• Go to page :
  • 1 2
  • Text Only

JesseLivermore said:   My objection with this product and company isn't that they make this product, but that they aggressively feature very young looking females to 'model' these clothes.

I probably wouldn't be as sensitive if we weren't parents, or if we didn't see such high rates of adults who are sexually attracted to young girls (and boys), but the trends are disturbing and American Apparel's marketing tactics are deplorable.

Well the woman in that picture certainly is not a young girl.


katnrica said:   Doesn't FW have any standards of decency? These things don't belong on this site - please try and keep this site family-friendly for Heavens' sake.

Are your kids browsing FW for deals on candy or something?


Thank you FW! Now I can get my daily porn fix and save money all in one stop. BTW......the gal modeling the black shirt is Hooters HOT!


i hope i never see a man wearing that.......please spare my eyes......


Shipping kills the deal
But hipping makes the deal


This is not a hot deal. Clothing like this usually leads to copious amounts of copulation, which usually leads to having wallet draining children.


Perfect for a get well for my grandmother. She just had surgery and needs something comfortable.


Bought it- THANKS!!!

Will be wearing something underneath it during the day


Awesome! Great find! Sexy - Sensual - Teasing - Revealing! If I wasn't 68 y/o and weighed 150# and so short I'd trip and break my neck in it - I would luv one. For all you yound girls and guys who can wear one - I hate you!!!


Does anyone like this kind appeal? I don't think it looks nice, and I surely won't buy it.


I agree, some of these young ladies are clearly underage:

http://www.amazon.com/American-Apparel-Kids-Baby--Baby/dp/B003IF...


Argh... SOOO close


What?


What's with all the upset? I think the vendor photoshopped it to make it kosher. AND why aren't complainers complaining about lingerie posts that clearly show a lot more?! Is it because kids don't know how to click on those posts?


nude is better than 'see-thru', IMHO


Zuke76 said:   This is not a hot deal. Clothing like this usually leads to copious amounts of copulation, which usually leads to having wallet draining children.

Ounce of prevention


jaimelobo said:   "Woooosh" (that was the sound of StevenColorado's post passing over your head)I won't ask you how you know, but this StevenColorado guy must get all the ladies.


That would have to be a under the cover tee IMO!




Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.

Thanks for visiting FatWallet.com. Join for free to remove this ad.

While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2013