Free copy of Dr. Hulda Clark's "The Cure for All Diseases"

Link

All diseases have simple explanations and cures once their true cause is known. Doctor Hulda Clark explains the causes of both common and extraordinary diseases and gives specific instruction for their cure through natural remedies and an electrical device you can build at home.

Good reviews on amazon 4.1/172
Thanks

Good grief can people be so stupid. "With the use of the Syncrometer she would search for common denominators (e.g. toxins, pathogens) in each case she undertook that was suffering from the same disease (for ex. cancer)" High school students in advanced biology know there is no one type of cancer but many with different causes courses of progression etc. etc. this book may be free but if you believe it it could cost you your life.

Not free

bealucky said:   Jane77 said:   Not free

Huh? When you click on the link it clearly states, "Get your free copy of Dr. Hulda Clark's book "THE CURE FOR ALL DISEASES".


As for the rest of you with the negative comments... this is a message board for sharing freebies not for dissertation on whether you agree with the subject matter. I may not necessarily agree or disagree with the premise of the book but posted the info for those who might have interest in it. If you are not interested then move on.
Sorry OP, but you are wrong. I bristle whenever I see someone say "Move along." Part of the relevance of the forum is indeed to discuss all aspects of a deal, including whether or not the content is good or relevant. It does help if one has an informed opinion, but thankfully, anyone is free to offer that opinion, as long as it is not obscene or containing a personal attack. I hope you don't take the red ratings personally. People call 'em as they see 'em. Again, being informed in offering that opinion is optional.

Red here indicates an inability to rationally understand the facts.

So small cell lung cancer ISN'T caused by years of heavy smoking, but instead by flatworms? What a load of crap!

She was a fraudulent criminal who died of cancer that she claimed she could cure, simple as that. If you can't understand that, well, better not to finish the thought...

sneakers said:   nrord said:   This is a "quack" book!! The title should tell you that. Cure for AIDS and Cancer - get real!!
The Bizarre Claims of Hulda Clark
LINK


While I would agree that there is no cure for all diseases, I would avoid quackwatch.org like the plague. Stephen Barret actually filed a lawsuit against hulda clark and lost. He is not an expert in alternative medicine. He filed a lawsuit against Mercola and lost as well. He is paid by big pharma and other big companies to attack alternative medicine. If you would read his website, it would be difficult to find anything about drugs that were put on the market and then pulled off. Somehow he fails to mention any such as Vioxx. Hulda actually does have a few things in her book that people will swear by including me.

Thank you. Add me to that list. Traditional medicine is profit driven. If they don't keep you sick, they don't continue to make money.

sneakers said:   nrord said:   This is a "quack" book!! The title should tell you that. Cure for AIDS and Cancer - get real!!
The Bizarre Claims of Hulda Clark
LINK


While I would agree that there is no cure for all diseases, I would avoid quackwatch.org like the plague. Stephen Barret actually filed a lawsuit against hulda clark and lost. He is not an expert in alternative medicine. He filed a lawsuit against Mercola and lost as well. He is paid by big pharma and other big companies to attack alternative medicine. If you would read his website, it would be difficult to find anything about drugs that were put on the market and then pulled off. Somehow he fails to mention any such as Vioxx. Hulda actually does have a few things in her book that people will swear by including me.

It's true that Barrett's libel lawsuit against Hulda Clark and several others was dismissed on procedural grounds, but it's worth noting a few things: The defendants in the lawsuit never argued that any of the facts in their smear campaign were true, (instead, they convinced a trial court judge that since the postings that formed the grounds of the lawsuit were made by an "anonymous" third party, they could not be named personally. And when Clark-affiliated people sued him, the case was dismissed as well - but a counter-claim for malicious prosecution by Barrett and the other people targeted by the Clarkians was settled in Barrett's favor, though the details have been sealed. Reliable details on the Mercola lawsuit aren't as easy to find.

The rest of your post is a red herring attack. Barrett's "cause" isn't going after the drug companies, he's dedicated to exposing fraud in alternative health practices. Trying to discredit him by saying "He isn't talking about Vioxx" is like trying to discredit the Susan Komen Foundation by saying "they completely ignore liver cancer!"

Barrett is argumentative, semi-obsessive and probably not the sweetest guy on the block. He also happens to be right a great deal of the time. His work has helped needle federal and state health officials into getting serious on cracking down on "health care" fraud. There is absolutely ZERO proof of him being "paid by big pharma and other companies" to do what he does. If you've ever visited quackwatch, it is pretty clearly the work of someone who is motivated solely by anger at the charlatans and frauds who prey on people when they are at their most vulnerable.

---