fees.


If this does pass, expect a supplemental charge with a different title. "Overdraft" may be dying but they will find another way to profit from overspenders.


comptalk said: Interesting the Fed would do this. Considering they are owned by the member banks and such. Must be a reason...

Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Congressional legislation to control these banking overdraft fee practices is imminent and the public outrage over these practices (and the fact that the fees are a substantial source of bank revenues). Given those facts, the Fed's failure to regulate in a manner to control these practices makes the Fed look all the more in bed with the banks if fails to assert its authority to regulate these practices.

Even if that is true, it seems pretty transparent to me.


Nessy said: PMonkeyDishwasher said: lgyeresi said: Stuff like this makes me kind of angry. Now the banks will take adverse action that will affect a much larger percentage of the population, including FWF members to recoup the lost revenue instead of just making easy money off some retards.
Although from the sound of it, they aren't really banning overdraft fees. They're making overdraft protection an opt-in system. I imagine the banks will still convince PLENTY of people who aren't good at handling money to take their overdraft offer.


Doesn't sound like a bad idea to me, the opt-in system I mean. Naturally they'll probably have an easy time of convincing some people that opting in will mean they won't be stuck in the middle of Nowhere without being able to gas some lonely night.

Agreed. But if the banks do it that way (with full disclosure and the consumer making an informed decision), the bank is not making money by misleading its consumers and has a right to keep the profits. I am not so sure I can say the same about the current practices.


hell, this was one of the only fees that actually makes sense at a bank.

i was charged $30 yesterday to cancel a check that got lost in the mail. they wouldn't waive it, so i told them to screw the payment stoppage and i'll just risk being a month ahead on my car loan and not being charged 5% of the value of my check.


Nessy said: PMonkeyDishwasher said: Although from the sound of it, they aren't really banning overdraft fees. They're making overdraft protection an opt-in system. I imagine the banks will still convince PLENTY of people who aren't good at handling money to take their overdraft offer.

Doesn't sound like a bad idea to me, the opt-in system I mean. Naturally they'll probably have an easy time of convincing some people that opting in will mean they won't be stuck in the middle of Nowhere without being able to gas some lonely night.

My guess is that they'll approach it as offering a service, but not mention the ability to decline it: "We also offer free overdraft protection for your account, so if you ever accidentally spend more than you have, we'll take care of that for you. Just sign here for that."


Anyone dumb enough to be paying overdraft fees will just squander their money another way. A fool and his money are soon parted.


comptalk said: Interesting the Fed would do this. Considering they are owned by the member banks and such. Must be a reason... Agreed... Might be blatant pandering to the populous, of which 75%+ wants it audited.


tyrone3971 said: I still don't understand why you can't have a debit card, attempt to make a purchase with it, if not enough money, then transaction fail.

That's the product I want and the "retards" want. Why won't the market give it to us?
I got Wamu to do this for me back in the day. From what I've heard, Chase may not allow this 'feature' so it may have been 'disabled' by Chase.

I think a lot of the online banks do this too. I'm fairly certain that my Fidelity mycash account will reject any transaction when they know I don't have available cash or cash equivalents in a linked account.


JTFH said: comptalk said: Interesting the Fed would do this. Considering they are owned by the member banks and such. Must be a reason... Agreed... Might be blatant pandering to the populous, of which 75%+ wants it audited.

I don't think that changing the regulations around "overdraft" fees will change the way us die hard people feel about the fed. However, it might sway the minds of those who are easily swayed by propaganda, and those who love to give away $35 dollars at a time to overdrafts. "Hey the fed took away the overdraft fees that I get hit with all the time, yay Bernanke, he is our savior!"


While I agree that the majority of overdraft fees are caused by people not keeping solid track of their accounts, at least this will tone down the practice many banks do of holding deposits for a day or two in order to rack up overdraft fees.


Gman476 said: I hate the feb with their damned black history month.

From the looks of my account statements, it's always red history month.


Up till now people complained about being charged a fee to use money they don't have. I imagine now the masses will complain about not being able to use money they don't have when their transactions fail because they're short $15.


This makes me want to cry. Billions of lost income for the banks, usually paid by the stupid folks. Banks will still get their money; our lovely GOV is just forcing them to take it from everyone via some other fee, not just the nitwits. How long until lottery ticket purchase is mandated for all by the GOV? I mean, right now, only the poor and the stupid are paying that tax...that's not a very Socialist way of doing business...


ash78 said: Gman476 said: I hate the feb with their damned black history month.From the looks of my account statements, it's always red history month.Lately, yes, it is Red History Year.


Xnarg said: ash78 said: Gman476 said: I hate the feb with their damned black history month.From the looks of my account statements, it's always red history month.Lately, yes, it is Red History Year.

How long do you think we can keep quoting this?


dbavaria said: Up till now people complained about being charged a fee to use money they don't have. I imagine now the masses will complain about not being able to use money they don't have when their transactions fail because they're short $15. And in response to these complaints, the banks will hand them an opt-in form to sign up for the $35 per transaction overdraft service. Problem solved.

And (who knows?) maybe some enterprising banker will invent an alternative to the debit card specifically designed for people to buy things when they don't have money in their accounts. It can use the same payment terminals and transaction processing networks as debit cards. They can call it something like a "credit card" or something like that.


please be aware that the original topic was "feB bans overdraft fees" someone got offended and cried about it.


dbavaria said: Up till now people complained about being charged a fee to use money they don't have. I imagine now the masses will complain about not being able to use money they don't have when their transactions fail because they're short $15.

Do you have any evidence that people are going to cry about a transaction being declined because they didn't have the money?


How about making accounts with overdraft fees free, and charge people for accounts that don't have overdraft fees.

I would take one free account with the overdraft fees (that would never affect me since I can balance a checkbook).

Voila, free checking still available.


Skipping 29 Messages...

I have two opinions here, neither of which I expect to be popular

1. Call a loan a loan, and regulate it just like every other loan. Let the customer see the APR before they agree to the OD line.
2. I hope the banking industry shrinks to a size that fits a productive purpose in society. Screwing poor ignoramuses does not qualify.

I do wonder how much my bank USAA rakes in OD fees currently. We mostly buy using credit cards, but we own USAA ATM cards that do not allow POS OD, and are charged about 9% apr for checking account OD. Truly a pittance compared to $35 for a couple dollar OD for a day or two other banks are collecting. If USAA is profitable without OD fee crap, I am comfortable forcing other banks to be as competitive as USAA, or to go away.




Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2012